skip to main content
research-article

Collaborations on YouTube: From Unsupervised Detection to the Impact on Video and Channel Popularity

Published:10 October 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

YouTube is the most popular platform for streaming of user-generated videos. Nowadays, professional YouTubers are organized in so-called multichannel networks (MCNs). These networks offer services such as brand deals, equipment, and strategic advice in exchange for a share of the YouTubers’ revenues. A dominant strategy to gain more subscribers and, hence, revenue is collaborating with other YouTubers. Yet, collaborations on YouTube have not been studied in a detailed quantitative manner. To close this gap, first, we collect a YouTube dataset covering video statistics over 3 months for 7,942 channels. Second, we design a framework for collaboration detection given a previously unknown number of persons featured in YouTube videos. We denote this framework, for the detection and analysis of collaborations in YouTube videos using a Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based approach, as CATANA. Third, we analyze about 2.4 years of video content and use CATANA to answer research questions guiding YouTubers and MCNs for efficient collaboration strategies. Thereby, we focus on (1) collaboration frequency and partner selectivity, (2) the influence of MCNs on channel collaborations, (3) collaborating channel types, and (4) the impact of collaborations on video and channel popularity. Our results show that collaborations are in many cases significantly beneficial regarding viewers and newly attracted subscribers for both collaborating channels, often showing more than 100% popularity growth compared with noncollaboration videos.

References

  1. YouTube LLC. YouTube Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html. Accessed September 26, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Ahonen, A. Hadid, and M. Pietikainen. 2006. Face description with local binary patterns: Application to face recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28 (2006), 2037--2041. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brandon Amos, Bartosz Ludwiczuk, and Mahadev Satyanarayanan. 2016. OpenFace: A General-Purpose Face Recognition Library with Mobile Applications. Technical Report. CMU-CS-16-118, CMU School of Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Divyashri Bhat, Amr Rizk, Michael Zink, and Ralf Steinmetz. 2017. Network assisted content distribution for adaptive bitrate video streaming. In ACM on Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys’17). 62--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anders Brodersen, Salvatore Scellato, and Mirjam Wattenhofer. 2012. YouTube around the world: Geographic popularity of videos. In ACM International Conference on World Wide Web. 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Xu Cheng, Mehrdad Fatourechi, Xiaoqiang Ma, Cong Zhang, Lei Zhang, and Jiangchuan Liu. 2014. Insight data of YouTube from a partner’s view. In ACM Network and Operating System Support on Digital Audio and Video Workshop (NOSSDAV’14). 73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Flavio Figueiredo, Fabrício Benevenuto, and Jussara M. Almeida. 2011. The tube over time: Characterizing popularity growth of YouTube videos. In ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’11). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brendan Gahan. 2015. How to be successful on YouTube: The 3 steps. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/DKJ1w1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacob Gardner and Kevin Lehnert. 2016. What’s new about new media? How multi-channel networks work with content creators. Elsevier Business Horizons 59, 3 (2016), 293--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Matt Gielen. 2015. Best Practices for a YouTube Multi-Channel Network 2.0. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/8BeUvT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bertram Gugel. 2015. YouTube Universum. Die Vernetzung der YouTuber visualisiert. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/fbai7M.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Nick Hayes. 2008. Influencer Marketing: Who Really Influences Your Customers? Taylor 8 Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mattias Holmbom. 2015. The YouTuber: A Qualitative Study of Popular Content Creators. Thesis. Umea University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gary B. Huang, Manu Ramesh, Tamara Berg, and Erik Learned-Miller. 2007. Labeled Faces in the Wild: A Database for Studying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments. Technical Report. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Christian Koch, Benedikt Lins, Amr Rizk, Ralf Steinmetz, and David Hausheer. 2017. vFetch: Video prefetching using pseudo subscriptions and user channel affinity in YouTube. In IEEE International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM'17). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Erik Learned-Miller, Gary B. Huang, Aruni Roy Chowdhury, Haoxiang Li, and Gang Hua. {n.d.}. Labeled Faces in the Wild Website. Retrieved from http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/lfw/. Accessed September 26, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Erik Learned-Miller, Gary B. Huang, Aruni Roy Chowdhury, Haoxiang Li, and Gang Hua. 2016. Labeled faces in the wild: A survey. In Advances in Face Detection and Facial Image Analysis. Springer, 189--248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Moritz Lode, Michael Oertl, Christian Koch, Amr Rizk, and Ralf Steinmetz. 2018. Detection and analysis of content creator collaborations in YouTube videos using face- and speaker-recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02020 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Arsha Nagrani, Joon Son Chung, and Andrew Zisserman. 2017. VoxCeleb: A large-scale speaker identification dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.08612 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Amandianeze O. Nwana, Salman Avestimehr, and Tsuhan Chen. 2013. A latent social approach to YouTube popularity prediction. In IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM’13). 3138--3144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Omkar M. Parkhi, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zisserman. 2015. Deep face recognition. In British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC’15).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. David Sandberg. {n.d.}. Facenet Project Repository. Retrieved from https://github.com/davidsandberg/facenet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Florian Schroff, Dmitry Kalenichenko, and James Philbin. 2015. FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’15).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Matthew Turk and Alex Pentland. 1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3, 1 (1991), 71--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yandong Wen, Kaipeng Zhang, Zhifeng Li, and Yu Qiao. 2016. A discriminative feature learning approach for deep face recognition. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV’16).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Christo Wilson, Bryce Boe, Alessandra Sala, Krishna P. N. Puttaswamy, and Ben Y. Zhao. 2009. User interactions in social networks and their implications. In ACM European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys’09). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lior Wolf, Tal Hassner, and Itay Maoz. 2011. Face recognition in unconstrained videos with matched background similarity. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’11). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kaipeng Zhang, Zhanpeng Zhang, and Zhifeng Li, Yu Qiao. {n.d.}. MTCNN Face Detection. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/X6Dwg1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Renjie Zhou, Samamon Khemmarat, Lixin Gao, Jian Wan, and Jilin Zhang. 2016. How YouTube videos are discovered and its impact on video views. Springer Multimedia Tools and Applications 75, 10 (2016), 6035--6058. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Collaborations on YouTube: From Unsupervised Detection to the Impact on Video and Channel Popularity

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!