A debate on language and tool support for design patterns

ABSTRACT

Design patterns have earned a place in the developer's arsenal of tools and techniques for software development. They have proved so useful, in fact, that some have called for their promotion to programming language features. In turn this has rekindled the age-old debate over the mechanism that belong in programming languages versus those that are better served by tools. The debate comes full circle when one contemplates code generation and methodological tool support for patterns. The authors compare and contrast programming languages, tools, and patterns to assess their relative merits and to clarify their roles in the development process.

References

1. 1.Alexandrescu, A. Creating Generic Components Using Standard C++. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. To appear.]]
2. 2.Baumgartner, G., et al. On the Interaction of Object-Oriented Design Patterns and Programming Languages. Technical report CSD-TR-96-020, Dept. of Computer Sciences, Purdue University, February 1996.]]
3. 3.Bosch, J. Design Patterns and Frameworks: On the Issue of Language Support. Workshop on Language Support for Design Patterns and Frameworks, European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '97), June 1997.]]
4. 4.Bosch, j. Design Patterns as Language Constructs. To appear, Journal of Object-Oriented Programming. Available at http ://www.i de.hk-r, se/--b o sch/articl e s. html.]]
5. 5.Budinsky, F., et al. Automatic Code Generation from Design Patterns. IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2 (1996), pp. 151-171.]]
6. 6.Chambers, C. Object-Oriented Multi-Methods in Cecil. European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '92), June/July 1992.]]
7. 7.Chambers, C. Predicate Classes. European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '93), July 1993.]]
8. 8.Chambers, C. The Cecil Language: Specification and Rationale, Version 2.1. Technical report #93--03-05 (revised), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, March 1997. Available at http://www ~cs.washin~on.edu/research/projects/cecil/www/Papers/cecil -spec.htmt.]]
9. 9.Coplien, J., et al., eds. Pattern Languages of Program Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995.]]
10. 10.Chiba, S. A Metaobject Protocol for C++. A CM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA "95), October 1995. Available at http://www.hlla, i s. tsukuba, ac. ilg/'-chiba/op enc++.html.]]
11. 11.Ducasse, S. Message Passing Abstractions as Elementary Bricks for Design Pattern Implementation. Workshop on Language Support for Design Patterns and Frameworks, European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '97), June 1997.]]
12. 12.Ernst, M.D., et al. Predicate Dispatching: A Unified Theory of Dispatch. European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '98), July 1998.]]
13. 13.Gamma, E., et al. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995.]]
14. 14.Gil, j., et al. Design Patterns vs. Language Design. Workshop on Language Support for Design Patterns and Frameworks, European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '97), June 1997.]]
15. 15.Harrison, N., et al., eds. Pattern Languages of Program Design 4. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2000.]]
16. 16.Harrison, W., et al. Attaching Instance Variables to Method Realizations Instead of Classes. International Conference on Computer Languages, April 1992.]]
17. 17.Harrison, W., et al. Subject-Oriented Programming~A Critique of Pure Objects. ACM Conference on Object- Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA "93), September 1993.]]
18. 18.Martin, R., et al., eds. Pattern Languages of Program Design 3. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998.]]
19. 19.Millstein, T., et al. Modular Statically Typed Multi methods . European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '99), June 1999.]]
20. 20.Norvig, P. Design Patterns in Dynamic Programming. Presentation at Object WorId, 1996. Available at http://www .norvig.com/design-patterns/.]]
21. 21.Schmidt, D., et al. Double-Checked Locking. In Pattern Languages of Program Design 3, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998.]]
22. 22.Seiter, L.M. Evolution of Object Behavior using Context Relations. 1EEE Transactions on Software Engineering, January 1998. An earlier version with the same name appeared in the A CM Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE '96), October 1996.]]
23. 23.Shalit, A. The Dylan Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1996.]]
24. 24.Simonyi, C. The Future is Intentional. IEEE Computer, May 1999. More information available at h~_://www.research. microsoft.corn/ip/.]]
25. 25.Ungar, D., et al. Self: The Power of Simplicity. ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA '87), October 1987.]]
26. 26.Vlissides, J. Pattern Hatching: Design Patterns Applied. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998.]]
27. 27.Vlissides, J. Visitor in Frameworks. C++ Report, Vol. 10, No. 10 (1999), pp. 40--46.]]

Index Terms

• Software and its engineering

  • Software creation and management

    • Designing software

      • Software implementation planning

        • Software design techniques

    • Software development process management