10.1145/3270112.3270118acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodelsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The impact of opt-in gamification on students' grades in a software design course

Published:14 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

An achievement-driven methodology strives to give students more control of their learning with enough flexibility to engage them in deeper learning.

We observed in the course Advanced Software Design, which uses the achievement-driven methodology, that students fail to get high grades, which may hamper deeper learning. To motivate students to pursue and get higher grades we added gamification elements to the course.

To measure the success of our gamification implementation, students filled out a questionaire rating the enjoyment and motivation produced by the game. We built a statistical regression model where enjoyment and motivation explain 55% of the variation in grades. However, only the relationship between motivation and grade is significant, which implies that notivation drives the overall effect of the model. The results suggest that the more the students were motivated by the game, the higher their grades on the course (and vice versa). This implies that if gamification indeed motivates students, then it makes them go beyond what is expected.

References

  1. G. Barata, S. Gama, J. Jorge, and D. Goncalves. 2013. Engaging Engineering Students with Gamification. (Sept 2013), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Katrin Becker and Scott Nicholson. 2016. Gamification in the Classroom: Old Wine in New Badges. ETC Press. 61--85 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. K. Berkling and C. Thomas. 2013. Gamification of a Software Engineering course and a detailed analysis of the factors that lead to it's failure. In 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL). IEEE, Kazan, Russia, 525--530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. John Biggs. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 32 (1996), 374--364. Issue 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. John Biggs and Catherine Tang. 2011. Teaching For Quality Learning At University. McGraw-Hill International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B. S Bloom. 1974. An introduction to mastery learning theory. In Schools, society, and mastery learning, J. H. Block (Ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bologna Declaration. 1999. Towards the European Higher European Area. In Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in 29 European countries. Bologna, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tony Clark. 2013. Computer Science: An Approach to Teaching and Learning. http://clarktony.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/computer-science-approach-to-teaching.html. Blog post.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Adrian A. de Freitas and Michelle M. de Freitas. 2013. Classroom Live: a software-assisted gamification tool. Computer Science Education 23, 2 (2013), 186--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. B. Merino de Paz. 2013. Gamification: A tool to improve sustainability efforts,. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Manchester.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Simone de Sousa Borges, Vinicius H. S. Durelli, Helena Macedo Reis, and Seiji Isotani. 2014. A Systematic Mapping on Gamification Applied to Education. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 216--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Edward Deci and Richard Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Contemporary Sociology 3 (01 1985).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments. ACM, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Darina Dicheva, Christo Dichev, Gennady Agre, and Galia Angelova. 2015. Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 18, 3 (2015), 75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ian Glover. 2013. Play as you learn: gamification as a technique for motivating learners. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC, 1999--2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Joseph F. Hair, William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, and Rolph E. Anderson. 2009. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition) (7 ed.). Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. John Hattie. 2012. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing the Impact on Learners. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wendy Hsin-Yuan Huang and Dilip Soman. 2013. Gamification of education. Research Report Series: Behavioural Economics in Action, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Williams J. 2012. The Gamification Brain Trust: Intrinsically Motivating People to Change Behavior (part 2). https://venturebeat.com/2012/09/22/the-gamification-brain-trust-intrinsically-motivating-people-to-change-behavior-part-2/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. J. Lee and J. Hammer. 2011. Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Acad. Exchange Quart. 15, 2 (2011), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Mora, D. Riera, C. Gonzalez, and J. Arnedo-Moreno. 2015. A Literature Review of Gamification Design Frameworks. In 2015 7th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-Games). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Siobhan O'Donovan, James Gain, and Patrick Marais. 2013. A Case Study in the Gamification of a University-level Games Development Course. In Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference (SAICSIT '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 242--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Chris Rust, Margaret Price, and Berry O'Donovan. 2003. Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28, 2 (2003), 147--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Richard Ryan and Edward Deci. 2000. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist 55 (02 2000), 68--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 1 (2000), 54 -- 67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Katie Seaborn and Deborah I. Fels. 2015. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (2015), 14 -- 31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. V. Todor and D. PiticÄČ. 2013. The gamification of the study of electronics in dedicated e-learning platforms. In Proceedings of the 36th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology. IEEE, 428--431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Pascal Van Hentenryck and Carleton Coffrin. 2014. Teaching creative problem solving in a MOOC. In SIGCSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 677--682. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sergi Villagrasa and Jaume Duran. 2013. Gamification for Learning 3D Computer Graphics Arts. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 429--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tobias Wrigstad and Elias Castegren. 2017. Mastery Learning-Like Teaching with Achievements. In SPLASH-E.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. G. Zichermann and C. Cunningham. 2011. Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. O'Reilly Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Barry J. Zimmerman and Manuel Martinez Pons. 1986. Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal 23 (1986), 614--628. Issue 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The impact of opt-in gamification on students' grades in a software design course

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!