skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Acting the Part: Examining Information Operations Within #BlackLivesMatter Discourse

Published:01 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This research examines how Russian disinformation actors participated in a highly charged online conversation about the #BlackLivesMatter movement and police-related shootings in the USA during 2016. We first present high-level dynamics of this conversation on Twitter using a network graph based on retweet flows that reveals two structurally distinct communities. Next, we identify accounts in this graph that were suspended by Twitter for being affiliated with the Internet Research Agency, an entity accused of conducting information operations in support of Russian political interests. Finally, we conduct an interpretive analysis that consolidates observations about the activities of these accounts. Our findings have implications for platforms seeking to develop mechanisms for determining authenticity---by illuminating how disinformation actors enact authentic personas and caricatures to target different audiences. This work also sheds light on how these actors systematically manipulate politically active online communities by amplifying diverging streams of divisive content.

References

  1. Monica Anderson and Paul Hitlin. 2016. Social Media Conversations About Race: How social media users see, share, and discuss race and the rise of hashtags like #BlackLivesMatter. (August 2016). Retrieved July 10, 2017 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/08/15/social-media-conversations-about-race/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmer Arif, John J. Robinson, Stephanie A. Stanek, Elodie S. Fichet, Paul Townsend, Zena Worku, and Kate Starbird. 2017. A closer look at the self-correcting crowd: Examining corrections in online rumors. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, 155--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Leigh Armistead (Ed.). 2004. Information Operations: Warfare and the Hard Reality of Soft Power. Potomac Books Inc., Lincoln, NE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mathieu Bastian, Sebastien Heymann, and Mathieu Jacomy. 2009. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ladislav Bittman. 1985. The KGB and Soviet Disinformation: An Insider's View. Pergamon-Brassey's, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Black Lives Matter. Herstory. Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/herstory/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Blue Lives Matter. 2017. About Us -- Blue Lives Matter. (May 2017). Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://bluelivesmatter.blue/organization/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kyle Booten. 2016. Hashtag drift: Tracing the evolving uses of political hashtags over time. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, 2401--2405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. danah boyd. 2017. Google and Facebook can't just make fake news disappear. Backchannel. (March 2017). Retrieved July 10, 2011 from https://medium.com/backchannel/google-and-facebook-cant-just-make-fake-news-disappear-48f4b4e5fbe8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alex Burns and Ben Eltham. 2009. Twitter Free Iran: An Evaluation of Twitter's Role in Public Diplomacy and Information Operations in Iran's 2009 Election Crisis. In Communications Policy & Research Forum. 298--310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dharma Dailey and Kate Starbird. 2017. Social Media Seamsters: Stitching Platforms & Audiences into Local Crisis Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1277--1289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Teun A. Van Dijk. 2015. Racism and the Press. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. John DH Downing and Charles Husband. 2005. Representing Race: Racisms, Ethnicity and the Media. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniel Edler and Martin Rosvall. 2014. The MapEquation software package. Retrieved from http://www.mapequation.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Robert M. Faris, Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Johan Farkas, Jannick Schou, and Christina Neumayer. 2018. Cloaked Facebook pages: Exploring fake Islamist propaganda in social media. New Media and Society 20, 5. 1850--1867.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Johan Farkas, Jannick Schou, and Christina Neumayer. 2018. Platformed antagonism: Racist discourses on fake Muslim Facebook pages. Critical Discourse Studies 0, 0. 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R. Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2011. Trace ethnography: Following coordination through documentary practices. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. Shapiro. Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126, 4 (2011). 1799--1839.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Anthony Giddens. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Catherine Grevet, Loren G. Terveen, and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Managing political differences in social media. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1400--1408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Drew Griffin and Donie O'Sullivan. 2017. The Fake Tea Party Twitter Account Linked to Russia and Followed by Sebastian Gorka. (Sep. 2017). Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/21/politics/tpartynews-twitter-russia-link/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jessica Guynn. 2015. Meet the Woman Who Coined #BlackLivesMatter. (March 4, 2015). Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/03/04/alicia-garza-black-lives-matter/24341593/#Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jonathan Haidt. 2012. The Righteous mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Vintage, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rongbin Han. 2015. Manufacturing consent in cyberspace: China's 'fifty-cent army'. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 44, 2 (2015). 105--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Philip N. Howard. 2002. Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New media, new organizations, new methods. New Media & Society 4, 4 (2002). 550--574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Joint Chiefs of Staff. 2014. Information Operations. Joint Publication 3--13. Department of Defense, United States. Retrieved from http://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_13.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Garth S. Jowett and Victoria O'Donnell. 1999. Propaganda and Persuasion. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Marina Kogan, Leysia Palen, and Kenneth M. Anderson. 2015. Think Local, Retweet Global: Retweeting by the Geographically-Vulnerable during Hurricane Sandy. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 981--993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. David Lazer, Brian Rubineau, Carol Chetkovich, Nancy Katz, and Michael Neblo. 2010. The coevolution of networks and political attitudes. Political Communication 27, 3 (2010). 248--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Herbert S. Lin and Jaclyn Kerr. 2017. On Cyber-Enabled Information/Influence Warfare and Manipulation. Oxford University Press, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Eden Litt. 2012. Knock, knock. Who's there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56, 3 (Sep. 2012), 330--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Jim Maddock, Kate Starbird, Haneen J. Al-Hassani, David E. Sandoval, Mania Orand, and Robert M. Mason. 2015. Characterizing online rumoring behavior using multi-dimensional signatures. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, 228--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. George E. Marcus. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1995). 95--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Alice E. Marwick and danah boyd. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13, 1 (2011), 114--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis. 2017. Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Louise Matsakis. 2017. Twitter Told Congress This Random American Is a Russian Propaganda Troll. (Nov. 2017). Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8x5mma/twitter-told-congress-this-random-american-is-a-russian-propaganda-trollGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Gregg R. Murray and Anthony Scime. Microtargeting and electorate segmentation: Data mining the American national election studies. Journal of Political Marketing 9, 3 (2010). 143--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Jonathan Corpus Ong and Jason Vincent A. Cabanes. 2018. Architects of Networked Disinformation. The Newton Tech4Dev Network. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Retrieved from http://newtontechfordev.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ARCHITECTS-OF-NETWORKED-DISINFORMATION-FULL-REPORT.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Walter J. Ong. 1975. The writer's audience is always a fiction. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 90, 1 (Jan. 1975), 9--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Leysia Palen and Kenneth M. Anderson. 2016. Crisis informatics - New data for extraordinary times. Science 353, 6296 (2016). 224--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Christopher Paul and Miriam Matthews. 2016. The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Zizi Papacharissi. 2009. The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and A SmallWorld. New Media & Society 11. 199--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Peter Pomerantsev and Michael Weiss. 2014. The menace of unreality: How the Kremlin weaponizes information, culture and money. Institute of Modern Russia, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Jarred Prier. 2017. Commanding the trend: Social media as information warfare. Strategic Studies Quarterly 11, 4 (2017), 36 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin Rosvall, Daniel Axelsson, and Carl T. Bergstrom. 2009. The map equation. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 178, 1 (Sep. 2009), 13--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Dana Rotman, Jennifer Preece, Yurong He, and Allison Druin. 2012. Extreme ethnography: challenges for research in large scale online environments. In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference. ACM, New York, NY, 207--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Saiph Savage, Andres Monroy-Hernandez, and Tobias Höllerer. 2016. Botivist: Calling Volunteers to Action using Online Bots. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 813--822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Esther Shein. 2013. Ephemeral data. Communications of the ACM 56, 9 (2013). 20--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Craig Silverman. 2018. Russian Trolls Ran Wild On Tumblr And The Company Refuses To Say Anything About It. (Feb. 2018). Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/russian-trolls-ran-wild-on-tumblr-and-the-company-refuses?utm_term=.ad65gb5jz#.rdwOw8O6ZGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Alvin A. Snyder. Warriors of Disinformation: American Propaganda, Soviet Lies, and the Winning of the Cold War: An Insider's Account. Arcade Publishing, New York. NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Alex Stamos. 2018. Authenticity Matters: The IRA Has No Place on Facebook. (Apr. 2018) Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/04/authenticity-matters/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2012. (How) will the revolution be retweeted? Information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, 7--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Leo Graiden Stewart, Ahmer Arif, A. Conrad Nied, Emma S. Spiro, and Kate Starbird. 2017. Drawing the lines of contention: Networked frame contests within #BlackLivesMatter discourse. In Proceedings of ACM Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW, Article 96 (December 2017), 23 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. The Internet Archive. About the Internet Archive. Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://archive.org/about/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Anton Troianovski. 2018. A Former Russian Troll Speaks: 'It Was Like Being in Orwell's World'. (Feb. 2018). Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/02/17/a-former-russian-troll-speaks-it-was-like-being-in-orwells-world/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Joshua Tucker, Andrew Guess, Pablo Barberá, Cristian Vaccari, Alexandra Siegel, Sergey Sanovich, Denis Stukal, and Brendan Nyhan. 2018. Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. William Flora Hewlett Foundation, Menlo Park, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Tumblr Help Center. 2018. Public Record of Usernames Linked to State-Sponsored Disinformation Campaigns. (Mar. 2018). Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://tumblr.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002280214Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Twitter. 2018. Update on Twitter's Review of the 2016 U.S. Election. (Jan. 2018) Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/topics/company/2018/2016-election-update.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 2018. Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF - USA v. IRA et al. (Feb. 2018). Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/downloadGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. United States House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. 2017. Exhibit B (Nov. 2017). https://democrats-intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/exhibit_b.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. United States House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. 2017. Testimony of Sean J. Edgett. (Nov. 2017). Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/prepared_testimony_of_sean_j._edgett_from_twitter.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Yiran Wang and Gloria Mark. 2017. Engaging with Political and Social Issues on Facebook in College Life. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 433--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Clair Wardle and Hossein Derakhshan. 2017. Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Council of Europe Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Jen Weedon, William Nuland and Alex Stamos. 2017. Information Operations and Facebook. (Apr. 2017) Retrieved April 17th, 2018 from https://fbnewsroomus.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/facebook-and-information-operations-v1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Marisol Wong-Villacres, Cristina M. Velasquez, and Neha Kumar. 2017. Social Media for Earthquake Response: Unpacking its Limitations with Care. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction 1, CSCW, Article 112 (December 2017), 22 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Samuel C. Woolley and Philip N. Howard. 2017. Computational Propaganda Worldwide: Executive Summary. Computational Propaganda Research Project. Oxford University, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Acting the Part: Examining Information Operations Within #BlackLivesMatter Discourse

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!