skip to main content
research-article

Engaging with Health Data: The Interplay Between Self-Tracking Activities and Emotions in Fertility Struggles

Published:01 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Self-tracking data is often seen as a means to reflect and achieve a goal, usually focusing on positive insights and actions. Lately, some studies have discussed the negative consequences of self-tracking, suggesting that people interact with personal data in different ways. We explored how self-tracking activities and the emotional context characterize how people engage with personal health data through the analysis of a complex and emotionally-loaded use case: fertility self-tracking. We qualitatively analyzed patient-generated content in an online health community dedicated to fertility. We found five distinct types of engagement with data: positive, burdened, obsessive, trapped, and abandoning. Each of them is composed of an action and an emotional component that mutually influence each other. We discuss how the interplay of these components characterize a person's engagement with data, how the online forum made these issues visible, and how they are embedded in the self-tracking culture. We also provide insights into the implications of these issues for self-tracking tools. Finally, we hypothesize how people transition through the types of relationships with data, suggesting directions for future research in the area.

References

  1. Rene Almeling and Iris L. Willey. 2017. Same medicine, different reasons: Comparing women's bodily experiences of producing eggs for pregnancy or for profit. Soc. Sci. Med. 1982 188, (September 2017), 21--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jessica S. Ancker, Holly O. Witteman, Baria Hafeez, Thierry Provencher, Mary Van De Graaf, and Esther Wei. 2015. "You get reminded you're a sick person": Personal data tracking and patients with multiple chronic conditions. J. Med. Internet Res. 17, 8 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, Anna L Cox, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Quantifying the Body and Caring for the Mind: Self-Tracking in Multiple Sclerosis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 6889--6901. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Andrea M. Barbarin, Predrag Klasnja, and Tiffany C. Veinot. 2016. Good or bad, ups and downs, and getting better: Use of personal health data for temporal reflection in chronic illness. Int. J. Med. Inf. 94, (2016), 237--245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Becker and R. Nachtigall. 1994. "Born to be a mother": Cultural Construction of Risk in Treatment in the U.S. Born Be Mother Cult. Constr. Risk Treat. US 39, 4 (1994), 507--518. DOI:https://doi.org/0277--9536(93)E0097-XGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Frank Bentley, Konrad Tollmar, Peter Stephenson, Laura Levy, Brian Jones, Scott Robertson, Ed Price, Richard Catrambone, and Jeff Wilson. 2013. Health Mashups: Presenting Statistical Patterns Between Wellbeing Data and Context in Natural Language to Promote Behavior Change. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 20, 5 (November 2013), 30:1--30:27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jacky Boivin and Lone Schmidt. 2005. Infertility-related stress in men and women predicts treatment outcome 1 year later. Fertil. Steril. 83, 6 (June 2005), 1745--1752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, 77--91. Retrieved July 8, 2018 from http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. CDC. FastStats - Infertility. Retrieved April 13, 2018 from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/infertility.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Janet Choi and Johan Smitz. 2014. Luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin: origins of difference. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 383, 1--2 (March 2014), 203--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chia-fang Chung, Kristin Dew, Allison Cole, Jasmine Zia, James Fogarty, Julie A Kientz, and Sean A Munson. 2016. Boundary Negotiating Artifacts in Personal Informatics: Patient-Provider Collaboration with Patient-Generated Data. In CSCW, 770--786. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. James Clawson, Jessica A. Pater, Andrew D. Miller, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and Lena Mamykina. 2015. No Longer Wearing: Investigating the Abandonment of Personal Health-tracking Technologies on Craigslist. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15), 647--658. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Felicia Cordeiro, Daniel A Epstein, Edison Thomaz, Elizabeth Bales, Arvind K Jagannathan, Gregory D Abowd, and James Fogarty. 2015. Barriers and Negative Nudges?: Exploring Challenges in Food Journaling. (2015), 1159--1162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Clara Caldeira, Tera L. Reynolds, Sean Victory, Kai Zheng, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Self-Tracking for Fertility Care: Collaborative Support for a Highly Personalized Problem. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact 1, CSCW (December 2017), 36:1--36:21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Abdallah S. Daar and Zara Merali. 2002. Infertility and social suffering: the case of ART in developing countries.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Elizabeth V. Eikey and Madhu C. Reddy. 2017. "It's Definitely Been a Journey": A Qualitative Study on How Women with Eating Disorders Use Weight Loss Apps. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Daniel A Epstein, Monica Caraway, Chuck Johnston, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2016. Beyond Abandonment to Next Steps: Understanding and Designing for Life after Personal Informatics Tool Use. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1109--1113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Daniel A Epstein, Nicole B Lee, Jennifer H Kang, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Laura R Pina, James Fogarty, Julie A Kientz, and Sean Munson. 2017. Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 6876--6888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Daniel A Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2015. A lived informatics model of personal informatics. Proc. 2015 ACM Int. Jt. Conf. Pervasive Ubiquitous Comput. - UbiComp 15 (2015), 731--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Wendy Nelson Espeland and Mitchell L. Stevens. 2008. A Sociology of Quantification. Eur. J. Sociol. Arch. Eur. Sociol. 49, 3 (December 2008), 401--436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayara Figueiredo, Clara Caldeira, Yunan Chen, and Kai Zheng. 2017. Routine self-tracking of health: reasons, facilitating factors, and the potential impact on health management practices. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. AMIA Symp. 2017, (2017), 706--714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yoon Frederiksen, Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard, Ninna Grønhøj Skovgård, Hans Jakob Ingerslev, and Robert Zachariae. 2015. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 5, 1 (January 2015), e006592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Thomas Fritz, Elaine M Huang, Gail C Murphy, and Thomas Zimmermann. 2014. Persuasive Technology in the Real World: A Study of Long-term Use of Activity Sensing Devices for Fitness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 487--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Gary Wolf. 2010. The Data-Driven Life - The New York Times. Retrieved February 12, 2018 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Erik Grönvall and Nervo Verdezoto. 2013. Beyond Self-monitoring: Understanding Non-functional Aspects of Home-based Healthcare Technology. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '13), 587--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Helen Verran. 2011. Number as Generative Device: Ordering and Valuing our Relations with Nature. In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social (Hardback) - Routledge. Retrieved February 23, 2018 from https://www.routledge.com/Inventive-Methods-The-Happening-of-the-Social/Lury-Wakeford/p/book/9780415574815Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Victoria Hollis, Artie Konrad, and Steve Whittaker. 2015. Change of Heart: Emotion Tracking to Promote Behavior Change. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2643--2652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ravi Karkar, Jessica Schroeder, Daniel A Epstein, Laura R Pina, Jeffrey Scofield, James Fogarty, Julie A Kientz, Sean A Munson, Roger Vilardaga, and Jasmine Zia. 2017. TummyTrials: A Feasibility Study of Using Self-Experimentation to Detect Individualized Food Triggers. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 6850--6863. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ravi Karkar, Jasmine Zia, Roger Vilardaga, Sonali R. Mishra, James Fogarty, Sean A. Munson, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. A framework for self-experimentation in personalized health. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA 23, 3 (May 2016), 440--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Dmitri Katz, Blaine Price, Simon Holland, and Nick Dalton. 2018. Data, Data Everywhere, and Still Too Hard to Link: Insights from User Interactions with Diabetes Apps.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Joseph Jofish Kaye, Mary McCuistion, Rebecca Gulotta, and David A. Shamma. 2014. Money Talks: Tracking Personal Finances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Mihan Lee. 2017. Don't Give Up! A Cyber-ethnography and Discourse Analysis of an Online Infertility Patient Forum. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 41, 3 (2017), 341--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - CHI 10 (2010), 557. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Understanding My Data, Myself: Supporting Self-Reflection with Ubicomp Technologies. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. James J. Lin, Lena Mamykina, Silvia Lindtner, Gregory Delajoux, and Henry B. Strub. 2006. Fish'N'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'06), 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Leslie S. Liu and Katie A. Siek. 2017. Sticky Baby Dust After Baby Dancing: Guilt and Judgment in "Trying to Conceive" Communities on YouTube.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Margaret Lock. 2000. Accounting for Disease and Distress: Morals of the Normal and Abnormal. In Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, 259--276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Deborah Lupton. 2013. Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Crit. Public Health 23, 4 (2013), 393--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Deborah Lupton. 2013. The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Soc. Theory Health 11, 3 (2013), 256--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Deborah Lupton. 2015. Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Cult. Health Sex. 17, 4 (2015), 440--453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Haley MacLeod, Anthony Tang, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2013. Personal Informatics in Chronic Illness Management. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2013 (GI '13), 149--156. Retrieved April 8, 2018 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2532129.2532155 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Lena Mamykina, Elizabeth Mynatt, Patricia Davidson, and Daniel Greenblatt. 2008. MAHI: Investigation of Social Scaffolding for Reflective Thinking in Diabetes Management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Andre N. Meyer, Gail C. Murphy, Thomas Zimmermann, and Thomas Fritz. 2017. Retrospecting on Work and Productivity: A Study on Self-Monitoring Software Developers' Work. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact 1, CSCW (December 2017), 79:1--79:24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. David Glen Mick and Susan Fournier. 1998. Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies. J. Consum. Res. 25, 2 (September 1998), 123--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Dawn Nafus. 2016. Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Gina Neff and Dawn Nafus. 2016. Self-Tracking. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Maja Nordfeldt and Olivia Widén. 2017. Me, my cycle and I. University of Gothenburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Jeni Paay, Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B Skov, Lars Lichon, and Stephan Rasmussen. 2015. Understanding Individual Differences for Tailored Smoking Cessation Apps. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 1699--1708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Laura R Pina, Sang-Wha Sien, Teresa Ward, Jason C Yip, Sean A Munson, James Fogarty, and Julie A Kientz. 2017. From Personal Informatics to Family Informatics: Understanding Family Practices Around Health Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17), 2300--2315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Igor Sacramento and Vanissa Wanick. 2017. mHealth and the Digital Cyborg Body: The Running Apps in a Society of Control. In Mobile e-Health, Hannah R Marston, Shannon Freeman and Charles Musselwhite (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 39--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Jamie Sherman. 2016. Data in the Age of Digital Reproduction: Reading the Quantified Self through Walter Benjamin. In Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press, 280-. Retrieved February 22, 2018 from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7580091Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Anselm Strauss and Juliet M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. K. P. Tang, S. H. Hirano, K. G. Cheng, and G. R. Hayes. 2012. Balancing caregiver and clinician needs in a mobile health informatics tool for preterm infants. In 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Jennifer L Welbourne, Anita L Blanchard, and Marla D Boughton. 2009. Supportive Communication, Sense of Virtual Community and Health Outcomes in Online Infertility Groups. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '09), 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. WHO | Infertility. WHO. Retrieved June 6, 2017 from http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/keyissues/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Engaging with Health Data: The Interplay Between Self-Tracking Activities and Emotions in Fertility Struggles

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader
              About Cookies On This Site

              We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

              Learn more

              Got it!