Abstract
In recent years, we have witnessed a growing trend for online service companies to offer “bundling sales” to increase revenue. Bundling sale means that a company groups a set of products/services and charges this bundle at a fixed price, which is usually less than the total price of individual items in the bundle. In this work, our aim is to understand the underlying dynamics of bundling, particularly what is the optimal bundling sale strategy and under what situations it will be more attractive than the separate sales. We focus on online service markets that exhibit network effects. We formulate mathematical models to capture the interactions between buyers and sellers, analyze the market equilibrium and its stability, and provide an optimization framework to determine the optimal sale strategy for a service provider. We analyze the impact of various factors on the profitability of bundling, including the network effects, operating costs, and variance and correlation of customers’ valuations toward these services. We show that bundling is more profitable when the variance of customers’ valuations and the operational cost of the services are small. In addition, a positive network effect and a negative correlation among customers’ valuation on services increase the profitability of bundling, whereas the heterogeneity of services and the asymmetry of operating costs reduce its advantage.
- W. J. Adams and J. L. Yellen. 1976. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, 3 (1976), 475--498.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Y. Bakos and E. Brynjolfsson. 1999. Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Science 45, 12 (1999), 1613--1630. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Y. Bakos and E. Brynjolfsson. 2000. Bundling and competition on the internet. Marketing Science 19, 1 (2000), 63--82.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mihai Banciu and Fredrik Ødegaard. 2016. Optimal product bundling with dependent valuations: The price of independence. European Journal of Operational Research 255, 2 (2016), 481--495.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Kostas Bimpikis and Mihalis G. Markakis. 2015. Inventory pooling under heavy-tailed demand. Management Science 62, 6 (2015), 1800--1813. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Chiranjeeb Buragohain, Divyakant Agrawal, and Subhash Suri. 2003. A game theoretic framework for incentives in P2P systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P’03). 48--56. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- O. Candogan, K. Bimpikis, and A. Ozdaglar. 2010. Optimal pricing in the presence of local network effects. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Internet and Network Economics. 118--132. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Chenghuan Sean Chu, Phillip Leslie, and Alan Sorensen. 2011. Bundle-size pricing as an approximation to mixed bundling. American Economic Review 101, 1 (2011), 263--303.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. Easley and J. Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gary D. Eppen. 1979. Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Management Science 25, 5 (1979), 498--501. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hanming Fang and Peter Norman. 2006. To bundle or not to bundle. RAND Journal of Economics 37, 4 (2006), 946--963.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Neil Gandal, Sarit Markovich, and Michael Riordan. n.d. Ain’t It “Suite”? Strategic Bundling in the PC Office Software Market. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Yigal Gerchak and Qi-Ming He. 2003. On the relation between the benefits of risk pooling and the variability of demand. IIE Transactions 35, 11 (2003), 1027--1031.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Roch Guérin, Jaudelice C. de Oliveira, and Steven Weber. 2014. Adoption of bundled services with network externalities and correlated affinities. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 14, 2--3 (Oct. 2014), Article 13, 32 pages. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. P. Guiltinan. 1987. The price bundling of services: A normative framework. Journal of Marketing 51, 2 (1987), 74--85.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Lorin M. Hitt and Pei-Yu Chen. 2005. Bundling with customer self-selection: A simple approach to bundling low-marginal-cost goods. Management Science 51, 10 (2005), 1481--1493. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Rustam Ibragimov and Johan Walden. 2010. Optimal bundling strategies under heavy-tailed valuations. Management Science 56, 11 (2010), 1963--1976.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. L. Katz and C. Shapiro. 1985. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review 75, 3 (1985), 424--440.Google Scholar
- J. O. Kephart and S. A. Fay. 2000. Competitive bundling of categorized information goods. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’00). ACM, New York, NY, 117--127. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. J. Liebowitz and S. E. Margolis. 1994. Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 2 (1994), 133--150.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Matutes and P. Regibeau. 1992. Compatibility and bundling of complementary goods in a duopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics 40, 1 (1992), 37--54.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- R. P. McAfee, J. McMillan, and M. D. Whinston. 1989. Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 2 (1989), 371--383.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. Niyato, D. T. Hoang, N. C. Luong, P. Wang, D. I. Kim, and Z. Han. 2016. Smart data pricing models for the Internet of Things: A bundling strategy approach. IEEE Network 30, 2 (March 2016), 18--25.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Prasad, R. Venkatesh, and V. Mahajan. 2010. Optimal bundling of technological products with network externality. Management Science 56, 12 (2010), 2224--2236. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Roch Guérin, Jaudelice C. de Oliveira, and Steven Weber. 2014. Adoption of bundled services with network externalities and correlated affinities. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 14, 2--3 (Oct. 2014), Article 13. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R. Schmalensee. 1984. Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. Journal of Business 57, 1 (1984), 211--230.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- R. Venkatesh and W. Kamakura. 2003. Optimal bundling and pricing under a monopoly: Contrasting complements and substitutes from independently valued products. Journal of Business 76, 2 (2003), 211--231.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. C. Wang, Y. Hsu, and W. Fang. 2004. Acceptance of technology with network externalities. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6, 4 (2004), 15--28.Google Scholar
- C. C. Wang, S. K. Lo, and W. Fang. 2008. Extending the technology acceptance model to mobile telecommunication innovation: The existence of network externalities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 7, 2 (2008), 101--110.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
Index Terms
On the Profitability of Bundling Sale Strategy for Online Service Markets With Network Effects
Recommendations
Competitive bundling in information markets: a seller-side analysis
The emerging field of data analytics and the increasing importance of data and information in decision making has created a large market for buying and selling information and information-related services. In this market, for some types of information ...
Sale or Lease? Durable-Goods Monopoly with Network Effects
This paper studies the pricing problem of a durable-goods monopolist. It finds that contrary to the existing literature, profits from selling durable goods might be higher than from leasing when the products exhibit network effects. Under the influence ...
The Role of Sale Signs
<P>Sale signs increase demand. The apparent effectiveness of this simple strategy is surprising; sale signs are inexpensive to produce and stores generally make no commitment when using them. As a result, they can be placed on any products, and as many ...






Comments