skip to main content
research-article

On the Profitability of Bundling Sale Strategy for Online Service Markets With Network Effects

Published:03 May 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In recent years, we have witnessed a growing trend for online service companies to offer “bundling sales” to increase revenue. Bundling sale means that a company groups a set of products/services and charges this bundle at a fixed price, which is usually less than the total price of individual items in the bundle. In this work, our aim is to understand the underlying dynamics of bundling, particularly what is the optimal bundling sale strategy and under what situations it will be more attractive than the separate sales. We focus on online service markets that exhibit network effects. We formulate mathematical models to capture the interactions between buyers and sellers, analyze the market equilibrium and its stability, and provide an optimization framework to determine the optimal sale strategy for a service provider. We analyze the impact of various factors on the profitability of bundling, including the network effects, operating costs, and variance and correlation of customers’ valuations toward these services. We show that bundling is more profitable when the variance of customers’ valuations and the operational cost of the services are small. In addition, a positive network effect and a negative correlation among customers’ valuation on services increase the profitability of bundling, whereas the heterogeneity of services and the asymmetry of operating costs reduce its advantage.

References

  1. W. J. Adams and J. L. Yellen. 1976. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, 3 (1976), 475--498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Y. Bakos and E. Brynjolfsson. 1999. Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Science 45, 12 (1999), 1613--1630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Bakos and E. Brynjolfsson. 2000. Bundling and competition on the internet. Marketing Science 19, 1 (2000), 63--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mihai Banciu and Fredrik Ødegaard. 2016. Optimal product bundling with dependent valuations: The price of independence. European Journal of Operational Research 255, 2 (2016), 481--495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kostas Bimpikis and Mihalis G. Markakis. 2015. Inventory pooling under heavy-tailed demand. Management Science 62, 6 (2015), 1800--1813. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chiranjeeb Buragohain, Divyakant Agrawal, and Subhash Suri. 2003. A game theoretic framework for incentives in P2P systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P’03). 48--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. O. Candogan, K. Bimpikis, and A. Ozdaglar. 2010. Optimal pricing in the presence of local network effects. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Internet and Network Economics. 118--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chenghuan Sean Chu, Phillip Leslie, and Alan Sorensen. 2011. Bundle-size pricing as an approximation to mixed bundling. American Economic Review 101, 1 (2011), 263--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Easley and J. Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gary D. Eppen. 1979. Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Management Science 25, 5 (1979), 498--501. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hanming Fang and Peter Norman. 2006. To bundle or not to bundle. RAND Journal of Economics 37, 4 (2006), 946--963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Neil Gandal, Sarit Markovich, and Michael Riordan. n.d. Ain’t It “Suite”? Strategic Bundling in the PC Office Software Market. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yigal Gerchak and Qi-Ming He. 2003. On the relation between the benefits of risk pooling and the variability of demand. IIE Transactions 35, 11 (2003), 1027--1031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Roch Guérin, Jaudelice C. de Oliveira, and Steven Weber. 2014. Adoption of bundled services with network externalities and correlated affinities. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 14, 2--3 (Oct. 2014), Article 13, 32 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. P. Guiltinan. 1987. The price bundling of services: A normative framework. Journal of Marketing 51, 2 (1987), 74--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lorin M. Hitt and Pei-Yu Chen. 2005. Bundling with customer self-selection: A simple approach to bundling low-marginal-cost goods. Management Science 51, 10 (2005), 1481--1493. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rustam Ibragimov and Johan Walden. 2010. Optimal bundling strategies under heavy-tailed valuations. Management Science 56, 11 (2010), 1963--1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. L. Katz and C. Shapiro. 1985. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review 75, 3 (1985), 424--440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. O. Kephart and S. A. Fay. 2000. Competitive bundling of categorized information goods. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’00). ACM, New York, NY, 117--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. J. Liebowitz and S. E. Margolis. 1994. Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 2 (1994), 133--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. C. Matutes and P. Regibeau. 1992. Compatibility and bundling of complementary goods in a duopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics 40, 1 (1992), 37--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. R. P. McAfee, J. McMillan, and M. D. Whinston. 1989. Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 2 (1989), 371--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. D. Niyato, D. T. Hoang, N. C. Luong, P. Wang, D. I. Kim, and Z. Han. 2016. Smart data pricing models for the Internet of Things: A bundling strategy approach. IEEE Network 30, 2 (March 2016), 18--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Prasad, R. Venkatesh, and V. Mahajan. 2010. Optimal bundling of technological products with network externality. Management Science 56, 12 (2010), 2224--2236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Roch Guérin, Jaudelice C. de Oliveira, and Steven Weber. 2014. Adoption of bundled services with network externalities and correlated affinities. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 14, 2--3 (Oct. 2014), Article 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. R. Schmalensee. 1984. Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. Journal of Business 57, 1 (1984), 211--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. R. Venkatesh and W. Kamakura. 2003. Optimal bundling and pricing under a monopoly: Contrasting complements and substitutes from independently valued products. Journal of Business 76, 2 (2003), 211--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. C. C. Wang, Y. Hsu, and W. Fang. 2004. Acceptance of technology with network externalities. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6, 4 (2004), 15--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C. C. Wang, S. K. Lo, and W. Fang. 2008. Extending the technology acceptance model to mobile telecommunication innovation: The existence of network externalities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 7, 2 (2008), 101--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On the Profitability of Bundling Sale Strategy for Online Service Markets With Network Effects

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
            ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  Volume 19, Issue 3
            Special Section on Advances in Internet-Based Collaborative Technologies
            August 2019
            289 pages
            ISSN:1533-5399
            EISSN:1557-6051
            DOI:10.1145/3329912
            • Editor:
            • Ling Liu
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 May 2019
            • Accepted: 1 September 2018
            • Revised: 1 July 2018
            • Received: 1 August 2017
            Published in toit Volume 19, Issue 3

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!