Achieving Gender Balance through Creative Expression

ABSTRACT

Increasing gender balance in computing is widely recognized by academic institutions, industry, and government agencies as an imperative. This paper describes how providing opportunities for creative expression early on and throughout the four years of an undergraduate computing degree achieves this goal. Prior studies have demonstrated that opportunity for creative expression has a positive effect on recruitment and retention of women, while conversely, lack of opportunity for creative expression has a negative effect. We describe our approach, integrated into a four-course sequence combining computing and the arts, so that other institutions may consider adopting it. Results of a six-year longitudinal study show that these courses attract, retain, and graduate 46% female students, while the corresponding number in our ABET-accredited Computer Science curriculum is approximately 20%. The paper concludes with general observations and suggests directions for future action in CS curricula design.

References

1. Bares, W.H., Manaris, B. & McCauley, R. Gender Equity in Computer Science through Computing in the Arts -- A Six-Year Longitudinal Study, Computer Science Education, 28, 3 (Sep. 2018), 191--210.
2. Barker, L. J., Garvin-Doxas, K., & Roberts, E. What can computer science learn from a fine arts approach to teaching? In Proceeding of the 36th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (St. Louis, MO, USA - February 23 - 27, 2005), ACM, NY, 421--425.
3. Barker, L. J. email communication, February 28, 2018.
4. Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 2 (May 2007), 73--79.
5. Beyer, S. Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 5 (Nov. 1990), 960--970.
6. Beyer, S. Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades, Computer Science Education, 24, 2--3 (Sep. 2014), 153--192.
7. Blickenstaff, J.C. Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?, Gender and Education, 17, 4 (Aug. 2006), 369-386.
8. Brainard, S. and Carlin, L. 1998. A Six-Year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science, Journal of Engineering Education, (87)4, pp. 369--375.
9. Computing Research Association (2017). Generation CS: Computer Science Undergraduate Enrollments Surge Since 2006. http://cra.org/data/Generation-CS/
10. Cooper, S. and Cunningham, S. 2010. Teaching computer science in context. ACM Inroads 1, 1 (March 2010), 5--8.
11. Else-Quest, N., Mineo, C. and Higgins, A. 2013. Math and Science Attitudes and Achievement at the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity, Psychology of Women Quarterly, (37)3, pp. 293--309.
12. Forte, A. and Guzdial, M. Computers for Communication, Not Calculation: Media As a Motivation and Context for Learning, in Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Track 4 - Volume 4, (Big Island HI, USA -- January 5--8, 2004) IEEE, Washington, DC, USA.
13. Forte, A. and Guzdial, M. Motivation and nonmajors in computer science: identifying discrete audiences for introductory courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48, 2 (May 2005), 248--253.
14. Garcia, D. and Barr, V. Guzdial, M. and Malan, D. 2013. Rediscovering the Passion, Beauty, Joy, and Awe: Making Computing Fun Again, Part 6, in Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, CO, USA -- March 6--9, 2013) ACM, NY, USA, 379--380.
15. Gu, M. and Tong, X. Towards Hypotheses on Creativity in Software Development. In 5th International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES), (Kausai Science City, Japan -- June 13--15, 2005) Springer, NY, USA, 47--61.
16. Guzdial, M. 2003. A Media Computation Course for Non-majors, SIGCSE Bulletin, 35, 3 (Sep. 2003), 104--108.
17. Guzdial, Mark. Does Contextualized Computing Education Help?, ACM Inroads, 1,4 (Dec. 2010), 4--6.
18. Guzdial, M. 2013. Exploring Hypotheses About Media Computation, in Proceedings of the 9th Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, (La Jolla, CA, USA - August 12--14, 2013) ACM, NY, USA, 19--26.
19. Guzdial, M. 2014. The most gender-balanced computing program in the USA: computational media at Georgia Tech, Computer Education Blog, September 2, 2014. https://computinged.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/the-most-gender-balanced-computing-program-in-the-usa/
20. JythonMusic. http://jythonmusic.org
21. Katz, S., Allbritton, D., Aronis, J., Wilson, C. and Soffa, M. Gender, Achievement, and Persistence in an Undergraduate Computer Science Program, SIGMIS Database, 37, 4 (Fall 2006), 42--57.
22. La Marche, Jeffrey Steven. User Interface Computation As a Contextualized Approach for Introductory Computing Instruction, in Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM International Computing Education Research Conference (La Holla, CA, USA -- August 12--14, 2013) ACM, NY, USA, 179--180.
23. Lewandowski, G., Johnson, E. and Goldweber, M. 2005. Fostering a creative interest in computer science. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (St. Louis, MO, USA -- February 23--27, 2005) ACM, NY, USA, 535--539.
24. McCauley, R., Manaris, B., Heise, D., Sheller, C., Jolley, J., and Zaring, A. Computing in the Arts: Curricular Innovations and Results. In Proceedings of the 48th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Seattle, WA -- March 8--11, 2017) ACM, NY, USA, 693--694.
25. Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. 2004. Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 2 (June 2004), 83--96.
26. Porter, L. and Simon, B. 2013. Retaining Nearly One-third More Majors with a Trio of Instructional Best Practices in CS1, in Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, CO -- March 6--9, 2013) ACM, NY, USA, 165--170.
27. Rich, L., Perry, H. and Guzdial, M. 2004. A CS1 Course Designed to Address Interests of Women, in Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Norfolk, VA, USA -- March 3--7, 2004) ACM, NY, USA, 190--194.
28. Riley, T. 1989. In C, Score and Performing Directions, Celestial Harmonies.
29. Simon, B. and Kinnunen, P., Porter, L. and Zazkis, D. Experience Report: CS1 for Majors with Media Computation, in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey -- June 26--30, 2010) ACM, NY, USA, 214--218.
30. Sloan, R. and Troy, P. 2008. CS 0.5: A Better Approach to Introductory Computer Science for Majors, in Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, USA -- March 12--15, 2008) ACM, NY, USA, 271--275.
31. Tew, A., Fowler, C. and Guzdial, M. 2005. Tracking an Innovation in Introductory CS Education from a Research University to a Two-year College, in Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (St. Louis, MO, USA -- February 23--27, 2005) ACM, NY, USA, 416--420.
32. Tims, J., Zweben, S., Timanovsky, Y. and Prey, J. ACM-NDC Study 2016--2017: Fifth Annual Study of Non-Doctoral-Granting Departments in Computing, ACM Inroads, 8(3), pp. 48--62, ACM, NY, USA.
33. Tims, J. 2018. Achieving Gender Equity: ACM-W Can't Do It Alone. Communications of the ACM, February, 61(2), p. 5.
34. Trueman, D., Cook, P., Smallwood, S. and Wang, G. 2006. "PLOrk: The Princeton laptop orchestra, year 1', in Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC 2006), Michigan Publishing, 443--50.
35. Uludag, S., Karakus, M. and Turner, S. Implementing IT0/CS0 with Scratch, App Inventor for Android, and Lego Mindstorms, in Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Information Technology Education (West Point, NY - October 20--22, 2011) 183--190.
36. Zweben, S. and Bizot, B. 2016 Taulbee Survey: Generation CS Continues to Produce Record Undergrad Enrollment; Graduate Degree Production Rises at both Master's and Doctoral Levels, Computing Research Association, https://cra.org/crn/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/05/2016-Taulbee-Survey.pdf

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education