10.1145/3287324.3293739acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Exploring Programming Instruction in Multidisciplinary Contexts

Published:22 February 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Programming is becoming skill required by a wide range of students, not just CS majors. Furthermore, not only are non-CS majors learning to program, but many non-CS faculty find themselves teaching programming courses. Introducing these faculty and students to the craft of programming is accompanied by a number of unique challenges. How can non-CS faculty position themselves as programming experts, given they are not CS people? How can we convince non-CS students that coding is a necessary skill? Often our non-computing majors are reluctant, stating "Programming isn't what I signed up for!" Many non-CS students are not receptive to learning new programming languages due to a lack of intrinsic motivation coupled with technological anxiety. These factors often result in low-self efficacy, which must be overcome in order to explore, play, and learn. This Birds of a Feather discussion brings together instructors from diverse disciplines to discuss the teaching of programming to a range of students, the barriers that exist for non-computing students, and the interventions that attempt to mitigate these issues.

References

  1. Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students' course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary educational psychology, 26(4), 553--570.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kinnunen, P., & Simon, B. (2011, August). CS majors' self-efficacy perceptions in CS1: results in light of social cognitive theory. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research (pp. 19--26). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ramalingam, V., LaBelle, D. and Wiedenbeck, A. 2004. Self-Efficacy and Mental Models in Learning to Program. ACM SIGCSE Bull., 36(3), 17--175 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lishinski, A., Yadav, A., Good, J., & Enbody, R. (2016, August). Learning to program: Gender differences and interactive effects of students' motivation, goals, and self-efficacy on performance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 211--220). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Programming Instruction in Multidisciplinary Contexts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2019
      1364 pages
      ISBN:9781450358903
      DOI:10.1145/3287324

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 February 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate169of526submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!