10.1145/3292500.3330706acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedings
research-article

DuerQuiz: A Personalized Question Recommender System for Intelligent Job Interview

ABSTRACT

In talent recruitment, the job interview aims at selecting the right candidates for the right jobs through assessing their skills and experiences in relation to the job positions. While tremendous efforts have been made in improving job interviews, a long-standing challenge is how to design appropriate interview questions for comprehensively assessing the competencies that may be deemed relevant and representative for person-job fit. To this end, in this research, we focus on the development of a personalized question recommender system, namely DuerQuiz, for enhancing the job interview assessment. DuerQuiz is a fully deployed system, in which a knowledge graph of job skills, Skill-Graph, has been built for comprehensively modeling the relevant competencies that should be assessed in the job interview. Specifically, we first develop a novel skill entity extraction approach based on a bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) with a Conditional Random Field (CRF) layer (LSTM-CRF) neural network enhanced with adapted gate mechanism. In particular, to improve the reliability of extracted skill entities, we design a label propagation method based on more than 10 billion click-through data from the large-scale Baidu query logs. Furthermore, we discover the hypernym-hyponym relations between skill entities and construct the Skill-Graph by leveraging the classifier trained with extensive contextual features. Finally, we design a personalized question recommendation algorithm based on the Skill-Graph for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of job interview assessment. Extensive experiments on real-world recruitment data clearly validate the effectiveness of DuerQuiz, which had been deployed for generating written exercises in the 2018 Baidu campus recruitment event and received remarkable performances in terms of efficiency and effectiveness for selecting outstanding talents compared with a traditional non-personalized human-only assessment approach.

References

  1. Tobias Baur, Ionut Damian, Patrick Gebhard, Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, and Elisabeth André. 2013. A job interview simulation: Social cue-based interaction with a virtual character. In Social Computing (SocialCom), 2013 International Conference on. IEEE, 220--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jason PC Chiu and Eric Nichols. 2016. Named entity recognition with bidirectional LSTM-CNNs. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol. 4 (2016), 357--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Amy JC Cuddy, Caroline A Wilmuth, Andy J Yap, and Dana R Carney. 2015. Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 100, 4 (2015), 1286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Hamish Cunningham, Diana Maynard, Kalina Bontcheva, and Valentin Tablan. 2002. A framework and graphical development environment for robust NLP tools and applications.. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 168--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jenny Rose Finkel, Trond Grenager, and Christopher Manning. 2005. Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 363--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ruiji Fu, Jiang Guo, Bing Qin, Wanxiang Che, Haifeng Wang, and Ting Liu. 2014. Learning semantic hierarchies via word embeddings. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ruiji Fu, Bing Qin, and Ting Liu. 2013. Exploiting multiple sources for open-domain hypernym discovery. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 1224--1234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. 249--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marti A Hearst. 1992. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Allen I Huffcutt and David J Woehr. 1999. Further analysis of employment interview validity: a quantitative evaluation of interviewer-related structuring methods. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Guillaume Lample, Miguel Ballesteros, Sandeep Subramanian, Kazuya Kawakami, and Chris Dyer. 2016. Neural architectures for named entity recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01360 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. H. Lee and Peter Brusilovsky. 2007. Fighting Information Overflow with Personalized Comprehensive Information Access: A Proactive Job Recommender. In Third International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jinyang Li, Chengyu Wang, Xiaofeng He, Rong Zhang, and Ming Gao. 2015. User generated content oriented chinese taxonomy construction. In Proceedings of the 17th Asia-Pacific Web Conference. Springer, 623--634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Qi Li and Heng Ji. 2014. Incremental joint extraction of entity mentions and relations. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Vol. 1. 402--412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Xiao Li, Ye-Yi Wang, and Alex Acero. 2008. Learning query intent from regularized click graphs. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 339--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Shotaro Misawa, Motoki Taniguchi, Yasuhide Miura, and Tomoko Ohkuma. 2017. Character-based Bidirectional LSTM-CRF with words and characters for Japanese Named Entity Recognition. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Subword and Character Level Models in NLP. 97--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Iftekhar Naim, M Iftekhar Tanveer, Daniel Gildea, and Mohammed Ehsan Hoque. 2015. Automated prediction and analysis of job interview performance: The role of what you say and how you say it. In Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on, Vol. 1. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Alexandre Passos, Vineet Kumar, and Andrew McCallum. 2014. Lexicon infused phrase embeddings for named entity resolution. arXiv:1404.5367 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Karolina Piwiec. 2018. 65+ recruitment stats HR pros must know in 2018. https://devskiller.com/65-recruitment-stats-hr-pros-must-know-2018/. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Chuan Qin, Hengshu Zhu, Tong Xu, Chen Zhu, Liang Jiang, Enhong Chen, and Hui Xiong. 2018. Enhancing person-job fit for talent recruitment: An ability-aware neural network approach. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 25--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lev Ratinov and Dan Roth. 2009. Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, 147--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Frank L Schmidt and Ryan D Zimmerman. 2004. A counterintuitive hypothesis about employment interview validity and some supporting evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, 3 (2004), 553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Dazhong Shen, Hengshu Zhu, Chen Zhu, Tong Xu, Chao Ma, and Hui Xiong. 2018. A Joint Learning Approach to Intelligent Job Interview Assessment. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rion Snow, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Y Ng. 2005. Learning syntactic patterns for automatic hypernym discovery. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 1297--1304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Fabian M Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. 2007. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 697--706. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mihai Surdeanu, Julie Tibshirani, Ramesh Nallapati, and Christopher D Manning. 2012. Multi-instance multi-label learning for relation extraction. In Proceedings of the 2012 joint conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and computational natural language learning. 455--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Liling Tan, Rohit Gupta, and Josef van Genabith. 2015. Usaar-wlv: Hypernym generation with deep neural nets. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015). 932--937.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Daniel W Turner III. 2010. Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The qualitative report, Vol. 15, 3 (2010), 754--760.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Chengyu Wang and Xiaofeng He. 2016. Chinese hypernym-hyponym extraction from user generated categories. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 1350--1361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wentao Wu, Hongsong Li, Haixun Wang, and Kenny Q Zhu. 2012. Probase: A probabilistic taxonomy for text understanding. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, 481--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tong Xu, Hengshu Zhu, Chen Zhu, Pan Li, and Hui Xiong. 2018. Measuring the popularity of job skills in recruitment market: A multi-criteria approach. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2572--2579.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Josuke Yamane, Tomoya Takatani, Hitoshi Yamada, Makoto Miwa, and Yutaka Sasaki. 2016. Distributional hypernym generation by jointly learning clusters and projections. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 1871--1879.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jie Yang, Yue Zhang, and Fei Dong. 2017. Neural word segmentation with rich pretraining. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.08960 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Daojian Zeng, Kang Liu, Yubo Chen, and Jun Zhao. 2015. Distant supervision for relation extraction via piecewise convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Yue Zhang and Jie Yang. 2018. Chinese NER Using Lattice LSTM. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. GuoDong Zhou and Jian Su. 2002. Named entity recognition using an HMM-based chunk tagger. In proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 473--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Chen Zhu, Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong, Pengliang Ding, and Fang Xie. 2016. Recruitment market trend analysis with sequential latent variable models. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 383--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Chen Zhu, Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong, Chao Ma, Fang Xie, Pengliang Ding, and Pan Li. 2018. Person-Job Fit: Adapting the Right Talent for the Right Job with Joint Representation Learning. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), Vol. 9, 3 (2018), 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. DuerQuiz

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)442
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)55

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!