skip to main content
10.1145/3306307.3328146acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
invited-talk

A ragdoll-less approach to physical animations of characters in vehicles

Published:28 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently the use of vehicles has increased in importance for many games. This is not only for open-world games, where the use of vehicles are a crucial element of world traversal, but also for scenario based games where the use of vehicles adds a more varied game-play experience. In many of these games, however, the characters inside the vehicles lack the animations to connect their motion to that of the vehicle. The use of a few poses or small number of animations makes in-vehicle characters too rigid and is particularly noticeable in open vehicles or those with excessive motion such as tractors, speedboats or motorbikes. This can break the connection the player has to the vehicle experience. To solve this problem, several games have used a method to control a ragdoll with physical parameters to follow the input poses [Fuller and Nilsson 2010] [Mach 2017]. However, this solution has several complications regarding controllability and stability when simulating a ragdoll and a vehicle at the same time. I would like to introduce a new approach using particle-based dynamics rather than using a ragdoll. We present two methods: a particle-based approach to physical movement (see Figure 1) and modifying goal positions to generate plausible target poses (see Figure 3).

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

gensub_168.mp4
a67-shin.mp4

References

  1. J. Fuller and A. Nilsson, Physics Meets Animation: Character Stunts in Just Cause 2, Game Developers Conference 2010. https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1012739/Physics-MeetsAnimation-Character-StuntsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mach, Physics Animation in 'Uncharted 4: A Thief's End', Game Developers Conference 2017. https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1024087/Physics-Animation-in-Uncharted-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Müller, B. Heidelberger, M. Teschner and M. Gross, Meshless Deformations based on shape matching. In SIGGRAPH '05: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers (Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2005), ACMPress, pp. 471--478 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. Rungjiratananon, Y. Kanamori and T.Nishita, Chain Shape Matching for Simulating Complex Hairstyles, Computer Graphics Forum 29, 8 (2010), 2438--2446Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Aristidou, Y. Chrysanthou and J. Lasenby, Extending FABRIK with model constraints, Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 27, 1 (2016), 35--57 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Rabbani and P. Kry, PhysIK : Physically plausible and Intuitive keyframing, Graphics Interface Conference (2016) ,153--161 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Kajita et al, Resolved momentum control: humanoid motion planning based on the linear and angular momentum. Intelligent Robots and Systems.(2003) 1644--1650Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A ragdoll-less approach to physical animations of characters in vehicles

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGGRAPH '19: ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Talks
      July 2019
      143 pages
      ISBN:9781450363174
      DOI:10.1145/3306307

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 July 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • invited-talk

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader