skip to main content
research-article

Visual smoothness of polyhedral surfaces

Published:12 July 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Representing smooth geometric shapes by polyhedral meshes can be quite difficult in situations where the variation of edges and face normals is prominently visible. Especially problematic are saddle-shaped areas of the mesh, where typical vertices with six incident edges are ill suited to emulate the more symmetric smooth situation. The importance of a faithful discrete representation is apparent for certain special applications like freeform architecture, but is also relevant for simulation and geometric computing.

In this paper we discuss what exactly is meant by a good representation of saddle points, and how this requirement is stronger than a good approximation of a surface plus its normals. We characterize good saddles in terms of the normal pyramid in a vertex.

We show several ways to design meshes whose normals enjoy small variation (implying good saddle points). For this purpose we define a discrete energy of polyhedral surfaces, which is related to a certain total absolute curvature of smooth surfaces. We discuss the minimizers of both functionals and in particular show that the discrete energy is minimal not for triangle meshes, but for principal quad meshes. We demonstrate our procedures for optimization and interactive design by means of meshes intended for architectural design.

References

  1. Lyuba Alboul and Ruud van Damme. 1996. Polyhedral metrics in surface reconstruction. In The Mathematics of Surfaces VI, G. Mullineux (Ed.). Clarendon Press, 171--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ben Andrews. 1999. Gauss curvature flow: the fate of the rolling stones. Invent. math. 138 (1999), 151--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ulrich Bauer, Konrad Polthier, and Max Wardetzky. 2010. Uniform convergence of discrete curvatures from nets of curvature lines. Discr. Comp. Geom. 43 (2010), 798--823. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ronny Bergmann, Marc Herrmann, Roland Herzog, Stephan Schmidt, and José Vidal Núñez. 2019. Total variation of the normal vector field as shape prior with applications in geometric inverse problems. preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexander Bobenko and Yuri Suris. 2009. Discrete differential geometry: Integrable Structure. American Math. Soc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alexander I. Bobenko and Peter Schröder. 2005. Discrete Willmore flow. In Geometry Processing 2005 (Symposium Proceedings). 101--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. David Bommes, Henrik Zimmer, and Leif Kobbelt. 2009. Mixed-integer quadrangulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3 (2009), 77:1--77:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. David Cohen-Steiner and Jean-Marie Morvan. 2003. Restricted Delauney triangulations and normal cycle. In Proc. 19th SoCG. 237--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Manfredo P. do Carmo. 1976. Differential geometry of curves and surfaces. Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nira Dyn, Kai Hormann, Sun-Jeong Kim, and David Levin. 2001. Optimizing 3D triangulations using discrete curvature analysis. In Mathematical Methods for Curves and Surfaces: Oslo 2000. Vanderbilt University Press, 135--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Vladimir A. Garanzha. 2010. Discrete extrinsic curvatures and approximation of surfaces by polar polyhedra. Comp. Math. & Math. Physics 50 (2010), 65--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Felix Günther, Caigui Jiang, and Helmut Pottmann. 2017. Smooth polyhedral surfaces. preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Klaus Hildebrandt, Konrad Polthier, and Max Wardetzky. 2006. On the convergence of metric and geometric properties of polyhedral surfaces. Geometriae Dedicata 123 (2006), 89--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gerhard Huisken. 1984. Flow by mean curvature of convex surfaces into spheres. J. Diff. Geometry 20 (1984), 237--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Caigui Jiang, Felix Günther, Johannes Wallner, and Helmut Pottmann. 2016. Measuring and controlling fairness of triangulations. In Advances in Architectural Geometry 2016. vdf Hochschulverlag, Zürich, 24--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Caigui Jiang, Chengcheng Tang, Amir Vaxman, Peter Wonka, and Helmut Pottmann. 2015. Polyhedral patterns. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 6 (2015), 172:1--172:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Leif Kobbelt, Swen Campagna, Jens Vorsatz, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 1998. Interactive multi-resolution modeling on arbitrary meshes. In Proc. SIGGRAPH. 105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. David Orden, Günter Rote, Francisco Santos, Brigitte Servatius, Herman Servatius, and Walter Whiteley. 2004. Non-crossing frameworks with non-crossing reciprocals. Discr. Comp. Geom. 32, 4 (2004), 567--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Davide Pellis, Martin Kilian, Johannes Wallner, and Helmut Pottmann. 2017. Material-minimizing forms and structures. ACM Trans. Graphics 36, 6 (2017), 173:1--173:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Helmut Pottmann, Michael Eigensatz, Amir Vaxman, and Johannes Wallner. 2015. Architectural geometry. Computers and Graphics 47 (2015), 145--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Eike Schling, Martin Kilian, Hui Wang, Jonas Schikore, and Helmut Pottmann. 2018. Design and construction of curved support structures with repetitive parameters. In Proc. Advances in Architectural Geometry. Klein Publishing, 140--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Oded Stein, Eitan Grinspun, and Keenan Crane. 2018. Developability of triangle meshes. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 4 (2018), 77:1--77:14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rasmus Tamstorf. 2013. Derivation of discrete bending forces and their gradients. Technical Report 07/2013. Disney Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rasmus Tamstorf and Eitan Grinspun. 2013. Discrete bending forces and their Jacobians. Graph. Models 75 (2013), 362--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Chengcheng Tang, Xiang Sun, Alexandra Gomes, Johannes Wallner, and Helmut Pottmann. 2014. Form-finding with polyhedral meshes made simple. ACM Trans. Graphics 33, 4 (2014), 70:1--70:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Huanxi Zhao and Guoliang Xu. 2006. Triangular surface mesh fairing via Gaussian curvature flow. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 195 (2006), 300--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Visual smoothness of polyhedral surfaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
        ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 38, Issue 4
        August 2019
        1480 pages
        ISSN:0730-0301
        EISSN:1557-7368
        DOI:10.1145/3306346
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 July 2019
        Published in tog Volume 38, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader