Abstract
We present a near-eye augmented reality display with resolution and focal depth dynamically driven by gaze tracking. The display combines a traveling microdisplay relayed off a concave half-mirror magnifier for the high-resolution foveal region, with a wide field-of-view peripheral display using a projector-based Maxwellian-view display whose nodal point is translated to follow the viewer's pupil during eye movements using a traveling holographic optical element. The same optics relay an image of the eye to an infrared camera used for gaze tracking, which in turn drives the foveal display location and peripheral nodal point. Our display supports accommodation cues by varying the focal depth of the microdisplay in the foveal region, and by rendering simulated defocus on the "always in focus" scanning laser projector used for peripheral display. The resulting family of displays significantly improves on the field-of-view, resolution, and form-factor tradeoff present in previous augmented reality designs. We show prototypes supporting 30, 40 and 60 cpd foveal resolution at a net 85° × 78° field of view per eye.
- G. Abadie. 2018. A Life of a Bokeh. SIGGRAPH Course: Advances in real-time rendering in games part 1.Google Scholar
- K. Akşit, W. Lopes, J. Kim, P. Shirley, and D. Luebke. 2017. Near-Eye Varifocal Augmented Reality Display using See-Through Screens. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH Asia.Google Scholar
- R. Albert, A. Patney, D. Luebke, and J. Kim. 2017. Latency requirements for foveated rendering in virtual reality. ACM TAP 14, 4 (2017). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Anstis. 1974. A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision research 14, 7 (1974).Google Scholar
- A. Bahill, M. Clark, and L. Stark. 1975. The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements. Mathematical Biosciences 24, 3--4 (1975).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. Baldwin. 1981. Area of interest: Instantaneous field of view vision model. In Image Generation/Display Conference.Google Scholar
- R. Baloh, A. Sills, W. Kumley, and Vi. Honrubia. 1975. Quantitative measurement of saccade amplitude, duration, and velocity. Neurology 25, 11 (1975).Google Scholar
- S. Bharadwaj and C. Schor. 2005. Acceleration characteristics of human ocular accommodation. Vision Research 45, 1 (2005).Google Scholar
- M. Bukowski, P. Hennessy, B. Osman, and M. McGuire. 2013. The Skylanders SWAP Force Depth-of-Field Shader. In GPU Pro 4: Advanced Rendering Techniques.Google Scholar
- O. Cakmakci and J. Rolland. 2006. Head-worn displays: a review. Journal of display technology 2, 3 (2006).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- F. Campbell and G. Westheimer. 1960. Dynamics of accommodation responses of the human eye. J. Physiol. 151, 2 (1960).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Cholewiak, G. Love, P. Srinivasan, R. Ng, and M. Banks. 2017. ChromaBlur: Rendering chromatic eye aberration improves accommodation and realism. ACM TOG 36, 6 (2017). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R. Cook, T. Porter, and L. Carpenter. 1984. Distributed Ray Tracing. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Magic Leap Corportation. 2019a. Magic Leap One Creator Edition. https://www.magicleap.com/magic-leap-one. Accessed: 2019-01-12.Google Scholar
- nReal Corportation. 2019b. nReal Light. https://www.nreal.ai/. Accessed: 2019-01-12.Google Scholar
- D. Dunn, C. Tippets, K. Torell, P. Kellnhofer, K. Akşit, P. Didyk, K. Myszkowski, D. Luebke, and H. Fuchs. 2017. Wide Field Of View Varifocal Near-Eye Display Using See-Through Deformable Membrane Mirrors. IEEE TVCG 23, 4 (2017). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. Elliott, K. Yang, and D. Whitaker. 1995. Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes: seeing beyond 6/6. Optometry and vis. science 72, 3 (1995).Google Scholar
- W. Fuhl, D. Geisler, T. Santini, T. Appel, W. Rosenstiel, and E. Kasneci. 2018. CBF: Circular Binary Features for Robust and Real-time Pupil Center Detection. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- W. Fuhl, T. Kübler, K. Sippel, W. Rosenstiel, and E. Kasneci. 2015. Excuse: Robust pupil detection in real-world scenarios. In Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns.Google Scholar
- W. Fuhl, T. Santini, G. Kasneci, W. Rosenstiel, and E.Kasneci. 2017. PupilNet v2.0: Convolutional Neural Networks for CPU based real time Robust Pupil Detection. CoRR abs/1711.00112 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00112Google Scholar
- Y. Gu and G. Legge. 1987. Accommodation to stimuli in peripheral vision. JOSA A 4, 8 (1987).Google Scholar
- B. Guenter, M. Finch, S. Drucker, D. Tan, and J. Snyder. 2012. Foveated 3D Graphics. ACM TOG 31, 6 (2012). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- P. Haeberli and K. Akeley. 1990. The Accumulation Buffer: Hardware Support for High-quality Rendering (Proc. of SIGGRAPH). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- G. Heron, W. Charman, and C. Schor. 2001. Dynamics of the accommodation response to abrupt changes in target vergence as a function of age. Vision Res. 41, 4 (2001).Google Scholar
- M.-L. Hsieh and K.Y. Hsu. 2001. Grating detuning effect on holographic memory in photopolymers. Optical Engineering 40, 10 (2001).Google Scholar
- X. Hu and H. Hua. 2014. High-resolution optical see-through multi-focal-plane head-mounted display using freeform optics. Optics Express 22, 11 (2014).Google Scholar
- H. Hua. 2017. Enabling Focus Cues in Head-Mounted Displays. Proc. IEEE 105, 5 (2017).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- H. Hua and B. Javidi. 2014. A 3D integral imaging optical see-through head-mounted display. Optics Express 22, 11 (2014).Google Scholar
- M. Ibbotson and S. Cloherty. 2009. Visual perception: saccadic omission, suppression or temporal masking? Current Biology 19, 12 (2009).Google Scholar
- C. Jang, K. Bang, G. Li, and B. Lee. 2018. Holographic near-eye display with expanded eye-box. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH Asia. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- C. Jang, K. Bang, S. Moon, J. Kim, S. Lee, and B. Lee. 2017. Retinal 3D: Augmented Reality Near-eye Display via Pupil-tracked Light Field Projection on Retina. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH Asia. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Kim, M. Stengel, A. Majercik, S. De Mello, S. Laine, M. McGuire, and D. Luebke. 2019. NVGaze: Low-Latency, Near-Eye Gaze Estimation with an Anatomically-Informed Dataset. In Proc. of CHI.Google Scholar
- J. Kim, Q. Sun, F. Huang, L. Wei, D. Luebke, and A. Kaufman. 2017. Perceptual Studies for Foveated Light Field Displays. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06034 (2017).Google Scholar
- S.-B. Kim and J.-H. Park. 2018. Optical see-through Maxwellian near-to-eye display with an enlarged eyebox. Optics Letters 43, 4 (2018).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- H. Kogelnik. 1969. Coupled wave theory for thick hologram gratings. Bell System Technical Journal 48, 9 (1969).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Koulieris, M.and Mantiuk R. Akşit, K.and Stengel, K. Mania, and C. Richardt. 2019. Near-Eye Display and Tracking Technologies for Virtual and Augmented Reality. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 38.Google Scholar
- B. Kress and W. Cummings. 2017. Towards the Ultimate Mixed Reality Experience: HoloLens Display Architecture Choices. In SID Symp. Digest of Technical Papers.Google Scholar
- G. Lee, J. Hong, S. Hwang, S. Moon, H. Kang, S. Jeon, J. Kim, H.and Jeong, and B. Lee. 2018b. Metasurface eyepiece for augmented reality. Nature comm. 9, 1 (2018).Google Scholar
- J. S. Lee, Y. K. Kim, M. Y. Lee, and Y. H. Won. 2019. Enhanced see-through near-eye display using time-division multiplexing of a Maxwellian-view and holographic display. Optics Express 27, 2 (2019).Google Scholar
- S. Lee, J. Cho, B. Lee, Y. Jo, C. Jang, D. Kim, and B. Lee. 2018a. Foveated retinal optimization for see-through near-eye multi-layer displays. IEEE Access 6 (2018).Google Scholar
- S. Lee, Y. Jo, D. Yoo, J. Cho, D. Lee, and B. Lee. 2018c. TomoReal: Tomographic Displays. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.04619 (2018).Google Scholar
- J. Lemley, A. Kar, A. Drimbarean, and P. Corcoran. 2018. Efficient CNN Implementation for Eye-Gaze Estimation on Low-Power/Low-Quality Consumer Imaging Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.10890 (2018).Google Scholar
- S. Liu, D. Cheng, and H. Hua. 2008. An optical see-through head mounted display with addressable focal planes. In Mixed and Augmented Reality. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Liu, H. Hua, and D. Cheng. 2010. A Novel Prototype for an Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display with Addressable Focus Cues. IEEE TVCG 16, 3 (2010). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- L. Loschky and G. Wolverton. 2007. How late can you update gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays without detection? ACM TOMM 3, 4 (2007). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Maimone, A. Georgiou, and J. Kollin. 2017. Holographic Near-eye Displays for Virtual and Augmented Reality. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Maimone, D. Lanman, K. Rathinavel, K. Keller, D. Luebke, and H. Fuchs. 2014. Pinlight Displays: Wide Field of View Augmented Reality Eyeglasses Using Defocused Point Light Sources. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4 (2014). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Mansouryar, J. Steil, Y. Sugano, and A. Bulling. 2016. 3d gaze estimation from 2d pupil positions on monocular head-mounted eye trackers. In Proc. of the Symp. on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- E. Matin. 1974. Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychological bulletin 81, 12 (1974).Google Scholar
- O. Mercier, Y. Sulai, K. Mackenzie, M. Zannoli, J. Hillis, D. Nowrouzezahrai, and D. Lanman. 2017. Fast Gaze-contingent Optimal Decompositions for Multifocal Displays. ACM TOG 36, 6 (2017). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- K. Miki, T. Nagamatsu, and D. Hansen. 2016. Implicit user calibration for gaze-tracking systems using kernel density estimation. In Proce. of the Symp. on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- G. Mlot, H. Bahmani, S. Wahl, and E. Kasneci. 2016. 3D Gaze Estimation using Eye Vergence.. In HEALTHINF. 125--131. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R. Narain, R. Albert, A. Bulbul, Gr. Ward, M. Banks, and J. O'Brien. 2015. Optimal presentation of imagery with focus cues on multi-plane displays. ACM TOG 34, 4 (2015). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Phillips, D. Shirachi, and L. Stark. 1972. Analysis of accommodative response times using histogram information. American Journal of Optometry 49, 5 (1972).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Reder. 1973. On-line monitoring of eye-position signals in contingent and noncontingent paradigms. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 5, 2 (1973).Google Scholar
- R. Rodieck. 1998. The first steps in seeing. Sinauer Associates Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
- J. Rolland, A. Yoshida, L. Davis, and J. Reif. 1998. High-resolution inset head-mounted display. Applied optics 37, 19 (1998).Google Scholar
- T. Santini, W. Fuhl, and E. Kasneci. 2017. CalibMe: Fast and Unsupervised Eye Tracker Calibration for Gaze-Based Pervasive Human-Computer Interaction. In Proc of CHI. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- K. Selgrad, C. Reintges, D. Penk, P. Wagner, and M. Stamminger. 2015. Real-time Depth of Field Using Multi-layer Filtering. In Proc of I3D. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Shenker. 1987. Optical design criteria for binocular helmet-mounted displays. In Display System Optics.Google Scholar
- L. Shi, F. Huang, W. Lopes, W. Matusik, and D. Luebke. 2017. Near-eye Light Field Holographic Rendering with Spherical Waves for Wide Field of View Interactive 3D Computer Graphics. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH Asia. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Shinya. 1994. Post-filtering for Depth of Field Simulation with Ray Distribution Buffer. In Proc. of Graphics Interface.Google Scholar
- T. Sousa. 2013. CryEngine3 Graphics Gems. SIGGRAPH Course: Advances in Real-Time Rendering Course.Google Scholar
- A Spooner. 1982. The trend towards area of interest in visual simulation technology. Technical Report. Naval Training Equipment Center Orlando FL.Google Scholar
- G. Tan, Y.-H. Lee, T. Zhan, J. Yang, S. Liu, D. Zhao, and S.-T. Wu. 2018. Foveated imaging for near-eye displays. Optics Express 26, 19 (2018).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- L. Thibos, D. Still, and A. Bradley. 1996. Characterization of spatial aliasing and contrast sensitivity in peripheral vision. Vision research 36, 2 (1996).Google Scholar
- M. Tonsen, J. Steil, Y. Sugano, and A. Bulling. 2017. InvisibleEye: Mobile Eye Tracking Using Multiple Low-Resolution Cameras and Learning-Based Gaze Estimation. In Proc. Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- B. Wang, K. Ciuffreda, and T. Irish. 2006. Equiblur zones at the fovea and near retinal periphery. Vision Research 46, 21 (2006).Google Scholar
- L. Xiao, A. Kaplanyan, A.r Fix, M. Chapman, and D. Lanman. 2018. DeepFocus: learned image synthesis for computational displays. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH Asia. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Y. Yang, H. Lin, Z. Yu, S. Paris, and Ji. Yu. 2016. Virtual DSLR: High Quality Dynamic Depth-of-Field Synthesis on Mobile Platforms. In Digital Phot. and Mob. Imaging.Google Scholar
- T. Zhan, Y. Lee, and S. Wu. 2018. High-resolution additive light field near-eye display by switchable Pancharatnam-Berry phase lenses. Optics Express 26, 4 (2018).Google Scholar
Index Terms
Foveated AR: dynamically-foveated augmented reality display
Recommendations
Electrostatic Tactile Display with Thin Film Slider and Its Application to Tactile Telepresentation Systems
A new electrostatic tactile display is proposed to realize compact tactile display devices that can be incorporated with virtual reality systems. The tactile display of this study consists of a thin conductive film slider with stator electrodes that ...
Requirements for Virtualization of AR Displays within VR Environments
Proceedings, Part I, of the 6th International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Designing and Developing Virtual and Augmented Environments - Volume 8525Everybody has been talking about new emerging products in augmented reality AR and their potential to enhance our daily life and work. The AR technology has been around for quite a while and various use cases have been thought and tested. Clearly, the ...
3D Tabletop AR: A Comparison of Mid-Air, Touch and Touch+Mid-Air Interaction
AVI '20: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual InterfacesThis paper contributes a first comparative study of three techniques for selecting 3D objects anchored to the table in tabletop Augmented Reality (AR). The impetus for this study is that touch interaction makes more sense when the targeted objects are ...





Comments