skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376709acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Red Alert: A Cognitive Countermeasure to Mitigate Attentional Tunneling

Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Attentional tunneling, that is the inability to detect unexpected changes in the environment, has been shown to have critical consequences in air traffic control. The motivation of this study was to assess the design of a cognitive countermeasure dedicated to mitigate such failure of attention. The Red Alert cognitive countermeasure relies on a brief orange-red flash (300 ms) that masks the entire screen with a 15% opacity. Twenty-two air traffic controllers faced two demanding scenarios, with or without the cognitive countermeasure. The volunteers were not told about the Red Alert so as to assess the intuitiveness of the design without prior knowledge. Behavioral results indicated that the cognitive countermeasure reduced reaction time and improved the detection of the notification when compared to the classical operational design. Further analyses showed this effect was even stronger for half of our participants (91.7% detection rate) who intuitively understood the purpose of this design.

References

  1. Ancman, E. I. L. E. E. N. 1991. Peripherally located CRTs: Color perception limitations. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1991 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference NAECON 1991 (pp. 960--965).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Aricò, P., Borghini, G., Di Flumeri, G., Colosimo, A., Bonelli, S., Golfetti, Pozzi, S., Imbert, J.P., Granger, G., Benhacene, R., & Babiloni, F.. 2016. Adaptive automation triggered by EEG-based mental workload index: a passive brain-computer interface application in realistic air traffic control environment. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 10, 539.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Athènes, S., Chatty, S., & Bustico, A. 2000. Human factors in ATC alarms and notifications design: an experimental evaluation. In Proceedings of the USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (pp. 1119--1134).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartram, L., Ware, C., & Calvert, T. 2001. Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction. In INTERACT (Vol. 1, pp. 157--165).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartwright-Finch, U., & Lavie, N. 2007. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition, 102, 321--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Claverie, B., Dubroca, M. C., Ripon, A., & Paty, J.1986. Etude psychophysiologique des processus attentionnels complexes des officiers contrôleurs de la Circulation Aérienne. Le Travail Humain, 249--260.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F.M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G.L., & Petersen. 1990. Attentional Modulation of Neural Processing of Shape, Color, and Velocity in Humans. Science 248.4962, 1556.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Crundall, D., Underwood, G., & Chapman, P. .1999. Driving experience and the functional field of view. Perception, 28(9), 1075--1087.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dehais, F., Tessier, C., & Chaudron, L. 2003. GHOST: experimenting conflicts countermeasures in the pilot's activity. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18, 163--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dehais, F., Causse, M., & Tremblay, S. .2011. Mitigation of Conflicts with Automation use of cognitive countermeasures. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(5), 448--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dehais, F., Hodgetts, H. M., Causse, M., Behrend, J., Durantin, G., & Tremblay, S.. 2019. Momentary lapse of control: A cognitive continuum approach to understanding and mitigating perseveration in human error. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Imbert, J.P., Hodgetts, H.M., Parise, R., Vachon, F., Dehais F., & Tremblay, S. 2014. Attentional costs and failures in air traffic control notifications. Ergonomics Vol. 57, No. 12, 1817--1832. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.952680Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Imbert, J.P., Hodgetts, H.M., Parise, R., Vachon, F., & Tremblay, S.. 2014. The LABY microworld: a platform for research, system engineering, and training in air traffic control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting vol. 58 no. 1 (pp. 1038--1042).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pappas, J.M., Fishel, S.R., Moss, J.D., Hicks, J.M., & Leech, T.D.. 2005. An eye-tracking approach to inattentional blindness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting vol. 49 no. 17 (pp. 1658--1662). doi: 10.1177/154193120504901734Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Plainis, S., Murray, I. J., & Chauhan, K.. 2001. Raised visual detection thresholds depend on the level of complexity of cognitive foveal loading. Perception, 30(10), 1203--1212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Regis, N., Dehais, F., Tessier, C., & Gagnon, J.F.. 2012. Ocular metrics for detecting attentional tunneling. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter Annual Meeting. Toulouse, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Regis, N., Dehais, F., Rachelson, E., Thooris, C., Pizziol, S., Causse, M., & Tessier, C.. 2014. Formal Detection of Attentional Tunneling in Human Operator--Automation Interactions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems (pp. 1--11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Richard, J.F.. 1980. L'attention. Paris : PUF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F.. 1999. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28, 1059--1074.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Vossel, S., Geng, J. J., & Fink, G. R.. 2014. Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. The Neuroscientist, 20(2), 150--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Wickens, C.D., & Alexander, A.L.2009. Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays. The international journal of aviation psychology, 19(2), 182--199. doi: 10.1080/10508410902766549Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Williams, L..- 1982. Cognitive load and the functional field of view. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 24(6), 683692.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Red Alert: A Cognitive Countermeasure to Mitigate Attentional Tunneling

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format