skip to main content
10.1145/3319502.3374785acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Closeness is Key over Long Distances: Effects of Interpersonal Closeness on Telepresence Experience

Published: 09 March 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Telepresence robots act as the remote embodiments of human operators, enabling people to stay connected to friends, family, and coworkers over lengthy physical separations. However, the factors affecting how humans can best make use of such systems are not yet well understood. This paper explores the effects of personalization and relationship closeness on telepresence via two studies. Study 1 was a between-participants experiment that investigated telepresence robot personalization. 32 pairs of friends (N = 64) participated in the study's team-building-style activities and answered questions about robot operator presence. The results unexpectedly indicated that relationship closeness influenced the interaction experience more than any other considered predictor variable. To study closeness more rigorously as the central manipulation, we conducted Study 2, a between-participants experiment with 24 pairs (N = 48) and a similar procedure. Robot operators who reported a closer relationship with their teammate felt more present in this investigation. These findings can inform the design and application of telepresence robot systems to increase a remote operator's feelings of presence via robot.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p499-fitter.mp4)

References

[1]
John Bell, William Cain, Amy Peterson, and Cui Cheng. 2016. From 2D to Kubi to Doubles: Designs for student telepresence in synchronous hybrid classrooms. International Journal of Designs for Learning, Vol. 7, 3 (2016).
[2]
Ellen Berscheid, Mark Snyder, and Allen M Omoto. 1989. The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, 5 (1989), 792.
[3]
Jan O Blom and Andrew F Monk. 2003. Theory of personalization of appearance: why users personalize their PCs and mobile phones. Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 18, 3 (2003), 193--228.
[4]
Charles E Case. 1992. Bumper stickers and car signs ideology and identity. The Journal of Popular Culture, Vol. 26, 3 (1992), 107--119.
[5]
Sheldon Cohen, Robin Mermelstein, Tom Kamarck, and Harry M Hoberman. 1985. Measuring the functional components of social support. In Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications. Springer, 73--94.
[6]
Allison Druin. 2009. Mobile technology for children: Designing for interaction and learning .Morgan Kaufmann.
[7]
Patrick M Eady and J Clayton Lafferty. 1974. The subarctic survival problem. Plymouth, Mich.: Experiential Learning Methods (1974).
[8]
Richard A Feinberg, Lisa Mataro, and W Jeffrey Burroughs. 1992. Clothing and social identity. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 11, 1 (1992), 18--23.
[9]
Deborah I Fels, Judith K Waalen, Shumin Zhai, and Patrice L Weiss. 2001. Telepresence under exceptional circumstances: Enriching the connection to school for sick children. In INTERACT. 617--624.
[10]
Naomi T Fitter, Yasmin Chowdhury, Elizabeth Cha, Leila Takayama, and Maja J Matarić. 2018. Evaluating the effects of personalized appearance on telepresence robots for education. In Companion of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) . 109--110.
[11]
Benjamin Gleason and Christine Greenhow. 2017. Hybrid learning in higher education: The potential of teaching and learning with robot-mediated communication. Online Learning, Vol. 21, 4 (2017).
[12]
Annica Kristoffersson, Silvia Coradeschi, and Amy Loutfi. 2013. A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2013 (2013), 3.
[13]
Min Kyung Lee and Leila Takayama. 2011. Now, I have a body: Uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 33--42.
[14]
Yap Lee-Xian and Bock Gilbert. 2006. Investigation of the effects of members' closeness size and IT in virtual communities: The social network perspective. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (2006), 526.
[15]
Dong Liu and Chia-chen Yang. 2016. Media niche of electronic communication channels in friendship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 21, 6 (2016), 451--466.
[16]
Carman Neustaedter, John Tang, Samarth Singhal, Rui Pan, Yasamin Heshmat, and Azadeh Forghani. 2016a. Shared Telepresence Robots at ACM CSCW 2016.
[17]
Carman Neustaedter, Gina Venolia, Jason Procyk, and Daniel Hawkins. 2016b. To Beam or not to Beam: A study of remote telepresence attendance at an academic conference. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 418--431.
[18]
Veronica Ahumada Newhart, Mark Warschauer, and Leonard Sender. 2016. Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Technologies in Learning, Vol. 23, 4 (2016), 2327--2686.
[19]
Gary M Olson and Judith S Olson. 2000. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 15, 2--3 (2000), 139--178.
[20]
Gary M Olson, Judith S Olson, and Gina Venolia. 2009. What still matters about distance? Proceedings of HCIC (2009).
[21]
Eric Paulos and John Canny. 1998. PRoP: Personal roving presence. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 296--303.
[22]
Irene Rae and Carman Neustaedter. 2017. Robotic telepresence at scale. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 313--324.
[23]
Irene Rae, Leila Takayama, and Bilge Mutlu. 2012. One of the gang: Supporting in-group behavior for embodied mediated communication. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) . 3091--3100.
[24]
Rabindra Ayyan Ratan and Béatrice Hasler. 2009. Self-presence standardized: Introducing the self-presence questionnaire (SPQ). In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Presence. Citeseer.
[25]
Stefan Stürmer, Toni A Ihme, Björn Fisseler, Katharina Sonnenberg, and Maria-Luisa Barbarino. 2018. Promises of structured relationship building for higher distance education: Evaluating the effects of a virtual fast-friendship procedure. Computers & Education, Vol. 124 (2018), 51--61.
[26]
Amanda Sullivan and Marina Umaschi Bers. 2017. Dancing robots: Integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore's early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education (2017), 1--22.
[27]
JaYoung Sung, Rebecca E Grinter, and Henrik I Christensen. 2009. Pimp my Roomba: Designing for personalization. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 193--196.
[28]
Manos Tsakiris, Matthew R Longo, and Patrick Haggard. 2010. Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 48, 9 (2010), 2740--2749.
[29]
Katherine M Tsui, Munjal Desai, Holly A Yanco, and Chris Uhlik. 2011. Exploring use cases for telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 11--18.
[30]
Gina Venolia, John Tang, Ruy Cervantes, Sara Bly, George Robertson, Bongshin Lee, and Kori Inkpen. 2010. Embodied social proxy: Mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 1049--1058.
[31]
Lillian Yang, Carman Neustaedter, and Thecla Schiphorst. 2017. Communicating through a telepresence robot: A study of long distance relationships. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3027--3033.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Integrating Function and Connection: Two Perspectives to Telepresence Robot Design for ClassroomCompanion Proceedings of the 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/3688828.3699633(9-14)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Facing LLMs: Robot Communication Styles in Mediating Health Information between Parents and Young AdultsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870368:CSCW2(1-37)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Navigating the Cyborg Classroom: Telepresence Robots, Accessibility Challenges, and Inclusivity in the ClassroomACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/367256917:2(1-21)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2020
690 pages
ISBN:9781450367462
DOI:10.1145/3319502
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 March 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. personalization
  2. relationship closeness
  3. remote presence
  4. telepresence robots

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

HRI '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)263
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Integrating Function and Connection: Two Perspectives to Telepresence Robot Design for ClassroomCompanion Proceedings of the 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/3688828.3699633(9-14)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Facing LLMs: Robot Communication Styles in Mediating Health Information between Parents and Young AdultsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870368:CSCW2(1-37)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Navigating the Cyborg Classroom: Telepresence Robots, Accessibility Challenges, and Inclusivity in the ClassroomACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/367256917:2(1-21)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Understanding the Career Mobility of Blind and Low Vision Software ProfessionalsProceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 17th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.1145/3641822.3641872(170-181)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Articulation work for supporting the values of students attending class via telepresence robotsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103318190(103318)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2023)Embodied Expressive Gestures in Telerobots: A Tale of Two UsersACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/357090812:2(1-20)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2023
  • (2023)"Who's that?"Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568294.3580090(287-291)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Does Robotic Telepresence Make the Classroom Accessible?Companion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563703.3596631(194-197)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Games and Play SIG: Connecting Through Social and Playful TechnologiesExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3583176(1-4)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Less Than Human: How Different Users of Telepresence Robots Expect Different Social Norms2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)10.1109/IROS55552.2023.10341962(3976-3982)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media