skip to main content
10.1145/3322276.3322298acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Vitro: Designing a Voice Assistant for the Scientific Lab Workplace

Published:18 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates whether voice assistants can play a useful role in the specialized work-life of the knowledge worker (in a biology lab). It is motivated both by promising advances in voice-input technology, and a long-standing vision in the community to augment scientific processes with voice-based agents. Through a reflection on our design process and a limited but fully functional prototype, Vitro, we find that scientists wanted a voice-enabled device that acted not a lab assistant, but lab equipment. Second, we discovered that such a device would need to be deeply embedded in the physical and social space in which it served scientists. Finally, we discovered that scientists preferred a device that supported their practice of "careful deviation" from protocols in their lab work. Through this research, we contribute implications for the design of voice-enabled systems in workplace settings.

References

  1. 2019a. HelixAI. (2019). https://www.askhelix.io/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2019b. NIH/3T3 (ATCC® CRL-1658). (2019). https://www.atcc.org/products/all/CRL-1658.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gregory D Abowd and Elizabeth D Mynatt. 2000. Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 1 (2000), 29--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Larry Arnstein, Chia Yang Hung, Robert Franza, Qing Hong Zhou, Gaetano Borriello, Sunny Consolvo, and Jing Su. 2002. Labscape: A smart environment for the cell biology laboratory . IEEE Pervasive Computing 1, 3 (2002), 13--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Barry Arons. 1991. Hyperspeech: Navigating in speech-only hypermedia. In Proceedings of the third annual ACM conference on Hypertext. ACM, 133--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jonas Austerjost, Marc Porr, Noah Riedel, Dominik Geier, Thomas Becker, Thomas Scheper, Daniel Marquard, Patrick Lindner, and Sascha Beutel. 2018. Introducing a Virtual Assistant to the Lab: A Voice User Interface for the Intuitive Control of Laboratory Instruments . SLAS Technology (2018), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vannevar Bush. 1945. As we may think . The Atlantic Monthly 176, 1 (1945), 101--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham Button, Jeff Coulter, John RE Lee, and Wes Sharrock. 1995. Computers, minds, and conduct. (1995). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Patrick Cahan and George Q Daley. 2013. Origins and implications of pluripotent stem cell variability and heterogeneity . Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 14, 6 (2013), 357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Praveen Chandar, Yasaman Khazaeni, Matthew Davis, Michael Muller, Marco Crasso, Q Vera Liao, N Sadat Shami, and Werner Geyer. 2017. Leveraging conversational systems to assists new hires during onboarding. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Janghee Cho and Janghee. 2018. Mental Models and Home Virtual Assistants (HVAs) . Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018), SRC05:1--SRC05:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Benjamin R Cowan, Nadia Pantidi, David Coyle, Kellie Morrissey, Peter Clarke, Sara Al-Shehri, David Earley, and Natasha Bandeira. 2017. "What Can I Help You with?": Infrequent Users' Experiences of Intelligent Personal Assistants. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43:1--43:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Scott Davidoff, Min Kyung Lee, Charles Yiu, John Zimmerman, and Anind K Dey. 2006. Principles of smart home control. In International conference on ubiquitous computing. Springer, 19--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Megan Rose Dickey. 2018. Now you can have a conversation with Alexa without screaming 'Hey, Alexa' for every request. (3 2018). https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/10/now-you-can-have-a-conversation-with-alexa-without-screaming-hey-alexa-for-every-request/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Stefan Etienne. 2018. Continued conversation is arriving for Google Home users today. (6 2018). https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/21/17486062/google-assistant-continued-conversations-home-max-mini-us-launchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerhard Fischer. 1993. Beyond human computer interaction: Designing useful and usable computational environments. People and Computers (1993), 17--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Markus Funk, Thomas Kosch, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2016. Interactive Worker Assistance: Comparing the Effects of In-situ Projection, Head-mounted Displays, Tablet, and Paper Instructions. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 934--939. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Verena Giller, Manfred Tscheligi, Reinhard Sefelin, Anu M"akel"a, Aapo Puskala, Kristiina Karvonen, and Victor Joseph. 1999. Maypole highlights: Image makers. Interactions 6, 6 (1999), 12--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Google. 2019. Conversation design. (2019). https://designguidelines.withgoogle.com/conversation/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. H Paul Grice. 1975. Logic and conversation . 1975 (1975), 41--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Grace Hu, Lily Chen, Johanna Okerlund, and Orit Shaer. 2015. Exploring the Use of Google Glass in Wet Laboratories . Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '15 (2015), 2103--2108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ruogu Kang, Laura Dabbish, Nathaniel Fruchter, and Sara Kiesler. 2015. "My data just goes everywhere": User mental models of the internet and implications for privacy and security . Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2015 (2015), 39--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rabia Khan and Antonella De Angeli. 2007. Mapping the demographics of virtual humans. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI... but not as we know it-Volume 2. BCS Learning & Development Ltd., 149--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sara Kiesler and Jennifer Goetz. 2002. Mental Models and Cooperation with Robotic Assistants . CHI'02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (2002), 576--577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Robert Kincaid and Graham Pollock. 2017. Nicky: Toward a Virtual Assistant for Test and Measurement Instrument Recommendations. In Semantic Computing (ICSC), 2017 IEEE 11th International Conference on. IEEE, 196--203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sara Kleinberg. 2018. 5 ways voice assistance is shaping consumer behavior . Thinking with Google (2018). https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/consumer-insights/voice-assistance-consumer-experience/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rafal Kocielnik, Daniel Avrahami, Jennifer Marlow, Di Lu, and Gary Hsieh. 2018. Designing for Workplace Reflection: A Chat and Voice-Based Conversational Agent . Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2018), 881--894.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Q Vera Liao, Matthew Davis, Werner Geyer, Michael Muller, and N Sadat Shami. 2016. What Can You Do? Studying Social-Agent Orientation and Agent Proactive Interactions with an Agent for Employees . Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16 (2016), 264--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Q. Vera Liao, Werner Geyer, Muhammed Mas-ud Hussain, Praveen Chandar, Matthew Davis, Yasaman Khazaeni, Marco Patricio Crasso, Dakuo Wang, Michael Muller, and N. Sadat Shami. 2018. All Work and No Play? Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18 (2018), 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Christoph Lipps, Franziska Klein, Tom Wahlicht, Virginia Seiffert, Milada Butueva, Jeannette Zauers, Theresa Truschel, Martin Luckner, Mario Kö ster, Roderick MacLeod, Jörn Pezoldt, Jochen Hü hn, Qinggong Yuan, Peter Paul Mü ller, Henning Kempf, Robert Zweigerdt, Oliver Dittrich-Breiholz, Thomas Pufe, Rainer Beckmann, Wolf Drescher, Jose Riancho, Carolina Sa n udo, Thomas Korff, Bertram Opalka, Vera Rebmann, Joachim R Gö thert, Paula M Alves, Michael Ott, Roland Schucht, Hansjörg Hauser, Dagmar Wirth, and Tobias May. 2018. Expansion of functional personalized cells with specific transgene combinations . Nature Communications 9, 1 (2018), 994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Gordon J Lithgow, Monica Driscoll, and Patrick Phillips. 2017. A long journey to reproducible results . Nature News 548, 7668 (2017), 387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Panagiotis Louridas. 1999. Design as bricolage: anthropology meets design thinking. Design Studies 20, 6 (1999), 517--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. "Like Having a Really Bad PA": The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents . Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16 (2016), 5286--5297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Michal Luria, Guy Hoffman, and Oren Zuckerman. 2017. Comparing Social Robot, Screen and Voice Interfaces for Smart-Home Control. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 580--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Carlos D Luzzani and Santiago G Miriuka. 2017. Pluripotent stem cells as a robust source of mesenchymal stem cells . Stem Cell Reviews and Reports 13, 1 (2017), 68--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Moira McGregor and John C Tang. 2017. More to Meetings: Challenges in Using Speech-Based Technology to Support Meetings. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2208--2220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Christine Murad, Cosmin Munteanu, Leigh Clark, and Benjamin R Cowan. 2018. Design Guidelines for Hands-free Speech Interaction. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 269--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Chelsea Myers, Jessica Nebolsky, Karina Caro, and Jichen Zhu. 2018. Patterns for How Users Overcome Obstacles in Voice User Interfaces . (2018), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Kenneth Olmstead. 2017. Nearly half of Americans use digital voice assistants, mostly on their smartphones . Technical Report. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/12/nearly-half-of-americans-use-digital-voice-assistants-mostly-on-their-smartphones/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharon Oviatt, Colin Swindells, and Alex Arthur. 2008. Implicit user-adaptive system engagement in speech and pen interfaces . Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08 4 (2008), 969. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sabine Payr. 2013. Virtual butlers and real people: styles and practices in long-term use of a companion. In Your Virtual Butler. Springer, 134--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Sara Perez. 2017. Voice-enabled smart speakers to reach 55% of U.S. households by 2022, says report . TechCrunch (2017). https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/08/voice-enabled-smart-speakers-to-reach-55-of-u-s-households-by-2022-says-report/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2015. Making multiple uses of the obscura 1C digital camera: reflecting on the design, production, packaging and distribution of a counterfunctional device. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2103--2112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Michael Polanyi. 2009. The tacit dimension . University of Chicago press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin Porcheron, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sarah Sharples. 2018. Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life . Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18 (2018), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Philipp M Scholl, Embedded Systems, Matthias Wille, Unit Human Factors, Health Dortmund, Kristof Van Laerhoven, and Embedded Systems. 2015. Wearables in the Wet Lab: A Laboratory System for Capturing and Guiding Experiments . Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (2015), 589--599. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Alex Sciuto, Arnita Saini, Jodi Forlizzi, and Jason I Hong. 2018. "Hey Alexa, What's Up?": A Mixed-Methods Studies of In-Home Conversational Agent Usage . Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 - DIS '18 (2018), 857--868.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Ben Shneiderman. 2000. The limits of speech recognition . Commun. ACM 43, 9 (2000), 63--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Aaron Springer and Henriette Cramer. 2018. "Play PRBLMS": Identifying and Correcting Less Accessible Content in Voice Interfaces . (2018), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Cal Swann. 2002. Action research and the practice of design. Design issues 18, 1 (2002), 49--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Aurélien Tabard, Juan-David Hincapié -Ramos, Morten Esbensen, and Jakob E Bardram. 2011. The eLabBench: an interactive tabletop system for the biology laboratory . Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces - ITS '11 (2011), 202--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Alexandra Vtyurina and Adam Fourney. 2018. Exploring the Role of Conversational Cues in Guided Task Support with Virtual Assistants. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 208:1--208:7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Alex C. Williams, Harmanpreet Kaur, Gloria Mark, Anne L. Thompson, Shamsi Iqbal, and Jaime Teevan. 2018. Supporting Workplace Detachment and Reattachment using Conversational Intelligence . Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18 (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Leslie Wu, Jesse Cirimele, Kristen Leach, Stuart Card, Larry Chu, T Kyle Harrison, and Scott R Klemmer. 2014. Supporting crisis response with dynamic procedure aids. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, 315--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. N Yankelovich, G-A Levow, and Matt Marx. 1995. Designing SpeechActs: Issues in Speech User Interfaces . Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (1995), 369--376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. R Yeh, Chunyuan Liao, and S Klemmer. 2006. ButterflyNet: a mobile capture and access system for field biology research . Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2006), 571--580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Xianjun Sam Zheng, Cedric Foucault, Patrik da Silva, Siddharth Dasari, Tao Yang, and Stuart Goose. 2015. Eye-Wearable Technology for Machine Maintenance: Effects of Display Position and Hands-free Operation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2125--2134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. John Zimmerman and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Research through design in HCI. In Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, 167--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI . Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '07 (2007), 493. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. John Zimmerman, Erik Stolterman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 310--319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Vitro: Designing a Voice Assistant for the Scientific Lab Workplace

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DIS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        June 2019
        1628 pages
        ISBN:9781450358507
        DOI:10.1145/3322276

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        DIS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate105of415submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

        Upcoming Conference

        DIS '24
        Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 1 - 5, 2024
        Copenhagen , Denmark

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader