skip to main content
10.1145/3323994.3369897acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract
Free Access

GROUP4Good: Exploring Positive Impacts of GROUP Research

Published:06 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In conducting research, one typically considers the potential harms associated with the research and how to minimize or mitigate the negative impacts thus leaving less time to consider designing for optimized benefits. The definition of positive impact relies heavily on the situational power structures, culture, and social norms of the given community. This workshop will give researchers across the GROUP community the opportunity to explore how we might design or use technologies to maximize wider societal benefits.

References

  1. EPS Baumer, J Burrell, MG Ames, JR Brubaker, and P Dourish. 2015. On the Importance and Implications of Studying Technology Non-use. Interactions 22, 2: 52--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. EPS Baumer, X Xu, C Chu, S Guha, and GK Gay. 2017. When Subjects Interpret the Data: Social Media Non-use as a Case for Adapting the Delphi Method to CSCW. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW), 1527--1543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L Blackwell, M Handel, S Roberts, A Bruckman, and Kimberly Voll. 2018. Understanding " Bad Actors " Online. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18), W21, 7 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S Bryant, A Forte, and A Bruckman. 2005. Becoming Wikipedian?: Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia. In Proceedings of 2005 ACM GROUP, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N Dell, V Vaidyanathan, I Medhi, E Cutrell, and W Thies. 2012. "Yours is better!": participant response bias in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 1321--1330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M Devito, A Marie Walker, J Birnholtz, K Ringland, K Macapagal, A Kraus, S Munson, C Liang, and H Saksono. 2019. Social Technologies for Digital Wellbeing Among Marginalized Communities. In Proccedings of the 2019 Computer Supported and Cooperative Work and Social Computing Conference (CSCW '19), In process.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C Fiesler, J Brubaker, A Forte, S Guha, N McDonald, and M Muller. 2019. Qualitative Research Methods for CSCW: Challenge and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Conference (CSCW '19), In process.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C Fiesler, S Chancellor, AL Hoffmann, J Pater, and N Proferes. 2016. Challenges and Futures for Ethical Social Media Research. In AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C Fiesler, A Young, T Peyton, A Bruckman, M Gray, J Hancock, and W Lutters. 2015. Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World. In roceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion), 289--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B Hecht, L. Wilcox, J.P. Bigham, J. Schöning, E. Hoque, J. Ernst, Y. Bisk, L. De Russis, L. Yarosh, B. Anjum, D. Contractor, and C Wu. 2018. It's Time to Do Something: Mitigating the Negative Impacts of Computing Through a Change to the Peer Review Process. CM Future of Computing Blog.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T Peyton. 2014. Pregnancy Ecologies As Teachable Moments For The Lifecourse: Changing The mHealth Design Paradigm. In In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '14), 269--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P Wisniewski, J Vitak, Xinru Page, Bart Knijenburg, Yang Wang, and Casey Fiesler. 2017. In Whose Best Interest?? Exploring the Real , Potential , and Imagined Ethical Concerns in Privacy-Focused Agenda. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17 Companion), 377--382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. GROUP4Good: Exploring Positive Impacts of GROUP Research

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GROUP '20: Companion Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
      January 2020
      168 pages
      ISBN:9781450367677
      DOI:10.1145/3323994

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 January 2020

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader