skip to main content
research-article

SAPIENS: Towards Software Architecture to Support Peripheral Interaction in Smart Environments

Published:13 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We present SAPIENS, a software architecture designed to support engineering of interactive systems featuring peripheral interaction in the context of smart environments. SAPIENS introduces dedicated components for user and device tracking, attention detection, priority management for devices, tasks, and notifications, context-awareness inference, user interruptibility prediction, and device interchangeability that can be instantiated at will according to the needs of the application. To implement these components effectively, SAPIENS employs event-based processing by reusing the core engine of a recently introduced software architecture, Euphoria (Schipor et al., 2019), that was specifically designed for engineering interactions in smart environments with heterogeneous I/O devices, and relies entirely on web standards, protocols, and open data-interchange formats, such as JavaScript, WebSockets, HTTP, and JSON. This inheritance makes SAPIENS flexible and adaptable to support implementation of diverse application scenarios for peripheral interaction and for a wide variety of smart environments, devices, platforms, data formats, and contexts of use. We present our design criteria for SAPIENS regarding (1) event handling techniques, (2) quality, (3) contextual, and (4) attention-related properties, and describe its components and dataflows that make SAPIENS a specialized software architecture for peripheral interaction scenarios. We also demonstrate SAPIENS with a practical application, inspired and adapted from Bakker's (2013) classical example for peripheral interaction, for which we provide an online simulation tool that researchers and practitioners can readily use to consult actual JavaScript code implementing the inner logic of selected components of our architecture as well as to observe live JSON messages exchanged by the various components of SAPIENS.

References

  1. Gregory D. Abowd, Anind K. Dey, Peter J. Brown, Nigel Davies, Mark Smith, and Pete Steggles. 1999. Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 304--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hamed S. Alavi and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2012. An Ambient Awareness Tool for Supporting Supervised Collaborative Problem Solving. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., Vol. 5, 3 (Jan. 2012), 264--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Erik van Alphen and Saskia Bakker. 2016. Lernanto: Using an Ambient Display During Differentiated Instruction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2334--2340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jorge Alves Lino, Benjamin Salem, and Matthias Rauterberg. 2010. Responsive environments: User experiences for ambient intelligence. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, Vol. 2, 4 (2010), 347--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Juan Carlos Augusto. 2007. Ambient Intelligence: The Confluence of Ubiquitous/Pervasive Computing and Artificial Intelligence .Springer, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Juan Carlos Augusto, H. Nakashima, and H. Aghajan. 2010. Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments: A State of the Art .Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Saskia Bakker. 2013. Design for peripheral interaction. Eindhoven University of Technology (2013). http://www.saskiabakker.com/PhDthesis_SaskiaBakker.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Saskia Bakker, Doris Hausen, and Ted Selker. 2016. Introduction: Framing peripheral interaction. In Peripheral Interaction. Springer, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Saskia Bakker, Elise Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2015. Peripheral interaction: Characteristics and considerations. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 19, 1 (2015), 239--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Saskia Bakker and Karin Niemantsverdriet. 2016. The interaction-attention continuum: considering various levels of human attention in interaction design. International Journal of Design, Vol. 10, 2 (2016), 1--14. http://ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2341/737Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Saskia Bakker, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2013. FireFlies: Physical Peripheral Interaction Design for the Everyday Routine of Primary School Teachers. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Saskia Bakker, Elise van den Hoven, Berry Eggen, and Kees Overbeeke. 2012. Exploring Peripheral Interaction Design for Primary School Teachers. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 245--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Norbert Baumgartner, Wolfgang Gottesheim, Stefan Mitsch, Werner Retschitzegger, and Wieland Schwinger. 2010. Editorial: BeAware!-Situation Awareness, the Ontology-driven Way. Data Knowl. Eng., Vol. 69, 11 (Nov. 2010), 1181--1193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. John N.A. Brown. 2014. Unifying interaction across distributed controls in a smart environment using anthropology-based computing to make human-computer interaction "Calm". (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Yaliang Chuang, Lin-Lin Chen, and Yoga Liu. 2018. Design Vocabulary for Human--IoT Systems Communication. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Diane Cook and Sajal Das. 2004. Smart Environments: Technology, Protocols and Applications (Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed Computing) .Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Diane J Cook, Juan C Augusto, and Vikramaditya R Jakkula. 2009. Ambient intelligence: Technologies, applications, and opportunities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, Vol. 5, 4 (2009), 277--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Anind K. Dey. 2001. Understanding and Using Context. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., Vol. 5, 1 (Jan. 2001), 4--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Krista M. Dombroviak and Rajiv Ramnath. 2007. A Taxonomy of Mobile and Pervasive Applications. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1609--1615. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Antonio Fernández-Caballero, Arturo Mart'inez-Rodrigo, José Manuel Pastor, José Carlos Castillo, Elena Lozano-Monasor, Mar'ia T López, Roberto Zangróniz, José Miguel Latorre, and Alicia Fernández-Sotos. 2016. Smart environment architecture for emotion detection and regulation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 64 (2016), 55--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. George H. Forman and John Zahorjan. 1994. The Challenges of Mobile Computing. Computer, Vol. 27, 4 (April 1994), 38--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Giancarlo Fortino, Daniele Parisi, Vincenzo Pirrone, and Giuseppe Di Fatta. 2014. BodyCloud: A SaaS Approach for Community Body Sensor Networks. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., Vol. 35 (June 2014), 62--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Bogdan-Florin Gheran, Jean Vanderdonckt, and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2018. Gestures for Smart Rings: Empirical Results, Insights, and Design Implications. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 623--635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Giuseppe Ghiani, Marco Manca, and Fabio Paternò. 2015. Authoring context-dependent cross-device user interfaces based on trigger/action rules. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, 313--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Milind S. Gide and Lina J. Karam. 2017. Computational Visual Attention Models. Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing, Vol. 10, 4 (2017), 347--427.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sylvain Giroux, Tatjana Leblanc, Abdenour Bouzouane, Bruno Bouchard, Hélène Pigot, and Jérémy Bauchet. 2009. The Praxis of Cognitive Assistance in Smart Homes. In Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, volume 3: Behaviour Monitoring and Interpretation. 183--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Christos Goumopoulos, Achilles Kameas, and Patras Hellas. 2009. Smart objects as components of ubicomp applications. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Vol. 4, 3 (2009). http://www.sersc.org/journals/IJMUE/vol4_no3_2009/1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Saul Greenberg, Nicolai Marquardt, Till Ballendat, Rob Diaz-Marino, and Miaosen Wang. 2011. Proxemic Interactions: The New Ubicomp? Interactions, Vol. 18, 1 (Jan. 2011), 42--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Robert P. Hawkins, Suzanne Pingree, Jacqueline Hitchon, Barry Radler, Bradley W. Gorham, Leeann Kahlor, Eilleen Gilligan, Ronald C. Serlin, Toni Schmidt, Prathana Kannaovakun, and Gudbjorg Hildur Kolbeins. 2006. What Produces Television Attention and Attention Style? Human Communication Research, Vol. 31, 1 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Marigo Heijboer, Elise Hoven, Bert Bongers, and Saskia Bakker. 2016. Facilitating Peripheral Interaction: Design and Evaluation of Peripheral Interaction for a Gesture-based Lighting Control with Multimodal Feedback. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., Vol. 20, 1 (Feb. 2016), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sumi Helal, William Mann, Hicham El-Zabadani, Jeffrey King, Youssef Kaddoura, and Erwin Jansen. 2005. The Gator Tech Smart House: A programmable pervasive space. Computer 3 (2005), 50--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Laurent Itti. 2000. Models of Bottom-up and Top-down Visual Attention. Ph.D. Dissertation. Pasadena, CA, USA. Advisor(s) Koch, Christof. https://thesis.library.caltech.edu/4722/ AAI9972609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Jae Yeol Lee, Min Seok Kim, Dong Woo Seo, Sang Min Lee, and Jae Sung Kim. 2012. Smart and Space-aware Interactions Using Smartphones in a Shared Space. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Companion (MobileHCI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 53--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Vicon Motion Systems Limited. 2019. Vicon Motion Capture. https://www.vicon.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaime Lloret, Alejandro Canovas, Sandra Sendra, and Lorena Parra. 2015. A smart communication architecture for ambient assisted living. IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 53, 1 (2015), 26--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Logbar. 2015. Ring ZERO | Shortcut anything. https://web.archive.org/web/20170511131824/http://ringzero.logbar.jp/ Retrieved April 18, 2019 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. J. Maisonnasse, N. Gourier, O. Brdiczka, P. Reignier, and J. L. Crowley. 2006. Detecting privacy in attention aware system. In Proceedings of the 2nd IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE '06), Vol. 2. 231--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sathiya Kumaran Mani, Ramakrishnan Durairajan, Paul Barford, and Joel Sommers. 2018. An Architecture for IoT Clock Synchronization. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things (IOT '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, bibinfonumpages8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Steve Mann. 1997. Wearable Computing: A First Step Toward Personal Imaging. Computer, Vol. 30, 2 (Feb. 1997), 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Alexander Mariakakis, Mayank Goel, Md Tanvir Islam Aumi, Shwetak N. Patel, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2015. SwitchBack: Using Focus and Saccade Tracking to Guide Users' Attention for Mobile Task Resumption. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2953--2962. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nicolai Marquardt, Robert Diaz-Marino, Sebastian Boring, and Saul Greenberg. 2011. The Proximity Toolkit: Prototyping Proxemic Interactions in Ubiquitous Computing Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 315--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Andrii Matviienko, Sebastian Horwege, Lennart Frick, Christoph Ressel, and Susanne Boll. 2016. CubeLendar: Design of a Tangible Interactive Event Awareness Cube. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2601--2608. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Microsoft. 2017. Kinect for Windows 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8. Skeleton Class. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.kinect.skeleton.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Irina Mocanu, Ovidiu-Andrei Schpor, Bogdan Cramariuc, and Lucia Rusu. 2017. [email protected]: A Smart Home Platform for Enhancing the Elderly Mobility. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 17, 4 (2017), 19--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Meredith Ringel Morris. 2012. Web on the Wall: Insights from a Multimodal Interaction Elicitation Study. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. MyGaze. 2019. myGaze eye tracker. http://www.mygaze.com/products/mygaze-eye-tracker/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Alfredo Navarra, Cristina M. Pinotti, Mario Francesco, and Sajal K. Das. 2015. Interference-free Scheduling with Minimum Latency in Cluster-based Wireless Sensor Networks. Wirel. Netw., Vol. 21, 7 (Oct. 2015), 2395--2411. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Michael Nebeling, Elena Teunissen, Maria Husmann, and Moira C. Norrie. 2014. XDKinect: Development Framework for Cross-device Interaction Using Kinect. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 65--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. North. 2019. Getting started with your Myo armband. https://support.getmyo.com/hc/en-us/articles/203398347-Getting-started-with-your-Myo-armband Retrieved April 18, 2019 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Bogdan Pogorelc, Artur Lugmayr, Bjorn Stockleben, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Nina Tahmasebi, Estefania Serral, Emilija Stojmenova, Bojan Imperl, Thomas Risse, Gideon Zenz, and Matjaz Gams. 2013. Ambient Bloom: New Business, Content, Design and Models to Increase the Semantic Ambient Media Experience. Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 66, 1 (2013), 7--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Bogdan Pogorelc, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Artur Lugmayr, Björn Stockleben, Thomas Risse, Juha Kaario, Estefania Constanza Lomonaco, and Matjavz Gams. 2012. Semantic ambient media: From ambient advertising to ambient-assisted living. Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 58, 2 (May 2012), 399--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Irina Popovici, Ovidiu-Andrei Schipor, and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2019. Hover: Exploring cognitive maps and mid-air pointing for television control. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 129 (2019), 95--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Robbie Schaefer and Wolfgang Mueller. 2003. Multimodal interactive user interfaces for mobile multi-device environments. In Workshop Multi-Device Interfaces for Ubiquitous Peripheral Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Ovidiu-Andrei Schipor, Stefan-Gheorghe Pentiuc, and Maria-Doina Schipor. 2011. Towards a multimodal emotion recognition framework to be integrated in a Computer Based Speech Therapy System. In 2011 6th Conference on Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue (SpeD). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Ovidiu-Andrei Schipor, Stefan-Gheorghe Pentiuc, and Maria-Doina Schipor. 2012. Toward Automatic Recognition of Children's Affective State Using Physiological Parameters and Fuzzy Model of Emotions. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 12, 2 (2012), 47--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Ovidiu-Andrei Schipor, Doina-Maria Schipor, Emilia Crismariu, and Stefan-Gheorghe Pentiuc. 2011. Finding key emotional states to be recognized in a computer based speech therapy system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 30 (2011), 1177--1182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Ovidiu-Andrei Schipor and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2018. Invisible, Inaudible, and Impalpable: Users' Preferences and Memory Performance for Digital Content in Thin Air. IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 17, 4 (2018), 76--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Ovidiu-Andrei Schipor, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2019. Euphoria: A Scalable, event-driven architecture for designing interactions across heterogeneous devices in smart environments. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 109 (May 2019), 43--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Teddy Seyed, Alaa Azazi, Edwin Chan, Yuxi Wang, and Frank Maurer. 2015. Sod-toolkit: A toolkit for interactively prototyping and developing multi-sensor, multi-device environments. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces. ACM, 171--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. StackOverflow. 2018. Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2018. https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2018#technology-programming-languagesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Cristian Andy Tua nase, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Stefan-Gheorghe Pentiuc, and Adrian Graur. 2008. Detecting and tracking multiple users in the proximity of interactive tabletops. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 8, 15 (2008), 61--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Peter Tolmie, James Pycock, Tim Diggins, Allan MacLean, and Alain Karsenty. 2002. Unremarkable Computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 399--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Sandra Trullemans, Lars Van Holsbeeke, and Beat Signer. 2017. The context modeling toolkit: A unified multi-layered context modeling approach. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, EICS (2017), 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2012a. Presence Bubbles: Supporting and Enhancing Human-Human Interaction with Ambient Media. Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 58, 2 (2012), 371--383. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2012b. User-defined Gestures for Free-hand TV Control. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (EuroITV '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 45--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2013. On Designing Interactivity Awareness for Ambient Displays. Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 66, 1 (2013), 59--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2015. Audience Silhouettes: Peripheral Awareness of Synchronous Audience Kinesics for Social Television. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2017. Smart-Pockets: Body-Deictic Gestures for Fast Access to Personal Data during Ambient Interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 103, C (July 2017), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Ionut-Alexandru Zaiti. 2014. Leap Gestures for TV: Insights from an Elicitation Study. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Jo Vermeulen, Steven Houben, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2016. Fluent Transitions Between Focused and Peripheral Interaction in Proxemic Interactions. In Peripheral Interaction. Springer, 137--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive Public Ambient Displays: Transitioning from Implicit to Explicit, Public to Personal, Interaction with Multiple Users. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Emily Vraga, Leticia Bode, and Sonya Troller-Renfree. 2016. Beyond self-reports: Using eye tracking to measure topic and style differences in attention to social media content. Communication Methods and Measures, Vol. 10, 2--3 (2016), 149--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Florian Wahl, Martin Freund, and Oliver Amft. 2015. WISEglass: Smart Eyeglasses Recognising Context. In Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Body Area Networks (BodyNets '15). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, 11--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Miaosen Wang, Sebastian Boring, and Saul Greenberg. 2012. Proxemic Peddler: A Public Advertising Display That Captures and Preserves the Attention of a Passerby. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, bibinfonumpages6 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Mark Weiser. 1999. The Computer for the 21st Century. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., Vol. 3, 3 (July 1999), 3--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1997. The coming age of calm technology. In Beyond calculation. Springer, 75--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2009. User-defined Gestures for Surface Computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1083--1092. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SAPIENS: Towards Software Architecture to Support Peripheral Interaction in Smart Environments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!