Abstract
Biological networks analysis has become a systematic and large-scale phenomenon. Most biological systems are often difficult to interpret due to the complexity of relationships and structural features. Moreover, existing primarily web-based interfaces for biological networks analysis often have limitations in usability as well as in supporting high-level reasoning and collaboration. Interactive surfaces coupled with tangible interactions offer opportunities to improve the comparison and analysis of large biological networks, which can aid researchers in making hypotheses and forming insights. We present Tangible BioNets, an active tangible and multi-surface system that allows users with diverse expertise to explore and understand the structural and functional aspects of biological organisms individually or collaboratively. The system was designed through an iterative co-design process and facilitates the exploration of biological network topology, catalyzing the generation of new insights. We describe a first informal evaluation with expert users and discuss considerations for designing tangible and multi-surface systems for large biological datasets.
- Al-Megren, S., & Ruddle, R. A. (2016, February). Comparing tangible and multi-touch interaction for interactive data visualization tasks. In Proceedings of the TEI'16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 279--286). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Andrews, C., Endert, A., & North, C. (2010, April). Space to think: large high-resolution displays for sense-making. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 55--64). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Arif, A. S., Manshaei, R., Delong, S., East, B., Kyan, M., & Mazalek, A. (2016, February). Sparse Tangibles: Collaborative exploration of gene networks using active tangibles and interactive tabletops. In Proceedings of the TEI'16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 287--295). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ball, R., North, C., & Bowman, D. A. (2007, April). Move to improve: promoting physical navigation to increase user performance with large displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 191--200). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Barabási, A. L. (2016). Network science. Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bi, X., & Balakrishnan, R. (2009, April). Comparing usage of a large high-resolution display to single or dual desktop displays for daily work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1005--1014). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., & DeRose, T. D. (1993, September). Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface. In Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 73--80). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Catalá, A., Garcia-Sanjuan, F., Jaen, J., & Mocholi, J. A. (2012). TangiWheel: a widget for manipulating collections on tabletop displays supporting hybrid input modality. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 27(4), 811--829.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Czerwinski, M., Smith, G., Regan, T., Meyers, B., Robertson, G. G., & Starkweather, G. K. (2003). Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. In Interact (Vol. 3, pp. 9--16).Google Scholar
- East, B., DeLong, S., Manshaei, R., Arif, A., & Mazalek, A. (2016, November). Actibles: open source active tangibles. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (pp. 469--472). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Emmert-Streib, F. (2012). Limitations of gene duplication models: Evolution of modules in protein interaction networks. PloS one, 7(4), e35531.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Grote, C., Segreto, E., Okerlund, J., Kincaid, R., & Shaer, O. (2015, January). Eugenie: Multi-touch and tangible interaction for bio-design. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 217--224). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hearst, M. A. (2014). What's missing from collaborative search? Computer, 47(3), 58--61. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Holmquist, L.E., Redström, J., & Ljungstrand, P. (1999). Token-based access to digital information. Proc. First Int. Symp. Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, HUC '99, pp. 234--245. Karlsruhe, Germany: Springer--Verlag. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kairam, S., MacLean, D., Savva, M., & Heer, J. (2012, May). GraphPrism: compact visualization of network structure. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 498--505). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kozlikova, B., Krone, M., Lindow, N., Falk, M., Baaden, M., Baum, D., ... & Hege, H. C. (2015, April). Visualization of biomolecular structures: State of the art. In Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis)-STARs (pp. 061-081). The Eurographics Association.Google Scholar
- Lehner, B. (2011). Molecular mechanisms of epistasis within and between genes. Trends in Genetics, 27(8), 323--331.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Liu, C., Chapuis, O., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Lecolinet, E., & Mackay, W. E. (2014, April). Effects of display size and navigation type on a classification task. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 4147--4156). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mirel, B. (2009). Supporting cognition in systems biology analysis: findings on users' processes and design implications. Journal of Biomedical discovery and Collaboration, 4(1), 2.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Okerlund, J., Segreto, E., Grote, C., Westendorf, L., Scholze, A., Littrell, R., & Shaer, O. (2016, February). Synflo: A tangible museum exhibit for exploring bio-design. In Proceedings of the TEI'16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 141--149). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Pavlopoulos, G. A., Malliarakis, D., Papanikolaou, N., Theodosiou, T., Enright, A. J., & Iliopoulos, I. (2015). Visualizing genome and systems biology: technologies, tools, implementation techniques and trends, past, present and future. Giga Science, 4(1), 38.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Reda, K., Johnson, A. E., Papka, M. E., & Leigh, J. (2015, April). Effects of display size and resolution on user behavior and insight acquisition in visual exploration. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2759--2768). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Shaer, O., Mazalek, A., Ullmer, B., & Konkel, M. (2013, February). From big data to insights: opportunities and challenges for TEI in genomics. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (pp. 109--116). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Shaer, O., Kol, G., Strait, M., Fan, C., Grevet, C., & Elfenbein, S. (2010, April). G-nome surfer: a tabletop interface for collaborative exploration of genomic data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1427--1436). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Stark, C., Breitkreutz, B. J., Reguly, T., Boucher, L., Breitkreutz, A., & Tyers, M. (2006). BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic acids research, 34(suppl_1), D535-D539.Google Scholar
- Valdes, C., Eastman, D., Grote, C., Thatte, S., Shaer, O., Mazalek, A., ... & Konkel, M. K. (2014, April). Exploring the design space of gestural interaction with active tokens through user-defined gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4107--4116). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Van Steen, K. (2011). Travelling the world of gene--gene interactions. Briefings in bioinformatics, 13(1), 1--19.Google Scholar
- Veretnik, S., Fink, J. L., & Bourne, P. E. (2008). Computational biology resources lack persistence and usability. PLoS computational biology, 4(7), e1000136.Google Scholar
- Yost, B., Haciahmetoglu, Y., & North, C. (2007, April). Beyond visual acuity: the perceptual scalability of information visualizations for large displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 101--110). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
Tangible BioNets: Multi-Surface and Tangible Interactions for Exploring Structural Features of Biological Networks
Recommendations
Tangible Tensors: An Interactive System for Grasping Trends in Biological Systems Modeling
C&C '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and CognitionAdvances in biology and computational power have led to the availability of large biological data sets, yet these advances raise new design challenges. Designers must build effective tools that cater to the needs of biologists and data scientists in ...
Tangible mtDNA: A Tangible Tabletop System for Exploring Genetic Mutations on Mitochondrial DNA Cancer Data
TEI '17: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionRapid growth in the volume of cancer DNA sequencing data has not been matched by an increase in our ability to understand, explore, and interpret this data. There is a need for new tools that can enhance analyses in order to enable us to interpret the ...
Tangible Chromatin: Tangible and Multi-surface Interactions for Exploring Datasets from High-Content Microscopy Experiments
In biology, microscopy data from thousands of individual cellular events presents challenges for analysis and problem solving. These include a lack of visual analysis tools to complement algorithmic approaches for tracking important but rare cellular ...






Comments