10.1145/3334480.3381056acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedings
abstract

Collaborative Learning & Co-Creation in XR

ABSTRACT

In this SIG, we aim at gathering researchers and practitioners to reflect on using XR technologies to support collaborative learning and co-creation, and to foster a joint force by connecting the Learning and Education community and the XR community at CHI. We witness a significant increase in CHI publications relating to these research areas: 292 titles about "collaborative learning" or "co-creation" since 2015 compared to 96 in 2010-2014; and 1180 titles about XR since 2015 compared to 288 in 2010-2014. This SIG will bring together researchers, educators, designers and practitioners to 1) stimulate a cross-disciplinary discussion on the opportunities of collaborative learning and co-creation in XR; 2) foresee the future directions, standards and obstacles to introduce XR to education; and 3) build a joint community connecting XR and education research at CHI.

References

  1. T.J. Bacile, C. Ye, and E. Swilley. 2014. From firm-controlled to consumer-contributed: Consumer co-production of personal media marketing communication. Journal of Interactive Marketing 28, 2 (2014), 117--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. Bovill, A. Cook-Sather, and P. Felten. 2011. Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development 16, 2 (2011), 133--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Å. Fast-Berglund, L. Gong, and D. Li. 2018. Testing and validating extended reality (xR) technologies in manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing 25 (2018), 31--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. H.S. Ferdous, T. Hoang, Z. Joukhadar, M. N. Reinoso, F. Vetere, D. Kelly, and L. Remedios. 2019. " What's Happening at that Hip?": Evaluating an On-body Projection based Augmented Reality System for Physiotherapy Classroom. In Proceedings of the CHI'19. ACM, 234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Gavish, T. Gutiérrez, S. Webel, J. Rodríguez, M. Peveri, U. Bockholt, and F. Tecchia. 2015. Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Interactive Learning Environments 23, 6 (2015), 778--798.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. D.W. Johnson, R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith. 1998. Cooperative learning returns to college what evidence is there that it works? Change: the magazine of higher learning 30, 4 (1998), 26--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Orts-Escolano, C. Rhemann, S. Fanello, W. Chang, A. Kowdle, Y. Degtyarev, D. Kim, P.L. Davidson, S. Khamis, M. Dou, and others. 2016. Holoportation: Virtual 3d teleportation in real-time. In Proceedings of UIST'16. ACM, 741--754.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. I. Radu. 2014. Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 6 (2014), 1533--1543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. I. Radu and B. Schneider. 2019. What Can We Learn from Augmented Reality (AR)?. In Proceedings of CHI'19. ACM, 544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K.E. Raheb, M. Stergiou, A. Katifori, and Y. Ioannidis. 2019. Dance Interactive Learning Systems: A Study on Interaction Workflow and Teaching Approaches. Comput. Surveys 52, 3 (2019), 50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. V. Ramaswamy and K. Ozcan. 2018. What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research 84 (2018), 196--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. E.B.-N. Sanders and P.J. Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4, 1 (2008), 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L.M. Schreiber and B.E. Valle. 2013. Social constructivist teaching strategies in the small group classroom. Small Group Research 44, 4 (2013), 395--411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. Shin. 2017. The role of affordance in the experience of virtual reality learning: Technological and affective affordances in virtual reality. Telematics and Informatics 34, 8 (2017), 1826--1836.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Slater and M.V. Sanchez-Vives. 2016. Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016), 74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. W.H. Voorberg, V.J.J.M. Bekkers, and L.G. Tummers. 2015. A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review 17, 9 (2015), 1333--1357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. P. Wang, X. Bai, M. Billinghurst, D. Han, S. Zhang, W. He, X. Zhang, and Y. Yan. 2019. I'm tired of demos: an adaptive MR remote collaborative platform. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2019 XR. ACM, 17--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. N.M. Webb. 2009. The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology 79, 1 (2009), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Collaborative Learning & Co-Creation in XR

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)267
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!