research-article

Robust Path Matching and Anomalous Route Detection Using Posterior Weighted Graphs

Published:25 July 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Understanding movement behaviors is critical for urban mobility and transport problems, including robust path matching, behavior analysis, and anomaly detection. We investigate a graph-based, probabilistic method for matching behaviors of entities operating on networks embedded in some geographic context (e.g., road networks) under different types of uncertainty. Our method uses a decay function that allows network topology and attribute information associated with that topology (geographic or otherwise) to guide generalizations of the activity patterns and model learning process. This allows the system to recognize when two routes within a network are similar, even when those routes share little explicit path information. We demonstrate this method’s robust ability to distinguish between fundamentally different behaviors, even when data are both incomplete and subject to noise. The results show good performance when matching behaviors on different sized and attributed synthetic networks, as well as on a real-world road network; it examines situations in which observed entity behavior is noisy, as well as situations in which observed behaviors differ from learned models as a result of systemic noise in the underlying network. Finally, our approach provides a robust method of detecting anomalous activity patterns on the network.

References

  1. Akinori Asahara, Kishiko Maruyama, Akiko Sato, and Kouichi Seto. 2011. Pedestrian-movement prediction based on mixed Markov-chain model. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS’11). ACM, New York, NY, 25--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Geoff Boeing. 2017. OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 65 (2017), 126--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Yingyi Bu, Lei Chen, Ada Wai-Chee Fu, and Dawei Liu. 2009. Efficient anomaly monitoring over moving object trajectory streams. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’09). ACM, New York, NY, 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Varun Chandola, Arindam Banerjee, and Vipin Kumar. 2009. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 41, 3 (2009), 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chao Chen, Daqing Zhang, Pablo Samuel Castro, Nan Li, Lin Sun, and Shijian Li. 2012. Real-time detection of anomalous taxi trajectories from GPS traces. In Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking, and Services. Springer, Berlin, 63--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lei Chen, M. Tamer Özsu, and Vincent Oria. 2005. Robust and fast similarity search for moving object trajectories. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’05). ACM, New York, NY, 491--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Duckham, L. Kulik, and M. Worboys. 2004. Imprecise navigation. GeoInformatica 7, 79 (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Y. Goh, J. Dauwels, N. Mitrovic, M. T. Asif, A. Oran, and P. Jaillet. 2012. Online map-matching based on Hidden Markov model for real-time traffic sensing applications. In Proceedings from the 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 776--781.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bo Huang, Ruey Long Cheu, and Yong Seng Liew. 2004. GIS and genetic algorithms for HAZMAT route planning with security considerations. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 18, 8 (2004), 769--787.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hai Huang, Lijuan Zhang, and Monika Sester. 2014. A recursive Bayesian filter for anomalous behavior detection in trajectory data. In Connecting a Digital Europe through Location and Place. Springer, Berlin, 91--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jung-Rae Hwang, Hye-Young Kang, and Ki-Joune Li. 2005. Spatio-temporal similarity analysis between trajectories on road networks. In Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling. Springer, Berlin, 280--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H. B. Johnson. 1976. Order upon the Land: The U.S. Rectangular Land Survey and the Upper Mississippi Country. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. B. Kuijpers and W. Othman. 2009. Modeling uncertainty of moving objects on road networks via space--time prisms. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 23, 9 (2009), 1095--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yinzhen Li, Ruichun He, Linzhong Liu, and Yaohuang Guo. 2005. Genetic algorithms for dissimilar shortest paths based on optimal fuzzy dissimilar measure and applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Volume I. 312--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Liang Liu, Clio Andris, and Carlo Ratti. 2010. Uncovering cabdrivers’ behavior patterns from their digital traces. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 34, 6 (2010), 541--548. <ce:title>GeoVisualization and the Digital City</ce:title> <ce:subtitle>Special issue of the International Cartographic Association Commission on GeoVisualization</ce:subtitle>.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Yin Lou, Chengyang Zhang, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, Wei Wang, and Yan Huang. 2009. Map-matching for low-sampling-rate GPS trajectories. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 352--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Qifeng Lu, Feng Chen, and Kathleen Hancock. 2009. On path anomaly detection in a large transportation network. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 33, 6 (2009), 448--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Peter Mooney and Adam Winstanley. 2006. An evolutionary algorithm for multicriteria path optimization problems. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 20, 4 (2006), 401--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dieter Pfoser. 2002. Indexing the trajectories of moving objects. Data Eng. Bull. 25, 2 (2002), 4--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Porta, P. Crucitti, and V. Latora. 2006. The network analysis of urban streets: A dual approach. Physica A 369, 2 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Prager and R. P. Wiegand. 2014. Real-time detection of anomalous paths through networks. In Proceedings from the 17th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yukio Sadahiro, Raymond Lay, and Tetsuo Kobayashi. 2013. Trajectories of moving objects on a network: Detection of similarities, visualization of relations, and classification of trajectories. Trans. GIS 17, 1 (2013), 18--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ramesh R. Sarukkai. 2000. Link prediction and path analysis using Markov chains. Comput. Network. 33, 1--6 (2000), 377--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. W. M. Spears and S. D. Prager. 2012. Evolutionary search for understanding movement dynamics on mixed networks. GeoInformatica 17, 2 (2012), 353–385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Eleftherios Tiakas, Apostolos N. Papadopoulos, Alexandros Nanopoulos, Yannis Manolopoulos, Dragan Stojanovic, and Slobodanka Djordjevic-Kajan. 2006. Trajectory similarity search in spatial networks. In Proceedings of the 10th International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium (IDEAS’06). 185--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gonzalo Vaca-Castano, Amir Roshan Zamir, and Mubaral Shah. 2012. City scale geo-spatial trajectory estimation of a moving camera. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. R. Paul Wiegand and Steven Prager. 2013. Simple methods for reasoning about behavior patterns on graphs given extremely sparse observations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications, and Services (GEOProcessing’13). 73--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. C. Zhang and W. Li. 2005. Markov chain modeling of multinomial land-cover classes. GISci. Remote Sens. 42, 1 (2005), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Robust Path Matching and Anomalous Route Detection Using Posterior Weighted Graphs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems
      ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems  Volume 5, Issue 2
      Special Issue on Urban Mobility: Algorithms and Systems
      June 2019
      133 pages
      ISSN:2374-0353
      EISSN:2374-0361
      DOI:10.1145/3350424
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 July 2019
      • Accepted: 1 June 2019
      • Revised: 1 May 2019
      • Received: 1 December 2018
      Published in tsas Volume 5, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!