Abstract
Researchers in human-centered computing have surfaced a feminist ethic of care in interaction with technologies, in data collection, and in data work. Drawing on two years of ethnographic fieldwork, we consider how democratic caring might be enacted and sustained through collaborative data work. We employ philosopher Joan Tronto's theory of caring democracy to structure our analysis of a resident-led initiative that uses data to organize and address issues of neglect and abandonment in their neighborhood. Adding to the CSCW literature on sociotechnical systems of care, we look particularly at Tronto's concept of caring democracy where caring needs and the ways in which they are met are an ongoing and inclusive process of assigning and reassigning caring responsibilities, characterized by both equality of voice and freedom from domination. This work develops grounded insight into the practice of democratic caring and how collaborative data work is relevant to this caring practice. We discuss opportunities and challenges for a data-supported caring democracy and address how caring democracy technologies are different from other modern civic technology practices. We conclude with a call to researchers to identify and enact democratic caring experiments in the small.
- Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Alyson L. Young, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2017. On Making Data Actionable: How Activists Use Imperfect Data to Foster Social Change For Human Rights Violations in Mexico. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 19 (November 2017), 19 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3134654Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mariam Asad. 2018. Prefigurative Design as an Alternative Approach to Civic Engagement. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97--100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3272983Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mariam Asad and Le Dantec, C. A. 2015. Illegitimate civic participation: supporting community activists on the ground. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(pp. 1694--1703). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mariam Asad, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Becky Nielsen, and Kate Diedrick. 2017. Creating a Sociotechnical API: Designing City-Scale Community Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2295--2306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025963Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Stefan Baack. 2015. Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data & Society, 2(2).Google Scholar
- Helena Karasti and Karen S Baker. 2008. Community Design: growing one's own information infrastructure. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, 217--220Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Karen S. Baker and Helena Karasti. 2018. Data Care and Its Politics: Designing for Local Collective Data Management as a Neglected Thing. In PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference - Volume 1, August 20--24, 2018, Hasselt and Genk, Belgium, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210587Google Scholar
- Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1301--1310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Shaowen Bardzell, and J Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 675--684). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Thomas Binder, Eva Brandt, Pelle Ehn, and Joachim Halse. 2015. "Democratic design experiments: between parliament and laboratory." CoDesign 11, no. 3--4: 152--165.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Douglas A. Blackmon. 2009. Slavery By Another Name The Re-enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II. Anchor Books, a division of Random House, Inc. New York.Google Scholar
- Lorraine Code. 1991. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, United States.Google Scholar
- Eric Corbett and Chris A. Le Dantec. 2018. Exploring Trust in Digital Civics. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 (pp. 9--20). ACM.Google Scholar
- Morgan Currie, Britt S Paris, Irene Pasquetto, and Jennifer Pierre. 2016. The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: Counter-data in Los Angeles County. Big Data & Society 3(2): 1--14.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2005. Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Jill P. Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 477--490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441831Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Catherine D'Ignazio, Alexis Hope, Becky Michelson, Robyn Churchill, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2016. A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies: "When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke". In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2612--2622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858460Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial Design, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Carl DiSalvo, Andrew Clement, and Vokmar Pipek. 2013. Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities. In Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 202--230). Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 656--671). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the tenth anniversary conference on participatory design 2008 (pp. 92--101). Indiana University.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Pelle Ehn. 2017. Learning in participatory design as I found it (1970--2015). In Participatory Design for Learning (pp. 7--21). Routledge.Google Scholar
- Arturo Escobar. 2018. Designs for the pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Virginia Eubanks. 2017. Automating Inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2574--2585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858409Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sarah Fox, Jill Dimond, Lilly Irani, Tad Hirsch, Michael Muller, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Social Justice and Design: Power and oppression in collaborative systems. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 117--122). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sarah Fox, Amanda Menking, Stephanie Steinhardt, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Imagining Intersectional Futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 387--393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022665Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Uwe Flick. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Eric Gordon and Paul Mihailidis. (Eds.). 2016. Civic media: Technology, design, practice. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Donna Haraway. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC. Chicago.Google Scholar
- Gillian R. Hayes (2011). The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 18(3), 15.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ellie Harmon, Matthias Korn, and Amy Voida. 2017. Supporting Everyday Philanthropy: Care Work In Situ and at Scale. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1631--1645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998330Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lara Houston and Steven J. Jackson. 2016. Caring for the "next billion" mobile handsets: Opening proprietary closures through the work of repair. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ICTD '16, ACMGoogle Scholar
- Lara Houston, Steven J. Jackson, Daniela K. Rosner, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Meg Young, and Laewoo Kang. 2016. Values in Repair. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Azra Ismail and Neha Kumar. 2018. Engaging Solidarity in Data Collection Practices for Community Health. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW, Article 76 (November 2018), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274345Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ian G. Johnson, Aare Puussaar, Jennifer Manuel, and Peter Wright. 2018. Neighbourhood Data: Exploring the Role of Open Data in Locally Devolved Policymaking Processes. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 83 (November 2018), 20 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3274352Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Naveena Karusala, Aditya Vishwanath, Arkadeep Kumar, Aman Mangal, and Neha Kumar. 2017. Care as a Resource in Underserved Learning Environments. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 2, Article 104 (November 2017), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134739Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Elizabeth Kaziunas, Mark S. Ackerman, Silvia Lindtner, and Joyce M. Lee. 2017. Caring through data: Attending to the social and emotional experiences of health datafication. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '17, ACMGoogle Scholar
- Christopher A Le Dantec and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43, 2: 241--264Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Thomas Lodato and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. Institutional constraints: the forms and limits of participatory design in the public realm. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '18), Liesbeth Huybrechts, Maurizio Teli, Ann Light, Yanki Lee, Julia Garde, John Vines, Eva Brandt, Anne Marie Kanstrup, and Keld Bødker (Eds.), Vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 12 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210595Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Siân E. Lindley, Anja Thieme, Alex S. Taylor, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Tim Regan, and David Sweeney. 2017. Surfacing Small Worlds through Data-In-Place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26(1--2), 135--163.Google Scholar
- Amanda Meng and Carl DiSalvo. (2018). Grassroots resource mobilization through counter-data action. Big Data & Society. 5(2): 1--12.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Stefania Mila and Lonneke van der Velden. 2016. The Alternative epistemologoes of data activism. Digital Culture and Society 2(2): 57--74.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Annemarie Mol. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge: New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Annemarie Mol, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols. 2010. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms.Google Scholar
- David Nemer. 2018. Going beyond the "T" in "CTC": Social Practices as Care in Community Technology Centers. Information 9, 135.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Nell Noddings. 2003. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Sebastian Prost, Clara Crivellaro, Andy Haddon, and Rob Comber. 2018, April. Food democracy in the making: Designing with local food networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 333). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- María Puig de la Bellacasa. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. Univ of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Aare Puussaar, Ian G. Johnson, Kyle Montague, Philip James, and Peter Wright. 2018. Making Open Data Work for Civic Advocacy. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 143 (November 2018), 20 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3274412Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Judith Preissle, Yuri Han. 2012. Feminist research ethics. In Hesse-Biber, S. N. Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 583--605). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781483384740Google Scholar
- Selma Sevenhuijsen. 2014. Care and Attention. In 'A meaningful life in a just society. Investigating Wellbeing and Democratic Caring'. Panel 'Rendering Care the Meaning of Politics'. Utrecht, Universiteit voor Humanistiek, 30--31 January.Google Scholar
- Taylor Shelton and Thomas Lodato. 2019. Actually existing smart citizens: Expertise and (non) participation in the making of the smart city. City, 1--18.Google Scholar
- Daniel Rosenberg. 2013. Data before the fact. In: Gitelman L (ed.) "Raw Data'' is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15--40.Google Scholar
- Thomas Smyth and Jill Dimond. 2014. Antioppressive Design. interactions 21, 6: 68--71. https://doi.org/10.1145/2668969Google Scholar
- Robert Soden and Austin Lord. 2018. Mapping Silences, Reconfiguring Loss: Practices of Damage Assessment & Repair in Post-Earthquake Nepal. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, No. CSCW, Article 161, November 2018. ACM, New York, NY. 25 pages. htps://doi.org/10.1145/3274430.Google Scholar
- Alex S. Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, David Sweeney, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger, and Jessa Lingel. 2015. Data-in-place: Thinking through the relations between data and community. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2863--2872). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Katie H. Taylor, Rogers Hall. 2013. Counter-mapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 18(1--2): 65--93.Google Scholar
- Austin Toombs. 2015. Enacting Care Through Collaboration in Communities of Makers. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81--84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2699326Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Austin Toombs, Laura Devendorf, Patrick Shih, Elizabeth Kaziunas, David Nemer, Helena Mentis, and Laura Forlano. 2018. Sociotechnical Systems of Care. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 479--485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3273010Google Scholar
- Joan C. Tronto. 2013. Caring Democracy. New York University Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Eric Gordon, Pete Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2016. Digital civics: Citizen empowerment with and through technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1096--1099). ACM.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Annika Wolff, Daniel Gooch, Jose J. Cavero Montaner, Umar Rashid, Gerd Kortuem. 2016. Creating an understanding of data literacy for a data-driven society. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(3), 9--26.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- "Westside Land Use Framework Plan". 2017. Accessed from: https://www.westsidefuturefund.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Westside-Land-Use-Framework-Plan-Abbrev-Dec-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Marisol Wong-Villacres, Cristina M. Velasquez, and Neha Kumar. 2017. Social Media for Earthquake Response: Unpacking its Limitations with Care. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 2, Article 32 (November 2017), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134747Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ellen Zegura, Carl DiSalvo, and Amanda Meng. 2018. Care and the Practice of Data Science for Social Good. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 34.Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
Collaborative Data Work Towards a Caring Democracy
Recommendations
Bringing e-democracy back in: why it matters for future research on e-governance
Special issue: Jane fountain's "building the virtual state"The author argues that contemporary digital information communication technologies (ICTs) facilitate new forms of e-government-enabled public sector policy making that enshrine some of the important norms and practices of e-democracy. The potential for ...
Political Participation and Democracy in the Information Age: Effects of ICT-Based Communication Forms between the Authorities and the Citizens on Traditional Channels of Participation and Democracy
ICDS '09: Proceedings of the 2009 Third International Conference on Digital SocietyThe main trends concerning the traditional channels of participation are reduced voting turnout, reduced participation in political parties, stable participation in associations and increased citizen contact. The influence of ICT based form of ...
How can HCI support end-of-life care? Critical perspectives on sociotechnical imaginaries for palliative care
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDesigning technologies in the palliative care environment is difficult due to the sensitivity of the context and vulnerability of the patients and their families in a critical stage of life. We conducted two focus groups with 9 healthcare workers to ...






Comments