skip to main content
research-article

Collaborative Data Work Towards a Caring Democracy

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 November 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Researchers in human-centered computing have surfaced a feminist ethic of care in interaction with technologies, in data collection, and in data work. Drawing on two years of ethnographic fieldwork, we consider how democratic caring might be enacted and sustained through collaborative data work. We employ philosopher Joan Tronto's theory of caring democracy to structure our analysis of a resident-led initiative that uses data to organize and address issues of neglect and abandonment in their neighborhood. Adding to the CSCW literature on sociotechnical systems of care, we look particularly at Tronto's concept of caring democracy where caring needs and the ways in which they are met are an ongoing and inclusive process of assigning and reassigning caring responsibilities, characterized by both equality of voice and freedom from domination. This work develops grounded insight into the practice of democratic caring and how collaborative data work is relevant to this caring practice. We discuss opportunities and challenges for a data-supported caring democracy and address how caring democracy technologies are different from other modern civic technology practices. We conclude with a call to researchers to identify and enact democratic caring experiments in the small.

References

  1. Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Alyson L. Young, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2017. On Making Data Actionable: How Activists Use Imperfect Data to Foster Social Change For Human Rights Violations in Mexico. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 19 (November 2017), 19 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3134654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mariam Asad. 2018. Prefigurative Design as an Alternative Approach to Civic Engagement. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97--100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3272983Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mariam Asad and Le Dantec, C. A. 2015. Illegitimate civic participation: supporting community activists on the ground. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(pp. 1694--1703). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mariam Asad, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Becky Nielsen, and Kate Diedrick. 2017. Creating a Sociotechnical API: Designing City-Scale Community Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2295--2306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025963Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Stefan Baack. 2015. Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data & Society, 2(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Helena Karasti and Karen S Baker. 2008. Community Design: growing one's own information infrastructure. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, 217--220Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Karen S. Baker and Helena Karasti. 2018. Data Care and Its Politics: Designing for Local Collective Data Management as a Neglected Thing. In PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference - Volume 1, August 20--24, 2018, Hasselt and Genk, Belgium, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210587Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1301--1310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Shaowen Bardzell, and J Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 675--684). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Thomas Binder, Eva Brandt, Pelle Ehn, and Joachim Halse. 2015. "Democratic design experiments: between parliament and laboratory." CoDesign 11, no. 3--4: 152--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Douglas A. Blackmon. 2009. Slavery By Another Name The Re-enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II. Anchor Books, a division of Random House, Inc. New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lorraine Code. 1991. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, United States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Eric Corbett and Chris A. Le Dantec. 2018. Exploring Trust in Digital Civics. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 (pp. 9--20). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Morgan Currie, Britt S Paris, Irene Pasquetto, and Jennifer Pierre. 2016. The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: Counter-data in Los Angeles County. Big Data & Society 3(2): 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2005. Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jill P. Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 477--490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441831Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Catherine D'Ignazio, Alexis Hope, Becky Michelson, Robyn Churchill, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2016. A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies: "When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke". In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2612--2622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858460Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial Design, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Carl DiSalvo, Andrew Clement, and Vokmar Pipek. 2013. Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities. In Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 202--230). Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 656--671). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the tenth anniversary conference on participatory design 2008 (pp. 92--101). Indiana University.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pelle Ehn. 2017. Learning in participatory design as I found it (1970--2015). In Participatory Design for Learning (pp. 7--21). Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Arturo Escobar. 2018. Designs for the pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Virginia Eubanks. 2017. Automating Inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2574--2585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sarah Fox, Jill Dimond, Lilly Irani, Tad Hirsch, Michael Muller, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Social Justice and Design: Power and oppression in collaborative systems. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 117--122). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sarah Fox, Amanda Menking, Stephanie Steinhardt, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Imagining Intersectional Futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 387--393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Uwe Flick. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. USA: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Eric Gordon and Paul Mihailidis. (Eds.). 2016. Civic media: Technology, design, practice. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Donna Haraway. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC. Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Gillian R. Hayes (2011). The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 18(3), 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ellie Harmon, Matthias Korn, and Amy Voida. 2017. Supporting Everyday Philanthropy: Care Work In Situ and at Scale. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1631--1645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998330Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lara Houston and Steven J. Jackson. 2016. Caring for the "next billion" mobile handsets: Opening proprietary closures through the work of repair. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ICTD '16, ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Lara Houston, Steven J. Jackson, Daniela K. Rosner, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Meg Young, and Laewoo Kang. 2016. Values in Repair. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Azra Ismail and Neha Kumar. 2018. Engaging Solidarity in Data Collection Practices for Community Health. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW, Article 76 (November 2018), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274345Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ian G. Johnson, Aare Puussaar, Jennifer Manuel, and Peter Wright. 2018. Neighbourhood Data: Exploring the Role of Open Data in Locally Devolved Policymaking Processes. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 83 (November 2018), 20 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3274352Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Naveena Karusala, Aditya Vishwanath, Arkadeep Kumar, Aman Mangal, and Neha Kumar. 2017. Care as a Resource in Underserved Learning Environments. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 2, Article 104 (November 2017), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134739Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Elizabeth Kaziunas, Mark S. Ackerman, Silvia Lindtner, and Joyce M. Lee. 2017. Caring through data: Attending to the social and emotional experiences of health datafication. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '17, ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Christopher A Le Dantec and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43, 2: 241--264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Thomas Lodato and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. Institutional constraints: the forms and limits of participatory design in the public realm. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '18), Liesbeth Huybrechts, Maurizio Teli, Ann Light, Yanki Lee, Julia Garde, John Vines, Eva Brandt, Anne Marie Kanstrup, and Keld Bødker (Eds.), Vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 12 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210595Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Siân E. Lindley, Anja Thieme, Alex S. Taylor, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Tim Regan, and David Sweeney. 2017. Surfacing Small Worlds through Data-In-Place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26(1--2), 135--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Amanda Meng and Carl DiSalvo. (2018). Grassroots resource mobilization through counter-data action. Big Data & Society. 5(2): 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Stefania Mila and Lonneke van der Velden. 2016. The Alternative epistemologoes of data activism. Digital Culture and Society 2(2): 57--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Annemarie Mol. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge: New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Annemarie Mol, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols. 2010. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. David Nemer. 2018. Going beyond the "T" in "CTC": Social Practices as Care in Community Technology Centers. Information 9, 135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Nell Noddings. 2003. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Sebastian Prost, Clara Crivellaro, Andy Haddon, and Rob Comber. 2018, April. Food democracy in the making: Designing with local food networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 333). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. María Puig de la Bellacasa. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. Univ of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Aare Puussaar, Ian G. Johnson, Kyle Montague, Philip James, and Peter Wright. 2018. Making Open Data Work for Civic Advocacy. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 143 (November 2018), 20 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3274412Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Judith Preissle, Yuri Han. 2012. Feminist research ethics. In Hesse-Biber, S. N. Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 583--605). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781483384740Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Selma Sevenhuijsen. 2014. Care and Attention. In 'A meaningful life in a just society. Investigating Wellbeing and Democratic Caring'. Panel 'Rendering Care the Meaning of Politics'. Utrecht, Universiteit voor Humanistiek, 30--31 January.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor Shelton and Thomas Lodato. 2019. Actually existing smart citizens: Expertise and (non) participation in the making of the smart city. City, 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Daniel Rosenberg. 2013. Data before the fact. In: Gitelman L (ed.) "Raw Data'' is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomas Smyth and Jill Dimond. 2014. Antioppressive Design. interactions 21, 6: 68--71. https://doi.org/10.1145/2668969Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Robert Soden and Austin Lord. 2018. Mapping Silences, Reconfiguring Loss: Practices of Damage Assessment & Repair in Post-Earthquake Nepal. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, No. CSCW, Article 161, November 2018. ACM, New York, NY. 25 pages. htps://doi.org/10.1145/3274430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Alex S. Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, David Sweeney, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger, and Jessa Lingel. 2015. Data-in-place: Thinking through the relations between data and community. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2863--2872). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Katie H. Taylor, Rogers Hall. 2013. Counter-mapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 18(1--2): 65--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Austin Toombs. 2015. Enacting Care Through Collaboration in Communities of Makers. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81--84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2699326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Austin Toombs, Laura Devendorf, Patrick Shih, Elizabeth Kaziunas, David Nemer, Helena Mentis, and Laura Forlano. 2018. Sociotechnical Systems of Care. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 479--485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3273010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Joan C. Tronto. 2013. Caring Democracy. New York University Press: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Eric Gordon, Pete Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2016. Digital civics: Citizen empowerment with and through technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1096--1099). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Annika Wolff, Daniel Gooch, Jose J. Cavero Montaner, Umar Rashid, Gerd Kortuem. 2016. Creating an understanding of data literacy for a data-driven society. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(3), 9--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. "Westside Land Use Framework Plan". 2017. Accessed from: https://www.westsidefuturefund.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Westside-Land-Use-Framework-Plan-Abbrev-Dec-2017.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Marisol Wong-Villacres, Cristina M. Velasquez, and Neha Kumar. 2017. Social Media for Earthquake Response: Unpacking its Limitations with Care. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 2, Article 32 (November 2017), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134747Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Ellen Zegura, Carl DiSalvo, and Amanda Meng. 2018. Care and the Practice of Data Science for Social Good. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Collaborative Data Work Towards a Caring Democracy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!