skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Information Materialities of Citizen Communication in the U.S. Congress

Published:07 November 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this paper, we use a materiality lens to explore how information and communication technologies condition interaction between citizens and policymakers of the U.S. Congress. We work with ethnographic data - six months of observation in Washington D.C. and 48 interviews with staff in the House of Representatives. Customer relation management systems (CRMs) used by Congress are one of numerous technologies expected to enhance responsive communication between citizens and representatives. We find, instead, that these technologies promote the datafication of citizen information that configures and constrains how policymakers engage citizens as legitimate actors within the policy-making process. CRMs not only mediate communication between citizens and policymakers, they shape the idea of what communication between citizens and policymakers can be and how citizens are viewed in the eyes of policymakers and their staff. Thus, we extend our understanding of the ways in which material configurations of communication technologies influence not only how communication acts unfolds, but also how each partner conceives of and engages with the other. This has dramatic implications for the possibilities of digital communication channels to enhance, or uphold, the ideals of a representative democracy.

References

  1. Claire Elizabeth Abernathy. 2015. Legislative Correspondence Management Practices: Congressional Offices and the Treatment of Constituent Opinion. Ph.D. Dissertation. Vanderbilt University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmer Arif, Leo Graiden Stewart, and Kate Starbird. 2018. Acting the part: Examining information operations within #blacklivesmatter discourse. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ulrich Beck. 1997. The reinvention of politics: rethinking modernity in the global social order. Polity Press; Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, MA. OCLC: ocm35673555.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Paul Beynon-Davies and Steve Martin. 2004. Electronic local government and the modernisation agenda: Progress and prospects for public service improvement. Local government studies 30, 2 (2004), 214--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruce A Bimber. 2003. Information and American democracy: technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; New York. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10461902 OCLC: 726828083.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nina Boulus-Rødje, Pernille Bjørn, and Ahmad Ghazawneh. 2015. "It's About Business not Politics": Software Development Between Palestinians and Israelis. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway, Nina Boulus-Rødje, Gunnar Ellingsen, Tone Bratteteig, Margunn Aanestad, and Pernille Bjørn (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 43--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Anne Bowser, Derek Hansen, Jennifer Preece, Yurong He, Carol Boston, and Jen Hammock. 2014. Gamifying Citizen Science: A Study of Two User Groups. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW Companion '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 137--140. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556502Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Andrew Chadwick. 2011. Explaining the failure of an online citizen engagement initiative: The role of internal institutional variables. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 8, 1 (2011), 21--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Andrew Chadwick and Christopher May. 2003. Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet:"e- Government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance 16, 2 (2003), 271--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Steven L Clift. 2004. E-government and Democracy. http://stevenclift.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/cliftegovdemocracy.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stephen Coleman. 2017. Can the internet strengthen democracy? Polity Press, Cambridge, UK ; Malden, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eric Corbett and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2018. Going the Distance: Trust Work for Citizen Participation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 312, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173886Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dharma Dailey and Kate Starbird. 2017. Social Media Seamsters: Stitching Platforms; Audiences into Local Crisis Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported CooperativeWork and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1277--1289. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Paul Dourish. 2017. The stuff of bits: an essay on the materialities of information. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Paul Dourish and Melissa Mazmanian. 2013. Media as Material: Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice. In How Matter Matters, Paul R. Carlile, Davide Nicolini, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas (Eds.). Oxford University Press, 92--118. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671533.003.0005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. James N. Druckman, Martin J. Kifer, and Michael Parkin. 2007. The Technological Development of Congressional Candidate Web Sites: How and Why Candidates Use Web Innovations. Social Science Computer Review 25, 4 (2007),425--442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307305623Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wendy Nelson Espeland and Mitchell L Stevens. 2008. A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology/ Archives Européennes de Sociologie 49, 3 (2008), 401--436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Richard F Fenno. 1978. Home style: House members in their districts. HarperCollins,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Open Gov Foundation. 2018. From Voicemail to Votes: human-centered investigation by The OpenGov Foundation into the systems, tools, constraints, and people who drive constituent engagement in Congress. https: //v2v.opengovfoundation.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jane E. Fountain. 2001. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctvcb59n3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12, 3 (2014), 564--581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. MatthewEric Glassman, Jacob R Straus, and Colleen J Shogan. 2013. Social networking and constituent communications: members' use of Twitter and Facebook during a two-month period in the 112th Congress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennifer Golbeck, Justin M. Grimes, and Anthony Rogers. 2010. Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 8 (2010), 1612--1621. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21344 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asi.21344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kathy Goldschmidt. 2011. Communicating with Congress: Perceptions of citizen advocacy on Capitol Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Åke Grönlund. 2003. Emerging electronic infrastructures: Exploring democratic components. Social science computer review 21, 1 (2003), 55--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mike Harding, Bran Knowles, Nigel Davies, and Mark Rouncefield. 2015. HCI, Civic Engagement; Trust. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2833--2842. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Brent Hecht, Loren Terveen, Kate Starbird, Ben Shneiderman, and Jennifer Golbeck. 2017. The 2016 US Election and HCI: Towards a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1307--1311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3051140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Libby Hemphill and Andrew J. Roback. 2014. Tweet Acts: How Constituents Lobby Congress via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1200--1210. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531735Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tim Hysom. 2008. Communicating with Congress: recommendations for improving the democratic dialogue. Congressional Management Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Steven J. Jackson, Tarleton Gillespie, and Sandy Payette. 2014. The Policy Knot: Re-integrating Policy, Practice and Design in Cscw Studies of Social Computing. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work; Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 588--602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602. 2531674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Steven J. Jackson, Stephanie B. Steinhardt, and Ayse Buyuktur. 2013. Why CSCW Needs Science Policy (and Vice Versa). In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1113--1124. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441902Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ian G. Johnson, Aare Puussaar, Jennifer Manuel, and Peter Wright. 2018. Neighbourhood Data: Exploring the Role of Open Data in Locally Devolved Policymaking Processes. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 83 (Nov.2018), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274352Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sarah Kaplan. 2011. Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science 22, 2 (2011), 320--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. David Karpf. 2010. Online political mobilization from the advocacy group's perspective: Looking beyond clicktivism. Policy & Internet 2, 4 (2010), 7--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Jofish Kaye, Casey Fiesler, Neha Kumar, and Bryan Semaan. 2017. Policy Impacts on the HCI Research Community. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1300--1302. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3051706Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sunyoung Kim, Jennifer Mankoff, and Eric Paulos. 2013. Sensr: Evaluating a Flexible Framework for Authoring Mobile Data-collection Tools for Citizen Science. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1453--1462. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441940Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Peter Kinnaird, Mario Romero, and Gregory Abowd. 2010. Connect 2 Congress: Visual Analytics for Civic Oversight. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2853--2862. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753872Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kevin Kosar. 2019. Congressional Staff Trends. https://www.hillhappenings.com/list/2018/9/5/capitol-historical-society-lecture-congressional-staffing-trends. Remarks by Kevin Kosar presented at the Capitol Historical Society Lecture in Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Travis Kriplean, Jonathan Morgan, Deen Freelon, Alan Borning, and Lance Bennett. 2012. Supporting Reflective Public Thought with Considerit. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 265--274. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145249Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Jennifer L Lawless. 2012. Becoming a candidate: Political ambition and the decision to run for office. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Jonathan Lazar, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Jeremy Barksdale, Batya Friedman, Jens Grossklags, Jan Gulliksen, Jeff Johnson, Tom McEwan, LoÃc MartÃnez-Normand, Wibke Michalk, Janice Tsai, Gerrit van der Veer, Hans von Axelson, Ake Walldius, Gill Whitney, Marco Winckler, Volker Wulf, Elizabeth F. Churchill, Lorrie Cranor, Janet Davis, Alan Hedge, Harry Hochheiser, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Clayton Lewis, Lisa Nathan, Fabio Paterno, Blake Reid, Whitney Quesenbery, Ted Selker, and Brian Wentz. 2016. Human-Computer Interaction and International Public Policymaking: A Framework for Understanding and Taking Future Actions. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 9, 2 (2016), 69--149. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000062Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Hanlin Li, Bodhi Alarcon, Sara Milkes Espinosa, and Brent Hecht. 2018. Out of Site: Empowering a New Approach to Online Boycotts. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 106 (Nov. 2018), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274375Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Silvia Lindtner and Seyram Avle. 2017. Tinkering with Governance: Technopolitics and the Economization of Citizenship. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 70 (Dec. 2017), 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3134705Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Daniel Lipinski. 2009. Congressional communication: Content and consequences. University of Michigan Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Jane Mansbridge. 2003. Rethinking Representation. American Political Science Review 97, 4 (Nov. 2003), 515--528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and David Lazer. 2007. From electronic government to information government. Governance and information technology: From electronic government to information government (2007), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Ines Mergel. 2012. The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity 17, 3, 4 (2012), 281--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Tina Nabatchi and Matt Leighninger. 2015. Public participation for 21st century democracy. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Michael A Neblo, Kevin M Esterling, and David Lazer. 2018. Politics with the people: building a directly representative democracy. Vol. 555. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316338179 OCLC: 1057675166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Wanda J Orlikowski. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization studies 28, 9 (2007), 1435--1448.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Diana Owen, Richard Davis, and Vincent James Strickler. 1999. Congress and the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 4, 2 (1999), 10--29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X99004002003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Leysia Palen and Sophia B. Liu. 2007. Citizen Communications in Crisis: Anticipating a Future of ICT-supported Public Participation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 727--736. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240736Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Sofie Pilemalm. 2018. Participatory Design in Emerging Civic Engagement Initiatives in the New Public Sector: Applying PD Concepts in Resource-Scarce Organizations. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 1, Article 5 (Jan.2018), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Hanna F Pitkin. 1967. The concept of representation. Vol. 75. Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Theodore M Porter. 2001. Trust in Numbers: the Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821617 OCLC: 700688673.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Christine Robson, Marti Hearst, Chris Kau, and Jeffrey Pierce. 2013. Comparing the Use of Social Networking and Traditional Media Channels for Promoting Citizen Science. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1463--1468. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441941Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Daniela K. Rosner. 2012. The Material Practices of Collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported CooperativeWork (CSCW '12). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 1155--1164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145375Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Dana Rotman, Jen Hammock, Jenny J. Preece, Carol L. Boston, Derek L. Hansen, Anne Bowser, and Yurong He. 2014. Does Motivation in Citizen Science Change with Time and Culture?. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work; Social Computing (CSCW Companion '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 229--232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556492Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Colleen J. Shogan. 2010. Blackberries, Tweets, and YouTube: Technology and the Future of Communicating with Congress. PS: Political Science & Politics 43, 2 (2010), 231--233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096510000041Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Stuart W Shulman. 2009. The case against mass e-mails: Perverse incentives and low quality public participation in US federal rulemaking. Policy & Internet 1, 1 (2009), 23--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. SIGCHI 2018. Proceedings of CSCW '18: The 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. SIGCHI, ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Vanessa Thomas, Christian Remy, Mike Hazas, and Oliver Bates. 2017. HCI and Environmental Public Policy: Opportunities for Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6986--6992. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025579Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Arjuna Tuzzi, Claudia Padovani, and Giorgia Nesti. 2002. Communication and (e) democracy: assessing European e-democracy discourses. IDEA (2002), 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Amy Voida, Lynn Dombrowski, Gillian R. Hayes, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2014. Shared Values/Conflicting Logics: Working Around e-Government Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3583--3592. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556971Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Ken Ward and Zach Graves. 2019. Doing Business With Congress: A Primer on Information Technology Acquisitions in the Legislative Branch.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Andrea Wiggins and Kevin Crowston. 2011. From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. In Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '11). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Langdon Winner. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus (1980), 121--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Joann Yates and Wanda Orlikowski. 2007. The PowerPoint presentation and its corollaries: How genres shape communicative action in organizations. Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations 1 (2007), 67--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Bo Yu and Guoray Cai. 2009. Facilitating Participatory Decision-making in Local Communities Through Map-based Online Discussion. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 215--224. https://doi.org/10.1145/1556460.1556492Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!