Abstract
In this paper, we use a materiality lens to explore how information and communication technologies condition interaction between citizens and policymakers of the U.S. Congress. We work with ethnographic data - six months of observation in Washington D.C. and 48 interviews with staff in the House of Representatives. Customer relation management systems (CRMs) used by Congress are one of numerous technologies expected to enhance responsive communication between citizens and representatives. We find, instead, that these technologies promote the datafication of citizen information that configures and constrains how policymakers engage citizens as legitimate actors within the policy-making process. CRMs not only mediate communication between citizens and policymakers, they shape the idea of what communication between citizens and policymakers can be and how citizens are viewed in the eyes of policymakers and their staff. Thus, we extend our understanding of the ways in which material configurations of communication technologies influence not only how communication acts unfolds, but also how each partner conceives of and engages with the other. This has dramatic implications for the possibilities of digital communication channels to enhance, or uphold, the ideals of a representative democracy.
- Claire Elizabeth Abernathy. 2015. Legislative Correspondence Management Practices: Congressional Offices and the Treatment of Constituent Opinion. Ph.D. Dissertation. Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
- Ahmer Arif, Leo Graiden Stewart, and Kate Starbird. 2018. Acting the part: Examining information operations within #blacklivesmatter discourse. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 20.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ulrich Beck. 1997. The reinvention of politics: rethinking modernity in the global social order. Polity Press; Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, MA. OCLC: ocm35673555.Google Scholar
- Paul Beynon-Davies and Steve Martin. 2004. Electronic local government and the modernisation agenda: Progress and prospects for public service improvement. Local government studies 30, 2 (2004), 214--229.Google Scholar
- Bruce A Bimber. 2003. Information and American democracy: technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; New York. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10461902 OCLC: 726828083.Google Scholar
- Nina Boulus-Rødje, Pernille Bjørn, and Ahmad Ghazawneh. 2015. "It's About Business not Politics": Software Development Between Palestinians and Israelis. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway, Nina Boulus-Rødje, Gunnar Ellingsen, Tone Bratteteig, Margunn Aanestad, and Pernille Bjørn (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 43--61.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Anne Bowser, Derek Hansen, Jennifer Preece, Yurong He, Carol Boston, and Jen Hammock. 2014. Gamifying Citizen Science: A Study of Two User Groups. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW Companion '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 137--140. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556502Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Andrew Chadwick. 2011. Explaining the failure of an online citizen engagement initiative: The role of internal institutional variables. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 8, 1 (2011), 21--40.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Andrew Chadwick and Christopher May. 2003. Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet:"e- Government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance 16, 2 (2003), 271--300.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Steven L Clift. 2004. E-government and Democracy. http://stevenclift.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/cliftegovdemocracy.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Stephen Coleman. 2017. Can the internet strengthen democracy? Polity Press, Cambridge, UK ; Malden, MA, USA.Google Scholar
- Eric Corbett and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2018. Going the Distance: Trust Work for Citizen Participation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 312, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173886Google Scholar
- Dharma Dailey and Kate Starbird. 2017. Social Media Seamsters: Stitching Platforms; Audiences into Local Crisis Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported CooperativeWork and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1277--1289. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998290Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Paul Dourish. 2017. The stuff of bits: an essay on the materialities of information. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Paul Dourish and Melissa Mazmanian. 2013. Media as Material: Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice. In How Matter Matters, Paul R. Carlile, Davide Nicolini, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas (Eds.). Oxford University Press, 92--118. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671533.003.0005Google Scholar
- James N. Druckman, Martin J. Kifer, and Michael Parkin. 2007. The Technological Development of Congressional Candidate Web Sites: How and Why Candidates Use Web Innovations. Social Science Computer Review 25, 4 (2007),425--442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307305623Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Wendy Nelson Espeland and Mitchell L Stevens. 2008. A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology/ Archives Européennes de Sociologie 49, 3 (2008), 401--436.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Richard F Fenno. 1978. Home style: House members in their districts. HarperCollins,.Google Scholar
- Open Gov Foundation. 2018. From Voicemail to Votes: human-centered investigation by The OpenGov Foundation into the systems, tools, constraints, and people who drive constituent engagement in Congress. https: //v2v.opengovfoundation.org/Google Scholar
- Jane E. Fountain. 2001. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctvcb59n3Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12, 3 (2014), 564--581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- MatthewEric Glassman, Jacob R Straus, and Colleen J Shogan. 2013. Social networking and constituent communications: members' use of Twitter and Facebook during a two-month period in the 112th Congress.Google Scholar
- Jennifer Golbeck, Justin M. Grimes, and Anthony Rogers. 2010. Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 8 (2010), 1612--1621. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21344 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asi.21344Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kathy Goldschmidt. 2011. Communicating with Congress: Perceptions of citizen advocacy on Capitol Hill.Google Scholar
- Åke Grönlund. 2003. Emerging electronic infrastructures: Exploring democratic components. Social science computer review 21, 1 (2003), 55--72.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mike Harding, Bran Knowles, Nigel Davies, and Mark Rouncefield. 2015. HCI, Civic Engagement; Trust. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2833--2842. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702255Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Brent Hecht, Loren Terveen, Kate Starbird, Ben Shneiderman, and Jennifer Golbeck. 2017. The 2016 US Election and HCI: Towards a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1307--1311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3051140Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Libby Hemphill and Andrew J. Roback. 2014. Tweet Acts: How Constituents Lobby Congress via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1200--1210. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531735Google Scholar
- Tim Hysom. 2008. Communicating with Congress: recommendations for improving the democratic dialogue. Congressional Management Foundation.Google Scholar
- Steven J. Jackson, Tarleton Gillespie, and Sandy Payette. 2014. The Policy Knot: Re-integrating Policy, Practice and Design in Cscw Studies of Social Computing. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work; Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 588--602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602. 2531674Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Steven J. Jackson, Stephanie B. Steinhardt, and Ayse Buyuktur. 2013. Why CSCW Needs Science Policy (and Vice Versa). In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1113--1124. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441902Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ian G. Johnson, Aare Puussaar, Jennifer Manuel, and Peter Wright. 2018. Neighbourhood Data: Exploring the Role of Open Data in Locally Devolved Policymaking Processes. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 83 (Nov.2018), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274352Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sarah Kaplan. 2011. Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science 22, 2 (2011), 320--346.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- David Karpf. 2010. Online political mobilization from the advocacy group's perspective: Looking beyond clicktivism. Policy & Internet 2, 4 (2010), 7--41.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jofish Kaye, Casey Fiesler, Neha Kumar, and Bryan Semaan. 2017. Policy Impacts on the HCI Research Community. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1300--1302. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3051706Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sunyoung Kim, Jennifer Mankoff, and Eric Paulos. 2013. Sensr: Evaluating a Flexible Framework for Authoring Mobile Data-collection Tools for Citizen Science. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1453--1462. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441940Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Peter Kinnaird, Mario Romero, and Gregory Abowd. 2010. Connect 2 Congress: Visual Analytics for Civic Oversight. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2853--2862. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753872Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kevin Kosar. 2019. Congressional Staff Trends. https://www.hillhappenings.com/list/2018/9/5/capitol-historical-society-lecture-congressional-staffing-trends. Remarks by Kevin Kosar presented at the Capitol Historical Society Lecture in Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Travis Kriplean, Jonathan Morgan, Deen Freelon, Alan Borning, and Lance Bennett. 2012. Supporting Reflective Public Thought with Considerit. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 265--274. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145249Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jennifer L Lawless. 2012. Becoming a candidate: Political ambition and the decision to run for office. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Jonathan Lazar, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Jeremy Barksdale, Batya Friedman, Jens Grossklags, Jan Gulliksen, Jeff Johnson, Tom McEwan, LoÃc MartÃnez-Normand, Wibke Michalk, Janice Tsai, Gerrit van der Veer, Hans von Axelson, Ake Walldius, Gill Whitney, Marco Winckler, Volker Wulf, Elizabeth F. Churchill, Lorrie Cranor, Janet Davis, Alan Hedge, Harry Hochheiser, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Clayton Lewis, Lisa Nathan, Fabio Paterno, Blake Reid, Whitney Quesenbery, Ted Selker, and Brian Wentz. 2016. Human-Computer Interaction and International Public Policymaking: A Framework for Understanding and Taking Future Actions. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 9, 2 (2016), 69--149. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000062Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hanlin Li, Bodhi Alarcon, Sara Milkes Espinosa, and Brent Hecht. 2018. Out of Site: Empowering a New Approach to Online Boycotts. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 106 (Nov. 2018), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274375Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Silvia Lindtner and Seyram Avle. 2017. Tinkering with Governance: Technopolitics and the Economization of Citizenship. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 70 (Dec. 2017), 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3134705Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Daniel Lipinski. 2009. Congressional communication: Content and consequences. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Jane Mansbridge. 2003. Rethinking Representation. American Political Science Review 97, 4 (Nov. 2003), 515--528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and David Lazer. 2007. From electronic government to information government. Governance and information technology: From electronic government to information government (2007), 1--14.Google Scholar
- Ines Mergel. 2012. The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity 17, 3, 4 (2012), 281--292.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Tina Nabatchi and Matt Leighninger. 2015. Public participation for 21st century democracy. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Michael A Neblo, Kevin M Esterling, and David Lazer. 2018. Politics with the people: building a directly representative democracy. Vol. 555. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316338179 OCLC: 1057675166.Google Scholar
- Wanda J Orlikowski. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization studies 28, 9 (2007), 1435--1448.Google Scholar
- Diana Owen, Richard Davis, and Vincent James Strickler. 1999. Congress and the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 4, 2 (1999), 10--29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X99004002003Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Leysia Palen and Sophia B. Liu. 2007. Citizen Communications in Crisis: Anticipating a Future of ICT-supported Public Participation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 727--736. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240736Google Scholar
- Sofie Pilemalm. 2018. Participatory Design in Emerging Civic Engagement Initiatives in the New Public Sector: Applying PD Concepts in Resource-Scarce Organizations. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 1, Article 5 (Jan.2018), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152420Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hanna F Pitkin. 1967. The concept of representation. Vol. 75. Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
- Theodore M Porter. 2001. Trust in Numbers: the Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821617 OCLC: 700688673.Google Scholar
- Christine Robson, Marti Hearst, Chris Kau, and Jeffrey Pierce. 2013. Comparing the Use of Social Networking and Traditional Media Channels for Promoting Citizen Science. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1463--1468. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441941Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Daniela K. Rosner. 2012. The Material Practices of Collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported CooperativeWork (CSCW '12). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 1155--1164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145375Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Dana Rotman, Jen Hammock, Jenny J. Preece, Carol L. Boston, Derek L. Hansen, Anne Bowser, and Yurong He. 2014. Does Motivation in Citizen Science Change with Time and Culture?. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work; Social Computing (CSCW Companion '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 229--232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556492Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Colleen J. Shogan. 2010. Blackberries, Tweets, and YouTube: Technology and the Future of Communicating with Congress. PS: Political Science & Politics 43, 2 (2010), 231--233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096510000041Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Stuart W Shulman. 2009. The case against mass e-mails: Perverse incentives and low quality public participation in US federal rulemaking. Policy & Internet 1, 1 (2009), 23--53.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- SIGCHI 2018. Proceedings of CSCW '18: The 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. SIGCHI, ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Vanessa Thomas, Christian Remy, Mike Hazas, and Oliver Bates. 2017. HCI and Environmental Public Policy: Opportunities for Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6986--6992. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025579Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Arjuna Tuzzi, Claudia Padovani, and Giorgia Nesti. 2002. Communication and (e) democracy: assessing European e-democracy discourses. IDEA (2002), 13.Google Scholar
- Amy Voida, Lynn Dombrowski, Gillian R. Hayes, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2014. Shared Values/Conflicting Logics: Working Around e-Government Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3583--3592. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556971Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ken Ward and Zach Graves. 2019. Doing Business With Congress: A Primer on Information Technology Acquisitions in the Legislative Branch.Google Scholar
- Andrea Wiggins and Kevin Crowston. 2011. From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. In Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '11). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Langdon Winner. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus (1980), 121--136.Google Scholar
- Joann Yates and Wanda Orlikowski. 2007. The PowerPoint presentation and its corollaries: How genres shape communicative action in organizations. Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations 1 (2007), 67--92.Google Scholar
- Bo Yu and Guoray Cai. 2009. Facilitating Participatory Decision-making in Local Communities Through Map-based Online Discussion. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 215--224. https://doi.org/10.1145/1556460.1556492Google Scholar
Digital Library
Recommendations
Technologies for Constituent Communication in the U.S. Congress
CSCW '20 Companion: Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingElected representatives use a myriad of technologies to communicate with their constituencies. Yet growing evidence finds that these technologies often promote one-way promotional forms of communication that push citizens away from policymakers and ...
Exploring U.S. e-diplomacy and non-state actors' increasing communicative influence
dg.o '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government researchIn the present "information as commodity" age, government agencies around the globe view information as not only an asset but also a national security priority. Under pressures to rapidly gather, process, and disseminate information, government agencies,...
Connecting to congress: improving deliberation in the information age
dg.o '07: Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on Digital government research: bridging disciplines & domainsWhat are the best methods for Members of the U.S. Congress to use their Web sites to engage constituents in the public policy process? How can Congress use the Internet to foster deliberation in an emerging digital democracy? To shed light on these ...






Comments