10.1145/3359852.3359893acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicpsprocConference Proceedings
research-article

Eq A Sketch 360, a Serious Toy for Drawing Equirectangular Spherical Perspectives

ABSTRACT

Eq a Sketch 360 is a simple program for raster sketching VR panoramas in equirectangular spherical perspective. It is built as a serious toy, to develop sketching intuition regarding equirectangular drawing as proper perspective drawing, with its specific constructions of vanishing points, geodesics, line projections, antipodes, and grids. It is useful as a teaching aid and as a production tool for preliminary perspective sketches to be further rendered with other digital or traditional tools. It is naturally adapted for the input variables adequate for observational sketches. In this paper we survey the operation and purposes of the program. We also show how it calculates the equirectangular geodesic through two given points, which enables one of its main drawing features.

References

  1. W. S. Ed Sobey. 2008. The Way Toys Work: The Science Behind the Magic 8 Ball, Etch A Sketch, Boomerang, and More, Chicago Review Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. B. Araújo. 2018. Drawing Equirectangular VR Panoramas with Ruler, Compass, and Protractor. Journal Of Science And Technology Of The Arts 10, 1 (April 2018), 15-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7559/citarj.v10i1.471Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. B. Araújo. 2018. Let's Sketch in 360°: Spherical Perspectives for Virtual Reality Panoramas. In Proceedings of Bridges 2018: Mathematics, Art, Music, Architecture, Education, Culture, 637--644. Retrieved September 2018 from http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2018/bridges2018-637.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. B. Araújo. 2018. Ruler, compass, and nail: constructing a total spherical perspective. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 12, 2-3 (July 2018) 144--169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2018.1469378Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Kemp. 1990. The Science of Art. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven and London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Huhtamo. 2013. Illusions in motion - media archaeology of the moving panorama and related spectacles. (1st ed.). The MIT Press, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Barre and A. Flocon. 1964. La perspective Curviligne. Flammarion, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. B. Araújo. 2016. Topologia, Anamorfoses, e o bestiário das Perspectivas curvilíneas. Convocarte, 2 (September 2016), 51--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. R. Casas. 1983. Flat-Sphere Perspective. Leonardo 16, 1 (1983), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Moose. 1986. Guidelines for Constructing a Fisheye Perspective. Leonardo 19, 1 (1986), 61--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G. Michel. 2013. L'oeil, au Centre de la Sphere Visuelle. Boletim da Aproged, 30 (April 2013), 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Rossi, S. Barba and L. F. Olivero. 'CubeME', a Variation for an Immaterial Rebuilding. In Rappresentazione / Materiale / Immateriale. Drawing as (in)Tangible Representation, 31--36. Rome, 2018. Retrieved September 2018 from http://hdl.handle.net/11591/392282Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. F. Olivero, A. Rossi, and S. Barba. 2019. A Codification of the Cubic Projection to Generate Immersive Models. diségno 4 (June 2019), 53--63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26375/disegno.4.2019.07Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. V. Correia and L. Romão. 2007. Extended Perspective System. In Proceedings of the 25th eCAADe International Conference. Frankfurt, 185--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. S. Scherotter. 2018. Sketch 360. (Nov. 2018). Retrieved September 2019 from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/garage/profiles/sketch-360/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Araújo. 2017. Cardboarding Mixed Reality with Dürer Machines. In 5th Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics & X. Univ. do Porto, Lisbon, 102--113. http://2017.xcoax.org/xCoAx2017.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. T. Luciani and J. Lundberg. 2016. Enabling Designers to Sketch Immersive Fulldome Presentations. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, California, 1490--1496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892343Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Mace. 1932. The Psychology of Study. McBride, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. F. Spitzer. 1939. Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30 (1939), 641--657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. B. Araújo. Eq A Sketch 360. Retrieved September 2019 from http://www.univ-ab.pt/~aaraujo/eqasketch360.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Eq A Sketch 360, a Serious Toy for Drawing Equirectangular Spherical Perspectives

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!