10.1145/3359996.3364818acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedings
research-article
Free Access

Augmented Reality Visualisation Concepts to Support Intraoperative Distance Estimation

ABSTRACT

The estimation of distances and spatial relations between surgical instruments and surrounding anatomical structures is a challenging task for clinicians in image-guided surgery. Using augmented reality (AR), navigation aids can be displayed directly at the intervention site to support the assessment of distances and reduce the risk of damage to healthy tissue. To this end, four distance-encoding visualisation concepts were developed using a head-mounted optical see-through AR setup and evaluated by conducting a comparison study. Results suggest the general advantage of the proposed methods compared to a blank visualisation providing no additional information. Using a Distance Sensor concept signalising the proximity of nearby structures resulted in the least time the instrument was located below 5mm to surrounding risk structures and yielded the least amount of collisions with them.

References

  1. D. Black, C. Hansen, A. Nabavi, R. Kikinis, and H. Hahn. 2017. A Survey of Auditory Display in Image-Guided Interventions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12, 10 (2017), 1665–1676.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Rositsa Bogdanova, Pierre Boulanger, and Bin Zheng. 2016. Depth perception of surgeons in minimally invasive surgery. Surgical Innovation 23, 5 (2016), 515–524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Hyunseok Choi, Byunghyun Cho, Ken Masamune, Makoto Hashizume, and Jaesung Hong. 2016. An effective visualization technique for depth perception in augmented reality-based surgical navigation. Int J Med Robot 12, 1 (2016), 62–72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lucio T. De Paolis and Valerio De Luca. 2018. Augmented visualization with depth perception cues to improve the surgeon’s performance in minimally invasive surgery. Med Biol Eng Comput (2018), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Christian Hansen, Stephan Zidowitz, Felix Ritter, Christoph Lange, Karl Oldhafer, and Horst K Hahn. 2013. Risk maps for liver surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8, 3 (2013), 419–428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Florian Heinrich, Gerd Schmidt, Kai Bornemann, Anna L Roethe, Walid I Essayed, and Christian Hansen. 2019. Visualization concepts to improve spatial perception for instrument navigation in image-guided surgery. In Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, Vol. 10951. 1095125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dietrich Manzey, Stefan Röttger, J Elin Bahner-Heyne, Dirk Schulze-Kissing, Andreas Dietz, Jürgen Meixensberger, and Gero Strauss. 2009. Image-guided navigation: the surgeon’s perspective on performance consequences and human factors issues. Int J Med Robot 5, 3 (2009), 297–308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)159
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!