Abstract
Game jams, which are game creation events in which developers design and build a game over a short period of time, have been shown to support participatory, active STEM learning. Game jams have expanded from their origins as physically co-located experiences and many are now conducted exclusively online. Though the co-located game jam has been noted as educational, little is known about how learning happens within online game jams. To better understand the ways online game jams support self-development, we interviewed fifteen online jam participants about their learning experiences during their jams. Additionally, we observed and analyzed several jams using activity theory. We found that online game jams support participants' learning through extensive feedback from others during and after the jam. Such feedback sessions were a key social and participatory learning elements for online jams, providing much-need social support. In contrast to the group-focused development in offline jams many participants in our study chose to develop games alone. Many individuals participated in online game jams regularly, treating them as a broader experience than singular events. We use these findings to discuss how we might better design for self-directed learning online and offer suggestions on how to better attune online game jams to the needs of participants.
- Attwell, G. 2007. Personal Learning Environments-the future of eLearning? Elearning papers. 2, 1 (Jan. 2007), 1--8.Google Scholar
- Baek, J. and Shore, J. 2016. Promoting Student Engagement in MOOCs. Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 293--296.Google Scholar
- Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google Scholar
- Brockett, R.G. and Hiemstra, R. 1991. Self-Direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge Series on Theory and Practice of Adult Education in North America. ERIC.Google Scholar
- Campbell, J. et al. 2016. Thousands of Positive Reviews: Distributed Mentoring in Online Fan Communities. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 691--704.Google Scholar
- Chan, C.K.K. 2012. Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a discussion. Metacognition and Learning. 7, 1 (Apr. 2012), 63--73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012--9086-z.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Clark, W. et al. 2009. Beyond Web 2.0: Mapping the technology landscapes of young learners. Journal of computer assisted learning. 25, 1 (2009), 56--69.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Dabbagh, N. and Kitsantas, A. 2012. Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education. 15, 1 (Jan. 2012), 3--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Dabbagh, N. and Reo, R. 2011. Back to the future: Tracing the roots and learning affordances of social software. Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. IGI Global. 1--20.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. 1999. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Perspectives on activity theory. 19, 38 (1999).Google Scholar
- Engestrom, Y. 2000. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics. 43, 7 (2000), 960--974.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. and Sannino, A. 2010. Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review. 5, 1 (Jan. 2010), 1--24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002.Google Scholar
- Evans, S. et al. 2017. More Than Peer Production: Fanfiction Communities As Sites of Distributed Mentoring. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2017), 259--272.Google Scholar
- Faas, T. et al. 2018. Watch Me Code: Programming Mentorship Communities on Twitch.Tv. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 50:1--50:18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3274319.Google Scholar
- Fine, G.A. 2012. Tiny publics: A theory of group action and culture. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Fowler, A. et al. 2013. The evolution and significance of the Global Game Jam. Proc. of the Foundations of Digital Games Conference (2013).Google Scholar
- Fowler, A. et al. 2013. The global game jam for teaching and learning. Proccedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Computing and Information Technology Research and Education New Zealand (2013), 28--34.Google Scholar
- Fowler, A. et al. 2015. Trends in organizing philosophies of game jams and game hackathons. GJ Workshop. FDG2015 (2015).Google Scholar
- Garrison, D.R. 1997. Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult education quarterly. 48, 1 (1997), 18--33.Google Scholar
- Georgen, C. et al. 2015. From lurking to participatory spectatorship: Understanding affordances of the Dota 2 noob stream. 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. ISLS (2015).Google Scholar
- Guevara-Villalobos, O. 2011. Cultures of independent game production: Examining the relationship between community and labour. DiGRA Conference (2011).Google Scholar
- Haaranen, L. 2017. Programming As a Performance: Live-streaming and Its Implications for Computer Science Education. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (New York, NY, USA, 2017), 353--358.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hunicke, R. et al. 2004. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI (2004), 1722.Google Scholar
- Joksimovic, S. et al. 2015. How Do You Connect?: Analysis of Social Capital Accumulation in Connectivist MOOCs. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 64--68.Google Scholar
- Joksimovic, S. et al. 2015. What Do cMOOC Participants Talk About in Social Media?: A Topic Analysis of Discourse in a cMOOC. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 156--165.Google Scholar
- Kaptelinin, V. and Nardi, B.A. 2006. Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT press.Google Scholar
- Kolog, E.A. et al. 2016. Hackathon for Learning Digital Theology in Computer Science. International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science. 8, 6 (2016).Google Scholar
- Kou, Y. and Gray, C.M. 2017. Supporting Distributed Critique Through Interpretation and Sense-Making in an Online Creative Community. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 60:1--60:18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3134695.Google Scholar
- Kreimeier, B. 2002. The case for game design patterns.Google Scholar
- Kultima, A. et al. 2016. Building Finnish Game Jam Community Through Positive Social Facilitation. Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 433--440.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kultima, A. 2015. Defining Game Jam. FDG (2015).Google Scholar
- Kultima, A. 2018. Design Values of Game Jam Organizers Case: Global Game Jam 2018 in Finland. Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons, and Game Creation Events (New York, NY, USA, 2018), 21--27.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Leont'ev, A.N. 1978. Activity, consciousness, and personality. (1978).Google Scholar
- Locke, R. et al. 2015. The game jam movement: disruption, performance and artwork. Proceedings of the 10th International conference on the foundations of digital games (FDG 2015), June 22--25, 2015, Pacific Grove, CA (2015).Google Scholar
- Luther, K. et al. 2015. Structuring, Aggregating, and Evaluating Crowdsourced Design Critique. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 473--485.Google Scholar
- Luther, K. et al. 2010. Why It Works (when It Works): Success Factors in Online Creative Collaboration. Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 1--10.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Marlow, J. and Dabbish, L. 2014. From Rookie to All-star: Professional Development in a Graphic Design Social Networking Site. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 922--933.Google Scholar
- McGowan, A. et al. 2016. Teaching Programming: Understanding Lecture Capture YouTube Analytics. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 35--40.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Milligan, C. et al. 2013. Patterns of Engagement in Connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching; Long Beach. 9, 2 (Mar. 2013), 149.Google Scholar
- Muncy, J. 2017. Making Videogames the Old-Fashioned Way-On a 52-Hour Train Ride. Wired.Google Scholar
- Nardi, B.A. 1996. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. mit Press.Google Scholar
- Nascimento, G. et al. 2014. Modeling and Analyzing the Video Game Live-Streaming Community. 2014 9th Latin American Web Congress (Oct. 2014), 1--9.Google Scholar
- Olesen, J.F. and Halskov, K. 2018. The Dynamic Design Space During a Game Jam. Proceedings of the 22Nd International Academic Mindtrek Conference (New York, NY, USA, 2018), 30--38.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Pirker, J. et al. 2018. Social Aspects of the Game Development Process in the Global Gam Jam. Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons, and Game Creation Events (New York, NY, USA, 2018), 9--16.Google Scholar
- Pirker, J. and Voll, K. Group forming processes-experiences and best practice from different game jams.Google Scholar
- Roque, R. et al. 2012. From Tools to Communities: Designs to Support Online Creative Collaboration in Scratch. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 220--223.Google Scholar
- Saadatmand, M. and Kumpulainen, K. 2014. Participants' Perceptions of Learning and Networking in Connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching; Long Beach. 10, 1 (Mar. 2014), n/a.Google Scholar
- Shin, K. et al. 2012. Localizing global game jam: Designing game development for collaborative learning in the social context. International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (2012), 117--132.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Siemens, G. 2014. Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. (Feb. 2014).Google Scholar
- Steinke, T. et al. 2016. Understanding a Community: Observations from the Global Game Jam Survey Data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons, and Game Creation Events (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 15--21.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sylvan, E. 2010. Predicting influence in an online community of creators. (Apr. 2010), 1913--1916.Google Scholar
- The Art Of Game Polish: Developers Speak: https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/132611/the_art_of_game_polish_developers_.php. Accessed: 2019-06-03.Google Scholar
- The Finish a Game Jam: https://itch.io/jam/the-finish-a-game-jam. Accessed: 2019-06-03.Google Scholar
- Thomas, L. and Owen, C. 2013. Living the indie life: Mapping creative teams in a 48 hour game jam and playing with data. Proceedings of The 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Matters of Life and Death (2013), 15.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Warner, J. and Guo, P.J. 2017. Hack.Edu: Examining How College Hackathons Are Perceived By Student Attendees and Non-Attendees. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (New York, NY, USA, 2017), 254--262.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Wenger, E. et al. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
- Xu, A. and Bailey, B. 2012. What Do You Think?: A Case Study of Benefit, Expectation, and Interaction in a Large Online Critique Community. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 295--304.Google Scholar
- Yuan, A. et al. 2016. Almost an Expert: The Effects of Rubrics and Expertise on Perceived Value of Crowdsourced Design Critiques. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 1005--1017.Google Scholar
- Zheng, S. et al. 2016. The Role of Social Media in MOOCs: How to Use Social Media to Enhance Student Retention. Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 419--428.Google Scholar
- Zook, A. and Riedl, M.O. 2013. Game conceptualization and development processes in the global game jam. Workshop proceedings of the 8th international conference on the foundations of digital games (2013).Google Scholar
Recommendations
Game jam: [4 research]
CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsRecent years have witnessed a rise in Game Jams - organized events to create playable prototypes in a very short time frame. Game Jams offer a unique and quick way to prototype games. Beyond that, we believe Game Jams can also be seen as a design ...
Game Jam Natives?: The Rise of the Game Jam Era in Game Development Cultures
ICGJ 2021: Sixth Annual International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons, and Game Creation EventsGame jams bring all kinds of creators together to make games from scratch in a relatively short time, often based on shared design constraints. The most influential game jam, Global Game Jam (GGJ) was established in 2009 as an annual event connecting ...
The Dynamic Design Space During a Game Jam
Mindtrek '18: Proceedings of the 22nd International Academic Mindtrek ConferenceGame jams have gained an increasingly important role in game development communities, and have attracted attention in academia as well. However, research on how game jam formats shapes and drives creativity and design processes is scarce, and needs ...






Comments