10.1145/3365109.3368769acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdcatConference Proceedings
short-paper

In-situ Data Analysis System for High Resolution Meteorological Large Eddy Simulation Model

ABSTRACT

In meteorology, high-resolution simulations using large eddy simulation (LES) models have attracted strong attention. In these LES models, the output data become large, because the spatio-temporal resolution is higher than that of conventional meteorological simulations. Therefore, I/O requirements become much more demanding. In addition, it becomes challenging to analyze the results of these simulations, owing to a large data set size. To overcome these problems, it is necessary to consider hardware and software architectures for in-situ data analysis, for accommodating these I/O requirements. In this study, we propose a large-scale fluid analysis system combining a meteorological LES model and dynamic mode decomposition (DMD). We propose to use a burst buffer as a temporary storage space for storing large-scale output of LES models, and to read these data from DMD. The burst buffer is an all-flash storage system between compute nodes and a parallel file system. The I/O performance of the LES output and DMD input of this workflow is analyzed, and it is shown that the proposed burst buffer is an effective medium for in-situ data analysis.

References

  1. J. Bent, G. Gibson, G. Grider, B. McClelland, P. Nowoczynski, J. Nunez, M. Polte, and M. Wingate. 2009. PLFS: a checkpoint filesystem for parallel applications. In Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/1654059.1654081Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wahid Bhimji, Debbie Bard, Melissa Romanus, David Paul, Andrey Ovsyan- nikov, Brian Friesen, Matt Bryson, Joaquin Correa, Glenn K Lockwood, Vakho Tsulaia, et al. 2016. Accelerating science with the NERSC burst buffer early user program. CUG2016 proceedings (2016), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jose J Camata, Vitor Silva, Patrick Valduriez, Marta Mattoso, and Alvaro LGA Coutinho. 2018. In situ visualization and data analysis for turbidity currents simulation. Computers & Geosciences 110 (2018), 23--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cray [n. d.]. DataWarp User Guide. ([n. d.]). http://docs.cray.com/books/ S-2558--5204/S2558--5204.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rafael Ferreira da Silva, Scott Callaghan, and Ewa Deelman. 2017. On the Use of Burst Buffers for Accelerating Data-intensive Scientific Workflows. In Pro- ceedings of the 12th Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science (WORKS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3150994.3151000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Christopher S Daley, Devarshi Ghoshal, Glenn K Lockwood, Sudip Dosanjh, La- vanya Ramakrishnan, and Nicholas J Wright. 2016. Performance characteriza- tion of scientificworkflows for the optimal use of burst buffers. In 11thWorkflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, WORKS'16. 69--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. David Ellsworth, Bryan Green, Chris Henze, Patrick Moran, and Timothy Sand- strom. 2006. Concurrent visualization in a production supercomputing environ- ment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 5 (2006), 997--1004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ryosaku. Ikeda, Hiroyuki Kusaka, Satoru Iizuka, and Taisuke Boku. 2015. Devel- opment of Urban Meteorological LES model for Thermal Environment at City Scale. In 9th International Conference for Urban Climate. 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. JCAHPC [n. d.]. Basic Specification of Oakforest-PACS. ([n. d.]). http://jcahpc. jp/files/OFP-basic.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ning Liu, Jason Cope, Philip Carns, Christopher Carothers, Robert Ross, Gary Grider, Adam Crume, and Carlos Maltzahn. 2012. On the role of burst buffers in leadership-class storage systems. In 2012 IEEE 28th Symposium on Mass Stor- age Systems and Technologies (MSST). 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSST.2012. 6232369Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lustre [n. d.]. Lustre File System. http://www.lustre.org. ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Keigo Matsuda, Ryo Onishi, and Keiko Takahashi. 2018. Tree-crown-resolving large-eddy simulation coupled with three-dimensional radiative transfer model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 173 (2018), 53--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kento Sato, Kathryn Mohror, Adam Moody, Todd Gamblin, Bronis R De Supin- ski, Naoya Maruyama, and Satoshi Matsuoka. 2014. A User-Level InfiniBand- Based File System and Checkpoint Strategy for Burst Buffers. In 2014 14th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing. 21-- 30. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2014.24Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Wolfram Schenck, Salem El Sayed, Maciej Foszczynski, Wilhelm Homberg, and Dirk Pleiter. 2017. Evaluation and Performance Modeling of a Burst Buffer So- lution. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 50, 2 (Jan. 2017), 12--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3041710.3041714Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Peter J. Schmid. 2010. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experi- mental data. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 656 (2010), 5--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Unidata [n. d.]. What is chunking? ([n. d.]). https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ software/netcdf/workshops/2011/nc4chunking/WhatIsChunking.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. T. Wang, K. Mohror, A. Moody, K. Sato, and W. Yu. 2016. An Ephemeral Burst- Buffer File System for Scientific Applications. In SC '16: Proceedings of the Inter- national Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. 807--818. https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2016.68Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hongfeng Yu, Chaoli Wang, Ray W Grout, Jacqueline H Chen, and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2010. In situ visualization for large-scale combustion simulations. IEEE computer graphics and applications 30, 3 (2010), 45--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. In-situ Data Analysis System for High Resolution Meteorological Large Eddy Simulation Model

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!