Mihaela Sabin
Stuart Zweben
ABSTRACT
Enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of undergraduate students in Information Technology (IT) programs are useful measures of institutional performance. Disaggregated by demographics characteristics, such as gender, race, and ethnicity, analysis of student data across IT programs in the U.S. supports the exploration of the breadth and diversity of student participation in IT. Evaluating undergraduate IT programs is particularly challenging for multiple factors, including: IT programs are not always titled "Information Technology"; IT programs are not always ABET-accredited; and IT programs may be housed in various academic units, such as business, computing, engineering, technology, or information sciences.
This paper builds on prior work used to identify IT programs in the U.S., including the National Center for Education Statistics' Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) codes, specifically CIP code 11 that designates IT and other computing programs. It also refines CIP code-based program identification and then analyzes 2017-2018 student data from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center to evaluate IT programs through a student participation lens. The in-depth analysis of student enrollment, retention, and graduation is intended to support IT programs with designing more inclusive learning environments that increase participation of all students, in particular women and racial and ethnic minority students. This paper finally signals the importance of CIP codes that designate IT programs and focuses attention to the role that faculty, IT programs, and SIGITE community at large need to have in CIP code selection to further advance research in IT education.
- J Scott Brown, Nader Mehri, Phyllis Cummins, Peter Riley Bahr, and Pallavi Timilsina. 2017. Understanding the enrollment trends among older learners in higher education in Ohio. Innovation in Aging, Vol. 1 (6 2017), 1204--1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx004.4380.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- CSAB.org. 2020. CSAB Leadership. https://csab.org/about-us/#leadership, Accessed Aug 12, 2020.Google Scholar
- Andrew Hansen, Bikalpa Neupane, Barry M. Lunt, and Richard Ofori. 2012. Identifying and Evaluating Information Technology Bachelor's Degree Programs. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Research in Information Technology (RIIT '12). ACM, New York, 19--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380790.2380796.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Richard G. Helps, Barry M. Lunt, and David K. Anthony. 2005. ABET Accreditation with IT Criteria. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '05). ACM, New York, 353--359. https://doi.org/10.1145/1095714.1095716.Google Scholar
- Barry Lunt, Joseph Ekstrom, Sandra Gorka, Greg Hislop, Reza Kamali, Eydie Lawson, Richard LeBlanc, Jacob Miller, and Han Reichgelt. 2008. Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Technical Report. ACM/IEEE Computer Society Task Force, New York.Google Scholar
- Barry Lunt, Brady Redfearn, Elizabeth Mitchell, Samuel Tenney, and Cayman Williams. 2019. Identifying and Evaluating Information Technology Baccalaureate Degree Programs per IT2017. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '19). ACM, New York, 5--9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349266.3351413.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barry M. Lunt and Michael Q. Adams. 2013. Identifying Information Technology Graduate-Level Programs. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '13). ACM, New York, 55--58. https://doi.org/10.1145/2512276.2512280.Google Scholar
- Barry M. Lunt and Bill Paterson. 2014. An Academic Profile of IT Faculty in the USA. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '14). ACM, New York, 163--166. https://doi.org/10.1145/2656450.2656455.Google Scholar
- Scott Murray, Sandra Gorka, Becky Rutherfoord, and Mihaela Sabin. 2018. Revising the ABET Information Technology Criteria to Reflect the IT 2017 Curriculum Guidelines. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '18). ACM, New York, 184--185. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241815.3241843.Google ScholarDigital Library
- National Center for Educational Statistics. 2010. Detail for CIP Code 11. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/cipdetail.aspx?y=55&cipid=88073, Accessed Aug 12, 2020.Google Scholar
- National Center for Educational Statistics. 2019. Introducing the 2020 Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) and Its Website. https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/introducing-the-2020-classification-of-instructional-programs-cip-and-its-website, Accessed Aug 12, 2020.Google Scholar
- National Center for Educational Statistics. 2020 a. College Navigator. https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/, Accessed Aug 12, 2020.Google Scholar
- National Center for Educational Statistics. 2020 b. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS).Google Scholar
- National Center for Science National Science Foundation and Engineering Statistics. 2019. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019. Technical Report NSF 19--304. NSF, Alexandria, VA. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd, Accessed Aug 12, 2020.Google Scholar
- Task Group on Information Technology Curricula. 2017. Information Technology Curricula 2017: Curriculum Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Information Technology. ACM, New York.Google Scholar
- Rajendra K. Raj, Jim Leone, Allen Parrish, and Mihaela Sabin. 2017. Rebooting Information Technology Programs: Panel. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '17). ACM, New York, 133--134. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125659.3125671Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dale C. Rowe, Barry M. Lunt, and Richard G. Helps. 2011. An Assessment Framework for Identifying Information Technology Programs. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '11). ACM, New York, 123--128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2047594.2047630Google Scholar
- Mihaela Sabin, Paul Snow, Simon, John Impagliazzo, Alison Clear, and Yan Timanovsky. 2018. Representative Names of Computing Degree Programs Worldwide. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE '18). ACM, New York, 105--112. https://doi.org/10.1145/3160489.3160501Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stuart Zweben. 2019. Enrollment and Retention in U.S. Computer Science Bachelor's Programs in 2016--17. ACM Inroads, Vol. 10, 4 (Nov. 2019), 47--59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366690Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stuart Zweben, Jodi Tims, and Yan Timanovsky. 2020. ACM-NDC Study 2018--2019: Eighth Annual Study of Non-Doctoral-Granting Departments in Computing. ACM Inroads, Vol. 11, 3 (2020), To appear in September 2020.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Evaluating Student Participation in Undergraduate Information Technology Programs in the U.S.
Recommendations
Evolving the information technology major by embracing interdisciplinary
The inherent interdisciplinarity, relative youth, and applied nature of the discipline of information technology makes it an ideal domain in which to experiment with curricular innovations designed to attract and retain undergraduate students in the ...
Deconstructing Successful and Unsuccessful Computer Science Undergraduate Interns
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationInternships play a crucial role in helping CS undergraduate students to commit to CS degrees and computing careers. Internships also promote students' personal and professional growth. Studies have also shown that pursuing an internship is positively ...
The funnel that grew our cis major in the cs desert
SIGCSE 08Across the US, plummeting CS enrollments and disappointing student retention have caused serious concern in recent years. Yet, in the Spring of 2007, the Berea College faculty unanimously adopted a CIS major in response to the rise in enrollment in CS0 ...
Comments