10.1145/3371382.3378373acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedings
research-article

Persuasive Social Robots using Reward/Coercion Strategies

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a user-study designed to examine the effect of reward/coercion persuasive strategies inspired by social power. We ran the study with 90 participants in a persuasion scenario in which they were asked to make a real choice to select a less-desirable option. The preliminary results indicated that the robot succeeded in persuading the users to select a less desirable choice compared to a better one. However, no difference was found in the perception of the robot regarding the persuasion strategies.

References

  1. Cynthia Breazeal, Atsuo Takanishi, and Tetsunori Kobayashi. 2008. Social robots that interact with people. Springer handbook of robotics (2008), 1349--1369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Colleen M Carpinella, Alisa B Wyman, Michael A Perez, and Steven J Stroessner. 2017. The robotic social attributes scale (rosas): Development and validation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on human-robot interaction. ACM, 254--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. JR French, Bertram Raven, and Dorwin Cartwright. 1959. The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory 7 (1959), 311--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Aimi Shazwani Ghazali, Jaap Ham, Emilia Barakova, and Panos Markopoulos. 2018. The influence of social cues in persuasive social robots on psychological reactance and compliance. Computers in Human Behavior 87 (2018), 58--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mojgan Hashemian, Ana Paiva, Samuel Mascarenhas, Pedro A Santos, and Rui Prada. 2019. Social Power in Human-Robot Interaction: Towards More Persuasive Robots. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2015--2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Byron Reeves and Clifford Ivar Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. John L Swasy. 1979. Measuring the bases of social power. ACR North American Advances (1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Katie Winkle, Séverin Lemaignan, Praminda Caleb-Solly, Ute Leonards, Ailie Turton, and Paul Bremner. 2019. Effective persuasion strategies for socially assistive robots. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 277--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Persuasive Social Robots using Reward/Coercion Strategies

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)150
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!