survey
Public Access

Multi-Label Active Learning Algorithms for Image Classification: Overview and Future Promise

Authors Info & Claims
Online:20 March 2020Publication History

Abstract

Image classification is a key task in image understanding, and multi-label image classification has become a popular topic in recent years. However, the success of multi-label image classification is closely related to the way of constructing a training set. As active learning aims to construct an effective training set through iteratively selecting the most informative examples to query labels from annotators, it was introduced into multi-label image classification. Accordingly, multi-label active learning is becoming an important research direction. In this work, we first review existing multi-label active learning algorithms for image classification. These algorithms can be categorized into two top groups from two aspects respectively: sampling and annotation. The most important component of multi-label active learning is to design an effective sampling strategy that actively selects the examples with the highest informativeness from an unlabeled data pool, according to various information measures. Thus, different informativeness measures are emphasized in this survey. Furthermore, this work also makes a deep investigation on existing challenging issues and future promises in multi-label active learning with a focus on four core aspects: example dimension, label dimension, annotation, and application extension.

References

  1. Rakesh Agrawal, Tomasz Imielinski, and Arun Swami. 1993. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’93). 207--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Erin L. Allwein, Robert E. Schapire, and Yoram Singer. 2000. Reducing multiclass to binary: A unifying approach for margin classifiers. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’00). 9--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Massih R. Amini and Patrick Gallinari. 2005. Semi-supervised learning with an imperfect supervisor. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 13, 1 (2005), 1--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dana Angluin. 1988. Queries and concept learning. Mach. Learn. 2, 4 (1988), 319--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mustafa Bilgic. 2012. Combining active learning and dynamic dimensionality reduction. In Proceedings of the 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 696--707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hans Kristian Bø, Ole Solheim, Asgeir Store Jakola, Kjell-Arne Kvistad, Ingerid Reinertsen, and Erik Magnus Berntsen. 2017. Intra-rater variability in low-grade glioma segmentation. J. Neuro-oncol. 131, 2 (2017), 393--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Matthew R. Boutell, Jiebo Luo, Xipeng Shen, and Christopher M. Brown. 2004. Learning multi-label scene classification. Pattern Recogn. 37, 9 (2004), 1757--1771.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Selcuk Bucak, Serhat, Rong Jin, and Anil K. Jain. 2011. Multi-label learning with incomplete class assignments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’11). 2801--2808.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Xiangyong Cao, Yang Chen, Qian Zhao, Deyu Meng, Yao Wang, Dong Wang, and Zongben Xu. 2016. Low-rank matrix factorization under general mixture noise distributions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’16). 1493--1501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Shayok Chakraborty, Vineeth Balasubramanian, and Sethuraman Panchanathan. 2011. Optimal batch selection for active learning in multi-label classification. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 1413--1416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Beijing Chen, Huazhong Shu, Gouenou Coatrieux, Gang Chen, Xingming Sun, and Jean Louis Coatrieux. 2015. Color image analysis by quaternion-type moments. J. Math. Imag. Vis. 51, 1 (2015), 124--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gang Chen, Yangqiu Song, Fei Wang, and Changshui Zhang. 2008. Semi-supervised multi-label learning by solving a sylvester equation. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM’08). 410--419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Myung Jin Choi, Antonio Torralba, and Alan S. Willsky. 2012. A tree-based context model for object recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34, 2 (2012), 240--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. David Cohn, Les Atlas, and Richard Ladner. 1994. Improving generalization with active learning. Mach. Learn. 15, 2 (1994), 201--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. David. A. Cohn, Zoubin Ghahramani, and Michael I. Jordan. 1996. Active learning with statistical models. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 4, 1 (1996), 705--712.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ido Dagan and Sean P. Engelson. 1995. Committee-based sampling for training probabilistic classifiers. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’95). 150--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pinar Donmez, Jaime G. Carbonell, and Jeff Schneider. 2009. Efficiently learning the accuracy of labeling sources for selective sampling. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’09). 259--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Charles Elkan and Keith Noto. 2008. Learning classifiers from only positive and unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’08). 213--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jonathan J. Entis, Priya Doerga, Lisa Feldman Barrett, and Bradford C. Dickerson. 2012. A reliable protocol for the manual segmentation of the human amygdala and its subregions using ultra-high resolution MRI. Neuroimage 60, 2 (2012), 1226--1235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Andrea Esuli and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2009. Active learning strategies for multi-label text classification. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR’09). 102--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yifan Fu, Xingquan Zhu, and Bin Li. 2013. A survey on instance selection for active learning. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 35, 2 (2013), 249--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Atsushi Fujii, Takenobu Tokunaga, Kentaro Inui, and Hozumi Tanaka. 1998. Selective sampling for example-based word sense disambiguation. Comput. Linguist. 24, 4 (1998), 573--597.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gabriel Pui Cheong Fung, Jeffrey X. Yu, Hongjun Lu, and Philip S. Yu. 2006. Text classification without negative examples revisit. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18, 1 (2006), 6--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nengneng Gao, Sheng-Jun Huang, and Songcan Chen. 2016. Multi-label active learning by model guided distribution matching. Front. Comput. Sci. 10, 5 (2016), 845--855.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Eva Gibaja and Sebastián Ventura. 2015. A tutorial on multilabel learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 3 (2015), 52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Robert J. Gillies, Paul E. Kinahan, and Hedvig Hricak. 2015. Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278, 2 (2015), 563--577.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Bin Gu and Victor S. Sheng. 2016. A robust regularization path algorithm for v-support vector classification. IEEE Trans. Neur. Netw. Learn. Syst. 1, 99 (2016), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Bin Gu, Victor S. Sheng, and Shuo Li. 2015. Bi-parameter space partition for cost-sensitive SVM. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’15). 3532--3539.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Bin Gu, Xingming Sun, and Victor. S. Sheng. 2017. Structural minimax probability machine. IEEE Trans. Neur. Netw. Learn. Syst. 28, 7 (2017), 1646--1656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Anqian Guo, Jian Wu, Victor S. Sheng, Pengpeng Zhao, and Zhiming Cui. 2017. Multi-label active learning with low-rank mapping for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME’17). 259--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Bernhard Pfahringer, Peter Reutemann, and Ian H. Witten. 2009. The WEKA data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newslett. 11, 1 (2009), 10--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jeff Howe. 2006. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14, 6 (2006), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Xian Sheng Hua and Guo Jun Qi. 2008. Online multi-label active annotation: Towards large-scale content-based video search. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM’08). 141--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Shengjun Huang, Rong Jin, and Zhihua Zhou. 2010. Active learning by querying informative and representative examples. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 892--900.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Shengjun Huang, Rong Jin, and Zhihua Zhou. 2014. Active learning by querying informative and representative examples. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 36, 10 (2014), 1936--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sheng Jun Huang, Songcan Chen, and Zhihua Zhou. 2015. Multi-label active learning: Query type matters. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (IJPRAI’15), 946--952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu Gang Jiang, Qi Dai, Jun Wang, Chong Wah Ngo, Xiangyang Xue, and Shih Fu Chang. 2012. Fast semantic diffusion for large-scale context-based image and video annotation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21, 6 (2012), 3080--3091.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yang Jiao. 2015. Active Learning-Based Multi-Label Image Classification. Soochow University in China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang Jiao, Pengpeng Zhao, Jian Wu, Yujie Shi, and Zhiming Cui. 2014. A multicriterion query-based batch mode active learning technique. In Foundations of Intelligent Systems. 669--680.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang Jiao, Pengpeng Zhao, Jian Wu, Xuefeng Xian, Haihui Xu, and Zhiming Cui. 2014. Active multi-label learning with optimal label subset selection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA’14). 523--534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Ajay J. Joshi, Fatih Porikli, and Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos. 2009. Multi-class active learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’09). 2372--2379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Ashish Kapoor, Kristen Grauman, Raquel Urtasun, and Trevor Darrell. 2007. Active learning with gaussian processes for object categorization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’07), Vol. 88. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Aram Kawewong, Rapeeporn Pimpup, and Osamu Hasegawa. 2013. Incremental learning framework for indoor scene recognition. In Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’13). 496--502.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Freda Kemp. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 52, 4 (2003), 691--691.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Ross D. King, Jem Rowland, Stephen G. Oliver, Michael Young, Wayne Aubrey, Emma Byrne, Maria Liakata, Magdalena Markham, Pinar Pir, and Larisa N. Soldatova. 2009. The automation of science. Science 324, 5923 (2009), 85--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Ross D. King, Kenneth E. Whelan, Ffion M. Jones, Philip G. K. Reiser, Christopher H. Bryant, Stephen H. Muggleton, Douglas B. Kell, and Stephen G. Oliver. 2004. Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist. Nature 427, 6971 (2004), 247--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. V. Krishnamurthy. 2002. Algorithms for optimal scheduling and management of hidden Markov model sensors. IEEE Trans. Sign. Process. 50, 6 (2002), 1382--1397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Kenneth Lang and Eric. B. Baum. 1992. Query learning can work poorly when a human oracle is used. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’92).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Guang He Lee, Shao Wen Yang, and Shou De Lin. 2016. Toward implicit sample noise modeling: Deviation-driven matrix factorization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.09274 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. David D. Lewis and Jason Catlett. 1994. Heterogenous uncertainty sampling for supervised learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’94). 148--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Jian Li, Xiaolong Li, Bin Yang, and Xingming Sun. 2015. Segmentation-based image copy-move forgery detection scheme. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 10, 3 (2015), 507--518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Xin Li and Yuhong Guo. 2013. Active learning with multi-label SVM classification. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’13). 1479--1485.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Xiaoli Li and Bing Liu. 2003. Learning to classify texts using positive and unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’03). 587--592.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Xuchun Li, Lei. Wang, and Eric. Sung. 2004. Multilabel SVM active learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’04), Vol. 4. 2207--2210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Geert Litjens, Thijs Kooi, Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi, Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio, Francesco Ciompi, Mohsen Ghafoorian, Jeroen Awm Van Der Laak, Bram Van Ginneken, and Clara I. Sánchez. 2017. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42 (2017), 60--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. B. Liu, Y. Dai, X. Li, and W. S. Lee. 2003. Building text classifiers using positive and unlabeled examples. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’03). 179--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Guangcan Liu, Z. Lin, S. Yan, J. Sun, Y. Yu, and Y. Ma. 2013. Robust recovery of subspace structures by low-rank representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35, 1 (2013), 171--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Deyu Meng and Fernando De La Torre. 2013. Robust matrix factorization with unknown noise. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’13), 1337--1344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Kaushik Mitra, Sameer Sheorey, and Rama Chellappa. 2010. Large-scale matrix factorization with missing data under additional constraints. Ophthal. Res. 40, 1 (2010), 35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Gulisong Nasierding and Abbas Z. Kouzani. 2010. Empirical study of multi-label classification methods for image annotation and retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA’10). 617--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Reports of International Data Corporation. 2010. Retrieved from http://www.idc.com/prodserv/prodserv.jsp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Fredrik Olsson. 2009. A Literature Survey of Active Machine Learning in the Context of Natural Language Processing. Swedish Institute of Computer Science. Technical Report T2009:06.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Guojun Qi, Xiansheng Hua, Yong Rui, Jinhui Tang, and Hongjiang Zhang. 2008. Two-dimensional active learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’08). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Guojun Qi, Xiansheng Hua, Yong Rui, Jinhui Tang, and Hongjiang Zhang. 2009. Two-dimensional multilabel active learning with an efficient online adaptation model for image classification. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31, 10 (2009), 1880--1897.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Oscar Reyes, Abdulrahman H. Altalhi, and Sebastián Ventura. 2018. Statistical comparisons of active learning strategies over multiple datasets. Knowl.-Based Syst. 145 (2018), 274--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Oscar Reyes, Carlos Morell, and Sebastián Ventura. 2018. Effective active learning strategy for multi-label learning. Neurocomputing 273 (2018), 494--508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Oscar Reyes, Eduardo Pérez, María Del Carmen Rodríguez-Hernández, Habib M. Fardoun, and Sebastián Ventura. 2016. JCLAL: A Java framework for active learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 17, 1 (2016), 3271--3275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Oscar Reyes and Sebastián Ventura. 2018. Evolutionary strategy to perform batch-mode active learning on multi-label data. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 9, 4 (2018), 46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Burr Settles. 2010. Active Learning Literature Survey. Computer Science Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. H. Sebastian Seung, Manfred Opper, and Haim Sompolinsky. 1992. Query by committee. In Proceedings of the The Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory (COLT’92). 287--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Victor S. Sheng, Foster Provost, and Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis. 2008. Get another label? improving data quality and data mining using multiple, noisy labelers. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’08). 614--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Victor S. Sheng and Jing Zhang. 2019. Machine learning with crowdsourcing: A brief summary of the past research and future directions. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’19), Vol. 33. 9837--9843.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Mohan Singh and Eoin Curran. 2008. Active learning for multi-label image annotation. In Proceedings of the Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (AICS’08). 173--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Asim Smailagic, Pedro Costa, Hae Young Noh, Devesh Walawalkar, Kartik Khandelwal, Adrian Galdran, Mostafa Mirshekari, Jonathon Fagert, Susu Xu, Pei Zhang, et al. 2018. MedAL: Accurate and robust deep active learning for medical image analysis. In Proceedings of the 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA’18). IEEE, 481--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Maja Stikic, Kristof Van Laerhoven, and Bernt Schiele. 2008. Exploring semi-supervised and active learning for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 81--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Michael D. Story and Marco Durante. 2018. Radiogenomics. Medical Physics 45, 11 (2018), e1111--e1122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Yu Yin Sun, Yin Zhang, and Zhi Hua Zhou. 2010. Multi-label learning with weak label. In Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’10). 593--598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Jinhui Tang, Zhengun Zha, Dacheng Tao, and Tatseng Chua. 2012. Semantic-gap-oriented active learning for multilabel image annotation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21, 4 (2012), 2354--2360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Simon Tong. 2001. Active Learning: Theory and Applications. Stanford University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Simon Tong and Daphne Koller. 2001. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 11 (2001), 45--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Grigorios Tsoumakas, Ioannis Katakis, and David Taniar. 2007. Multi-label classification: An overview. Int. J. Data Warehous. Min. 3, 3 (2007), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Grigorios Tsoumakas, Ioannis Katakis, and Ioannis Vlahavas. 2008. Effective and efficient multilabel classification in domains with large number of labels. In Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD Workshop on Mining Multidimensional Data (MMD’08). 30--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Grigorios Tsoumakas, Ioannis Katakis, and Ioannis Vlahavas. 2009. Mining multi-label data. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook. Springer, 667--685.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Grigorios Tsoumakas, Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis, Jozef Vilcek, and Ioannis Vlahavas. 2011. MULAN: A Java library for multi-label learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 7 (2011), 2411--2414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Devis Tuia, Michele Volpi, Loris Copa, Mikhail Kanevski, and Jordi Munoz-Mari. 2011. A survey of active learning algorithms for supervised remote sensing image classification. IEEE J. Select. Top. Sign. Process. 5, 3 (2011), 606--617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Gokhan Tur, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, and Robert E. Schapire. 2005. Combining active and semi-supervised learning for spoken language understanding. Speech Commun. 45, 2 (2005), 171--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. M. Visser, D. M. J. Müller, R. J. M. van Duijn, M. Smits, N. Verburg, E. J. Hendriks, R. J. A. Nabuurs, J. C. J. Bot, R. S. Eijgelaar, M. Witte, et al. 2019. Inter-rater agreement in glioma segmentations on longitudinal MRI. NeuroImage: Clin. 22 (2019), 101727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Meng Wang and Xiansheng Hua. 2011. Active learning in multimedia annotation and retrieval: A survey. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 2 (2011), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Zhihua Wei, Hanli Wang, and Rui Zhao. 2013. Semi-supervised multi-label image classification based on nearest neighbor editing. Neurocomputing 119 (2013), 462--468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Xuezhi Wen, Ling Shao, Yu Xue, and Wei Fang. 2015. A rapid learning algorithm for vehicle classification. Inf. Sci. 295, 1 (2015), 395--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Jian Wu, Anqian Guo, Victor S. Sheng, Pengpeng Zhao, Zhiming Cui, and Hua Li. 2017. Adaptive low-rank multi-label active learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM’17). 1336--1344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Jian Wu, Chunfeng Lian, Su Ruan, Thomas R. Mazur, Sasa Mutic, Mark A. Anastasio, Perry W. Grigsby, Pierre Vera, and Hua Li. 2019. Treatment outcome prediction for cancer patients based on radiomics and belief function theory. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 3, 2 (2019), 216--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Jian Wu, Su Ruan, Chunfeng Lian, Sasa Mutic, Mark A. Anastasio, and Hua Li. 2018. Active learning with noise modeling for medical image annotation. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI’18). IEEE, 298--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Jian Wu, Victor S. Sheng, Jing Zhang, Pengpeng Zhao, and Zhiming Cui. 2014. Multi-label active learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’14). 5227--5231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Jian Wu, Chen Ye, Victor S. Sheng, Yufeng Yao, Pengpeng Zhao, and Zhiming Cui. 2015. Semi-automatic labeling with active learning for multi-label image classification. In Proceedings of the Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia (PCM’15). 473--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Jian Wu, Chen Ye, Victor S. Sheng, Jing Zhang, Peng Peng Zhao, and Zhiming Cui. 2017. Active learning with label correlation exploration for multi-label image classification. IET Comput. Vis. 11, 7 (2017), 577--584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Jian Wu, Shiquan Zhao, Victor S. Sheng, Jing Zhang, Chen Ye, Peng Peng Zhao, and Zhiming Cui. 2017. Weak labeled active learning with conditional label dependence for multi-label image classification. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 19, 6 (2017), 1156--1169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Jian Wu, Shiquan Zhao, Victor S. Sheng, Pengpeng Zhao, and Zhiming Cui. 2016. Multi-label active learning for image classification with asymmetrical conditional dependence. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME’16). 5227--5231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Zhihua Xia, Xinhui Wang, Xingming Sun, Quansheng Liu, and Naixue Xiong. 2016. Steganalysis of LSB matching using differences between nonadjacent pixels. Multimedia Tools Appl. 75, 4 (2016), 1947--1962.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Xin Shun Xu, Yuan Jiang, Liang Peng, Xiangyang Xue, and Zhi Hua Zhou. 2011. Ensemble approach based on conditional random field for multi-label image and video annotation. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM’11). 1377--1380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Shuicheng Yan. 2012. Practical low-rank matrix approximation under robust L1-norm. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’12). 1410--1417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Bishan Yang, Jian Tao Sun, Tengjiao Wang, and Zheng Chen. 2009. Effective multi-label active learning for text classification. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’09). 917--926.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Lin Yang, Yizhe Zhang, Jianxu Chen, Siyuan Zhang, and Danny Z. Chen. 2017. Suggestive annotation: A deep active learning framework for biomedical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’17). Springer, 399--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Shu Jun Yang, Yuan Jiang, and Zhi Hua Zhou. 2013. Multi-instance multi-label learning with weak label. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’13). 1862--1868.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Chen Ye, Jian Wu, Victor S. Sheng, and Pengpeng Zhao. 2015. Multi-label active learning with label correlation for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’15). 3437--3441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Chen Ye, Jian Wu, Victor S. Sheng, Shiquan Zhao, Pengpeng Zhao, and Zhiming Cui. 2015. Multi-label active learning with chi-square statistics for image classification. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (ICMR’15). 583--586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Hong-Jun Yoon, Arvind Ramanathan, Folami Alamudun, and Georgia Tourassi. 2018. Deep radiogenomics for predicting clinical phenotypes in invasive breast cancer. In Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI’18), Vol. 10718. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 107181H.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  108. Guoxian Yu, Guoji Zhang, Huzefa Rangwala, Carlotta Domeniconi, and Zhiwen Yu. 2012. Protein function prediction using weak-label learning. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine (ACM BCB’12). 202--209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Hwanjo Yu. 2005. SVM selective sampling for ranking with application to data retrieval. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’05). 354--363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Zheng Jun Zha, Xian Sheng Hua, Tao Mei, Jingdong Wang, Guo Jun Qi, and Zengfu Wang. 2008. Joint multi-label multi-instance learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’08). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Bang Zhang, Yang Wang, and Fang Chen. 2014. Multilabel image classification via high-order label correlation driven active learning. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23, 3 (2014), 1430--1441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. Bang Zhang, Yang Wang, and Wei Wang. 2012. Batch mode active learning for multi-label image classification with informative label correlation mining. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on the Applications of Computer Vision (WACV’12). 401--407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Jing Zhang, Victor S. Sheng, and Jian Wu. 2019. Crowdsourced label aggregation using bilayer collaborative clustering. IEEE Trans. Neur. Netw. Learn. Syst. 30, 10 (2019), 3172--3185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  114. Xiaoyu Zhang, Jian Cheng, Changsheng Xu, Hanqing Lu, and Songde Ma. 2009. Multi-view multi-label active learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME’09). 258--261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Yi Zhang. 2010. Multi-task active learning with output constraints. In Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’10). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Shiquan Zhao, Jian Wu, Victor S. Sheng, Chen Ye, Pengpeng Zhao, and Zhiming Cui. 2015. Weak labeled multi-label active learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM’15). 1127--1130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. Yuhui Zheng, Jeon Byeungwoo, Danhua Xu, Q. M. Jonathan Wu, and Zhang Hui. 2015. Image segmentation by generalized hierarchical fuzzy C-means algorithm. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28, 2 (2015), 961--973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Zhi Hua Zhou. 2010. Semi-supervised learning by disagreement. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 24, 3 (2010), 415--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Zhi Hua Zhou, Yu Yin Sun, and Yu Feng Li. 2009. Multi-instance learning by treating instances as non-I.I.D. samples. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’09). 1249--1256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. Zhi Hua Zhou and Min Ling Zhang. 2007. Multi-instance multi-label learning with application to scene classification. In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’07). 1609--1616.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Zhi Hua Zhou, Min Ling Zhang, Sheng Jun Huang, and Yu Feng Li. 2012. Multi-instance multi-label learning. Artif. Intell. 176, 1 (2012), 2291--2320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Xiaojin Zhu. 2005. Semi-Supervised Learning Literature Survey. Computer Science Technical Report 1530, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multi-Label Active Learning Algorithms for Image Classification: Overview and Future Promise

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!