10.1145/3380851.3416761acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Teaching the Intersections of Technology & Design through Critical Discourse Analysis for International Audiences

Published:03 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper I discuss how I used the technics of Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis to guide students’ critical engagement with technical writing and design project for transnational/international/global context. I describe the motivation for this pedagogy, students’ learning activities, and digital project. I then discuss some outcomes from this class as well as implications for technical and professional communication. Although I currently discuss results from one face-to-face classroom at this stage, I show the possibility of an experiment to integrate critical approaches into our pedagogy in an effort to guide students’ conscientiousness about transnational/international/global contexts.

References

  1. Tracy Bridgeford, Karla S. Kitalong, and Dickie Selfe. 2004. Innovative approaches to teaching Technical Communication. Utah State University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benadette Longo. 1998. An approach for applying cultural study theory to technical writing research, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7:1, 53-73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Benadette Longo, & K. Fountain. 2013. What can history teach us about technical communication? In J. Johnson-Eilola & S. Selber (Ed.), Solving problems in technical communication (pp. 165-186). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lloyd F. Bitzer. 1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & rhetoric, 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. John M. Lannon, and Laura J. Gurak. 2020. Technical Communication, 15th ed. Pearson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Carolyn Miller. 1979. A humanistic rationale for technical writing, College English, 40(6), pp. 610-617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Deborah Balzhiser, Charise Pimentel, and Amanda Scott. 2019. Matters of form: Questions of race, identity, design, and the U.S. census. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(1), pp. 3-20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Victoria L. Bergvall, and Kathryn A. Remlinger. 1996. Reproduction, resistance and gender in educational discourse: The role of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 7(4), pp. 453-479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Norman Fairclough, 2015. Language and power. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ian Roderick. 2016. Critical discourse studies and technology: A multimodal approach to technoculture. Bloomsbury.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Theo A. van Djik. 2008. Discourse and context: A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Teun A. van Djik. 2011. Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity, in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Teun A. van Djik. 2003. The Discourse-Knowledge Interface. In: Weiss G., Wodak R. (eds) Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. 2016. Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Michel Foucault. 1972. The archaeology of Knowledge and the discourse on language.Pantheon Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Michel Foucault. 1978. The History of sexuality volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.) Pantheon Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Norman Fairclough. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Michael Weber. 1968. Wirtschaft und gesellschaft (Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology). Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Eds.). Bedminster Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Michel Foucault. 1975. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ian Roderick. 2018. Multimodal critical discourse analysis as ethical praxis,  Critical Discourse Studies, 15:2, 154-168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellen Barton and Susan Eggly. 2009. Ethical or unethical persuasion? The rhetoric of offers to participate in clinical trials. Written Communication, 26, 295–319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Anabela Carvalho and Jacquelin Burgess. 2005. Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis, 25, 1457–1469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Carolyn Dunn and Michelle Eble. 2015. Giving voice to the silenced: Using critical discourse analysis to inform crisis communication theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 717-735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Angela A. Haas and Michelle Eble. 2018. Introduction: The Social Justice Turn. In A. Haas & M. Eble (eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 3-19). University Press of Colorado.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Dennis Jancsary, Markus A. Hollerer, and Renate E. Meyer. 2016. Critical analysis of visual and multimodal texts. In Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse studies (pp.180-204). Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. David Machin and Andrea Mayr. 2013. How to do critical discourse analysis. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Simons, Gary F. and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2018. Ethnologue: languages of the World, 21st Ed. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Elvis Yevudey and G. Edzordzi Agbozo, 2019. Teacher trainee sociolinguistic backgrounds and attitudes to language-in-education policy in Ghana: a preliminary survey. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20 (4), 338–364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. G. Edzordzi Agbozo and Elvis ResCue. 2020. Educational language policy in an African country: Making a place for code-switching/translanguaging. Applied Linguistics Review, 11(3), pp. 1-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!