skip to main content
10.1145/3384419.3430406acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Achieving deterministic and low-latency wireless connection with zero-wire: demo abstract

Published:16 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the ubiquitous deployment and development of wireless technology for the Internet of Things (IoT), contemporary radio frequency (RF)-based solutions still cannot match the performance of a "wire" in terms of latency and throughput. This abstract presents a demonstration of Zero-Wire, a novel optical wireless approach that addresses this gap to enable latency-sensitive IoT applications. The essence of this approach is a new networking paradigm, referred to as a symbol-synchronous bus, wherein a mesh of nodes concurrently transmits optical signals. The demonstration setup is composed of 25 Zero-Wire nodes, forming a mesh network, and the demo showcases the network's behavior during a series of transmissions. End-to-end performance measurements include 19 kbps of contention-agnostic goodput, latency under 1 ms for two-byte frames, jitter on the order of 10s of μs, and a base reliability of 99%.

References

  1. Ferran Adelantado, Xavier Vilajosana, Pere Tuset-Peiro, Borja Martinez, Joan Melia-Segui, and Thomas Watteyne. 2017. Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN. IEEE Communications magazine 55, 9 (2017), 34--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. F. Ferrari, M. Zimmerling, L. Thiele, and O. Saukh. 2011. Efficient network flooding and time synchronization with Glossy. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. 73--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jonathan Oostvogels, Fan Yang, Sam Michiels, and Danny Hughes. 2020. Zero-Wire: A Deterministic and Low-Latency Wireless Bus Through Symbol-Synchronous Transmission of Optical Signals. In The 18th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '20), November 16--19, 2020, Virtual Event, Japan. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15 pages Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Thomas Watteyne, Joy Weiss, Lance Doherty, and Jonathan Simon. 2015. Industrial IEEE802. 15.4e networks: Performance and trade-offs. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 604--609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Achieving deterministic and low-latency wireless connection with zero-wire: demo abstract

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SenSys '20: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
              November 2020
              852 pages
              ISBN:9781450375900
              DOI:10.1145/3384419

              Copyright © 2020 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 16 November 2020

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • short-paper

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader