skip to main content
10.1145/3384419.3430776acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

milliEgo: single-chip mmWave radar aided egomotion estimation via deep sensor fusion

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Robust and accurate trajectory estimation of mobile agents such as people and robots is a key requirement for providing spatial awareness for emerging capabilities such as augmented reality or autonomous interaction. Although currently dominated by optical techniques e.g., visual-inertial odometry these suffer from challenges with scene illumination or featureless surfaces. As an alternative, we propose milliEgo, a novel deep-learning approach to robust egomotion estimation which exploits the capabilities of low-cost mm Wave radar. Although mmWave radar has a fundamental advantage over monocular cameras of being metric i.e., providing absolute scale or depth, current single chip solutions have limited and sparse imaging resolution, making existing point-cloud registration techniques brittle. We propose a new architecture that is optimized for solving this challenging pose transformation problem. Secondly, to robustly fuse mmWave pose estimates with additional sensors, e.g. inertial or visual sensors we introduce a mixed attention approach to deep fusion. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate our proposed system is able to achieve 1.3% 3D error drift and generalizes well to unseen environments. We also show that the neural architecture can be made highly efficient and suitable for real-time embedded applications.

References

  1. Farhad Aghili and Chun-Yi Su. 2016. Robust relative navigation by integration of ICP and adaptive Kalman filter using laser scanner and IMU. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 21, 4 (2016), 2015--2026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Pulkit Agrawal, Ashvin V Nair, Pieter Abbeel, Jitendra Malik, and Sergey Levine. 2016. Learning to poke by poking: Experiential learning of intuitive physics. In Advances in neural information processing systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yasin Almalioglu, Mehmet Turan, Chris Xiaoxuan Lu, Niki Trigoni, and Andrew Markham. 2020. Milli-RIO: Ego-Motion Estimation with Low-Cost Millimetre-Wave Radar. IEEE Sensors Journal (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Oscar Alsing. 2018. Mobile Object Detection using TensorFlow Lite and Transfer Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nicolas Alt, Patrick Rives, and Eckehard Steinbach. 2013. Reconstruction of transparent objects in unstructured scenes with a depth camera. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. 4131--4135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sofien Bouaziz, Andrea Tagliasacchi, and Mark Pauly. 2013. Sparse iterative closest point. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 32. 113--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlos Pena Caballero, Elifaleth Cantu, Jesus Rodriguez, Adolfo Gonzales, Osvaldo Castellanos, Angel Cantu, Megan Strait, Jae Son, and Dongchul Kim. [n. d.]. A Multiple Radar Approach for Automatic Target Recognition of Aircraft using Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar. In 2018 1st International Conference on Data Intelligence and Security (ICDIS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cesar Cadena, Luca Carlone, Henry Carrillo, Yasir Latif, Davide Scaramuzza, José Neira, Ian Reid, and John J Leonard. 2016. Past, present, and future of simultaneous localization and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age. IEEE Transactions on robotics (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sarah H Cen and Paul Newman. 2018. Precise ego-motion estimation with millimeter-wave radar under diverse and challenging conditions. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Balasubramaniyan Chandrasekaran, Shruti Gangadhar, and James M Conrad. 2017. A survey of multisensor fusion techniques, architectures and methodologies. In SoutheastCon 2017. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Changhao Chen, Xiaoxuan Lu, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2018. Ionet: Learning to cure the curse of drift in inertial odometry. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Changhao Chen, Xiaoxuan Lu, Johan Wahlstrom, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2019. Deep Neural Network Based Inertial Odometry Using Low-cost Inertial Measurement Units. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Changhao Chen, Stefano Rosa, Yishu Miao, Chris Xiaoxuan Lu, Wei Wu, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2019. Selective sensor fusion for neural visual-inertial odometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Javier Civera, Oscar G Grasa, Andrew J Davison, and JMM Montiel. 2010. 1-Point RANSAC for extended Kalman filtering: Application to real-time structure from motion and visual odometry. Journal of field robotics 27, 5 (2010), 609--631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ronald Clark, Sen Wang, Hongkai Wen, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2017. Vinet: Visual-inertial odometry as a sequence-to-sequence learning problem. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. George E Dahl, Tara N Sainath, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2013. Improving deep neural networks for LVCSR using rectified linear units and dropout. In 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. 8609--8613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Daniel DeTone, Tomasz Malisiewicz, and Andrew Rabinovich. 2018. Superpoint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 224--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Alexey Dosovitskiy, Philipp Fischer, Eddy Ilg, Philip Hausser, Caner Hazirbas, Vladimir Golkov, Patrick Van Der Smagt, Daniel Cremers, and Thomas Brox. 2015. Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2758--2766.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zi-Yi Dou, Zhaopeng Tu, Xing Wang, Longyue Wang, Shuming Shi, and Tong Zhang. 2019. Dynamic layer aggregation for neural machine translation with routing-by-agreement. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Andreas Eitel, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Luciano Spinello, Martin Riedmiller, and Wolfram Burgard. 2015. Multimodal deep learning for robust RGB-D object recognition. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 681--687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Steven Gold, Anand Rangarajan, Chien-Ping Lu, Suguna Pappu, and Eric Mjolsness. 1998. New algorithms for 2D and 3D point matching: Pose estimation and correspondence. Pattern recognition 31, 8 (1998), 1019--1031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Davide Guermandi, Qixian Shi, Andy Dewilde, Veerle Derudder, Ubaid Ahmad, Annachiara Spagnolo, Ilja Ocket, André Bourdoux, Piet Wambacq, Jan Craninckx, et al. 2017. A 79-GHz MIMO PMCW radar SoC in 28-nm CMOS. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 52, 10 (2017), 2613--2626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ankur Handa, Thomas Whelan, John McDonald, and Andrew J Davison. 2014. A benchmark for RGB-D visual odometry, 3D reconstruction and SLAM. In IEEE international conference on Robotics and automation (ICRA).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Gibson Hu, Shoudong Huang, Liang Zhao, Alen Alempijevic, and Gamini Dissanayake. 2012. A robust rgb-d slam algorithm. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 1714--1719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Daniel P Huttenlocher and Shimon Ullman. 1990. Recognizing solid objects by alignment with an image. International journal of computer vision 5, 2 (1990), 195--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Texas Instruments. [n. d.]. Automotive mmWave sensors. http://www.ti.com/sensors/mmwave/overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Texas Instruments. [n. d.]. mmWave sensors Overview. https://www.ti.com/sensors/mmwave-radar/overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Texas Instruments. [n. d.]. mmWave Training Series. https://training.ti.com/mmwave-training-seriesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jean-Pierre Joosting. [n. d.]. Radar enables heavy lifting drones to navigate in complex environments. https://www.eenewseurope.com/news/radar-enables-heavy-lifting-drones-navigate-complex-environments?from=singlemessage&isappinstalled=0#Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Deok-Hwa Kim and Jong-Hwan Kim. 2013. Image-Based ICP algorithm for visual odometry using a RGB-D sensor in a dynamic environment. In Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 2012. 423--430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Andrew Kramer, Carl Stahoviak, Angel Santamaria-Navarro, Ali-akbar Aghamohammadi, and Christoffer Heckman. 2020. Radar-Inertial Ego-Velocity Estimation for Visually Degraded Environments. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. MARK LAPEDUS. 2017. Here Comes High-Res Car Radar. https://semiengineering.com/here-comes-high-res-car-radar/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Stefan Leutenegger, Simon Lynen, Michael Bosse, Roland Siegwart, and Paul Furgale. 2015. Keyframe-based visual-inertial odometry using nonlinear optimization. The International Journal of Robotics Research 34, 3 (2015), 314--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Bo Li, Tianlei Zhang, and Tian Xia. 2016. Vehicle detection from 3d lidar using fully convolutional network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.07916 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruihao Li, Sen Wang, Zhiqiang Long, and Dongbing Gu. 2018. Undeepvo: Monocular visual odometry through unsupervised deep learning. In 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). 7286--7291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Shengzhong Liu, Shuochao Yao, Jinyang Li, Dongxin Liu, Tianshi Wang, Huajie Shao, and Tarek Abdelzaher. 2020. GIobalFusion: A Global Attentional Deep Learning Framework for Multisensor Information Fusion. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 1 (2020), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Chris Xiaoxuan Lu, Yang Li, Peijun Zhao, Changhao Chen, Linhai Xie, Hongkai Wen, Rui Tan, and Niki Trigoni. 2018. Simultaneous localization and mapping with power network electromagnetic field. In Proceedings of the 24th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Chris Xiaoxuan Lu, Stefano Rosa, Peijun Zhao, Bing Wang, Changhao Chen, John A. Stankovic, Niki Trigoni, and Andrew Markham. 2020. See Through Smoke: Robust Indoor Mapping with Low-cost mmWave Radar. In ACM International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jonathan S Lu, Patrick Cabrol, Daniel Steinbach, and Ravikumar V Pragada. 2013. Measurement and characterization of various outdoor 60 GHz diffracted and scattered paths. In MILCOM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Dimitrios Lymberopoulos, Jie Liu, Xue Yang, Romit Roy Choudhury, Vlado Handziski, and Souvik Sen. 2015. A realistic evaluation and comparison of indoor location technologies: Experiences and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on information processing in sensor networks.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. George R MacCartney, Sijia Deng, Shu Sun, and Theodore S Rappaport. 2016. Millimeter-wave human blockage at 73 GHz with a simple double knife-edge diffraction model and extension for directional antennas. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Babak Mamandipoor, Greg Malysa, Amin Arbabian, Upamanyu Madhow, and Karam Noujeim. 2014. 60 ghz synthetic aperture radar for short-range imaging: Theory and experiments. In ACSSC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Andriy Myronenko and Xubo Song. 2010. Point set registration: Coherent point drift. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 32, 12 (2010), 2262--2275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Austin Nicolai, Ryan Skeele, Christopher Eriksen, and Geoffrey A Hollinger. 2016. Deep learning for laser based odometry estimation. In RSS workshop Limits and Potentials of Deep Learning in Robotics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Chris Nuttall and Tim Bradshaw. [n. d.]. Google draws on old radar technology for its motion sensor Pixel 4 smartphone. https://www.ft.com/content/02c051ec-f005-11e9-ad1e-4367d8281195Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Yeong Sang Park, Young-Sik Shin, and Ayoung Kim. 2020. PhaRaO: Direct Radar Odometry using Phase Correlation. In IEEE ICRA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Niki Parmar, Ashish Vaswani, Jakob Uszkoreit, Łukasz Kaiser, Noam Shazeer, Alexander Ku, and Dustin Tran. 2018. Image transformer. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Michail N Petsios, Emmanouil G Alivizatos, and Nikolaos K Uzunoglu. 2008. Solving the association problem for a multistatic range-only radar target tracker. Signal Processing (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Morgan Quigley, Ken Conley, Brian Gerkey, Josh Faust, Tully Foote, Jeremy Leibs, Rob Wheeler, and Andrew Y Ng. 2009. ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System. In ICRA workshop on open source software, Vol. 3. 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Valentin Radu and Mahesh K Marina. 2013. HiMLoc: Indoor smartphone localization via activity aware pedestrian dead reckoning with selective crowdsourced WiFi fingerprinting. In International conference on indoor positioning and indoor navigation.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Jeffrey J Richardson and L Monika Moskal. 2011. Strengths and limitations of assessing forest density and spatial configuration with aerial LiDAR. Remote Sensing of Environment 115, 10 (2011), 2640--2651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Peng Rong and Mihail L Sichitiu. 2006. Angle of arrival localization for wireless sensor networks. In SECON.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. ROS.org. [n. d.]. gmapping. http://wiki.ros.org/gmappingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Muhamad Risqi U Saputra, Pedro Porto Buarque de Gusmao, Chris Xiaoxuan Lu, Yasin Almalioglu, Stefano Rosa, Changhao Chen, Johan Wahlstrom, Wei Wang, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2020. Deeptio: A deep thermal-inertial odometry with visual hallucination. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Muhamad Risqi U Saputra, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2018. Visual SLAM and structure from motion in dynamic environments: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51, 2 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Sheng Shen, Mahanth Gowda, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2018. Closing the gaps in inertial motion tracking. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. 429--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Charles Spence and Jon Driver. 2004. Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Rupesh K Srivastava, Klaus Greff, and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 2015. Training very deep networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2377--2385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Benjamin Ummenhofer, Huizhong Zhou, Jonas Uhrig, Nikolaus Mayer, Eddy Ilg, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Thomas Brox. 2017. Demon: Depth and motion network for learning monocular stereo. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Deepak Uttam and B Culshaw. 1985. Precision time domain reflectometry in optical fiber systems using a frequency modulated continuous wave ranging technique. Journal of Lightwave Technology (1985).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Sen Wang, Ronald Clark, Hongkai Wen, and Niki Trigoni. 2017. Deepvo: Towards end-to-end visual odometry with deep recurrent convolutional neural networks. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2043--2050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Sen Wang, Ronald Clark, Hongkai Wen, and Niki Trigoni. 2018. End-to-end, sequence-to-sequence probabilistic visual odometry through deep neural networks. The International Journal of Robotics Research (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Wei Wang, Muhamad Risqi U Saputra, Peijun Zhao, Pedro Gusmao, Bo Yang, Changhao Chen, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2019. DeepPCO: End-to-End Point Cloud Odometry through Deep Parallel Neural Network. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Xiaolong Wang, Ross Girshick, Abhinav Gupta, and Kaiming He. 2018. Non-local neural networks. In CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. DK Barton HR Ward. 1969. Handbook of radar measurement.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Rob Weston, Sarah Cen, Paul Newman, and Ingmar Posner. 2018. Probably unknown: Deep inverse sensor modelling in radar. In ICRA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhuoling Xiao, Hongkai Wen, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2014. Lightweight map matching for indoor localisation using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Qiang Xu, Rong Zheng, and Steve Hranilovic. 2015. IDyLL: Indoor localization using inertial and light sensors on smartphones. In ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Hongfei Xue, Wenjun Jiang, Chenglin Miao, Fenglong Ma, Shiyang Wang, Ye Yuan, Shuochao Yao, Aidong Zhang, and Lu Su. 2020. DeepMV: Multi-View Deep Learning for Device-Free Human Activity Recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 1 (2020), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Hongfei Xue, Wenjun Jiang, Chenglin Miao, Ye Yuan, Fenglong Ma, Xin Ma, Yijiang Wang, Shuochao Yao, Wenyao Xu, Aidong Zhang, et al. 2019. DeepFusion: A Deep Learning Framework for the Fusion of Heterogeneous Sensory Data. In Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. 151--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Yan Yan, Long Li, Guodong Xie, Changjing Bao, Peicheng Liao, Hao Huang, Yongxiong Ren, Nisar Ahmed, Zhe Wang, et al. 2016. Multipath effects in millimetre-wave wireless communication using orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Scientific reports 6 (2016), 33482.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Heng Yang, Jingnan Shi, and Luca Carlone. 2020. TEASER: Fast and Certifiable Point Cloud Registration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.07715 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Nan Yang, Rui Wang, Jorg Stuckler, and Daniel Cremers. 2018. Deep virtual stereo odometry: Leveraging deep depth prediction for monocular direct sparse odometry. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 817--833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Shuochao Yao, Shaohan Hu, Yiran Zhao, Aston Zhang, and Tarek Abdelzaher. 2017. Deepsense: A unified deep learning framework for time-series mobile sensing data processing. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Shuochao Yao, Yiran Zhao, Huajie Shao, Dongxin Liu, Shengzhong Liu, Yifan Hao, Ailing Piao, Shaohan Hu, Lu Su, and Tarek F Abdelzaher. 2019. SADeepSense: Self-Attention Deep Learning Framework for Heterogeneous On-Device Sensors in Internet of Things Applications. In IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Xiaoqing Ye, Jiamao Li, Hexiao Huang, Liang Du, and Xiaolin Zhang. 2018. 3d recurrent neural networks with context fusion for point cloud semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Renjie Zhao, Timothy Woodford, Teng Wei, Qian Kun, and Xinyu Zhang. 2020. M-Cube: A Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Software Radio. In ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. milliEgo: single-chip mmWave radar aided egomotion estimation via deep sensor fusion

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SenSys '20: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
        November 2020
        852 pages
        ISBN:9781450375900
        DOI:10.1145/3384419

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 November 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader