skip to main content
10.1145/3384419.3430778acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

DroneScale: drone load estimation via remote passive RF sensing

Published:16 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Drones have carried weapons, drugs, explosives and illegal packages in the recent past, raising strong concerns from public authorities. While existing drone monitoring systems only focus on detecting drone presence, localizing or fingerprinting the drone, there is a lack of a solution for estimating the additional load carried by a drone. In this paper, we present a novel passive RF system, namely DroneScale, to monitor the wireless signals transmitted by commercial drones and then confirm their models and loads. Our key technical contribution is a proposed technique to passively capture vibration at high resolution (i.e., 1Hz vibration) from afar, which was not possible before. We prototype DroneScale using COTS RF components and illustrate that it can monitor the body vibration of a drone at the targeted resolution. In addition, we develop learning algorithms to extract the physical vibration of the drone from the transmitted signal to infer the model of a drone and the load carried by it. We evaluate the DroneScale system using 5 different drone models, which carry external loads of up to 400g. The experimental results show that the system is able to estimate the external load of a drone with an average accuracy of 96.27%. We also analyze the sensitivity of the system with different load placements with respect to the drone's body, flight modes, and distances up to 200 meters.

References

  1. 9news. CU Boulder police investigating drone that flew over Folsom Field during game. https://www.denverpost.com/2017/10/19/drone-over-folsom-field/. October 19, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 9news. How Many Drones Are Smuggling Drugs Across the U.S. Southern Border? https://www.airspacemag.com/fight-today/narcodrones-180974934/. July 02, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. AJC News. Georgia man admits he tried to use drone to drop pot into prison. https://tinyurl.com/ybaft7k4. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Aker and S. Kalkan. Using deep networks for drone detection. In 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Amazon. Precision Steel Calibration Weight. https://tinyurl.com/ydfulrac. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Analog Dialogue. Understanding and Eliminating 1/f Noise. https://tinyurl.com/yb8h52d8. July 02, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Z. Anwar, Z. Kaleem, and A. Jamalipour. Machine learning inspired sound-based amateur drone detection for public safety applications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(3):2526--2534, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. ARDRONIS. This Counter-Drone System Will Safely Hijack and Capture Rogue Drones. https://tinyurl.com/yapeqh22. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. AUDS. Anti-UAV Defense System (AUDS). https://tinyurl.com/ybqckm6v. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Autel Robotics. Autel Robotics EVO. https://auteldrones.com/products/evo. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Bernardini, F. Mangiatordi, E. Pallotti, and L. Capodiferro. Drone detection by acoustic signature identification. Electronic Imaging, 2017(10):60--64, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. B. Brannon and A. Barlow. Aperture uncertainty and adc system performance. Applications Note AN-501. Analog Devices, Inc.(September), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. Buitinck, G. Louppe, M. Blondel, F. Pedregosa, A. Mueller, O. Grisel, V. Niculae, P. Prettenhofer, A. Gramfort, J. Grobler, R. Layton, J. VanderPlas, A. Joly, B. Holt, and G. Varoquaux. API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project. In ECML PKDD Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning, pages 108--122, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Busset, F. Perrodin, P. Wellig, B. Ott, K. Heutschi, T. Rühl, and T. Nussbaumer. Detection and tracking of drones using advanced acoustic cameras. In Unmanned/Unattended Sensors and Sensor Networks XI; and Advanced Free-Space Optical Communication Techniques and Applications, volume 9647, page 96470F. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. G. Cai, B. M. Chen, K. Peng, M. Dong, and T. H. Lee. Modeling and control system design for a uav helicopter. In 2006 14th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. G. Cai, B. M. Chen, K. Peng, M. Dong, and T. H. Lee. Modeling and control of the yaw channel of a uav helicopter. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, 55(9):3426--3434, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. E. E. Case, A. M. Zelnio, and B. D. Rigling. Low-cost acoustic array for small uav detection and tracking. In 2008 IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, pages 110--113. IEEE, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. L. Chen. Curse of Dimensionality, pages 545--546. Springer US, Boston, MA, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. F. Christnacher, S. Hengy, M. Laurenzis, A. Matwyschuk, P. Naz, S. Schertzer, and G. Schmitt. Optical and acoustical uav detection. In Electro-Optical Remote Sensing X, volume 9988, page 99880B. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Clifford. Fundamental principles behind the sigma-delta adc topology: Part 1. Technical Article for Analog Devices, Inc, pages 1--4, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Coluccia, M. Ghenescu, T. Piatrik, G. De Cubber, A. Schumann, L. Sommer, J. Klatte, T. Schuchert, J. Beyerer, M. Farhadi, et al. Drone-vs-bird detection challenge at ieee avss 2017. In 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. H. M. Corporation. The impact of clock generator performance on data converters.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Daily News. Mother-daughter team busted for using drone to smuggle contraband into prison. https://tinyurl.com/yavv4chn. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Dedrone. Dedrone: Complete Airspace Security Solution. https://www.dedrone.com/. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Dedrone. Worldwide Drone Incidents. https://tinyurl.com/y9d8vfh3. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39(1):1--22, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. I. C. Dikmen, A. Arisoy, and H. Temeltas. Attitude control of a quadrotor. In 2009 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies, June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. DJI. DJI Mavic 2 Zoom. https://tinyurl.com/y98ev3q5. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. DJI. DJI Phantom 4 Pro. https://www.dji.com/phantom-4-pro. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. DroneDetector. Protect Yourself From Air, Ground, and Water-Based Threats. http://dronedetector.com/. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. DroneShield. DroneShield: Detect. Assess. Respond. https://www.droneshield.com/. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Drozdowicz, M. Wielgo, P. Samczynski, K. Kulpa, J. Krzonkalla, M. Mordzonek, M. Bryl, and Z. Jakielaszek. 35 ghz fmcw drone detection system. In 2016 17th International Radar Symposium (IRS), pages 1--4. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. FAA. FAA: Drones and Weapons, A Dangerous Mix. https://tinyurl.com/y8c227s5. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. FalconShield. Falcon Shield: Automatic radio-controlled drone identiication solution. https://tinyurl.com/yaeed9gk. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Fintan Corrigan. How Do Drones Work And What Is Drone Technology. https://www.dronezon.com/learn-about-drones-quadcopters/what-is-drone-technology-or-how-does-drone-technology-work/. July 02, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. S. R. Ganti and Y. Kim. Implementation of detection and tracking mechanism for small uas. In 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pages 1254--1260. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Y. Guddeti, R. Subbaraman, M. Khazraee, A. Schulman, and D. Bharadia. SweepSense: Sensing 5 GHz in 5 Milliseconds with Low-cost Radios. pages 317--330, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. L. Hauzenberger and E. Holmberg Ohlsson. Drone detection using audio analysis. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. A. Herschfelt, C. R. Birtcher, R. M. Gutierrez, Y. Rong, H. Yu, C. A. Balanis, and D. W. Bliss. Consumer-grade drone radar cross-section and micro-doppler phenomenology. In 2017 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf), pages 0981--0985. IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. F. Hoffmann, M. Ritchie, F. Fioranelli, A. Charlish, and H. Griffiths. Micro-doppler based detection and tracking of uavs with multistatic radar. In 2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. G. Hoffmann, H. Huang, S. Waslander, and C. Tomlin. Quadrotor helicopter flight dynamics and control: Theory and experiment. In AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference and exhibit, page 6461, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. A. Hommes, A. Shoykhetbrod, D. Noetel, S. Stanko, M. Laurenzis, S. Hengy, and F. Christnacher. Detection of acoustic, electro-optical and radar signatures of small unmanned aerial vehicles. In Target and Background Signatures II, volume 9997, page 999701. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. J. Hua, Z. Xiong, J. Lowey, E. Suh, and E. R. Dougherty. Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules. Bioinformatics, 21(8):1509--1515, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Ian Beavers. Noise Spectral Density: A New ADC Metric? https://www.analog.com/en/technical-articles/noise-spectral-density.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. S. Jeon, J.-W. Shin, Y.-J. Lee, W.-H. Kim, Y. Kwon, and H.-Y. Yang. Empirical study of drone sound detection in real-life environment with deep neural networks. In 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pages 1858--1862. IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. W. Kester. Which adc architecture is right for your application. In EDA Tech Forum, volume 2, pages 22--25, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. E. Kuantama, O. G. Moldovan, I. Ţarcă, T. Vesselényi, and R. Ţarcă. Analysis of quadcopter propeller vibration based on laser vibrometer. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, page 1461348419866292, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. D. Lee and M. Lee. Low flicker noise, odd-phase master lo active mixer using a low switching frequency scheme. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 50(10):2281--2293, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. C. Liang, N. Cao, X. Lu, and Y. Ye. Uav detection using continuous wave radar. pages 1--5, 09 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. H. Liu, Z. Wei, Y. Chen, J. Pan, L. Lin, and Y. Ren. Drone detection based on an audio-assisted camera array. In 2017 IEEE Third International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM), pages 402--406. IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. LORD. IMU MicroStrain LORD 3DM-GX5-25. http://tinyurl.com/yxm8bngy. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. F. M. Mahmoud and M. Abdelghany. Low flicker-noise rf cmos gilbert-cell mixer for 2.4 ghz wireless communication systems. In 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), pages 1158--1161. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. R. Mahony, V. Kumar, and P. Corke. Multirotor aerial vehicles: Modeling, estimation, and control of quadrotor. IEEE Robotics and Automation magazine, 19(3):20--32, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. J. Mezei and A. Molnár. Drone sound detection by correlation. In 2016 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), pages 509--518. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. P. J. Moreno, P. P. Ho, and N. Vasconcelos. A kullback-leibler divergence based kernel for svm classification in multimedia applications. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 1385--1392, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. T. Müller. Robust drone detection for day/night counter-uav with static vis and swir cameras. In Ground/Air Multisensor Interoperability, Integration, and Networking for Persistent ISR VIII, volume 10190, page 1019018. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. News 5. Drone spotted dropping items into Cuyahoga County jail. https://tinyurl.com/y89db3z2. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. P. Nguyen, T. Kim, J. Miao, D. Hesselius, E. Kenneally, D. Massey, E. Frew, R. Han, and T. Vu. Towards RF-based Localization of a Drone and Its Controller. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications, DroNet'19, pages 21--26, Seoul, Republic of Korea, June 2019. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. P. Nguyen, H. Truong, M. Ravindranathan, A. Nguyen, R. Han, and T. Vu. Matthan: Drone presence detection by identifying physical signatures in the drone's rf communication. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pages 211--224. ACM, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Parrot. Parrot - ANAFI 4K Quadcopter. https://www.parrot.com/us/drones/anafi. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Parrot. Parrot Bebop 2. https://www.parrot.com/us/drones/parrot-bebop-2. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. P. Petrides, C. Kyrkou, P. Kolios, T. Theocharides, and C. Panayiotou. Towards a holistic performance evaluation framework for drone-based object detection. In 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pages 1785--1793. IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Planet Analog. SIGNAL CHAIN BASICS (Part 104): Understanding noise in ADCs. https://www.planetanalog.com/signal-chain-basics-part-104-understanding-noise-in-adcs/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. G. J. Pottie and W. J. Kaiser. Principles of embedded networked systems design. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Q. Pu, S. Gupta, S. Gollakota, and S. Patel. Whole-home gesture recognition using wireless signals. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing & Networking, MobiCom '13, pages 27--38, New York, NY, USA, 2013. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. S. Rahman and D. A. Robertson. Radar micro-Doppler signatures of drones and birds at K-band and W-band. Scientific Reports, 8(1):17396, Nov. 2018. Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. S. Ramesh, T. Pathier, and J. Han. SoundUAV: Towards Delivery Drone Authentication via Acoustic Noise Fingerprinting. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications, DroNet'19, Seoul, Republic of Korea, June 2019. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. M. Ringnér. What is principal component analysis? Nature biotechnology, 26(3):303--304, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. M. Ritchie, F. Fioranelli, H. Griffiths, et al. Monostatic and bistatic radar measurements of birds and micro-drone. In 2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf), pages 1--5. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Rong Zheng, Shuwu Zhang, and Bo Xu. Text-independent speaker identification using gmm-ubm and frame level likelihood normalization. In 2004 International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing, pages 289--292, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. F. Sabatino. Quadrotor control: modeling, nonlinearcontrol design, and simulation. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. A. Schroder, M. Renker, U. Aulenbacher, A. Murk, U. Boniger, R. Oechslin, and P. Wellig. Numerical and experimental radar cross section analysis of the quadrocopter dji phantom 2. In 2015 IEEE Radar Conference, pages 463--468. IEEE, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. A. Schumann, L. Sommer, J. Klatte, T. Schuchert, and J. Beyerer. Deep cross-domain flying object classification for robust uav detection. In 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Y. Seo, B. Jang, and S. Im. Drone detection using convolutional neural networks with acoustic stft features. In 2018 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. X. Shi, C. Yang, W. Xie, C. Liang, Z. Shi, and J. Chen. Anti-Drone System with Multiple Surveillance Technologies: Architecture, Implementation, and Challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(4):68--74, Apr. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. D.-H. Shin, D.-H. Jung, D.-C. Kim, J.-W. Ham, and S.-O. Park. A distributed fmcw radar system based on fiber-optic links for small drone detection. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 66(2):340--347, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. K. Stasiak, M. Ciesielski, A. Kurowska, and W. Przybysz. A study on using different kinds of continuous-wave radars operating in c-band for drone detection. In 2018 22nd International Microwave and Radar Conference (MIKON), pages 521--526. IEEE, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. The New York Times. Gatwick Airport Shut Down by `Deliberate' Drone Incursions. https://tinyurl.com/y7quw3jc. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. TJP. Explosive-laden drones targeted precision missile tech in Beirut - report. https://tinyurl.com/y7w7htf. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Tommy Neu. Why your high-speed ADC can never have enough SNR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. U. S. Customs and Border Protection. Yuma Sector Agents Intercept Narcotics Dropped From Drones. https://tinyurl.com/yboplk3o. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. J. Verbeke and S. Debruyne. Vibration analysis of a uav multirotor frame. In Proceedings of ISMA 2016 International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, pages 2401--2409, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. www.droneflyers.com. Basics of Radio Frequencies for FPV Quadcopter Drones. https://tinyurl.com/y75pzn2g. July 02, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. www.northwestgeorgianews.com. Report: Trio planned to use drone to to get tobacco, phones to inmate. https://tinyurl.com/y8hnamtj. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. www.wpxi.com. Man accused of using drone to drop explosives on ex-girlfriend's property. https://tinyurl.com/y9x6jw2s. July 01, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. DroneScale: drone load estimation via remote passive RF sensing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SenSys '20: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
      November 2020
      852 pages
      ISBN:9781450375900
      DOI:10.1145/3384419

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 November 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader