ABSTRACT
Autonomous perception requires high-quality environment sensing in the form of 3D bounding boxes of dynamic objects. The primary sensors used in automotive systems are light-based cameras and LiDARs. However, they are known to fail in adverse weather conditions. Radars can potentially solve this problem as they are barely affected by adverse weather conditions. However, specular reflections of wireless signals cause poor performance of radar point clouds. We introduce Pointillism, a system that combines data from multiple spatially separated radars with an optimal separation to mitigate these problems. We introduce a novel concept of Cross Potential Point Clouds, which uses the spatial diversity induced by multiple radars and solves the problem of noise and sparsity in radar point clouds. Furthermore, we present the design of RP-net, a novel deep learning architecture, designed explicitly for radar's sparse data distribution, to enable accurate 3D bounding box estimation. The spatial techniques designed and proposed in this paper are fundamental to radars point cloud distribution and would benefit other radar sensing applications
- FMCW fundamentals in TI radar. https://training.ti.com/mmwave-training-series.Google Scholar
- Intel Real Sense D415 depth camera. https://www.intelrealsense.com/.Google Scholar
- LiDAR vs. RADAR. https://www.sensorsmag.com/components/lidar-vs-radar.Google Scholar
- OS-1, Ouster 16 channel LiDAR. https://ouster.com/products/os1-lidar-sensor/.Google Scholar
- Perception matters: How deep learning enables autonomous vehicles to understand their environment. https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2018/08/10/autonomous-vehicles-perception-layer/.Google Scholar
- Report of traffic collision involving an autonomous vehicle (OL 316). https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/vr/autonomous/autonomousveh_ol316.Google Scholar
- Scalabel - bekley deepdrive. https://www.scalabel.ai/.Google Scholar
- Self-driving cars can handle neither rain nor sleet nor snow. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-17/self-driving-cars-still-can-t-handle-bad-weather.Google Scholar
- Uber self-driving car crash: What really happened. https://www.forbes.com/sites/meriameberboucha/2018/05/28/uber-self-driving-car-crash-what-really-happened/#11619a944dc4.Google Scholar
- Waymo open dataset: An autonomous driving dataset, 2019.Google Scholar
- F. Adib, Z. Kabelac, and D. Katabi. Multi-person localization via RF body reflections. In 12th {USENIX} Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation ({NSDI} 15), pages 279--292, 2015.Google Scholar
- F. Adib, H. Mao, Z. Kabelac, D. Katabi, and R. C. Miller. Smart homes that monitor breathing and heart rate. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACMconference on human factors in computing systems, pages 837--846. ACM, 2015.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Y. Almalioglu, M. Turan, C. X. Lu, N. Trigoni, and A. Markham. Milli-rio: Ego-motion estimation with low-cost millimetre-wave radar. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020.Google Scholar
- M. Bühren and B. Yang. Automotive radar target list simulation based on reflection center representation of objects. In Proc. Intern. Workshop on Intelligent Transportation (WIT), pages 161--166, 2006.Google Scholar
- H. Caesar, V. Bankiti, A. H. Lang, S. Vora, V. E. Liong, Q. Xu, A. Krishnan, Y. Pan, G. Baldan, and O. Beijbom. nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11027, 2019.Google Scholar
- L. Daniel, D. Phippen, E. Hoare, A. Stove, M. Cherniakov, and M. Gashinova. Low-thz radar, lidar and optical imaging through artificially generated fog. 2017.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Danzer, T. Griebel, M. Bach, and K. Dietmayer. 2D car detection in radar data with pointnets, 2019.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Darms, P. Rybski, and C. Urmson. Classification and tracking of dynamic objects with multiple sensors for autonomous driving in urban environments. In 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pages 1197--1202. IEEE, 2008.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- X. Du, M. H. Ang, S. Karaman, and D. Rus. A general pipeline for 3D detection of vehicles. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 3194--3200. IEEE, 2018.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, X. Xu, et al. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Kdd, volume 96, pages 226--231, 1996.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- L. Favalli, P. Gamba, T. Gatti, and A. Mecocci. Multi-radar data fusion for object tracking and shape estimation. Signal processing, 48(3):235--239, 1996.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- F. Fembacher, F. B. Khalid, G. Balazs, D. T. Nugraha, and A. Roger. Real-time synthetic aperture radar for automotive embedded systems. In 2018 15th European Radar Conference (EuRAD), pages 517--520. IEEE, 2018.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun. Are we ready for autonomous driving? the KITTI vision benchmark suite. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- T. Gisder, M.-M. Meinecke, and E. Biebl. Synthetic aperture radar towards automotive applications. In 2019 20th International Radar Symposium (IRS), pages 1--10. IEEE, 2019.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Gishkori, D. Wright, L. Daniel, M. Gashinova, and B. Mulgrew. Imaging moving targets for a forward-scanning automotive sar. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 56(2):1106--1119, 2019.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. Guan, S. Madani, S. Jog, and H. Hassanieh. High resolution millimeter wave imaging for self-driving cars, 2019.Google Scholar
- L. Hammarstrand, L. Svensson, F. Sandblom, and J. Sorstedt. Extended object tracking using a radar resolution model. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 48(3):2371--2386, 2012.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C.-Y. Hsu, A. Ahuja, S. Yue, R. Hristov, Z. Kabelac, and D. Katabi. Zero-effort in-home sleep and insomnia monitoring using radio signals. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(3):59, 2017.Google Scholar
- C.-Y. Hsu, R. Hristov, G.-H. Lee, M. Zhao, and D. Katabi. Enabling identification and behavioral sensing in homes using radio reflections. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, page 548. ACM, 2019.Google Scholar
- C.-Y. Hsu, Y. Liu, Z. Kabelac, R. Hristov, D. Katabi, and C. Liu. Extracting gait velocity and stride length from surrounding radio signals. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2116--2126. ACM, 2017.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- I. Jouny. Target identification using multi-radar fusion. In Automatic Target Recognition XVII, volume 6566, page 65660M. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2007.Google Scholar
- M. Kutila, P. Pyykönen, H. Holzhüter, M. Colomb, and P. Duthon. Automotive lidar performance verification in fog and rain. In 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 1695--1701. IEEE, 2018.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Lombacher, M. Hahn, J. Dickmann, and C. Wöhler. Potential of radar for static object classification using deep learning methods. In 2016 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM), pages 1--4. IEEE, 2016.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. X. Lu, S. Rosa, P. Zhao, B. Wang, C. Chen, J. A. Stankovic, N. Trigoni, and A. Markham. See through smoke: robust indoor mapping with low-cost mmwave radar. In MobiSys, pages 14--27, 2020.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- B. Major, D. Fontijne, A. Ansari, R. Teja Sukhavasi, R. Gowaikar, M. Hamilton, S. Lee, S. Grzechnik, and S. Subramanian. Vehicle detection with automotive radar using deep learning on range-azimuth-doppler tensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, pages 0--0, 2019.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. Maturana and S. Scherer. VoxNet: A 3D convolutional neural network for real-time object recognition.Google Scholar
- P. Mededović, M. Veletić, and Ž. Blagojević. Wireless insite software verification via analysis and comparison of simulation and measurement results. In 2012 Proceedings of the 35th International Convention MIPRO, pages 776--781. IEEE, 2012.Google Scholar
- A. Metzner and T. Wickramarathne. On multi-sensor radar configurations for vehicle tracking in autonomous driving environments. In 2018 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), pages 1--8. IEEE, 2018.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Meyer and G. Kuschk. Automotive radar dataset for deep learning based 3D object detection. In 2019 16th European Radar Conference (EuRAD), pages 129--132. IEEE, 2019.Google Scholar
- M. Meyer and G. Kuschk. Deep learning based 3D object detection for automotive radar and camera. In 2019 16th European Radar Conference (EuRAD), pages 133--136. IEEE, 2019.Google Scholar
- F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825--2830, 2011.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. D. Pendleton, H. Andersen, X. Du, X. Shen, M. Meghjani, Y. H. Eng, D. Rus, and M. H. Ang. Perception, planning, control, and coordination for autonomous vehicles. Machines, 5(1):6, 2017.Google Scholar
- M. N. Petsios, E. G. Alivizatos, and N. K. Uzunoglu. Solving the association problem for a multistatic range-only radar target tracker. Signal Processing, 88(9):2254--2277, 2008.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- C. R. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas. Frustum pointnets for 3D object detection from RGB-D data. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun 2018.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. R. Qi, H. Su, M. NieBner, A. Dai, M. Yan, and L. J. Guibas. Volumetric and multi-view cnns for object classification on 3D data. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun 2016.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. R. Qi, L. Yi, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas. PointNet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space, 2017.Google Scholar
- A. Scheel, C. Knill, S. Reuter, and K. Dietmayer. Multi-sensor multi-object tracking of vehicles using high-resolution radars. In 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 558--565. IEEE, 2016.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- K. Schuler, D. Becker, and W. Wiesbeck. Extraction of virtual scattering centers of vehicles by ray-tracing simulations. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 56(11):3543--3551, 2008.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- O. Schumann, M. Hahn, J. Dickmann, and C. Wöhler. Semantic segmentation on radar point clouds. 2018 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), pages 2179--2186, 2018.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Shi, C. Guo, L. Jiang, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang, and H. Li. PV-RCNN: Point-voxel feature set abstraction for 3D object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.13192, 2019.Google Scholar
- S. Shi, X. Wang, and H. Li. PointRCNN: 3D object proposal generation and detection from point cloud, 2018.Google Scholar
- Y. Tian, G.-H. Lee, H. He, C.-Y. Hsu, and D. Katabi. RF-based fall monitoring using convolutional neural networks. 2018.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Van Brummelen, M. O'Brien, D. Gruyer, and H. Najjaran. Autonomous vehicle perception: the technology of today and tomorrow. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 89:384--406, 2018.Google Scholar
- T. Visentin, A. Sagainov, J. Hasch, and T. Zwick. Classification of objects in polarimetric radar images using CNNs at 77 GHz. 2017 IEEE Asia Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC), pages 356--359, 2017.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Z. Wang and K. Jia. Frustum convnet: Sliding frustums to aggregate local pointwise features for amodal 3D object detection, 2019.Google Scholar
- S. Wold, K. Esbensen, and P. Geladi. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems, 2(1--3):37--52, 1987.Google Scholar
- J. Xu, M. Dong, D. Ding, and R. Chen. Multi-radar data fusion imaging based on iterative adaptive algorithm. In 2017 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES), pages 1--2. IEEE, 2017.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Yue, H. He, H. Wang, H. Rahul, and D. Katabi. Extracting multi-person respiration from entangled RF signals. 2018.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- X. Zhang, W. Xu, C. Dong, and J. M. Dolan. Efficient l-shape fitting for vehicle detection using laser scanners. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 54--59. IEEE, 2017.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Zhao, F. Adib, and D. Katabi. Emotion recognition using wireless signals. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 95--108. ACM, 2016.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Zhao, T. Li, M. Abu Alsheikh, Y. Tian, H. Zhao, A. Torralba, and D. Katabi. Through-wall human pose estimation using radio signals. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7356--7365, 2018.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Zhao, Y. Tian, H. Zhao, M. A. Alsheikh, T. Li, R. Hristov, Z. Kabelac, D. Katabi, and A. Torralba. RF-based 3D skeletons. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, pages 267--281. ACM, 2018.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Zhao, S. Yue, D. Katabi, T. S. Jaakkola, and M. T. Bianchi. Learning sleep stages from radio signals: A conditional adversarial architecture. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70, pages 4100--4109. JMLR. org, 2017.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Pointillism: accurate 3D bounding box estimation with multi-radars
Recommendations
Scalable and effective artificial intelligence for multivariate radar environment
AbstractGround based radar is a key system for aerial defence of any country. Current generations of radar use Moving Target Indicator (MTI) filter, Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) and Peak Detection (PD) algorithms for detection of target ...
High-Resolution Object Detection with SAR Imaging for Autonomous Driving
ICCDA 2021: 2021 The 5th International Conference on Compute and Data AnalysisThe development of autonomous driving technology has been rapidly developing for the past decades. One key task in autonomous driving technology is the detection of objects around the vehicle. Radars are now more and more widely equipped by autonomous ...
TileMask: A Passive-Reflection-based Attack against mmWave Radar Object Detection in Autonomous Driving
CCS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications SecurityIn autonomous driving, millimeter wave (mmWave) radar has been widely adopted for object detection because of its robustness and reliability under various weather and lighting conditions. For radar object detection, deep neural networks (DNNs) are ...





Comments