skip to main content
10.1145/3384419.3430897acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Zero-wire: a deterministic and low-latency wireless bus through symbol-synchronous transmission of optical signals

Published:16 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The performance dichotomy between wired and wireless networks for the Internet of Things primarily arises from the inherent complexity and inefficiency of networking abstractions such as routing, medium access control and store-and-forward packet switching. This paper aims to enable a new class of latency-sensitive applications by breaking all three of these abstractions to deliver a performance envelope that resembles that of a wired bus in terms of deterministic latency and throughput. The essence of this approach is a novel networking paradigm for optical wireless communication, referred to as a symbol-synchronous bus, wherein a mesh of nodes concurrently transmit LED-based signals. This paper realises the paradigm within a platform called Zero-Wire and evaluates it on a 25-node testbed under laboratory conditions. Key end-to-end performance measurements on this physical prototype include 19 kbps of contention-agnostic goodput, interface-level latency under 1 ms for two-byte frames across four hops, jitter on the order of 10s of μs, and a base reliability of 99%. These first results indicate a bright future for the under-explored area of optical wireless mesh networks in delivering ubiquitous connectivity through a simple and low-cost physical layer.

References

  1. [n.d.]. BeagleBone Black. https://beagleboard.org/black. Accessed: 2020-04-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [n.d.]. InfluxDB. https://www.influxdata.com. Accessed: 2020-05-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [n.d.]. RPMsg Quick Start Guide. https://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/RPMsg_Quick_Start_Guide. Accessed: 2020-03-06.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [n.d.]. Visible Light Communication Testbed. https://www.esat.kuleuven.be/telemic/research/NetworkedSystems/infrastructure/IoT-Lab/vlc-lab/visible-light-communication-testbed. Accessed: 2020-07-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2016. IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks. IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011) (April 2016), 1--709. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 2016. IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015 (revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011): IEEE standard for low-rate wireless personal area networks (WPANs). IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016--5997, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. David J Acunzo, Graham MacKenzie, and Mark CW van Rossum. 2012. Systematic biases in early ERP and ERF components as a result of high-pass filtering. Journal of neuroscience methods 209, 1 (2012), 212--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ferran Adelantado, Xavier Vilajosana, Pere Tuset-Peiro, Borja Martinez, Joan Melia-Segui, and Thomas Watteyne. 2017. Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN. IEEE Communications magazine 55, 9 (2017), 34--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. LoRa Alliance. 2017. LoRaWAN specification v1.1. Technical Report. https://lora-alliance.org/sites/default/files/2018-04/lorawantm_specification_-v1.1.pdf. Accessed: 2020-14-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. N. Alvi, S. S. Naqvi, S. H. Bouk, N. Javaid, U. Qasim, and Z. A. Khan. 2012. Evaluation of Slotted CSMA/CA of IEEE 802.15.4. In 2012 Seventh International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications. 391--396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dan Awtrey and Dallas Semiconductor. 1997. Transmitting data and power over a one-wire bus. Sensors-The Journal of Applied Sensing Technology 14, 2 (1997), 48--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jona Beysens, Ander Galisteo, Qing Wang, Diego Juara, Domenico Giustiniano, and Sofie Pollin. 2018. DenseVLC: A Cell-Free Massive MIMO System with Distributed LEDs. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 320--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dinesh Bharadia and Sachin Katti. 2014. FastForward: Fast and constructive full duplex relays. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44, 4 (2014), 199--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rens Bloom, Marco Zúñiga Zamalloa, and Chaitra Pai. 2019. LuxLink: Creating a Wireless Link from Ambient Light. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 166--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Abhishek Borkar and Prabhat Ranjan. 2011. Optical wireless sensor network design for a conducting chamber. In 2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks. IEEE, 990--993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Marco Cattani, Andreas Loukas, Marco Zimmerling, Marco Zuniga, and Koen Langendoen. 2016. Staffetta: Smart duty-cycling for opportunistic data collection. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems CD-ROM. 56--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nan Cen, Jithin Jagannath, Simone Moretti, Zhangyu Guan, and Tommaso Melodia. 2019. LANET: Visible-light ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks 84 (2019), 107--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gianluca Cena and Adriano Valenzano. 2002. A multistage hierarchical distributed arbitration technique for priority-based real-time communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 49, 6 (2002), 1227--1239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Tengfei Chang, Thomas Watteyne, Qin Wang, and Xavier Vilajosana. 2016. LLSF: Low latency scheduling function for 6TiSCH networks. In 2016 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS). IEEE, 93--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bo Chen, Yue Qiao, Ouyang Zhang, and Kannan Srinivasan. 2015. AirExpress: Enabling seamless in-band wireless multi-hop transmission. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. 566--577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nikolaus Correll, Prabal Dutta, Richard Han, and Kristofer Pister. 2017. Wireless Robotic Materials. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems (SenSys '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Article 24, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Conrad Dandelski, Bernd-Ludwig Wenning, Daniel Viramontes Perez, Dirk Pesch, and Jean-Paul MG Linnartz. 2015. Scalability of dense wireless lighting control networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 53, 1 (2015), 157--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yuanbo Deng and Daping Chu. 2017. Coherence properties of different light sources and their effect on the image sharpness and speckle of holographic displays. Scientific Reports 7 (12 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Marco Di Natale, Haibo Zeng, Paolo Giusto, and Arkadeb Ghosal. 2012. Understanding and using the controller area network communication protocol: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Manjunath Doddavenkatappa, Mun Choon Chan, and Ben Leong. 2013. Splash: Fast data dissemination with constructive interference in wireless sensor networks. In Presented as part of the 10th {USENIX} Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation ({NSDI} 13). 269--282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Manjunath Doddavenkatappa and Mun Choon. 2014. P3: a practical packet pipeline using synchronous transmissions for wireless sensor networks. In IPSN-14 Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE, 203--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wan Du, Jansen Christian Liando, Huanle Zhang, and Mo Li. 2015. When pipelines meet fountain: Fast data dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 365--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. D. Dujovne, T. Watteyne, X. Vilajosana, and P. Thubert. 2014. 6TiSCH: deterministic IP-enabled industrial Internet (of Things). IEEE Communications Magazine 52, 12 (December 2014), 36--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Simon Duquennoy, Olaf Landsiedel, and Thiemo Voigt. 2013. Let the tree bloom: Scalable opportunistic routing with ORPL. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Simon Duquennoy, Fredrik Österlind, and Adam Dunkels. 2011. Lossy links, low power, high throughput. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 12--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mohammad Farsi, Karl Ratcliff, and Manuel Barbosa. 1999. An overview of controller area network. Computing & Control Engineering Journal 10, 3 (1999), 113--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Federico Ferrari, Marco Zimmerling, Luca Mottola, and Lothar Thiele. 2012. Low-power wireless bus. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. F. Ferrari, M. Zimmerling, L. Thiele, and O. Saukh. 2011. Efficient network flooding and time synchronization with Glossy. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. 73--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Norman Finn. 2018. Introduction to time-sensitive networking. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine 2, 2 (2018), 22--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Ander Galisteo, Diego Juara, and Domenico Giustiniano. 2019. Research in visible light communication systems with OpenVLC1. 3. In 2019 IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). IEEE, 539--544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Zabih Ghassemlooy, Shlomi Arnon, Murat Uysal, Zhengyuan Xu, and Julian Cheng. 2015. Emerging optical wireless communications-advances and challenges. IEEE journal on selected areas in communications 33, 9 (2015), 1738--1749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. G Gräwer and W Heinze. 1997. Using a fiber optic CAN bus for the proton source control of the CERN PS-Linac. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Piyush Gupta and Panganmala R Kumar. 2000. The capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on information theory 46, 2 (2000), 388--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Navid Hamedazimi, Zafar Qazi, Himanshu Gupta, Vyas Sekar, Samir R Das, Jon P Longtin, Himanshu Shah, and Ashish Tanwer. 2014. FireFly: A reconfigurable wireless data center fabric using free-space optics. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 44. ACM, 319--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Carsten Herrmann, Fabian Mager, and Marco Zimmerling. 2018. Mixer: efficient many-to-all broadcast in dynamic wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 145--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nicolas Himmelmann, Dingwen Yuan, Lars Almon, and Matthias Hollick. 2020. Concurrent Wireless Cut-Through Forwarding: Ultra-Low Latency Multi-Hop Communication for the Internet of Things. In 2020 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Jens Horneber and Anton Hergenröder. 2014. A survey on testbeds and experimentation environments for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 16, 4 (2014), 1820--1838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Qingqing Huang, Baoping Tang, and Lei Deng. 2015. Development of high synchronous acquisition accuracy wireless sensor network for machine vibration monitoring. Measurement 66 (2015), 35--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Romain Jacob, Jonas Baechli, Reto Da Forno, and Lothar Thiele. 2019. Synchronous Transmissions made easy: Design your network stack with Baloo. In 16th International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (EWSN 2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Jithin Jagannath and Tommaso Melodia. 2018. An opportunistic medium access control protocol for visible light ad hoc networks. In 2018 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC). IEEE, 609--614.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Jithin Jagannath and Tommaso Melodia. 2019. VL-ROUTE: A cross-layer routing protocol for visible light ad hoc network. CoRR abs/1904.05177 (2019). arXiv:1904.05177 http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05177Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Abdulkadir Karaagac, Jetmir Haxhibeqiri, Ingrid Moerman, and Jeroen Hoebeke. 2018. Time-critical communication in 6TiSCH networks. In 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW). IEEE, 161--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. V. Kawadia and P. R. Kumar. 2005. Principles and protocols for power control in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 23, 1 (Jan 2005), 76--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Olaf Landsiedel, Federico Ferrari, and Marco Zimmerling. 2013. Chaos: Versatile and efficient all-to-all data sharing and in-network processing at scale. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Alleyne Leach. 1994. Profibus: the German fieldbus standard. Assembly automation 14, 1 (1994), 8--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. F. Leens. 2009. An introduction to I2C and SPI protocols. IEEE Instrumentation Measurement Magazine 12, 1 (February 2009), 8--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Nickolaus E. Leggett. 2004. Wireless bus. US Patent 6,771,9353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Carlos Ley-Bosch, Itziar Alonso-González, David Sánchez-Rodríguez, and Carlos Ramírez-Casañas. 2016. Evaluation of the effects of hidden node problems in IEEE 802.15.7 uplink performance. Sensors 16, 2 (2016), 216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Qijie Liang, Xiaoqin Yan, Xinqin Liao, Shiyao Cao, Shengnan Lu, Xin Zheng, and Yue Zhang. 2015. Integrated active sensor system for real time vibration monitoring. Scientific reports 5 (2015), 16063.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Chun-Hao Liao, Yuki Katsumata, Makoto Suzuki, and Hiroyuki Morikawa. 2016. Revisiting the so-called constructive interference in concurrent transmission. In 2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN). IEEE, 280--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Chun-Hao Liao, Guibing Zhu, Daiki Kuwabara, Makoto Suzuki, and Hiroyuki Morikawa. 2017. Multi-hop LoRa networks enabled by concurrent transmission. IEEE Access 5 (2017), 21430--21446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. KIX Lin and K Hirohashi. 2009. High-speed full-duplex multiaccess system for LED-based wireless communications using visible light. In Proc of the International Symposium on Optical Engineering and Photonic Technology (OEPT). 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Fabian Mager, Dominik Baumann, Romain Jacob, Lothar Thiele, Sebastian Trimpe, and Marco Zimmerling. 2019. Feedback control goes wireless: Guaranteed stability over low-power multi-hop networks. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems. 97--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Luiz M Matheus, Alex B Vieira, Marcos AM Vieira, and Luiz FM Vieira. 2019. DYRP-VLC: A dynamic routing protocol for wireless ad-hoc visible light communication networks. Ad Hoc Networks 94 (2019), 101941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Maxim Integrated 2010. Wake up and hear the IR. Maxim Integrated. Application Note 4467. https://www.maximintegrated.com/en/design/technical-documents/app-notes/4/4467.html. Accessed: 2020-04-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Mobashir Mohammad and Mun Choon Chan. 2018. Codecast: supporting data driven in-network processing for low-power wireless sensor networks. In 2018 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). IEEE, 72--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Masanobu Morishita. 1989. Radio bus system. US Patent 4,866,733.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Omer Narmanlioglu, Refik Caglar Kizilirmak, Farshad Miramirkhani, and Murat Uysal. 2017. Cooperative visible light communications with full-duplex relaying. IEEE Photonics Journal 9, 3 (2017), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Zhibo Pang, Michele Luvisotto, and Dacfey Dzung. 2017. Wireless high-performance communications: The challenges and opportunities of a new target. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine 11, 3 (2017), 20--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Parth H Pathak, Xiaotao Feng, Pengfei Hu, and Prasant Mohapatra. 2015. Visible light communication, networking, and sensing: a survey, potential and challenges. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials 17, 4 (2015), 2047--2077.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Nuno Pereira, Bjrn Andersson, and Eduardo Tovar. 2007. WiDom: A dominance protocol for wireless medium access. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 3, 2 (2007), 120--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Nuno Pereira, Bjorn Andersson, Eduardo Tovar, and Anthony Rowe. 2007. Static-priority scheduling over wireless networks with multiple broadcast domains. In 28th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS 2007). IEEE, 447--458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Nuno Pereira, Ricardo Gomes, Björn Andersson, and Eduardo Tovar. 2009. Efficient aggregate computations in large-scale dense WSN. In 2009 15th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium. IEEE, 317--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Stig Petersen and Simon Carlsen. 2011. WirelessHART vs. ISA100. 11a: The format war hits the factory floor. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Michael Rahaim and Thomas DC Little. 2017. Interference in IM/DD optical wireless communication networks. IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking 9, 9 (2017), D51--D63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. S. Rajagopal, R. D. Roberts, and S. Lim. 2012. IEEE 802.15.7 visible light communication: modulation schemes and dimming support. IEEE Communications Magazine 50, 3 (March 2012), 72--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Bhaskaran Raman, Kameswari Chebrolu, Sagar Bijwe, and Vijay Gabale. 2010. PIP: A connection-oriented, multi-hop, multi-channel TDMA-based MAC for high throughput bulk transfer. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 15--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. JA Richmond. 1998. Spies in ancient Greece. Greece & Rome 45, 1 (1998), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Matthias Ringwald and Kay Römer. 2005. BitMAC: a deterministic, collision-free, and robust MAC protocol for sensor networks.. In EWSN. 57--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Stefan Schmid, Giorgio Corbellini, Stefan Mangold, and Thomas R Gross. 2013. LED-to-LED visible light communication networks. In Proceedings of the fourteenth ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing. ACM, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. S. Schmid, G. Corbellini, S. Mangold, and T. R. Gross. 2014. Continuous synchronization for LED-to-LED visible light communication networks. In 2014 3rd International Workshop in Optical Wireless Communications (IWOW). 45--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Meryem Simsek, Adnan Aijaz, Mischa Dohler, Joachim Sachs, and Gerhard Fettweis. 2016. 5G-enabled tactile internet. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 34, 3 (2016), 460--473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Jianping Song, Song Han, Al Mok, Deji Chen, Mike Lucas, Mark Nixon, and Wally Pratt. 2008. WirelessHART: Applying wireless technology in real-time industrial process control. In 2008 IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium. IEEE, 377--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. ISO Standard. 1993. Iso 11898, 1993. Road vehicles-interchange of digital information-Controller Area Network (CAN) for high-speed communication (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. STMicroelectronics. [n.d.]. STM32G474xB STM32G474xC STM32G474xE. https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/stm32g474cb.pdf. Accessed: 2020-04-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Felix Sutton, Bernhard Buchli, Jan Beutel, and Lothar Thiele. 2015. Zippy: On-demand network flooding. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 45--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Felix Sutton, Reto Da Forno, Jan Beutel, and Lothar Thiele. 2017. Blitz: A network architecture for low latency and energy-efficient event-triggered wireless communication. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Wireless. 55--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Yuichi Tanaka, Shinichiro Haruyama, and Masao Nakagawa. 2000. Wireless optical transmissions with white colored LED for wireless home links. In 11th IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications. PIMRC 2000. Proceedings (Cat. No. 00TH8525), Vol. 2. IEEE, 1325--1329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Andrew S Tanenbaum et al. 2003. Computer networks, 4th edition. Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Texas Instruments 2013. AM335x PRU_ICSS Reference Guide. Texas Instruments. https://elinux.org/images/d/da/Am335xPruReferenceGuide.pdf. Accessed: 2020-01-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Texas Instruments 2019. PRU-ICSS/ PRU_ICSSG Getting Starting Guide on Linux. Texas Instruments. Application report. http://www.ti.com/lit/an/sprace9a/sprace9a.pdf. Accessed: 2020-01-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Pascal Thubert. 2019. An Architecture for IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4. Internet-Draft draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-28. IETF Secretariat. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-28.txt Accessed: 2020-06-04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Ken Tindell, Alan Burns, and Andy J Wellings. 1995. Calculating controller area network (CAN) message response times. Control Engineering Practice 3, 8 (1995), 1163--1169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Fouad Tobagi and Leonard Kleinrock. 1975. Packet switching in radio channels: Part II-The hidden terminal problem in carrier sense multiple-access and the busy-tone solution. IEEE Transactions on communications 23, 12 (1975), 1417--1433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. E. Tovar and F. Vasques. 1999. Real-time fieldbus communications using Profibus networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 46, 6 (Dec 1999), 1241--1251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Qing Wang and Domenico Giustiniano. 2014. Communication networks of visible light emitting diodes with intra-frame bidirectional transmission. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies. ACM, 21--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Thomas Watteyne, Joy Weiss, Lance Doherty, and Jonathan Simon. 2015. Industrial IEEE802. 15.4e networks: Performance and trade-offs. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 604--609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Matthew Weiner, Milos Jorgovanovic, Anant Sahai, and Borivoje Nikolié. 2014. Design of a low-latency, high-reliability wireless communication system for control applications. In 2014 IEEE International conference on communications (ICC). IEEE, 3829--3835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Matthias Wilhelm, Vincent Lenders, and Jens B Schmitt. 2014. On the reception of concurrent transmissions in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 13, 12 (2014), 6756--6767.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Andreas Willig, Kirsten Matheus, and Adam Wolisz. 2005. Wireless technology in industrial networks. Proc. IEEE 93, 6 (2005), 1130--1151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Hongming Yang and Ashish Pandharipande. 2013. Full-duplex relay VLC in LED lighting linear system topology. In IECON 2013-39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IEEE, 6075--6080.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Hongming Yang and Ashish Pandharipande. 2014. Full-duplex relay VLC in LED lighting triangular system topology. In 2014 6th international symposium on communications, control and signal processing(ISCCSP). IEEE, 85--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  98. S. Yin and O. Gnawali. 2016. Towards embedded visible light communication robust to dynamic ambient light. In 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM). 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Chao Zhang, Jia Ye, Gaofeng Pan, and Zhiguo Ding. 2018. Cooperative hybrid VLC-RF systems with spatially random terminals. IEEE Transactions on Communications 66, 12 (2018), 6396--6408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Marco Zimmerling, Luca Mottola, and Silvia Santini. 2020. Synchronous transmissions in low-power wireless: A survey of communication protocols and network services. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08557 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Zero-wire: a deterministic and low-latency wireless bus through symbol-synchronous transmission of optical signals

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SenSys '20: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
              November 2020
              852 pages
              ISBN:9781450375900
              DOI:10.1145/3384419

              Copyright © 2020 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 16 November 2020

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader