10.1145/3385955.3407929acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Effects of Brightness on Distance Judgments in Head Mounted Displays

Published:12 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many HMD applications are improved when people perceive and act similarly in the virtual world as they would in an equivalent real environment. However, multiple studies show people underestimate egocentric distances in HMDs while being reasonably accurate in the real world. Some studies also show that brightness in the periphery may be one factor influencing these distance judgments. We built upon this previous work and examine if the brightness of the entire screen affects distance judgments. Using direct blind-walking, we compared a bright environment to an artificially darkened one with a between-subject experiment. The results of the experiment indicate that overall brightness has no significant effect on egocentric distance judgment. We discuss the implications of our findings in the context of previous work. Our findings may help designers of HMD software featuring dark environments (e.g., some entertainment applications).

References

  1. Jeffrey Andre and Sheena Rogers. 2006. Using verbal and blind-walking distance estimates to investigate the two visual systems hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 3 (01 Apr 2006), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193682Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lauren E. Buck, Mary K. Young, and Bobby Bodenheimer. 2018. A Comparison of Distance Estimation in HMD-Based Virtual Environments with Different HMD-Based Conditions. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 15, 3, Article 21 (July 2018), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196885Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kung-Ching Chu, Ching-Wen Huang, Rong-Fu Lin, Cheng-Hsun Tsai, Jin-Nan Yeh, Sung-Yu Su, Cheng-Jeng Ou, Shih-Chyuan Fan Jiang, and Wen-Ching Tsai. 2014. 24.1: A Method for Analyzing the Eye Strain in Fringe-Field-Switching LCD under Low-Frequency Driving. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers 45, 1 (2014), 308–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00083.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. John Coules. 1955. Effect of photometric brightness on judgments of distance.Journal of Experimental Psychology 50, 1 (1955), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, William B. Thompson, Nathan Nash, and Michael McCardell. 2015. Egocentric Distance Perception in the Oculus Rift (DK2). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception (Tübingen, Germany) (SAP ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804408.2804422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Valentina Dilda, Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, and William B. Thompson. 2006. Angle of elevation influences distance perception to targets on the ceiling. Journal of Vision 6, 6 (2006). http://www.journalofvision.org/6/6/420/ Abstract.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hiroyuki Egusa. 1982. Effect of brightness on perceived distance as a figure—ground phenomenon. Perception 11, 6 (1982), 671–676.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hiroyuki Egusa. 1983. Effects of brightness, hue, and saturation on perceived depth between adjacent regions in the visual field. Perception 12, 2 (1983), 167–175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Mario Farnè. 1977. Brightness as an indicator to distance: relative brightness per se or contrast with the background?Perception 6, 3 (1977), 287–293.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sérgio Fukusima, Jack Loomis, and José Aparecido Da Silva. 2002. Visual Perception of Egocentric Distance as Assessed by Triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (Aug. 2002). https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.23.1.86Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Timofey Y. Grechkin, Tien Dat Nguyen, Jodie M. Plumert, James F. Cremer, and Joseph K. Kearney. 2010. How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments?ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 7, 4, Article 26 (July 2010), 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1823738.1823744Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Adam Jones, David M. Krum, and Mark T. Bolas. 2016. Vertical Field-of-View Extension and Walking Characteristics in Head-Worn Virtual Environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 14, 2, Article 9 (Oct. 2016), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983631Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J Adam Jones, Evan A Suma, David M Krum, and Mark Bolas. 2012. Comparability of narrow and wide field-of-view head-mounted displays for medium-field distance judgments. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. ACM, 119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J Adam Jones, J Edward Swan II, Gurjot Singh, and Stephen R Ellis. 2011. Peripheral visual information and its effect on distance judgments in virtual and augmented environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. ACM, 29–36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Joshua M Knapp and Jack M Loomis. 2004. Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 13, 5(2004), 572–577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Scott A Kuhl, William B Thompson, and Sarah H Creem-Regehr. 2009. HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 6, 3 (2009), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. R. Kunz, L. Wouters, D. Smith, W. B. Thompson, and S. H. Creem-Regehr. 2009. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: A comparison of verbal reports and blind walking. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 6 (2009), 1284–1293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Bochao Li, Anthony Nordman, James Walker, and Scott A. Kuhl. 2016. The Effects of Artificially Reduced Field of View and Peripheral Frame Stimulation on Distance Judgments in HMDs. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (Anaheim, California) (SAP ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/2931002.2931013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Bochao Li, James Walker, and Scott A Kuhl. 2018. The effects of peripheral vision and light stimulation on distance judgments through HMDs. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 15, 2 (2018), 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Bochao Li, Ruimin Zhang, Anthony Nordman, and Scott A Kuhl. 2015. The effects of minification and display field of view on distance judgments in real and HMD-based environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception. ACM, 55–58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Barbara Matusiak. 2004. The impact of lighting/daylighting and reflectances on the size impression of the room. Full-scale studies. Architectural Science Review 47, 2 (2004), 115–119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Daniel Oberfeld, Heiko Hecht, and Matthias Gamer. 2010. Surface lightness influences perceived room height. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63, 10(2010), 1999–2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Robert P O’Shea, Shane G Blackburn, and Hiroshi Ono. 1994. Contrast as a depth cue. Vision research 34, 12 (1994), 1595–1604.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rebekka S Renner, Boris M Velichkovsky, and Jens R Helmert. 2013. The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments-a review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 46, 2 (2013), 23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. John J Rieser, Daniel H Ashmead, Charles R Talor, and Grant A Youngquist. 1990. Visual Perception and the Guidance of Locomotion without Vision to Previously Seen Targets. Perception 19, 5 (1990), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1068/p190675 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1068/p190675PMID: 2103000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Cynthia S Sahm, Sarah H Creem-Regehr, William B Thompson, and Peter Willemsen. 2005. Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 2, 1 (2005), 35–45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Arthur E Stamps III. 2007. Evaluating spaciousness in static and dynamic media. Design Studies 28, 5 (2007), 535–557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. W. B. Thompson, P. Willemsen, A. A. Gooch, S. H. Creem-Regehr, J. M. Loomis, and A. C. Beall. 2004. Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter When Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments?Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 5(2004), 560–571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Christoph von Castell, Heiko Hecht, and Daniel Oberfeld. 2018. Bright paint makes interior-space surfaces appear farther away. PloS one 13, 9 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Peter Willemsen, Mark B. Colton, Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, and William B. Thompson. 2009. The Effects of Head-Mounted Display Mechanical Properties and Field-of-View on Distance Judgments in Virtual Environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 6, 2 (2009), 8:1–8:14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Peter Willemsen, Amy A. Gooch, William B. Thompson, and Sarah H. Creem-Regehr. 2008. Effects of Stereo Viewing Conditions on Distance Perception in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 17, 1(2008), 91–101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Bing Wu, Teng Leng Ooi, and Zijiang J He. 2004. Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information. Nature 428, 6978 (2004), 73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruimin Zhang, Anthony Nordman, James Walker, and Scott A. Kuhl. 2012. Minification affects verbal and action-based distance judgments differently in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 9, 3 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2325722.2325727 Presented at the 2012 ACM Symposium on Applied Perception.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

(auto-classified)
  1. Effects of Brightness on Distance Judgments in Head Mounted Displays

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!