ACM Digital Library home
ACM home
Advanced Search
10.1145/3391614.3393660acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedings
research-article
Open Access

Conceptualizing Augmented Reality Television for the Living Room

Publication: IMX '20: ACM International Conference on Interactive Media ExperiencesJune 2020 Pages 1–12https://doi.org/10.1145/3391614.3393660
  • 1citation
  • 452
    • Downloads
Metrics
Total Citations1
Total Downloads452
Last 12 Months452
Last 6 weeks97
IMX '20: ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences
Conceptualizing Augmented Reality Television for the Living Room
Pages 1–12
PreviousChapterNextChapter

ABSTRACT

We examine the concept and characteristics of “Augmented Reality Television” (ARTV) using a four-step investigation method consisting of (1) an analysis of commonly-accepted perspectives on Augmented and Mixed Reality systems, (2) a literature survey of previous work on ARTV, (3) relevant connections with other areas of scientific investigation from TVX/IMX, such as Ambient Media, Interactive TV, and 3-D TV, and (4) by proposing a conceptual framework for ARTV called the “Augmented Reality Television Continuum.” Our work comes at a moment when the excitement and hype about the potential of AR for home entertainment has overlooked rigorous analysis and clear-cut examinations of the concepts involved, which should be the hallmark of any exact science. With this work, our goal is to draw the community’s attention toward fundamentals and first principles of ARTV and to tease out its salient qualities on solid foundations.

References

  1. Gary Anthes. 2019. Augmented Reality Gets Real. Commun. ACM 62, 9 (Aug. 2019), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3344293Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ronald T. Azuma. 1997. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 6, 4 (Aug. 1997), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ronald T. Azuma. 2016. The Most Important Challenge Facing Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 25, 3 (Dec. 2016), 234–238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ronald T. Azuma. 2017. Making Augmented Reality a Reality. Imaging and Applied Optics 2017 (3D, AIO, COSI, IS, MATH, pcAOP), JTu1F.1. http://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?URI=AIO-2017-JTu1F.1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ronald T. Azuma. 2019. The Road to Ubiquitous Consumer Augmented Reality Systems. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 1, 1 (2019), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.113Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Caroline Baillard, Matthieu Fradet, Vincent Alleaume, Pierrick Jouet, and Anthony Laurent. 2017. Multi-device Mixed Reality TV: A Collaborative Experience with Joint Use of a Tablet and a Headset. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology(VRST ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 67, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3141196Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chris Baume. 2017. The Mermaid’s Tears. https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2017-09-mermaids-tears-object-based-audioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rik Bauwens, Hendrik Lievens, Maarten Wijnants, Chris Pike, Iris Jennes, and Werner Bailer. 2019. Interactive Radio Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3323347Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. BBC. 2019. His Dark Materials: Discover your Daemon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2019-07-personalised-documentary-data-instagramifactionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Designing Interaction, Not Interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces(AVI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/989863.989865Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Amritpal Singh Bhachu. 2011. Inclusive Technologies for Enhancing the Accessibility of Digital Television. SIGACCESS Access. Comput.99 (Jan. 2011), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/1948954.1948956Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mark Billinghurst, Adrian Clark, and Gun Lee. 2015. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 8, 2–3(2015), 73–272. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Oliver Bimber and Ramesh Raskar. 2005. Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. A. K. Peters, Ltd., Natick, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jan Bobeth, Johann Schrammel, Stephanie Deutsch, Michael Klein, Mario Drobics, Christina Hochleitner, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Tablet, Gestures, Remote Control? Influence of Age on Performance and User Experience with ITV Applications. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602299.2602315Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Matthew Brooks. 2019. Creating a Personalised and Interactive Episode of BBC Click with StoryKit. https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2019-04-object-based-media-click-interactivity-tvGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Grigore C. Burdea and Philippe Coiffet. 2003. Virtual Reality Technology. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pablo Cesar, Konstantinos Chorianopoulos, and Jens F. Jensen. 2008. Social Television and User Interaction. Computers in Entertainment 6, 1, Article 4(2008), 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1350843.1350847Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Teresa Chambel, V. Michael Bove, Sharon Strover, Paula Viana, and Graham Thomas. 2013. Immersive Media Experiences: Immersiveme 2013 Workshop at ACM Multimedia. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia(MM ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1095–1096. https://doi.org/10.1145/2502081.2503831Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Teresa Chambel, Rene Kaiser, Omar A. Niamut, Wei Tsang Ooi, and Judith A. Redi. 2016. AltMM ’16: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Multimedia Alternate Realities. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/2983298Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. José Coelho, Carlos Duarte, Pradipta Biswas, and Patrick Langdon. 2011. Developing Accessible TV Applications. In Proceedings of the 13th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049561Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. John Corpuz. 2019. 20 Remote Control Apps for Android Devices. https://www.tomsguide.com/uk/us/pictures-story/494-android-tv-remote-apps.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jasmine Cox, Rhianne Jones, Chris Northwood, Jonathan Tutcher, and Ben Robinson. 2017. Object-Based Production: A Personalised Interactive Cooking Application. In Adjunct Publication of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’17 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 79–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/3084289.3089912Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marco de Sá and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2013. Mobile Augmented Reality: A Design Perspective. In Human Factors in Augmented Reality Environments, Huang W., Alem L., and Livingston M. (Eds.). Springer, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4205-9_6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. F. de Sorbier, Y. Takaya, Y. Uematsu, I. Daribo, and H. Saito. 2010. Augmented Reality for 3D TV Using Depth Camera Input. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia. 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2010.5665956Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Brian Epstein. 1998. Script for Digital Living Room Conference Keynote. https://epstein.org/ambient-intelligence/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jennica Falk, Johan Redström, and Staffan Björk. 1999. Amplifying Reality. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing(HUC ’99). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 274–280. https://doi.org/10.5555/647985.743879Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jon Francombe. 2018. Vostok-K Incident: Immersive Audio Drama on Personal Devices. https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2018-10-multi-speaker-immersive-audio-metadataGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. David Geerts and Dirk De Grooff. 2009. Supporting the Social Uses of Television: Sociability Heuristics for Social TV. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518793Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. David Geerts, Rinze Leenheer, Dirk De Grooff, Joost Negenman, and Susanne Heijstraten. 2014. In Front of and behind the Second Screen: Viewer and Producer Perspectives on a Companion App. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602299.2602312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. David Geerts, Evert van Beek, and Fernanda Chocron Miranda. 2019. Viewers’ Visions of the Future. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3323356Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. David Geerts, Evert van Beek, and Fernanda Chocron Miranda. 2019. Viewers’ Visions of the Future. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3323356Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Simon Gibbs, Constantin Arapis, Christian Breiteneder, Vali Lalioti, Sina Mostafawy, and Josef Speier. 1998. Virtual Studios: An Overview. IEEE Multimedia 5, 1 (1998), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/93.664740Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. David Gómez, Ana M Bernardos, and José R Casar. 2014. A System to Enable Level-of-Detail Mobile Interaction with Augmented Media Objects. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing. IEEE, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2014.47Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Lauren Goode. 2019. Get Ready to Hear a Lot More About ’XR’. https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-xr/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Google. [n.d.]. ARCore Overview | Google Developers. https://developers.google.com/ar/discoverGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. O. Grau and V. Vinayagamoorthy. 2010. Stereoscopic 3D Sports Content without Stereo Rigs. SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal 119, 7 (Oct 2010), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.5594/J17314Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Nick Hanson. 2019. Creating a Personalised and Interactive Episode of BBC Click with StoryKit. https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2019-07-personalised-documentary-data-instagramifactionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Nick Hanson. 2019. Storytelling of the Future. https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2019-02-storytelling-interactive-digital-dramaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Nick Hanson. 2019. Where Next For Interactive Stories?https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2019-01-interactive-drama-stories-branching-narrativeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Intel. [n.d.]. Virtual Reality vs. Augmented Reality vs. Mixed Reality. https://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/tech-tips-and-tricks/virtual-reality-vs-augmented-reality.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaitlyn Irvine. 2017. XR: VR, AR, MR - What’s the Difference?https://www.viget.com/articles/xr-vr-ar-mr-whats-the-difference/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Aric Jenkins. 2019. The Fall and Rise of VR: The Struggle to Make Virtual Reality Get Real. https://fortune.com/longform/virtual-reality-struggle-hope-vr/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Brett Jones, Rajinder Sodhi, Michael Murdock, Ravish Mehra, Hrvoje Benko, Andrew Wilson, Eyal Ofek, Blair MacIntyre, Nikunj Raghuvanshi, and Lior Shapira. 2014. RoomAlive: Magical Experiences Enabled by Scalable, Adaptive Projector-Camera Units. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647383Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Brett R. Jones, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2013. IllumiRoom: Peripheral Projected Illusions for Interactive Experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Hiroyuki Kawakita and Toshio Nakagawa. 2014. Augmented TV: An Augmented Reality System for TV Programs Beyond the TV Screen. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS). IEEE, 955–960. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCS.2014.6911158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Yuki Kawamura and Kazuhiro Otsuki. 2018. 3D Free-Viewpoint Augmented Reality on a Second Display Synchronized with a Broadcast Program. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Communication and Information Processing(ICCIP ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290420.3290449Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Naoki Kimura and Jun Rekimoto. 2018. ExtVision: Augmentation of Visual Experiences with Generation of Context Images for a Peripheral Vision Using Deep Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 427, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. A. Leonidis, M. Korozi, V. Kouroumalis, E. Poutouris, E. Stefanidi, D. Arampatzis, E. Sykianaki, N. Anyfantis, E. Kalligiannakis, V.C. Nicodemou, Z. Stefanidi, E. Adamakis, N. Stivaktakis, T. Evdaimon, and M. Antona. 2019. Ambient Intelligence in the Living Room. Sensors 19, 22 (2019), 5011. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19225011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Jie Li, Zhiyuan Zheng, Britta Meixner, Thomas Röggla, Maxine Glancy, and Pablo Cesar. 2018. Designing an Object-Based Preproduction Tool for Multiscreen TV Viewing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Paper LBW600, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188658Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Valentin Lohmüller and Christian Wolff. 2019. Towards a Comprehensive Definition of Second Screen. In Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019(MuC’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340781Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Víctor Manuel López Jaquero, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Jose Ignacio Panach, Oscar Pastor, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2019. A Newcomer’s Guide to EICS, the Engineering Interactive Computing Systems Community. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, EICS, Article Article 1 (June 2019), 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3300960Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Artur Lugmayr, Bjoern Stockleben, Thomas Risse, Juha Kaario, and Bogdan Pogorelc. 2013. New Business, Design and Models to Create Semantic Ambient Media Experiences. Multimedia Tools Appl. 66, 1 (Sept. 2013), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1239-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Steve Mann. 1999. Mediated Reality. Linux J. 1999, 59es (March 1999), 1. https://doi.org/10.5555/327697.327702Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Steve Mann, Tom Furness, Yu Yuan, Jay Iorio, and Zixin Wang. 2018. All Reality: Virtual, Augmented, Mixed (X), Mediated (X,Y), and Multimediated Reality. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08386Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Bernard Marr. 2019. What Is Extended Reality Technology? A Simple Explanation for Anyone. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2019/08/12/what-is-extended-reality-technology-a-simple-explanation-for-anyone/#6ffa4ba37249Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Mark McGill, John H. Williamson, and Stephen Brewster. 2016. Examining the Role of Smart TVs and VR HMDs in Synchronous At-a-Distance Media Consumption. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 23, 5, Article 33 (Nov. 2016), 57 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Jennifer McNally and Beth Harrington. 2017. How Millennials and Teens Consume Mobile Video. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077548.3077555Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. L.M.J. Meesters, W.A. IJsselsteijn, and P.J.H. Seuntiens. 2004. A Survey of Perceptual Evaluations and Requirements of Three-Dimensional TV. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 14, 3 (March 2004), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2004.823398Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Microsoft. [n.d.]. Windows Mixed Reality. https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/windows-mixed-realityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Paul Milgram and Herman Colquhoun Jr.1999. A Taxonomy of Real and Virtual World Display Integration. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E77-D, 12 (December 1994), 1321–1329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Paul Milgram, Haruo Takemura, Akira Utsumi, and Fumio Kishino. 1995. Augmented Reality: A Class of Displays on the Reality-Virtuality Continuum. In Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2351, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Vol. 2351. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Keith Mitchell, Andrew Jones, Johnathan Ishmael, and Nicholas J.P. Race. 2010. Social TV: Toward Content Navigation Using Social Awareness. In Proc. of the 8th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video(EuroITV ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1145/1809777.1809833Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Mukesh Nathan, Chris Harrison, Svetlana Yarosh, Loren Terveen, Larry Stead, and Brian Amento. 2008. CollaboraTV: Making Television Viewing Social Again. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video(UXTV ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/1453805.1453824Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Netflix. 2018. Black Mirror: Bandersnatch. https://www.netflix.com/gb/title/80988062Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Nielsen. 2018. Streamers Show Strong Ties with Traditional TV. https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2018/streamers-showstrong-ties-with-traditional-tv.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Lyndon Nixon, Lotte Belice Baltussen, and Johan Oomen. 2015. LinkedCulture: Browsing Related Europeana Objects While Watching a Cultural Heritage TV Programme. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Personalized Access to Cultural Heritage - Volume 1352(PATCH’15). CEUR-WS.org, Aachen, DEU, 37–40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Virpi Oksman, Elina Noppari, Antti Tammela, Maarit Mäkinen, and Ville Ollikainen. 2007. Mobile TV in Everyday Life Contexts: Individual Entertainment or Shared Experiences?. In Proc. of the 5th European Conf. on Interactive TV and Video(EuroITV ’07). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72559-6_23Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. H. M. Ozaktas and L. Onural. 2010. Three-Dimensional Television: Capture, Transmission, Display. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72532-9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. J. A. Paradiso and J. A. Landay. 2009. Guest Editors’ Introduction: Cross-Reality Environments. IEEE Pervasive Computing 8, 3 (July 2009), 14–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2009.47Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Bogdan Pogorelc, Artur Lugmayr, Björn Stockleben, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Nina Tahmasebi, Estefanía Serral, Emilija Stojmenova, Bojan Imperl, Thomas Risse, Gideon Zenz, and Matjaž Gams. 2013. Ambient Bloom: New Business, Content, Design and Models to Increase the Semantic Ambient Media Experience. Multimedia Tools Appl. 66, 1 (Sept. 2013), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1228-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Bogdan Pogorelc, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Artur Lugmayr, Björn Stockleben, Thomas Risse, Juha Kaario, Estefania Constanza Lomonaco, and Matjaž Gams. 2012. Semantic Ambient Media: From Ambient Advertising to Ambient-Assisted Living. Multimedia Tools Appl. 58, 2 (May 2012), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-011-0917-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Irina Popovici and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2019. Consolidating the Research Agenda of Augmented Reality Television with Insights from Potential End-Users. In Proceedings of 2019 IEEE Int. Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)(ISMAR ’19). 73–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2019.00033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Irina Popovici and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2019. Towards Visual Augmentation of the Television Watching Experience: Manifesto and Agenda. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3325121Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Irina Popovici and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2019. Understanding Users’ Preferences for Augmented Reality Television. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality(ISMAR ’19). 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2019.00024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Irina Popovici, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, and Wenjun Wu. 2019. TV Channels in Your Pocket! Linking Smart Pockets to Smart TVs. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3325119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Qualcomm. [n.d.]. Extended Reality XR | Immersive VR | Qualcomm. https://www.qualcomm.com/invention/extended-realityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Glenda Revelle, Emily Reardon, Kristin Cook, Lori Takeuchi, Rafael Ballagas, Koichi Mori, Hiroshi Horii, Hayes Raffle, Maria Sandberg, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2015. Electric Agents: Combining Collaborative Mobile Augmented Reality and Web-Based Video to Reinvent Interactive Television. Computers in Entertainment 12, 3, Article 1 (Feb. 2015), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702109.2633413Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Asreen Rostami, Chiara Rossitto, and Annika Waern. 2018. Frictional Realities: Enabling Immersion in Mixed-Reality Performances. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210825.3210827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Pejman Saeghe, Sarah Clinch, Bruce Weir, Maxine Glancy, Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Ollie Pattinson, Stephen Robert Pettifer, and Robert Stevens. 2019. Augmenting Television With Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3325129Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Ovidiu-Andrei Schipor, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, and Wenjun Wu. 2019. SAPIENS: Towards Software Architecture to Support Peripheral Interaction in Smart Environments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, EICS, Article Article 11 (June 2019), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Albrecht Schmidt, Hans-Werner Gellersen, and Michael Beigl. 1999. Matching Information and Ambient Media. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings, Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture(CoBuild ’99). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/10705432_13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Hanna Kathrin Schraffenberger. 2018. Arguably Augmented Reality: Relationships Between the Virtual and the Real. Ph.D. Dissertation. Leiden University, The Netherlands. http://www.arguablyar.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Jenny Scribani. 2019. What is Extended Reality (XR)?https://www.visualcapitalist.com/extended-reality-xr/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. José Somolinos. 2019. Augmented Reality Disrupts Television. https://medium.com/@josesomolinos/augmented-reality-disrupts-television-9d79ed01f27Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Rafael Sotelo, Jose Joskowicz, and Nicolás Rondan. 2017. Experiences on Hybrid Television and Augmented Reality on ISDB-T. In 2017 IEEE Int. Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB). IEEE, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/BMSB.2017.7986231Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Maximilian Speicher, Brian D. Hall, and Michael Nebeling. 2019. What is Mixed Reality?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Paper 537, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300767Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. J. Stauder and P. Robert. 2002. Let the Sunshine on Your Screen: Introducing Augmented Reality into Interactive Television. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Vol. 1. 837–840 vol.1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2002.1035912Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Ivan E. Sutherland. 1968. A Head-Mounted Three Dimensional Display. In Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I(AFIPS ’68 (Fall, part I)). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1145/1476589.1476686Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Raphael Tang, Ferhan Ture, and Jimmy Lin. 2019. Yelling at Your TV: An Analysis of Speech Recognition Errors and Subsequent User Behavior on Entertainment Systems. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 853–856. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331271Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. TIME. 2017. Facebook Reveals Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and More at Annual F8 Conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtUye84PuFYGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. TWiT Tech Podcast Network. 2018. Augmented Reality on Your Television. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpj90PkfPJ8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. [93] Unity.[n.d.]. https://unity3d.com/what-is-xr-glossaryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2012. Point & Click Mediated Interactions for Large Home Entertainment Displays. Multimedia Tools and Applications 59, 1 (2012), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0698-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2012. Presence Bubbles: Supporting and Enhancing Human-Human Interaction with Ambient Media. Multimedia Tools and Applications 58, 2 (2012), 371–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0674-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2012. User-Defined Gestures for Free-Hand TV Control. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video(EuroITV ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325626Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2013. There’s a World Outside Your TV: Exploring Interactions Beyond the Physical TV Screen. In Proc. of the 11th European Conf. on Interactive TV and Video(EuroITV ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2465958.2465972Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2015. Audience Silhouettes: Peripheral Awareness of Synchronous Audience Kinesics for Social Television. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745197.2745207Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Ştefan Gheorghe Pentiuc. 2008. Interactive Coffee Tables: Interfacing TV within an Intuitive, Fun and Shared Experience. In Proceedings of EuroITV ’08, the 6th European Interactive TV Conference(EuroITV ’08). Springer, 183–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69478-6_24Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Ionut-Alexandru Zaiţi. 2014. Leap Gestures for TV: Insights from an Elicitation Study. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602299.2602316Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Carlos Velasco, Yunwen Tu, and Marianna Obrist. 2018. Towards Multisensory Storytelling with Taste and Flavor. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multisensory Approaches to Human-Food Interaction(MHFI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Article 2, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3279954.3279956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Penelope Allen, Matt Hammond, and Michael Evans. 2012. Researching the User Experience for Connected TV: A Case Study. In CHI ’12 EA on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212832Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Maxine Glancy, Paul Debenham, Alastair Bruce, Christoph Ziegler, and Richard Schäffer. 2018. Personalising the TV Experience with Augmented Reality Technology: Synchronised Sign Language Interpretation. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210825.3213562Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Maxine Glancy, Christoph Ziegler, and Richard Schäffer. 2019. Personalising the TV Experience Using Augmented Reality: An Exploratory Study on Delivering Synchronised Sign Language Interpretation. In Proc. of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 532, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300762Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Rajiv Ramdhany, and Matt Hammond. 2016. Enabling Frame-Accurate Synchronised Companion Screen Experiences. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2932206.2932214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. John Waterworth and Kei Hoshi. 2016. Human-Experiential Design of Presence in Everyday Blended Reality. Springer, Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319303321Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Brian Westover. 2019. How to Connect Alexa to Your Samsung Smart TV. https://www.tomsguide.com/uk/us/samsung-smart-tv-alexa-how-to,news-29557.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Jacob O. Wobbrock and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Research Contributions in Human-Computer Interaction. Interactions 23, 3 (April 2016), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2907069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. XR Access. [n.d.]. Virtual, Augmented, & Mixed Reality for People with Disabilities. https://xraccess.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Ionut-Alexandru Zaiţi, Ştefan Gheorghe Pentiuc, and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2015. On Free-Hand TV Control: Experimental Results on User-Elicited Gestures with Leap Motion. Pers. Ubiq. Computing 19, 5-6 (2015), 821–838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-015-0863-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Zenith Media. [n.d.]. Media Consumption Forecasts 2018. https://www.zenithmedia.com/product/media-consumption-forecasts2018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. C. Zimmer, N. Ratz, M. Bertram, and C. Geiger. 2018. War Children: Using AR in a Documentary Context. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). 390–394. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2018.00112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

(auto-classified)
  1. Conceptualizing Augmented Reality Television for the Living Room

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          Get this Publication

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format
          View Table of Contents
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!