Methods for Generating Typologies of Non/use

Abstract

Prior studies of technology non-use demonstrate the need for approaches that go beyond a simple binary distinction between users and non-users. This paper proposes a set of two different methods by which researchers can identify types of non/use relevant to the particular sociotechnical settings they are studying. These methods are demonstrated by applying them to survey data about Facebook non/use. The results demonstrate that the different methods proposed here identify fairly comparable types of non/use. They also illustrate how the two methods make different trade offs between the granularity of the resulting typology and the total sample size. The paper also demonstrates how the different typologies resulting from these methods can be used in predictive modeling, allowing for the two methods to corroborate or disconfirm results from one another. The discussion considers implications and applications of these methods, both for research on technology non/use and for studying social computing more broadly.

References

1. Alessandro Acquisti and Ralph Gross. 2006. Imagined Communities : Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook. In Proceedings of the Privacy Enhancing Technology Symposium. Springer, Cambridge, England, 36--58.
2. Cecilie Schou Andreassen, Torbjørn Torsheim, Geir Scott Brunborg, and Ståle Pallesen. 2012. Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychological Reports, Vol. 110, 2 (April 2012), 501--517. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501--517
3. Anne Archambault and Jonathan Grudin. 2012. A Longitudinal Study of Facebook, LinkedIn, & Twitter Use. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). Austin, TX, 2741--2750. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208671
4. Eric Baumer, Mark Sueyoshi, and Bill Tomlinson. 2008. Exploring the Role of the Reader in the Activity of Blogging. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). ACM, Florence, Italy, 1111--1120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357228
5. Eric P. S. Baumer. 2018. Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Non /Use of Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). ACM, Montréal, QC, 616:1--616:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174190
6. Eric P. S. Baumer, Phil Adams, Vera D. Khovanskaya, Tony C. Liao, Madeline E. Smith, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Kaiton Williams. 2013. Limiting, Leaving, and (Re )Lapsing : An Exploration of Facebook Non -Use Practices and Experiences. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). ACM, Paris, 3257--3266. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466446
7. Eric P. S. Baumer, Morgan G. Ames, Jenna Burrell, Jed R. Brubaker, and Paul Dourish. 2015a. Why Study Technology Non -Use? First Monday, Vol. 20, 11 (2015).
8. Eric P. S. Baumer and Jed R. Brubaker. 2017. Post-Userism. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). ACM, Denver, CO, 6291--6303. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025740
9. Eric P. S. Baumer, Jenna Burrell, Morgan G. Ames, Jed R. Brubaker, and Paul Dourish. 2015b. On the Importance and Implications of Studying Technology Non -Use. interactions, Vol. 22, 2 (2015), 52--56. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723667
10. Eric P. S. Baumer, Shion Guha, Emily Quan, David Mimno, and Geri K. Gay. 2015c. Missing Photos, Suffering Withdrawal, or Finding Freedom How Experiences of Social Media Non -Use Influence the Likelihood of Reversion. Social Media
11. Society, Vol. 1, 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115614851
12. Eric P. S. Baumer, Shion Guha, Patrick Skeba, and Geraldine Gay. 2019. All Users are (Not) Created Equal: Predictors Vary for Different Forms of Facebook Non/use. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--28.
13. Eric P. S. Baumer, David Mimno, Shion Guha, Emily Quan, and Geri K Gay. 2017a. Comparing grounded theory and topic modeling: Extreme divergence or unlikely convergence? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 68, 6 (2017), 1397--1410.
14. Eric P. S. Baumer, Rui Sun, and Peter Schaedler. 2018. Departing and Returning : Sense of Agency As an Organizing Concept for Understanding Social Media Non /Use Transitions. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 23:1--23:19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274292
15. Eric P. S. Baumer, Xiaotong Xu, Christine Chu, Shion Guha, and Geri K. Gay. 2017b. When Subjects Interpret the Data : Social Media Non -Use as a Case for Adapting the Delphi Method to CSCW. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ) (CSCW '17). ACM, Portland, OR, 1527--1543. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998182
16. V. Benet-Martinez and O. P. John. 1998. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology1, Vol. 75 (1998), 729--750.
17. Michael S Bernstein, Mark S Ackerman, Ed H Chi, and Robert C Miller. 2011. The trouble with social computing systems research. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 389--398.
18. Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out : Classification and Its Consequences .MIT Press .
19. George EP Box and R Daniel Meyer. 1986. An analysis for unreplicated fractional factorials. Technometrics, Vol. 28, 1 (1986), 11--18.
20. Danah Boyd. 2006. Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing Community into Being on Social Network Sites. First Monday, Vol. 11, 12 (Dec. 2006). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i12.1418
21. danah boyd. 2014. It's Complicated : The Social Lives of Networked Teens 1 edition ed.). Yale University Press, New Haven.
22. Petter Bae Brandtzæg. 2010. Towards a unified Media-User Typology (MUT): A meta-analysis and review of the research literature on media-user typologies. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, 5 (2010), 940--956.
23. Petter Bae Brandtzaeg and Jan Heim. 2011. A typology of social networking sites users. International Journal of Web Based Communities, Vol. 7, 1 (2011), 28--51.
24. Jed R. Brubaker, Mike Ananny, and Kate Crawford. 2016. Departing Glances: A Sociotechnical Account of 'leaving' Grindr. New Media & Society, Vol. 18, 3 (2016), 373--390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814542311
25. Jed R. Brubaker and Vanessa Callison-Burch. 2016. Legacy Contact : Designing and Implementing Post -Mortem Stewardship at Facebook. In Proc CHI. ACM Press, 2908--2919. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858254
26. Tom Buchanan, Carina Paine, Adam N. Joinson, and Ulf-Dietrich Reips. 2007. Development of Measures of Online Privacy Concern and Protection for Use on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, 2 (2007), 157--165. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20459
27. Paul Cairns. 2007. HCI... not as it should be: inferential statistics in HCI research. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI... but not as we know it-Volume 1. British Computer Society, 195--201.
28. Junxiang Chen. 2018. Interpretable Clustering Methods. Ph.D. Dissertation. Northeastern University.
29. Yushi Chen, Zhouhan Lin, Xing Zhao, Gang Wang, and Yanfeng Gu. 2014. Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Journal of Selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, Vol. 7, 6 (2014), 2094--2107.
30. Paul T. Costa and Robert R. McCrae. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO -PIR ) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO -FFI ) Professional Manual .Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
31. Jenny Davis. 2012. The Problem with Internet Addiction.
32. Thomas G Dietterich. 2000. Ensemble methods in machine learning. In International workshop on multiple classifier systems. Springer, 1--15.
33. Finale Doshi-Velez and Been Kim. 2017. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608 (2017).
34. Maeve Duggan, Nicole B. Ellison, Cliff Lampe, Amanda Lenhart, and Mary Madden. 2015. Pew Social Meida Report 2015. Technical Report January. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.
35. Susan Dumais, Robin Jeffries, Daniel M. Russell, Diane Tang, and Jaime Teevan. 2014. Understanding User Behavior Through Log Data and Analysis. In Ways of Knowing in HCI, Judith S. Olson and Wendy A. Kellogg (Eds.). Springer New York, New York, NY, 349--372. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4939-0378--8_14
36. Allen Louis Edwards. 1983. Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction .Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
37. Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends :" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, 4 (July 2007), 1143--1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.2007.00367.x
38. Chris Elsden, Arthi Manohar, Jo Briggs, Mike Harding, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2018. Making sense of blockchain applications: A typology for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 458.
39. Facebook. [n. d.]. How Do I Deactivate My Account? https://www.facebook.com/help/214376678584711.
40. Gloria Fraser. 2018. Evaluating inclusive gender identity measures for use in quantitative psychological research. Psychology & Sexuality, Vol. 9, 4 (2018), 343--357.
41. Christian Fuchs and Marianna Obrist. 2010. HCI and society: towards a typology of universal design principles. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 26, 6 (2010), 638--656.
42. Mike Furr. 2011. Scale Construction and Psychometrics for Social and Personality Psychology .SAGE Publications Ltd, London.
43. Radhika Garg. 2019. An analysis of (non-) use practices and decisions of internet of things. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 3--24.
44. Radhika Garg and Subhasree Sengupta. 2019. " When you can do it, why can't I?": Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in Family Technology Use and Non-Use. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--22.
45. Lance Gentry, Roger J Calantone, and Shaojie Anna Cui. 2006. The forecasting classification grid: a typology for method selection. Journal of Global Business Management, Vol. 2, 1 (2006), 48--60.
46. Ilana Gershon. 2011. Un-Friend My Heart : Facebook, Promiscuity, and Heartbreak in a Neoliberal Age. Anthropological Quarterly, Vol. 84, 4 (Nov. 2011), 865--894. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2011.0048
47. Samuel D. Gosling, Peter J. Rentfrow, and William B. Swann Jr. 2003. A Very Brief Measure of the Big -Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 37, 6 (Dec. 2003), 504--528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092--6566(03)00046--1
48. Sukeshini A Grandhi, Linda Plotnick, and Starr Roxanne Hiltz. 2019. Do I Stay or Do I Go? Motivations and Decision Making in Social Media Non-use and Reversion. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, GROUP (2019), 1--27.
49. Jon E. Grant. 2008. Impulse Control Disorders : A Clinician 's Guide to Understanding and Treating Behavioral Addictions .W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York.
50. Jon E. Grant, Marc N. Potenza, Aviv Weinstein, and David A. Gorelick. 2010. Introduction to Behavioral Addictions. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Vol. 36, 5 (Aug. 2010), 233--241. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2010.491884
51. Mark Griffiths. 2005. A "components' model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, Vol. 10, 4 (jan 2005), 191--197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359
52. Mark D. Griffiths. 2013. Social Networking Addiction : Emerging Themes and Issues. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy, Vol. 4, 5 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155--6105.1000e118
53. Mark D. Griffiths, Daria J. Kuss, and Zsolt Demetrovics. 2014. Social Networking Addiction. In Behavioral Addictions. Elsevier, 119--141.
54. Shion Guha, Eric P. S. Baumer, and Geri K. Gay. 2018. Regrets, I 've Had a Few : When Regretful Experiences Do (and Don 't) Compel Users to Leave Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ). ACM, Sanibel Island, FL, 166--177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3148338
55. Eszter Hargittai. 2008. Whose Space - Differences Among Users and Non -Users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, 1 (2008), 276--297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.2007.00396.x
56. Eszter Hargittai and Yu-li Patrick Hsieh. 2010. From Dabblers to Omnivores : A Typology of Social Network Site Usage. In A Networked Self : Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, Zizi Papacharissi (Ed.). Routledge, New York, 146--168.
57. Ellie Harmon and Melissa Mazmanian. 2013. Stories of the Smartphone in Everyday Discourse : Conflict, Tension & Instability. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). Paris, 1051--1060. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466134
58. Samantha Jaroszewski, Danielle Lottridge, Oliver L Haimson, and Katie Quehl. 2018. " Genderfluid" or" Attack Helicopter" Responsible HCI Research Practice with Non-binary Gender Variation in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
59. Yongick Jeong and Yeuseung Kim. 2017. Privacy concerns on social networking sites: Interplay among posting types, content, and audiences. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 69 (2017), 302--310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.042
60. O. P. John, E. M. Donahue, and R. L. Kentle. 1991. The Big Five Inventory - Versions 4a and 54. Technical Report. University of California Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, Berkeley, CA.
61. O. P. John, L. P. Naumann, and C. J. Soto. 2008. Paradigm Shift to the Integrative Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Conceptual Issues. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research, O. P. John, R. W. Robins, and L. A. Pervin (Eds.). Guilford Press, New York, NY, 114--158.
62. Dae-Ki Kang and Kiwook Sohn. 2009. Learning decision trees with taxonomy of propositionalized attributes. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 42, 1 (2009), 84--92.
63. Matthew Kay, Steve Haroz, Shion Guha, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2016. Special interest group on transparent statistics in hci. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1081--1084.
64. Funda Kivran-Swaine, Priya Govindan, and Mor Naaman. 2011. The Impact of Network Structure on Breaking Ties in Online Social Networks : Unfollowing on Twitter. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). ACM, Vancouver, BC, 1101--1104.
65. Haewoon Kwak, Hyunwoo Chun, and Sue Moon. 2011. Fragile Online Relationship : A First Look at Unfollow Dynamics in Twitter. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). ACM, Vancouver, BC, 1091--1100. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979104
66. Cliff Lampe, Jessica Vitak, and Nicole Ellison. 2013. Users and Nonusers : Interactions between Levels of Facebook Adoption and Social Capital. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ). Baltimore, MD, 809--819. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441867
67. Alex Leavitt. 2015. "This Is a Throwaway Account ": Temporary Technical Identities and Perceptions of Anonymity in a Massive Online Community. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ) (CSCW '15). ACM, Vancouver, BC, 317--327. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675175
68. Dominik J. Leiner, Lara Kobilke, Christina Rueß, and Hans-Bernd Brosius. 2018. Functional Domains of Social Media Platforms: Structuring the Uses of Facebook to Better Understand Its Gratifications. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 83 (June 2018), 194--203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.042
69. Amanda Lenhart and John B. Horrigan. 2003. Re-Visualizing the Digital Divide as a Digital Spectrum. IT & Society, Vol. 1, 5 (2003), 23--39.
70. Hanlin Li, Nicholas Vincent, Janice Tsai, Jofish Kaye, and Brent Hecht. 2019. How Do People Change Their Technology Use in Protest? Understanding. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--22.
71. Kai Lukoff, Cissy Yu, Julie Kientz, and Alexis Hiniker. 2018. What Makes Smartphone Use Meaningful or Meaningless - Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., Vol. 2, 1 (March 2018), 22:1--22:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3191754
72. Ulrik Lyngs, Kai Lukoff, Petr Slovak, Reuben Binns, Adam Slack, Michael Inzlicht, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2019. Self-Control in Cyberspace : Applying Dual Systems Theory to a Review of Digital Self -Control Tools. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). ACM, Glasgow, 131:1--131:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300361
73. Henrik Madsen and Poul Thyregod. 2010. Introduction to general and generalized linear models .CRC Press.
74. Naresh K. Malhotra, Sung S. Kim, and James Agarwal. 2004. Internet Users ' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC ): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model. Information Systems Research, Vol. 15, 4 (2004), 336--355.
75. Alice E. Marwick and danah boyd. 2010. I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience. New Media & Society, Vol. 13, 1 (July 2010), 114--133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
76. Alice E Marwick and danah boyd. 2014. Networked Privacy: How Teenagers Negotiate Context in Social Media. New Media & Society, Vol. 16, 7 (Nov. 2014), 1051--1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995
77. Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa. 1987. Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality across Instruments and Observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, 1 (Jan. 1987), 81--90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022--3514.52.1.81
78. Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Jr. Costa. 1997. Personality Trait Structure as a Human Universal. American Psychologist, Vol. 52, 5 (May 1997), 509--516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
79. Michael Muller, Shion Guha, Eric P. S. Baumer, David Mimno, and N Sadat Shami. 2016. Machine learning and grounded theory method: Convergence, divergence, and combination. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, 3--8.
80. Blair Nonnecke and Jenny Preece. 2001. Why Lurkers Lurk. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. Boston.
81. Daniel Oberski. 2016. Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In Modern statistical methods for HCI. Springer, 275--287.
82. Judith S Olson and Wendy A Kellogg. 2014. Ways of Knowing in HCI. Vol. 2. Springer.
83. Pew Research Center. 2018. Demographics of Internet and Home Broadband Usage in the United States. Technical Report. Pew Research Center, Internet & Technology, Washington, D.C.
84. Ethan R. Plaut. 2015. Technologies of Avoidance: The Swear Jar and the Cell Phone. First Monday, Vol. 20, 11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i11.6295
85. Laura Portwood-Stacer. 2012. How We Talk About Media Refusal, Part 1: "Addiction ". Flow, Vol. 16, 3 (2012).
86. Laura Portwood-Stacer. 2013. Media Refusal and Conspicuous Non-Consumption: The Performative and Political Dimensions of Facebook Abstention. New Media & Society, Vol. 15, 7 (Nov. 2013), 1041--1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812465139
87. Jenny Preece, Blair Nonnecke, and Dorine Andrews. 2004. The Top Five Reasons for Lurking: Improving Community Experiences for Everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 20, 2 (March 2004), 201--223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.015
88. Lee Rainie, Aaron Smith, and Maeve Duggan. 2013. Coming and Going on Facebook. Technical Report. Pew Research Center, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, D.C.
89. Salvatore Ruggieri. 2017. Enumerating Distinct Decision Trees. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. PMLR 70. Sydney, Australia, 2960--2968. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/ruggieri17a.html
90. Tracii Ryan and Sophia Xenos. 2011. Who Uses Facebook - An Investigation into the Relationship between the Big Five, Shyness, Narcissism, Loneliness, and Facebook Usage. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27, 5 (Sept. 2011), 1658--1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004
91. Nithya Sambasivan, Ed Cutrell, Kentaro Toyama, and Bonnie Nardi. 2010. Intermediated Technology Use in Developing Communities. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). Atlanta, GA, 2583--2592. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753718
92. Christine Satchell and Paul Dourish. 2009. Beyond the User: Use and Non-Use in HCI. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer -Human Interaction Conference (OZCHI ). ACM, Melbourne, Australia, 9--16.
93. Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2014. Giving up Twitter for Lent : How and Why We Take Breaks from Social Media. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). Toronto, ON, 773--782. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556983
94. H. Jeff Smith, Sandra J. Milberg, and Sandra J. Burke. 1996. Information Privacy : Measuring Individuals ' Concerns about Organizational Practices. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, 2 (June 1996), 167. https://doi.org/10.2307/249477
95. Katta Spiel, Oliver L Haimson, and Danielle Lottridge. 2019. How to do better with gender on surveys: a guide for HCI researchers. interactions, Vol. 26, 4 (2019), 62--65.
96. Stefan Stieger, Christoph Burger, Manuel Bohn, and Martin Voracek. 2013. Who Commits Virtual Identity Suicide - Differences in Privacy Concerns, Internet Addiction, and Personality between Facebook Users and Quitters. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 16, 9 (Sept. 2013), 629--34. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0323
97. Adam Tapal, Ela Oren, Reuven Dar, and Baruch Eitam. 2017. The Sense of Agency Scale : A Measure of Consciously Perceived Control over One 's Mind, Body, and the Immediate Environment. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8 (Sept. 2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01552
98. Zeynep Tufekci. 2008. Grooming, Gossip, Facebook and MySpace. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 11, 4 (June 2008), 544--564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801999050
99. Yang Wang, Gregory Norcie, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2011. Who Is Concerned about What? A Study of American, Chinese and Indian Users' Privacy Concerns on Social Network Sites. Trust 2011, Vol. LNCS 6740 (2011), 146--153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--21599--5_11
100. Tom Wells and Michael Link. 2014. Facebook User Research Using a Probability -Based Sample and Behavioral Data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 19, 4 (July 2014), 1042--1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12058
101. Jason Weston and Chris Watkins. 1998. Multi-class support vector machines. Technical Report. Citeseer.
102. David S White and Alison Le Cornu. 2011. Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, Vol. 16, 9 (2011).
103. Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, and Yunan Chen. 2014. Understanding User Adaptation Strategies for the Launching of Facebook Timeline. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ). ACM, Toronto, ON, 2421--2430. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557363
104. Sally Wyatt. 2003. Non-Users Also Matter : The Construction of Users and Non -Users of the Internet. In How Users Matter : The Co -Construction of Users and Technology, Nelly Oudshoorn and Trevor Pinch (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 67--79.
105. Susan Wyche and Eric P. S. Baumer. 2016. Imagined Facebook: An Exploratory Study of Non-Users Perceptions of Social Media in Rural Zambia. New Media & Society (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815625948
106. Susan P. Wyche, Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck, and Andrea Forte. 2013. "Facebook Is a Luxury ": An Exploratory Study of Social Media Use in Rural Kenya. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW). San Antonio, TX, 33--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441783

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing design and evaluation methods

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI design and evaluation methods

• Social and professional topics

  • User characteristics