skip to main content
research-article

"Learning for the Rise of China": Exploring Uses and Gratifications of State-Owned Online Platform

Published:29 May 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In January 2019, the Chinese Communist Party launched the online platform XueXi QiangGuo, which translates into "Learning for the Rise of China." Within two months, XueXi became the top-downloaded item of the month on Apple's App Store in China. In response, we conducted an interview study with 28 active XueXi users to investigate their uses and gratifications of this state-owned online platform. Our results reveal seven key motivations: compliance, self-status seeking, general information seeking, job support, entertainment, patriotism, and learning. This state-owned platform introduced a new model for official information dissemination and political communication through direct surveillance and monitoring, leveraging and fostering emotional attachment, and offering heterogeneous apolitical content. We discuss the intended and unintended ramifications of these components, highlighting the importance of future CSCW research to critically engage with pluralist political narratives situated in varied societies, especially non-Western democracies.

References

  1. Tanja Aitamurto and Jorge Saldivar. 2017. Motivating participation in crowdsourced policymaking: The interplay of epistemic and interactive aspects. Proceedings of the Acm on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baidu. 2019. How to create learning groups in XueXi QiangGuo (in Chinese). Baidu (20 Jan 2019). Retrieved September 24, 2019 from https://jingyan.baidu.com/article/75ab0bcb784afdd6864db2fd.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1301--1310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H Russell Bernard, Amber Wutich, and Gery W Ryan. 2016. Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. SAGE publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. François Bougon. 2018. Inside the Mind of Xi Jinping. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Danah Boyd. 2012. Privacy and Security The Politics of Real Names. Commun. ACM 55, 8 (2012), 29--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dan Chen. 2017. "Supervision by Public Opinion" or by Government Officials? Media Criticism and Central-Local Government Relations in China. Modern China 43, 6 (2017), 620--645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Fangwei Chen. 2019. Removing ranking from XueXi QiangGuo has long-term implications (in Chinese). jxntv (29 Mar 2019). Retrieved May 19, 2019 from http://opinion.jxntv.cn/2019/0329/9133790.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jie Chen et al. 2004. Popular political support in urban China. Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Paul A Cohen. 2010. Discovering history in China: American historical writing on the recent Chinese past. Columbia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rogier Creemers. 2017. Cyber China: Upgrading propaganda, public opinion work and social management for the twenty-first century. Journal of Contemporary China 26, 103 (2017), 85--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Rogier Creemers. 2018. China's Social Credit System: An Evolving Practice of Control. Available at SSRN 3175792 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sebastian Deterding. 2015. The lens of intrinsic skill atoms: A method for gameful design. Human--Computer Interaction 30, 3--4 (2015), 294--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Tawanna R Dillahunt and Alex Lu. 2019. DreamGigs: Designing a Tool to Empower Low-resource Job Seekers. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 578.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Abraham Doris-Down, Husayn Versee, and Eric Gilbert. 2013. Political blend: an application designed to bring people together based on political differences. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. ACM, 120--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Leon Festinger. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations 7, 2 (1954), 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Joseph Fewsmith. 2018. Can Fighting Corruption Save the Party. In The China questions: critical insights into a rising power, Jennifer Rudolph and Michael Szonyi (Eds.). Harvard University Press, 18--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, and Justin M Rao. 2016. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public opinion quarterly 80, S1 (2016), 298--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Michel Foucault. 2012. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nina Gerber, Benjamin Reinheimer, and Melanie Volkamer. 2019. Investigating People's Privacy Risk Perception. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2019, 3 (2019), 267--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Andre Gonawela, Joyojeet Pal, Udit Thawani, Elmer Van Der Vlugt, Wim Out, Priyank Chandra, et al. 2018. Speaking their mind: Populist style and antagonistic messaging in the tweets of Donald Trump, Narendra Modi, Nigel Farage, and Geert Wilders. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27, 3--6 (2018), 293--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Joseph Graf. 2008. New media-The cutting edge of campaign communications. Campaigns on the cutting edge (2008), 48--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Catherine Grevet, Loren G Terveen, and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Managing political differences in social media. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 1400--1408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Peter Hays Gries. 2004. China's new nationalism: Pride, politics, and diplomacy. University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Peter Hays Gries, Qingmin Zhang, H Michael Crowson, and Huajian Cai. 2011. Patriotism, nationalism and China's US policy: Structures and consequences of Chinese national identity. The China Quarterly 205 (2011), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Greg Guest, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods 18, 1 (2006), 59--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Loni Hagen, Mary Falling, Oleksandr Lisnichenko, AbdelRahim A Elmadany, Pankti Mehta, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Justin Costakis, and Thomas E Keller. 2019. Emoji Use in Twitter White Nationalism Communication. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 201--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Libby Hemphill, Jahna Otterbacher, and Matthew Shapiro. 2013. What's congress doing on twitter?. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 877--886.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Robert Hoffmann and Jeremy Larner. 2013. The demography of Chinese nationalism: A field-experimental approach. The China Quarterly 213 (2013), 189--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Geert Hofstede. 1984. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Vol. 5. sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Philip CC Huang. 1993. "Public Sphere"/"Civil Society" in China? The Third Realm between State and Society. Modern China 19, 2 (1993), 216--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Zheping Huang. 2019. China's most popular app is a propaganda tool teaching Xi Jinping Thought. Retrieved March 31, 2019 from https://www.scmp.com/tech/apps-social/article/2186037/chinas-most-popular-app-propaganda-tool-teaching-xi-jinping-thoughtGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Lilly Irani, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1311--1320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Martin Jacques. 2009. When China rules the world: The end of the western world and the birth of a new global order. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Adam N Joinson. 2008. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1027--1036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Mayur Karnik, Ian Oakley, Jayant Venkatanathan, Tasos Spiliotopoulos, and Valentina Nisi. 2013. Uses & gratification of a Facebook media sharing group. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, 821--826.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Andrea Kavanaugh, John M Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, Than Than Zin, and Debbie Denise Reese. 2005. Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10, 4 (2005), JCMC10417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Michael Keane and Guanhua Su. 2019. When push comes to nudge: a Chinese digital civilisation in-the-making. Media International Australia (2019), 1329878X19876362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Yubo Kou, Bryan Semaan, and Bonnie Nardi. 2017. A Confucian look at Internet censorship in China. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 377--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Robert E Kraut and Paul Resnick. 2012. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Cliff Lampe, Rick Wash, Alcides Velasquez, and Elif Ozkaya. 2010. Motivations to participate in online communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1927--1936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Pierre F Landry. 2009. Does the Communist Party Help Strengthen China's Legal Reforms? China Review (2009), 45--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Christopher A Le Dantec, Mariam Asad, Aditi Misra, and Kari E Watkins. 2015. Planning with crowdsourced data: rhetoric and representation in transportation planning. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1717--1727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Ya-Wen Lei. 2018. What should we know about public opinion in China? In The China questions: critical insights into a rising power, Jennifer Rudolph and Michael Szonyi (Eds.). Harvard University Press, 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Pei Li and Cate Cadell. 2019. Alibaba is the force behind hit Chinese Communist Party app: sources. Retrieved March 31, 2019 from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-alibaba-government/alibaba-is-the-force-behind-hit-chinese-communist-party-app-sources-idUSKCN1Q70Y7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Fan Liang, Vishnupriya Das, Nadiya Kostyuk, and Muzammil M Hussain. 2018. Constructing a Data-Driven Society: China's Social Credit System as a State Surveillance Infrastructure. Policy & Internet 10, 4 (2018), 415--453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Zhicong Lu, Michelle Annett, Mingming Fan, and Daniel Wigdor. 2019. I feel it is my responsibility to stream: Streaming and Engaging with Intangible Cultural Heritage through Livestreaming. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Roderick MacFarquhar. 2018. Does Mao still matter? In The China questions: critical insights into a rising power, Jennifer Rudolph and Michael Szonyi (Eds.). Harvard University Press, 26--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Jun Mai. 2019. Mao Zedong's "little red book' gets modern twist with mobile app for studying ?Xi Jinping Thought'. Retrieved March 31, 2019 from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3004007/mao-zedongs-little-red-book-gets-modern-twist-mobile-appGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Ben Marder, Emma Slade, David Houghton, and Chris Archer-Brown. 2016. -I like them, but won't "like' them": An examination of impression management associated with visible political party affiliation on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 61 (2016), 280--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Maxwell E McCombs and Donald L Shaw. 1972. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public opinion quarterly 36, 2 (1972), 176--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Matti Nelimarkka. 2019. A Review of Research on Participation in Democratic Decision-Making Presented at SIGCHI Conferences: Toward an Improved Trading Zone Between Political Science and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Wanda J Orlikowski. 1993. Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Evan Osnos. 2014. Age of ambition: Chasing fortune, truth, and faith in the new China. Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Joyojeet Pal and Andre Gonawela. 2016. Political social media in the global South. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society. Springer, 587--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Philip Palmgreen, Lawrence A Wenner, and Jay D Rayburn. 1980. Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: A study of television news. Communication research 7, 2 (1980), 161--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Namsu Park, Kerk F Kee, and Sebastián Valenzuela. 2009. Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12, 6 (2009), 729--733.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Elizabeth Perry. 2018. Is the Chinese communist regime legitimate. In The China questions: critical insights into a rising power, Jennifer Rudolph and Michael Szonyi (Eds.). Harvard University Press, 11--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Jenny Preece and Diane Maloney-Krichmar. 2003. Online communities: focusing on sociability and usability. Handbook of human-computer interaction (2003), 596--620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Reuter. 2019. China's most popular app pushes Communist Party propaganda. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://globalnews.ca/news/5018989/china-most-popular-app-pushes-communist-party-propagandaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Alan M Rubin. 2009. Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In Media effects. Routledge, 181--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Michael B Salwen and Michel Dupagne. 2001. Third_person perception of television violence: The role of self_perceived knowledge. Media Psychology 3, 3 (2001), 211--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Jesper Schlæger and Min Jiang. 2014. Official microblogging and social management by local governments in China. China Information 28, 2 (2014), 189--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Constantine Sedikides. 1993. Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of personality and social psychology 65, 2 (1993), 317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Irving Seidman. 2006. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Bryan C Semaan, Scott P Robertson, Sara Douglas, and Misa Maruyama. 2014. Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: towards depolarization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 1409--1421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Susan L Shirk. 2007. China: fragile superpower. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Andrew D Smock, Nicole B Ellison, Cliff Lampe, and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2011. Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 6 (2011), 2322--2329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Thomas F Stafford, Marla Royne Stafford, and Lawrence L Schkade. 2004. Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision sciences 35, 2 (2004), 259--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Apple App Store. 2019. Xuexi Qianguo. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://itunes.apple.com/cn/app/%E5%AD%A6%E4%B9%A0%E5%BC%BA%E5%9B%BD/id1426355645?mt=8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Wenfang Tang and Benjamin Darr. 2012. Chinese nationalism and its political and social origins. Journal of Contemporary China 21, 77 (2012), 811--826.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Tencent Technology. 2019. WeChat 2019 annual analytical report: Face-covering has become the most popular emoticon (in Chinese). Retrieved March 11, 2019 from https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/gi_3xSDWBie-fgg76XXJCgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Patricia M Thornton. 2007. Disciplining the state: virtue, violence, and state-making in modern China. Vol. 283. Harvard Univ Council on East Asian.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. TikTok. 2020. TikTok 2019 annual analytical report (in Chinese). Retrieved March 11, 2019 from https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mjzr2ssMpmDdVeMeiOTb3gGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Chad Van De Wiele and Stephanie Tom Tong. 2014. Breaking boundaries: The uses & gratifications of Grindr. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 619--630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Rob van Roy, Sebastian Deterding, and Bieke Zaman. 2018. Uses and Gratifications of Initiating Use of Gamified Learning Platforms. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, LBW565.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. MW Van Someren, YF Barnard, and JAC Sandberg. 1994. The think aloud method: a practical approach to modelling cognitive. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Dakuo Wang and Gloria Mark. 2015. Internet censorship in China: Examining user awareness and attitudes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 22, 6 (2015), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Yuhua Wang. 2018. Can the Chinese Communist Party learn from Chinese Emperors. In The China questions: critical insights into a rising power, Jennifer Rudolph and Michael Szonyi (Eds.). Harvard University Press, 58--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Yiran Wang and Gloria Mark. 2013. Trust in online news: Comparing social media and official media use by Chinese citizens. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, 599--610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Darcy Warkentin, Michael Woodworth, Jeffrey T Hancock, and Nicole Cormier. 2010. Warrants and deception in computer mediated communication. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 9--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. David Webster. 1992. Building free and independent media. Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Wikipedia. 2019. Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. Retrieved July 22, 2019 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_People%27s_Political_Consultative_ConferenceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Wikipedia. 2019. Confidence doctrine. Retrieved July 29, 2019 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_doctrineGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Langdon Winner. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus (1980), 121--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Joanne VWood. 1989. Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological bulletin 106, 2 (1989), 231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Jinping Xi. 2017. Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. Retrieved January 12, 2020 from http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/download/Xi_Jinping's_report_at_19th_CPC_National_Congress.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Qiang Xiao. 2011. The rise of online public opinion and its political impact. Changing media, changing China (2011), 202--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Shengnan Yang, Pei-Ying Chen, Patrick C Shih, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Cross-strait frenemies: Chinese netizens vpn in to facebook Taiwan. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Guangxia Zhao and Xinrui Song. 2019.XueXi QiangGuo started a strategic media complaint on communicating positive energy with Pear Video, collaborating with short video platform for the first time (in Chinese). People's Daily (29 Aug 2019). Retrieved October 4, 2019 from http://media.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0829/c14677--31325686.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Lei Zheng. 2013. Social media in Chinese government: Drivers, challenges and capabilities. Government Information Quarterly 30, 4 (2013), 369--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Christina Zhou. 2019. China's Communist Party requires millions of people to tune into 'Xi Jinping thought' every day. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02--19/millions-of-chinese-required-to-tune-into-xi-jinping-thought/10821092Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "Learning for the Rise of China": Exploring Uses and Gratifications of State-Owned Online Platform

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!