skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Shifting forms of Engagement: Volunteer Learning in Online Citizen Science

Published:29 May 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Peer production projects involve people in many tasks, from editing articles to analyzing datasets. To facilitate mastery of these practices, projects offer a number of learning resources, ranging from project-defined FAQsto individually-oriented search tools and communal discussion boards. However, it is not clear which project resources best support participant learning, overall and at different stages of engagement. We draw onSørensen's framework of forms of presence to distinguish three types of engagement with learning resources:authoritative, agent-centered and communal. We assigned resources from the Gravity Spy citizen-science into these three categories and analyzed trace data recording interactions with resources using a mixed-effects logistic regression with volunteer performance as an outcome variable. The findings suggest that engagement with authoritative resources (e.g., those constructed by project organizers) facilitates performance initially. However, as tasks become more difficult, volunteers seek and benefit from engagement with their own agent-centered resources and community-generated resources. These findings suggest a broader scope for the design of learning resources for peer production

References

  1. Scott Bateman, Jaime Teevan, and Ryen W White. 2012. The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(2012), 1785--1794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rick Bonney, Heidi Ballard, Rebecca Jordan, Ellen McCallie, Tina Phillips, Jennifer Shirk, and Candie C Wilderman. 2009. Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report.Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Susan L Bryant, Andrea Forte, and Amy S Bruckman. 2005. Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. ACM, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carolin Cardamone, Kevin Schawinski, Marc Sarzi, Steven P Bamford, Nicola Bennert, C M Urry, Chris Lintott, William C Keel, John Parejko, Robert C Nichol, Daniel Thomas, Dan Andreescu, Phil Murray, Jordan Raddick, An?e Slosar, Alex Szalay, and Jan Vandenberg. 2009. Galaxy Zoo Green Peas: discovery of a class of compact extremely star-forming galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 399, 3 (Nov. 2009), 1191--1205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shayan Doroudi, Ece Kamar, and Emma Brunskill. 2019. Not Everyone Writes Good Examples but Good Examples Can Come from Anywhere. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, Vol. 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Shayan Doroudi, Ece Kamar, Emma Brunskill, and Eric Horvitz. 2016. Toward a Learning Science for Complex Crowdsourcing Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2623--2634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Stephen Downes. 2006. Learning networks and connective knowledge. Collective intelligence and e-learning 20 (2006), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yrjö Engeström. 2014. Learning by expanding. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Aaron Halfaker, Aniket Kittur, and John Riedl. 2011. Don't Bite the Newbies: How Reverts Affect the Quantity and Quality of Wikipedia Work. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym'11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163--172. https://doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038585Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Katie DeVries Hassman, Gabriel Mugar, Carsten Østerlund, and Corey Jackson. 2013. Learning at the Seafloor, Looking at the Sky: The Relationship Between Individual Tasks and Collaborative Engagement in Two Citizen Science Projects. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Caroline Haythornthwaite. 2014. New Media, New Literacies, and New Forms of Learning.International Journal of Learning and Media4, 3--4 (2014), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Caroline A Haythornthwaite and Richard Andrews. 2011. E-learning Theory & Practice. Los Angeles : Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Corey Brian Jackson, Kevin Crowston, and Carsten Østerlund. 2018. Did they login? Patterns of Anonymous Contributions in Online Communities.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Corey Brian Jackson, Carsten Østerlund, Gabriel Mugar, Katie DeVries Hassman, and Kevin Crowston. 2014. Motivations for Sustained Participation in Crowdsourcing: Case Studies of Citizen Science on the Role of Talk. In2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 1624--1634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Aditya Johri and Seungwon Yang. 2017. Scaffolded Help for Learning: How Experts Collaboratively Support Newcomer Participation in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 149--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Chris Jones and Maarten de Laat. 2016. Network Learning. In The SAGE Handbook of E-learning Research, C Haythorn-thwaite, R Andrews, J Fransman, and E M Meyers (Eds.). 44--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press., NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosemary Luckin. 2008. The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning.Computers & Education 50, 2 (Feb. 2008), 449--462.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tanushree Mitra and Eric Gilbert. 2014. The language that gets people to give. In Proceedings of the ACM 2014 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 49--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Gabriel Mugar, Carsten Østerlund, Katie DeVries Hassman, Kevin Crowston, and Corey Brian Jackson. 2014. Planet hunters and seafloor explorers: legitimate peripheral participation through practice proxies in online citizen science.Proceedings of the ACM 2014 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(2014), 109--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. David Oleson, Alexander Sorokin, Greg Laughlin, Vaughn Hester, John Le, and Lukas Biewald. 2011. Programmatic Gold: Targeted and Scalable Quality Assurance in Crowdsourcing. Workshops at the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence(Aug. 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Carsten Østerlund and Paul Carlile. 2005. Relations in Practice: Sorting Through Practice Theories on Knowledge Sharing in Complex Organizations. The Information Society 21, 2 (April 2005), 91--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Carsten Østerlund, Gabriel Mugar, Corey Brian Jackson, Katie DeVries Hassman, and Kevin Crowston. 2014. Socializing the Crowd: Learning to talk in citizen science. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting, OCIS Division. Philadelphia, PA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jennifer Preece and Ben Shneiderman. 2009. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction1, 1 (March 2009), 13--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Brian J Reiser. 2002. Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. In Proceedings of the conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 255--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Henry Sauermann and Chiara Franzoni. 2015. Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 112, 3 (2015), 679--684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Robert Simpson, Kevin R. Page, and David De Roure. 2014. Zooniverse: Observing the World's Largest Citizen Science Platform. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '14 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1049--1054. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2579215Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Estrid Sørensen. 2009. The Materiality of Learning. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. James C Spohrer and Elliot Soloway. 1985. Putting It All Together Is Hard for Novice Programmers. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (1985).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Henry M Walker and Kevin Engel. 2006. Research exercises: immersion experiences to promote information literacy. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 21, 4 (April 2006), 61--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarah Weir, Juho Kim, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, and Robert C. Miller. 2015. Learner sourcing Subgoal Labels for How-to Videos. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 405--416. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675219Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wesley Willett, Jeffrey Heer, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2012. Strategies for crowdsourcing social data analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 227--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Michael Zevin, Scott Coughlin, Sara Bahaadini, Emre Besler, Neda Rohani, Sarah Allen, Miriam Cabero, Kevin Crowston, Aggelos K Katsaggelos, Shane L Larson, Tae Kyoung Lee, Chris Lintott, Tyson B Littenberg, Andrew Lundgren, Carsten Øesterlund, Joshua R Smith, Laura Trouille, and Vicky Kalogera. 2016. Gravity Spy: Integrating Advanced LIGO Detector Characterization, Machine Learning, and Citizen Science. arXiv6 (Nov. 2016), 064003. arXiv:1611.04596Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Haiyi Zhu, Steven P Dow, Robert E Kraut, and Aniket Kittur. 2014. Reviewing versus doing. In Proceedings of the ACM 2014 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1445--1455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Shifting forms of Engagement: Volunteer Learning in Online Citizen Science

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!