skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

On Shooting Stars: Comparing CAVE and HMD Immersive Virtual Reality Exergaming for Adults with Mixed Ability

Published:30 September 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Inactivity and a lack of engagement with exercise is a pressing health problem in the United States and beyond. Immersive Virtual Reality (iVR) is a promising medium to motivate users through engaging virtual environments. Currently, modern iVR lacks a comparative analysis between research and consumer-grade systems for exercise and health. This article examines two such iVR mediums: the Cave Automated Virtual Environment (CAVE) and the head-mounted display (HMD). Specifically, we compare the room-scale Mechdyne CAVE and HTC Vive Pro HMD with a custom in-house exercise game that was designed such that user experiences were as consistent as possible between both systems. To ensure that our findings are generalizable for users of varying abilities, we recruited 40 participants with and without cognitive disabilities with regard to the fact that iVR environments and games can differ in their cognitive challenge between users. Our results show that across all abilities, the HMD excelled in in-game performance, biofeedback response, and player engagement. We conclude with considerations in utilizing iVR systems for exergaming with users across cognitive abilities.

References

  1. Abeer Al-Nafjan, Manar Hosny, Yousef Al-Ohali, and Areej Al-Wabil. 2017. Review and classification of emotion recognition based on EEG brain-computer interface system research: A systematic review. Applied Sciences 7, 12 (2017), 1239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Rosa María Baños, Cristina Botella, Mariano Alcañiz, Víctor Liaño, Belén Guerrero, and Beatriz Rey. 2004. Immersion and emotion: Their impact on the sense of presence. CyberPsychology 8 Behavior 7, 6 (2004), 734--741.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jochen Baumeister, T. Barthel, Kurt-Reiner Geiss, and M. Weiss. 2008. Influence of phosphatidylserine on cognitive performance and cortical activity after induced stress. Nutritional Neuroscience 11, 3 (2008), 103--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Beccue and C. Wheelock. 2016. Research Report: Virtual Reality for Consumer Markets. Technical Report. Tractica Research. https://www.tractica.com/research/virtual-reality-for-consumer-markets/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sheffy Bhayee, Patricia Tomaszewski, Daniel H. Lee, Graeme Moffat, Lou Pino, Sylvain Moreno, and Norman A. S. Farb. 2016. Attentional and affective consequences of technology supported mindfulness training: A randomised, active control, efficacy trial. BMC Psychology 4, 1 (2016), 60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Wolfram Boucsein. 2012. Electrodermal Activity. Springer Science 8 Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Doug A. Bowman, Ameya Datey, Umer Farooq, Y. Ryu, and Omar Vasnaik. 2001. Empirical Comparisons of Virtual Environment Displays. Technical Report. Department of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute 8 State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnathan Bown, Elisa White, and Akshya Boopalan. 2017. Looking for the ultimate display: A brief history of virtual reality. In Boundaries of Self and Reality Online. Elsevier, 239--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Francesco Brigo. 2011. Intermittent rhythmic delta activity patterns. Epilepsy 8 Behavior 20, 2 (2011), 254--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mónica S. Cameirao, I. Badia S. Bermúdez, Esther Duarte Oller, and Paul F. Verschure. 2009. The rehabilitation gaming system: A review. Studies in Health Techology and Informatics 145, 6 (2009), 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mónica S. Cameirão, S. Bermúdez, and P. F. M. J. Verschure. 2008. Virtual reality based upper extremity rehabilitation following stroke: A review. Journal of CyberTherapy 8 Rehabilitation 1, 1 (2008), 63--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Luca Chittaro, Riccardo Sioni, Cristiano Crescentini, and Franco Fabbro. 2017. Mortality salience in virtual reality experiences and its effects on users’ attitudes towards risk. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 101 (2017), 10--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ronald A. Cohen. 2011. Yerkes-Dodson law. In Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, J. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, and B. Caplan (Eds.). Springer, 2737--2738.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Davide Corbetta, Federico Imeri, and Roberto Gatti. 2015. Rehabilitation that incorporates virtual reality is more effective than standard rehabilitation for improving walking speed, balance and mobility after stroke: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy 61, 3 (2015), 117--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Maxime Cordeil, Tim Dwyer, Karsten Klein, Bireswar Laha, Kim Marriott, and Bruce H. Thomas. 2017. Immersive collaborative analysis of network connectivity: Cave-style or head-mounted display? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (2017), 441--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. HTC Corporation. 2019. HTC corporation: Vive Pro HMD. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://www.vive.com/us/product/vive-pro/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Patrick J. Costello. 1997. Health and Safety Issues Associated with Virtual Reality: A Review of Current Literature. Advisory Group on Computer Graphics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Heather Creagh. 2003. Cave automatic virtual environment. In Proceedings of the 2003 Electrical Insulation Conference and Electrical Manufacturing 8 Coil Winding Technology Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 499--504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hugo D. Critchley. 2002. Electrodermal responses: What happens in the brain. Neuroscientist 8, 2 (2002), 132--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. H. Crosbie, S. Lennon, J. R. Basford, and S. M. McDonough. 2007. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: Still more virtual than real. Disability and Rehabilitation 29, 14 (2007), 1139--1146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Eduardo Cuervo, Krishna Chintalapudi, and Manikanta Kotaru. 2018. Creating the perfect illusion: What will it take to create life-like virtual reality headsets? In Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. ACM, New York, NY, 7--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Günther Deuschl and Andrew Eisen. 1999. Recommendations for the Practice of Clinical Neurophysiology: Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (Suppl. 52). Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Julia Diemer, Georg W. Alpers, Henrik M. Peperkorn, Youssef Shiban, and Andreas Mühlberger. 2015. The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology 6 6 (2015), 26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jay Earles, Raymond A. Folen, and Larry C. James. 2001. Biofeedback using telemedicine: Clinical applications and case illustrations. Behavioral Medicine 27, 2 (2001), 77--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Aviv Elor, Sri Kurniawan, and Mircea Teodorescu. 2018. Towards an immersive virtual reality game for smarter post-stroke rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP’18). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 219--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Aviv Elor, Steven Lessard, Mircea Teodorescu, and Sri Kurniawan. 2019. Project Butterfly: Synergizing immersive virtual reality with actuated soft exosuit for upper-extremity rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR’19). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1448--1456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Aviv Elor, Mircea Teodorescu, and Sri Kurniawan. 2018. Project Star Catcher: A novel immersive virtual reality experience for upper limb rehabilitation. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 11, 4 (2018), 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Samantha Finkelstein, Andrea Nickel, Tiffany Barnes, and Evan A. Suma. 2010. Astrojumper: Motivating children with autism to exercise using a VR game. In CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’10). ACM, New York, NY, 4189--4194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: 2017 Data. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2017.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Joshua J. Foster, David W. Sutterer, John T. Serences, Edward K. Vogel, and Edward Awh. 2017. Alpha-band oscillations enable spatially and temporally resolved tracking of covert spatial attention. Psychological Science 28, 7 (2017), 929--941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jean Dickinson Gibbons and Subhabrata Chakraborti. 2011. Nonparametric Statistical Inference. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Shawn N. Gieser, Eric Becker, and Fillia Makedon. 2013. Using CAVE in physical rehabilitation exercises for rheumatoid arthritis. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. ACM, New York, NY, 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Atefeh Goshvarpour, Ataollah Abbasi, and Ateke Goshvarpour. 2017. An accurate emotion recognition system using ECG and GSR signals and matching pursuit method. Biomedical Journal 40, 6 (2017), 355--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. John D. Green and Arnaldo A. Arduini. 1954. Hippocampal electrical activity in arousal. Journal of Neurophysiology 17, 6 (1954), 533--557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Helena Grillon, Françoise Riquier, Bruno Herbelin, and Daniel Thalmann. 2006. Virtual reality as a therapeutic tool in the confines of social anxiety disorder treatment. International Journal on Disability and Human Development 5, 3 (2006), 243--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Diane Gromala, Xin Tong, Amber Choo, Mehdi Karamnejad, and Chris D. Shaw. 2015. The virtual meditative walk: Virtual reality therapy for chronic pain management. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 521--524.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindsay F. Haas. 2003. Hans Berger (1873--1941), Richard Caton (1842--1926), and electroencephalography. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery 8 Psychiatry 74, 1 (2003), 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Michael E. Hasselmo and Howard Eichenbaum. 2005. Hippocampal mechanisms for the context-dependent retrieval of episodes. Neural Networks 18, 9 (2005), 1172--1190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Toyohiko Hatada, Haruo Sakata, and Hideo Kusaka. 1980. Psychophysical analysis of the “sensation of reality” induced by a visual wide-field display. SMPTE Journal 89, 8 (1980), 560--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Desmond J. Higham and Nicholas J. Higham. 2016. MATLAB Guide. Vol. 150. SIAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. J. Allan Hobson and Edward F. Pace-Schott. 2002. The cognitive neuroscience of sleep: Neuronal systems, consciousness and learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3, 9 (2002), 679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hunter G. Hoffman, Gloria T. Chambers, Walter J. Meyer, Lisa L. Arceneaux, William J. Russell, Eric J. Seibel, Todd L. Richards, Sam R. Sharar, and David R. Patterson. 2011. Virtual reality as an adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 41, 2 (2011), 183--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Hunter G. Hoffman, Walter J. Meyer III, Maribel Ramirez, Linda Roberts, Eric J. Seibel, Barbara Atzori, Sam R. Sharar, and David R. Patterson. 2014. Feasibility of articulated arm mounted oculus rift virtual reality goggles for adjunctive pain control during occupational therapy in pediatric burn patients. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17, 6 (2014), 397--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Myles Hollander, Douglas A. Wolfe, and Eric Chicken. 2013. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. Vol. 751. John Wiley 8 Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. L. M. Howden and J. A. Meyer. 2011. Age and sex composition: 2010. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. John R. Hughes. 2008. Gamma, fast, and ultrafast waves of the brain: Their relationships with epilepsy and behavior. Epilepsy 8 Behavior 13, 1 (2008), 25--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Conrad Iber and Conrad Iber. 2007. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. Vol. 1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Westchester, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Apple Inc. 2019. Augmented Reality—ARKit 3. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://developer.apple.com/augmented-reality/arkit/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. InteraXon. 2019. Featured Research with Muse. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://choosemuse.com/muse-research/ , developer.choosemuse.com/tools/available-data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Jerome Iruthayarajah, Amanda McIntyre, Andreea Cotoi, Steven Macaluso, and Robert Teasell. 2017. The use of virtual reality for balance among individuals with chronic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 24, 1 (2017), 68--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Charlene Jennett, Anna L. Cox, Paul Cairns, Samira Dhoparee, Andrew Epps, Tim Tijs, and Alison Walton. 2008. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 9 (2008), 641--661.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Fan Jiang, Xubo Yang, and Lele Feng. 2016. Real-time full-body motion reconstruction and recognition for off-the-shelf VR devices. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry—Volume 1. ACM, New York, NY, 309--318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. M. Carmen Juan and David Pérez. 2009. Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety in an acrophobic environment viewed via HMD or CAVE. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 18, 3 (2009), 232--248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Kwanguk Kim, M. Zachary Rosenthal, David Zielinski, and Rachel Brady. 2012. Comparison of desktop, head mounted display, and six wall fully immersive systems using a stressful task. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshops (VRW’12). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 143--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Natasha Kovacevic, Petra Ritter, William Tays, Sylvain Moreno, and Anthony Randal McIntosh. 2015. ‘My virtual dream’: Collective neurofeedback in an immersive art environment. PLoS ONE 10, 7 (2015), e0130129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Olave E. Krigolson, Chad C. Williams, Angela Norton, Cameron D. Hassall, and Francisco L. Colino. 2017. Choosing MUSE: Validation of a low-cost, portable EEG system for ERP research. Frontiers in Neuroscience 11 (2017), 109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Belinda Lange, Chien-Yen Chang, Evan Suma, Bradley Newman, Albert Skip Rizzo, and Mark Bolas. 2011. Development and evaluation of low cost game-based balance rehabilitation tool using the Microsoft Kinect sensor. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1831--1834.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Joseph J. LaViola Jr. 2000. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 32, 1 (2000), 47--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Mingyang Liu, Di Fan, Xiaohan Zhang, and Xiaopeng Gong. 2016. Human emotion recognition based on galvanic skin response signal feature selection and SVM. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Smart City and Systems Engineering (ICSCSE’16). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 157--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Rodolfo R. Llinás. 2014. Intrinsic electrical properties of mammalian neurons and CNS function: A historical perspective. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 8 (2014), 320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Keith R. Lohse, Courtney G. E. Hilderman, Katharine L. Cheung, Sandy Tatla, and H. F. Machiel Van der Loos. 2014. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS ONE 9, 3 (2014), e93318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. J. F. Lubar, M. O. Swartwood, J. N. Swartwood, and D. L. Timmermann. 1995. Quantitative EEG and auditory event-related potentials in the evaluation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Effects of methylphenidate and implications for neurofeedback training. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 34 (1995), 143--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Joel F. Lubar. 1991. Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 16, 3 (1991), 201--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Hengameh Marzbani, Hamid Reza Marateb, and Marjan Mansourian. 2016. Neurofeedback: A comprehensive review on system design, methodology and clinical applications. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 7, 2 (2016), 143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Katharina Meyerbröker, Nexhmedin Morina, Gerard Kerkhof, and Paul M. G. Emmelkamp. 2011. Virtual reality exposure treatment of agoraphobia: A comparison of computer automatic virtual environment and head-mounted display. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine 9, 1 (2011), 41--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Haylie L. Miller and Nicoleta L. Bugnariu. 2016. Level of immersion in virtual environments impacts the ability to assess and teach social skills in autism spectrum disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 19, 4 (2016), 246--256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Nexhmedin Morina, Hiske Ijntema, Katharina Meyerbröker, and Paul M. G. Emmelkamp. 2015. Can virtual reality exposure therapy gains be generalized to real-life? A meta-analysis of studies applying behavioral assessments. Behaviour Research and Therapy 74 (2015), 18--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Hossein Mousavi Hondori and Maryam Khademi. 2014. A review on technical and clinical impact of Microsoft Kinect on physical therapy and rehabilitation. Journal of Medical Engineering 2014 (2014), 846514.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Maria V. Nararro-Haro, Hunter G. Hoffman, Azucena Garcia-Palacios, Mariana Sampaio, Wadee Alhalabi, Karyn Hall, and Marsha Linehan. 2016. The use of virtual reality to facilitate mindfulness skills training in dialectical behavioral therapy for borderline personality disorder: A case study. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016), 1573.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. NaturalPoint Inc. 2019. DBA Optitrack Motion Capture System. Available at https://optitrack.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Neulog. 2019. GSR Logger Sensor NUL-217. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://neulog.com/gsr/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. John O’Keefe and Neil Burgess. 1999. Theta activity, virtual navigation and the human hippocampus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 11 (1999), 403--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Sean O’Nuallain. 2009. Zero power and selflessness: What meditation and conscious perception have in common. Journal of Cognitive Sciences 4, 2 (2009), 46--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Orion. 2019. Motion Capture, VR, Games—Project Orion. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://www.ikinema.com/docs/s317i365.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Patrick Z. Pearce. 2008. Exercise is medicine. Current Sports Medicine Reports 7, 3 (2008), 171--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Adam Philpot, Maxine Glancy, Peter J. Passmore, Andrew Wood, and Bob Fields. 2017. User experience of panoramic video in CAVE-like and head mounted display viewing conditions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video. 65--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Polar. 2019. Polar OH1—Optical Heart Rate Sensor. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://www.polar.com/us-en/products/accessories/oh1-optical-heart-rate-sensor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Rosemarie J. E. Rajae-Joordens. 2008. Measuring experiences in gaming and TV applications. In Probing Experience. Springer, 77--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Rafael Ramirez and Zacharias Vamvakousis. 2012. Detecting emotion from EEG signals using the Emotive Epoc device. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Brain Informatics. 175--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Debbie Rand, Rachel Kizony, and Patrice Tamar L. Weiss. 2008. The Sony PlayStation II Eyetoy: Low-cost virtual reality for use in rehabilitation. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 32, 4 (2008), 155--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Madhavi Rangaswamy, Bernice Porjesz, David B. Chorlian, Kongming Wang, Kevin A. Jones, Lance O. Bauer, John Rohrbaugh, et al. 2002. Beta power in the EEG of alcoholics. Biological Psychiatry 52, 8 (2002), 831--842.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Lisa Rebenitsch and Charles Owen. 2016. Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Reality 20, 2 (2016), 101--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. G. Roelkens, J. Van Campenhout, J. Brouckaert, D. Van Thourhout, R. Baets, P. R. Romeo, P. Regreny, et al. 2007. III-V/Si photonics by die to wafer bonding. Materials Today 10, 7-8 (2007), 36--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Bernard Rosner, Robert J. Glynn, and Mei-Ling T. Lee. 2006. The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data. Biometrics 62, 1 (2006), 185--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Barbara Olasov Rothbaum, Matthew Price, Tanja Jovanovic, Seth D. Norrholm, Maryrose Gerardi, Boadie Dunlop, Michael Davis, et al. 2014. A randomized, double-blind evaluation of D-cycloserine or alprazolam combined with virtual reality exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans. American Journal of Psychiatry 171, 6 (2014), 640--648.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Mar Rus-Calafell, José Gutiérrez-Maldonado, and Joan Ribas-Sabaté. 2014. A virtual reality-integrated program for improving social skills in patients with schizophrenia: A pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 45, 1 (2014), 81--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Valorie N. Salimpoor, Mitchel Benovoy, Gregory Longo, Jeremy R. Cooperstock, and Robert J. Zatorre. 2009. The rewarding aspects of music listening are related to degree of emotional arousal. PLoS ONE 4, 10 (2009), e7487.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Harold Sandler. 2012. Inactivity: Physiological Effects. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Gustavo Saposnik, Mindy Levin, and the Stroke Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group. 2011. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 42, 5 (2011), 1380--1386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Hope Services. 2020. About Hope Services. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://www.hopeservices.org/about-hope-services/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Youssef Shiban, Iris Schelhorn, Paul Pauli, and Andreas Mühlberger. 2015. Effect of combined multiple contexts and multiple stimuli exposure in spider phobia: A randomized clinical trial in virtual reality. Behaviour Research and Therapy 71 (2015), 45--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Wolf Singer and Charles M. Gray. 1995. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18, 1 (1995), 555--586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Rodrigo Soares, Elton Siqueira, Marco Miura, Tiago Silva, and Carla Castanho. 2016. Biofeedback sensors in game telemetry research. In Proceedings of SBGames 2016. 81--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Penny J. Standen and David J. Brown. 2005. Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of people with intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychology 8 Behavior 8, 3 (2005), 272--282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Ivan E. Sutherland. 1965. The ultimate display. In Multimedia: From Wagner to Virtual Reality. Norton, New York, NY, 506--508.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Ivan E. Sutherland. 1968. A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I. ACM, New York, NY, 757--764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. C. H. Vanderwolf. 2000. Are neocortical gamma waves related to consciousness? Brain Research 855, 2 (2000), 217--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Peter M. B. Walker. 1999. Chambers Dictionary of Science and Technology. Kingfisher.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. I. Q. Whishaw and C. Hippocampal Vanderwolf. 1973. Hippocampal EEG and behavior: Change in amplitude and frequency of RSA (theta rhythm) associated with spontaneous and learned movement patterns in rats and cats. Behavioral Biology 8, 4 (1973), 461--484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Emma M. Whitham, Trent Lewis, Kenneth J. Pope, Sean P. Fitzgibbon, C. Richard Clark, Stephen Loveless, Dylan DeLosAngeles, Angus K. Wallace, Marita Broberg, and John O. Willoughby. 2008. Thinking activates EMG in scalp electrical recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology 119, 5 (2008), 1166--1175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg, Orr Tomer, Alon S. Keren, Israel Nelken, and Leon Y. Deouell. 2008. Transient induced gamma-band response in EEG as a manifestation of miniature saccades. Neuron 58, 3 (2008), 429--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On Shooting Stars: Comparing CAVE and HMD Immersive Virtual Reality Exergaming for Adults with Mixed Ability

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!