skip to main content
research-article

Breaking the Accessibility Barrier in Non-Visual Interaction with PDF Forms

Published:18 June 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

PDF forms are ubiquitous. Businesses big and small, government agencies, health and educational institutions and many others have all embraced PDF forms. People use PDF forms for providing information to these entities. But people who are blind frequently find it very difficult to fill out PDF forms with screen readers, the standard assistive software that they use for interacting with computer applications. Firstly, many of the them are not even accessible as they are non-interactive and hence not editable on a computer. Secondly, even if they are interactive, it is not always easy to associate the correct labels with the form fields, either because the labels are not meaningful or the sequential reading order of the screen reader misses the visual cues that associate the correct labels with the fields. In this paper we present a solution to the accessibility problem of PDF forms. We leverage the fact that many people with visual impairments are familiar with web browsing and are proficient at filling out web forms. Thus, we create a web form layer over the PDF form via a high fidelity transformation process that attempts to preserve all the spatial relationships of the PDF elements including forms, their labels and the textual content. Blind people only interact with the web forms, and the filled out web form fields are transparently transferred to the corresponding fields in the PDF form. An optimization algorithm automatically adjusts the length and width of the PDF fields to accommodate arbitrary size field data. This ensures that the filled out PDF document does not have any truncated form-field values, and additionally, it is readable. A user study with fourteen users with visual impairments revealed that they were able to populate more form fields than the status quo and the self-reported user experience with the proposed interface was superior compared to the status quo.

References

  1. Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Sergio Luján-Mora, and Tania Acosta. 2017. Accessibility of Portable Document Format in Education Repositories. In Proceedings of the 2017 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers. 239--242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adobe. [n.d.]. Adobe Acrobat Pro DC. https://acrobat.adobe.com/us/en/acrobat/acrobat-pro.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Adobe. [n.d.]. Adobe Acrobat Reader DC. https://acrobat.adobe.com/us/en/acrobat/pdf-reader.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dragan Ahmetovic, Tiziana Armano, Cristian Bernareggi, Michele Berra, Anna Capietto, Sandro Coriasco, Nadir Murru, Alice Ruighi, and Eugenia Taranto. 2018. Axessibility: a latex package for mathematical formulae accessibility in pdf documents. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 352--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Amazon. [n.d.]. Amazon Textract | Extract Text & Data | AWS. https://aws.amazon.com/textract/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Apple. [n.d.]. Vision Accessibility - Mac - Apple. https://www.apple.com/accessibility/mac/vision/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vikas Ashok, Yevgen Borodin, Yury Puzis, and IV Ramakrishnan. 2015. Capti-speak: a speech-enabled web screen reader. In Proceedings of the 12th Web for All Conference. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Vikas Ashok, Yury Puzis, Yevgen Borodin, and IV Ramakrishnan. 2017. Web screen reading automation assistance using semantic abstraction. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 407--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yevgen Borodin, Jeffrey P Bigham, Glenn Dausch, and IV Ramakrishnan. 2010. More than meets the eye: a survey of screen-reader browsing strategies. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A). ACM, 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Peter Brophy and Jenny Craven. 2007. Web accessibility. Library trends, Vol. 55, 4 (2007), 950--972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Attorney Grievance Committee. [n.d.]. Background Check Request Form. https://www.nycourts.gov/courts/ad1/Committees&Programs/DDC/Background%20Check%20Request%2001%2028%202019.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE BUREAU OF CORPORATIONS and CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS. [n.d.]. Articles of Incorporation-Nonprofit. https://www.dos.pa.gov/BusinessCharities/Business/RegistrationForms/Documents/5306--7102-%20Art%20of%20Inc-Dom%20Nonprofit.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alireza Darvishy. 2018. PDF accessibility: Tools and challenges. In International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, 113--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Alireza Darvishy and Hans-Peter Hutter. 2013. Comparison of the effectiveness of different accessibility plugins based on important accessibility criteria. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 305--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alireza Darvishy, Hans-Peter Hutter, Alexander Horvath, and Martin Dorigo. 2010. A flexible software architecture concept for the creation of accessible PDF documents. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer, 47--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Alireza Darvishy, Hans-Peter Hutter, and Oliver Mannhart. 2011. Web application for analysis, manipulation and generation of accessible PDF documents. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 121--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alireza Darvishy, Thomas Leemann, and Hans-Peter Hutter. 2012. Two software plugins for the creation of fully accessible PDF documents based on a flexible software architecture. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer, 621--624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Heather Devine, Andres Gonzalez, and Matthew Hardy. 2011. Making accessible PDF documents. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM symposium on Document engineering. 275--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Luchin Doblies, David Stolz, Alireza Darvishy, and Hans-Peter Hutter. 2014. PAVE: A web application to identify and correct accessibility problems in PDF documents. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer, 185--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Freedom Scientific. [n.d.]. JAWS® - Freedom Scientific. https://www.freedomscientific.com/products/software/jaws/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Yoichi Haga, Wataru Makishi, Kentaro Iwami, Kentaro Totsu, Kazuhiro Nakamura, and Masayoshi Esashi. 2005. Dynamic Braille display using SMA coil actuator and magnetic latch. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 119, 2 (2005), 316--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Maurice G Kendall. 1938. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, Vol. 30, 1/2 (1938), 81--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Donald E Knuth and Michael F Plass. 1981. Breaking paragraphs into lines. Software: Practice and Experience, Vol. 11, 11 (1981), 1119--1184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Template Lab. [n.d.]. CONTRACT FOR SELLING A CAR. http://templatelab.com/vehicle-purchase-agreement/?wpdmdl=32339Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jonathan Lazar, Aaron Allen, Jason Kleinman, and Chris Malarkey. 2007. What frustrates screen reader users on the web: A study of 100 blind users. International Journal of human-computer interaction, Vol. 22, 3 (2007), 247--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Vladimir I Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. In Soviet physics doklady, Vol. 10. 707--710.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jennifer Mankoff, Holly Fait, and Tu Tran. 2005. Is your web page accessible? A comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 41--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hisashi Miyashita, Daisuke Sato, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2007. Making multimedia content accessible for screen reader users. In Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A). 126--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Julius T Nganji. 2015. The Portable Document Format (PDF) accessibility practice of four journal publishers. Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 37, 3 (2015), 254--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. NVDA team. [n.d.]. NVDA. https://www.nvaccess.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. University of Minnesota. [n.d.]. ADMISSION APPLICATION UPDATE FORM. https://admissions.tc.umn.edu/PDFs/Application_Update.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. State of Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles. [n.d.]. Bill of Sale. https://dmv.nebraska.gov/sites/dmv.nebraska.gov/files/doc/dvr/forms/billofsale.pdf?trkid=1&cka=88&cko=219&cks1=push&cks2=24248663&cks3=psh-cpa-pushnami-trumpboasts-fri-720am-cr1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Christopher Power, André Freire, Helen Petrie, and David Swallow. 2012. Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 433--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Brian Sierkowski. 2002. Achieving web accessibility. In Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services. 288--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Mireia Ribera Turró. 2008. Are PDF documents accessible? Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 27, 3 (2008), 25--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. W3C. 2016. PDF Techniques for WCAG 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Cheng Xu, Ali Israr, Ivan Poupyrev, Olivier Bau, and Chris Harrison. 2011. Tactile display for the visually impaired using TeslaTouch. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 317--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Levent Yobas, Dominique M Durand, Gerard G Skebe, Frederick J Lisy, and Michael A Huff. 2003. A novel integrable microvalve for refreshable braille display system. Journal of microelectromechanical systems, Vol. 12, 3 (2003), 252--263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Breaking the Accessibility Barrier in Non-Visual Interaction with PDF Forms

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!