skip to main content
research-article

Design and Development of Heuristic Utility Management Algorithm for Chinese Library Management System

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 September 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Utility Management in a library is the programmatic tool with the synthetic mental program ability, along with Artificial Intelligence capacities, headed to manage a high volume of books, articles, and assignments, which help to ease the manual significance of librarians. This computerized machine code helps librarians to deal with various databases of the library management system. This framework keeps the records of all the resource details in an optimized manner. It uses a utility management software code with an optimized search classifier that helps to deal with the resource of the library. In this work, the Heuristic Utility Management Algorithm (HUMA) has been used to keep track of resources in the library using mathematical modeling and standardized programmatic computation on tags, which relates the decode scanner to parse the input information. HUMA helps to reduce the manual routine work done by the librarians, and it has been analyzed in this research with prominent survey outcomes based on experimental validation.

References

  1. S. AlAwadhi and S. M. Al-Daihani. 2019. Marketing academic library information services using social media. Library Management 40, 3/4 (2019), 228–239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. L. Ayres, M. P. Cummings, G. Baele, A. E. Darling, P. O. Lewis, D. L. Swofford, and M. A. Suchard. 2019. BEAGLE 3: Improved performance, scaling, and usability for a high-performance computing library for statistical phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 68, 6 (2019), 1052--1061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. K. Davidson and J. Yin. 2019. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China: A contextual exploration. In Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (28–48). IGI Global. DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-6192-7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. Shao, Q. He, G. Cha, and Q. Xi. 2019. Comparison of the assessment systems of public libraries in the United States and China. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association 68, 2 (2019), 164–179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. Hanel, J. He, J. Fu, S. Reid, and J. E. Niosi. 2020. A romance of the three kingdoms: Biotechnology clusters in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong Province, China. In Disruptive Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (1241–1289). IGI Global. DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-9273-0.ch061Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Kim, A. E. Amador, and S. L. Russell. 2019. U. S. Patent Application No. 10/303,377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Mitchell. 2019. Using cloud services for library IT infrastructure. Code4lib Journal, (9).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Gloet and D. Samson. 2020. Knowledge management and systematic innovation capability. In Disruptive Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (1198–1218). IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Vàzquez, J. Ardanuy, A. López-Borrull, and C. Ollé. 2019. Scientific output in library and information science: A comparative study of the journals anales de documentación and bid textos universitaris en biblioteconomia i documentació. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51, 2 (2019), 440–457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. J. Jones and M. Harvey. 2019. Library 2.0: The effectiveness of social media as a marketing tool for libraries in educational institutions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51, 1 (2019), 3–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. S. Tsang. 2016. Society, schools, and progress in China: The commonwealth and international library: Education and educational research. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Yi, D. Mo, H. Wang, Q. Gao, Y. Shi, P. Wu, and S. Rozelle. 2019. Do resources matter? Effects of an in‐class library project on student independent reading habits in primary schools in rural china. Reading Research Quarterly 54, 3 (2019), 383–411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Xu, Q. Kang, Z. Song, and C. P. Clarke. 2015. Applications of mobile social media: WeChat among academic libraries in China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 41, 1 (2015), 21–30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. Corbett and A. Brown. 2015. The roles that librarians and libraries play in distance education settings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 18, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Crowe, M. A. Crumpton, D. Gwynn, J. Harper, M. B. Lock, and M. G. Scanlon. 2019. The status of entrepreneurship in libraries: Content analysis and assessment from the conference for entrepreneurial librarians. In Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation (pp. 115--132). Emerald Publishing Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. B. K. Maxson, M. Neely, L. M. Roberts, S. M. Stone, M. S. Lowe, K. V. Macy, and W. Miller. 2019. The power of peers: Approaches from writing and libraries. Reference Services Review 47, 3 (2019), 314--330. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-03-2019-0020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A. Vårheim, R. Skare, and N. Lenstra. 2019. Examining libraries as public sphere institutions: Mapping questions, methods, theories, findings, and research gaps. Library and Information Science Research 41, 2 (2019), 93–101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Verbeke, J. H. Falk, K. Brown, and D. Meier. 2019. A study of rural librarians’ self-efficacy in facilitating and developing adult science programs. The Library Quarterly 89, 2 (2019), 116–136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. K. Merga. 2019. How do librarians in schools support struggling readers? English in Education 53, 2 (2019), 145–160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. N. Kurniasih, N. Kurniawati, E. Rizal, A. Sudirman, M. Alif, Y. S. Maulana, and E. Satria. 2019. Analysis of the implementation of unpad library management system using the technology acceptance model: Librarian perspective. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (1175, 1, 012228). IOP Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Lyu, S. Wang, T. E. Balius, I. Singh, A. Levit, Y. S. Moroz, and A. A. Tolmachev. 2019. Ultra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes. Nature 566(7743), 224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design and Development of Heuristic Utility Management Algorithm for Chinese Library Management System

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
        ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing  Volume 20, Issue 3
        May 2021
        240 pages
        ISSN:2375-4699
        EISSN:2375-4702
        DOI:10.1145/3457152
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 September 2021
        • Accepted: 1 August 2020
        • Revised: 1 July 2020
        • Received: 1 June 2020
        • Online AM: 7 May 2020
        Published in tallip Volume 20, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Refereed
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!