Abstract
While the computing power of mobile devices has been quickly evolving in recent years, the growth of mobile storage capacity is, however, relatively slower. A common problem shared by budget-phone users is that they frequently run out of storage space. This article conducts a deep inspection of file usage of mobile applications and their potential implications on user experience. Our major findings are as follows: First, mobile applications could rapidly consume storage space by creating temporary cache files, but these cache files quickly become obsolete after being re-used for a short period of time. Second, file access patterns of large files, especially executable files, appear highly sparse and random, and therefore large portions of file space are never visited. Third, file prefetching brings an excessive amount of file data into page cache but only a few prefetched data are actually used. The unnecessary memory pressure causes premature memory reclamation and prolongs application launching time. Through the feasibility study of two preliminary optimizations, we demonstrated a high potential to eliminate unnecessary storage and memory space consumption with a minimal impact on user experience.
- Hyojun Kim, Nitin Agrawal, and Cristian Ungureanu. 2012. Revisiting storage for smartphones. ACM Trans. Stor. 8, 4 (2012), 1--25.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Wongun Lee, Keonwoo Lee, Hankeun Son, Wook-Hee Kim, Beomseok Nam, and Youjip Won. 2015. WALDIO: Eliminating the filesystem journaling in resolving the journaling of journal anomaly. In Proceedings of the 2015 USENIX Conference on Usenix Annual Technical Conference. USENIX Association, 235--247.Google Scholar
- Sooman Jeong, Kisung Lee, Seongjin Lee, Seoungbum Son, and Youjip Won. 2013. I/O Stack optimization for smartphones. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC’13).Google Scholar
- Daeho Jeong, Youngjae Lee, and Jin-Soo Kim. 2015. Boosting quasi-asynchronous I/O for better responsiveness in mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies. USENIX Association, 191--202.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- David T. Nguyen, Gang Zhou, Guoliang Xing, Xin Qi, Zijiang Hao, Ge Peng, and Qing Yang. 2015. Reducing smartphone application delay through read/write isolation. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys’15). ACM, 287--300.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jongmin Lee, Yongseok Oh, Hunki Kwon, Jongmoo Choi, Donghee Lee, and Sam H. Noh. 2013. TinyFTL: An FTL architecture for flash memory cards with scarce resources. In Proceedings of the ACM Asia-Pacific Workshop on Systems (APSYS’13). ACM, 16.Google Scholar
- Cheng Ji, Li-Pin Chang, Liang Shi, Congming Gao, Chao Wu, Yuangang Wang, and Chun Jason Xue. 2017. Lightweight data compression for mobile flash storage. ACM Trans. Embedd. Comput. Syst. 16, 5s (2017), 183.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jace Courville and Feng Chen. 2016. Understanding storage i/o behaviors of mobile applications. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Massive Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST’16).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Kisung Lee and Youjip Won. 2012. Smart layers and dumb result: IO characterization of an Android-based smartphone. In Proceedings of International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT’12). ACM, 23--32.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Peter of GSMArena. 2017. Counterclockwise: Looking Back at the Ever Growing CPU Core Count of Mobile Chipsets. Retrieved from https://www.gsmarena.com/counterclockwise_looking_back_at_the_ever_growing_cpu_core_count_of_mobile_chipsets-news-26454.php.Google Scholar
- Peter of GSMArena. 2018. Counterclockwise: Base Storage Grows, But the Card Slot Remains Popular. Retrieved from https://www.gsmarena.com/counterclockwise_base%_storage_grows-news-29440.php.Google Scholar
- Kevin Purdy. 2014. Insufficient Storage Available’ Is One of Android’s Greatest Annoyances. Retrieved from https://www.itworld.com/article/2833377/mobile/insufficient-storage-available-is-one-of-android-s-greatest-annoyances-here-s-how-to-fix-it.html.Google Scholar
- Xiaoqing Luo, Frank Mueller, Philip Carns, Jonathan Jenkins, Robert Latham, Robert Ross, and Shane Snyder. 2017. ScalaIOExtrap: Elastic i/o tracing and extrapolation. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS’17). IEEE, 585--594.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Tyler Harter, Chris Dragga, Michael Vaughn, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, and Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau. 2012. A file is not a file: Understanding the I/O behavior of Apple desktop applications. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 30, 3 (2012), 10.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jonathan Corbet. 2015. Adaptive File Readahead. Retrieved from https://lwn.net/Articles/155510/.Google Scholar
- Song Jiang, Xiaoning Ding, Yuehai Xu, and Kei Davis. 2013. A prefetching scheme exploiting both data layout and access history on disk. ACM Trans. Stor. 9, 3 (2013), 10.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2015. Managing Your App’s Memory. Retrieved from https://developer.android.com/training/articles/memory.html.Google Scholar
- 2015. App Programming Guide for iOS: The App Life Cycle. Retrieved from https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/iPhone/Conceptual/iPhoneOSProgrammingGuide/TheAppLifeCycle/TheAppLifeCycle.html.Google Scholar
- Jang Hyun Kim, Junghwan Sung, Sang Yun Hwang, and Hyo-Joong Suh. 2015. A novel Android memory management policy focused on periodic habits of a user. In Ubiquitous Computing Application and Wireless Sensor. Springer, 143--149.Google Scholar
- Sang-Hoon Kim, Jinkyu Jeong, and Jin-Soo Kim. 2017. Application-aware swapping for mobile systems. ACM Trans. Embedd. Comput. Syst. 16, 5s (2017), 182.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2018. UI Automator. Retrieved from https://developer.android.com/training/testing/ui-automator.Google Scholar
- Cameron Summerson. 2016. Five Ways to Free Up Space on Your Android Device. Retrieved from https://www.howtogeek.com/112356/5-ways-to-free-up-space-on-android/.Google Scholar
- 2018. Files Go. Retrieved from https://filesgo.google.com/.Google Scholar
- 2011. Ensuring Data Reaches Disk. Retrieved from https://lwn.net/Articles/457667/.Google Scholar
- Byungjo Kim, Dong Hyun Kang, Changwoo Min, and Young Ik Eom. 2014. Understanding implications of trim, discard, and background command for eMMC storage device. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 3rd Global Conference onConsumer Electronics (GCCE’14). IEEE, 709--710.Google Scholar
- Sangwook Shane Hahn, Sungjin Lee, Cheng Ji, Li-Pin Chang, Inhyuk Yee, Liang Shi, Chun Jason Xue, and Jihong Kim. 2017. Improving file system performance of mobile storage systems using a decoupled defragmenter. In Proceedings of the USENIX International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC’17).Google Scholar
- Takashi Sato. 2007. Ext4 online defragmentation. In Proceedings of the Linux Symposium, Vol. 2. Citeseer, 179--86.Google Scholar
- Clayton Shepard, Ahmad Rahmati, Chad Tossell, Lin Zhong, and Phillip Kortum. 2011. LiveLab: Measuring wireless networks and smartphone users in the field. ACM SIGMETRICS Perf. Eval. Rev. 38, 3 (2011), 15--20.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Duo Liu, Kan Zhong, Xiao Zhu, Yang Li, Lingbo Long, and Zili Shao. 2017. Non-volatile memory based page swapping for building high-performance mobile devices. IEEE Trans. Comput. 66, 11 (2017), 1918--1931.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Amos Waterland. 2014. Stress is a deliberately simple workload generator for POSIX systems. Retrieved from https://people.seas.harvard.edu/ apw/stress/.Google Scholar
- 2018. Test UI performance. Retrieved from https://developer.android.com/training/testing/performance.Google Scholar
- 2014. systrace. Retrieved from https://developer.android.com/studio/command-line/systrace.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Inspection and Characterization of App File Usage in Mobile Devices
Recommendations
Exploring large-scale small file storage for search engines
Large-scale small file storage for original pages degrades performance of search engines. In this paper, we first analyze the disadvantages of the existing EXT3 file system in accessing small files. Then, the rate and speed of compression algorithms are ...
A comparison of the usage and experience of a file sharing system with different operation policies
SIGUCCS '11: Proceedings of the 39th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User servicesThere are many kinds of file sharing systems used for various pur-poses in the world. At our University, we use a commercial product called Proself as our file sharing system. Proself has been set up under two different operation policies in our ...






Comments