Editorial Notes
The editors have requested minor, non-substantive changes to the VoR and, in accordance with ACM policies, a Corrected VoR was published on February 9, 2021. For reference purposes the VoR may still be accessed via the Supplemental Material section on this page.
Abstract
Natural language processing technologies, such as topic models, have been proven to be effective for scholarly recommendation tasks with the ability to deal with content information. Recently, venue recommendation is becoming an increasingly important research task due to the unprecedented number of publication venues. However, traditional methods focus on either the author’s local network or author-venue similarity, where the multiple relationships between scholars and venues are overlooked, especially the venue–venue interaction. To solve this problem, we propose an author topic model–enhanced joint graph modeling approach that consists of venue topic modeling, venue-specific topic influence modeling, and scholar preference modeling. We first model the venue topic with Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Then, we model the venue-specific topic influence in an asymmetric and low-dimensional way by considering the topic similarity between venues, the top-influence of venues, and the top-susceptibility of venues. The top-influence characterizes venues’ capacity of exerting topic influence on other venues. The top-susceptibility captures venues’ propensity of being topically influenced by other venues. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets show that our proposed joint graph modeling approach outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Version of Record for "Venue Topic Model?enhanced Joint Graph Modelling for Citation Recommendation in Scholarly Big Data" by Wang et al., ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, Volume 20, Issue 1 (TALLIP 20:1).
- Hamed Alhoori and Richard Furuta. 2017. Recommendation of scholarly venues based on dynamic user interests. J. Inf. 11, 2 (2017), 553--563.Google Scholar
- Rebekah R. Brown, Ana Deletic, and Tony H. F. Wong. 2015. Interdisciplinarity: How to catalyse collaboration. Nature News 525, 7569 (2015), 315.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Hung-Hsuan Chen, Liang Gou, Xiaolong Zhang, and Clyde Lee Giles. 2011. Collabseer: A search engine for collaboration discovery. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM, 231--240.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jinyin Chen, Jian Zhang, Xuanheng Xu, Chenbo Fu, Dan Zhang, Qingpeng Zhang, and Qi Xuan. 2019. E-LSTM-D: A deep learning framework for dynamic network link prediction. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet.: Syst. (2019). Early access. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2019.2932913Google Scholar
- Zhen Chen, Feng Xia, Huizhen Jiang, Haifeng Liu, and Jun Zhang. 2015. AVER: Random walk based academic venue recommendation. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 579--584.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Wenyi Huang, Zhaohui Wu, Chen Liang, Prasenjit Mitra, and C. Lee Giles. 2015. A neural probabilistic model for context based citation recommendation. In Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’15). AAAI Press, 2404--2410.Google Scholar
- Noriaki Kawamae. 2010. Serendipitous recommendations via innovators. In Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 218--225.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Samiya Khan, Xiufeng Liu, Kashish A. Shakil, and Mansaf Alam. 2017. A survey on scholarly data: From big data perspective. Inf. Process. Manage. 53, 4 (2017), 923--944.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Xiangjie Kong, Jun Zhang, Da Zhang, Yi Bu, Ying Ding, and Feng Xia. 2020. The gene of scientific success. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 14, 4 (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3385530Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jianxin Li, Taotao Cai, Ke Deng, Xinjue Wang, Timos Sellis, and Feng Xia. 2020. Community-diversified influence maximization in social networks. Inf. Syst. 92, 101522 (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2020.101522Google Scholar
- Jiaying Liu, Feng Xia, Lei Wang, Bo Xu, Xiangjie Kong, Hanghang Tong, and Irwin King. 2019. Shifu2: A network representation learning based model for advisor-advisee relationship mining. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. (2019). Early access. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2019.2946825Google Scholar
- Zheng Liu, Xing Xie, and Lei Chen. 2018. Context-aware academic collaborator recommendation. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery 8 Data Mining. ACM, 1870--1879.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hiep Luong, Tin Huynh, Susan Gauch, Loc Do, and Kiem Hoang. 2012. Publication venue recommendation using author network’s publication history. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems. Springer, 426--435.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Fanqi Meng, Dehong Gao, Wenjie Li, Xu Sun, and Yuexian Hou. 2013. A unified graph model for personalized query-oriented reference paper recommendation. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information 8 Knowledge Management. ACM, 1509--1512.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3111--3119.Google Scholar
- Welly Naptali, Masatoshi Tsuchiya, and Seiichi Nakagawa. 2010. Topic-dependent language model with voting on noun history. ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process. 9, 2 (2010), 1--31.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Michal Rosen-Zvi, Thomas Griffiths, Mark Steyvers, and Padhraic Smyth. 2004. The author-topic model for authors and documents. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. AUAI Press, 487--494.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Roberta Sinatra, Dashun Wang, Pierre Deville, Chaoming Song, and Albert-László Barabási. 2016. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science 354, 6312 (2016), aaf5239.Google Scholar
- Jie Tang, Sen Wu, Jimeng Sun, and Hang Su. 2012. Cross-domain collaboration recommendation. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1285--1293.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jie Tang, Jing Zhang, Limin Yao, Juanzi Li, Li Zhang, and Zhong Su. 2008. Arnetminer: Extraction and mining of academic social networks. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 990--998.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hao Wang, Huawei Shen, Wentao Ouyang, and Xueqi Cheng. 2018. Exploiting POI-specific geographical influence for point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). 3877--3883.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Wei Wang, Junyang Chen, Jinzhong Wang, Junxin Chen, and Zhiguo Gong. 2019. Geography-aware inductive matrix completion for personalized point of interest recommendation in smart cities. IEEE IoT J. 7, 5 (2019), 4361--4370. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2950418Google Scholar
- Wei Wang, Junyang Chen, Jinzhong Wang, Junxin Chen, Jinquan Liu, and Zhiguo Gong. 2019. Trust-enhanced collaborative filtering for personalized point of interests recommendation. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 16, 9 (2019), 6124--6132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2958696Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Wei Wang, Jiaying Liu, Zhuo Yang, Xiangjie Kong, and Feng Xia. 2019. Sustainable collaborator recommendation based on conference closure. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 6, 2 (2019), 311--322.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Zonghan Wu, Shirui Pan, Guodong Long, Jing Jiang, and Chengqi Zhang. 2019. Graph wavenet for deep spatial-temporal graph modeling. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’19). 1907--1913.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Feng Xia, Wei Wang, Teshome Megersa Bekele, and Huan Liu. 2017. Big scholarly data: A survey. IEEE Trans. Big Data 3, 1 (2017), 18--35.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Zaihan Yang and Brian D. Davison. 2012. Venue recommendation: Submitting your paper with style. In Proceedings of the 2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, Vol. 1. IEEE, 681--686.Google Scholar
- Shuo Yu, Jiaying Liu, Zhuo Yang, Zhen Chen, Huizhen Jiang, Amr Tolba, and Feng Xia. 2018. PAVE: Personalized academic venue recommendation exploiting co-publication networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 108 (2018), 38--47.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Yinggong Zhao, Shujian Huang, Xin-Yu Dai, and Jiajun Chen. 2016. Adaptation of language models for SMT using neural networks with topic information. ACM Trans. Asian Low-Resour. Lang. Inf. Process. 15, 3 (2016), 1--15.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Xiaokang Zhou, Wei Liang, Kevin Wang, Runhe Huang, and Qun Jin. 2018. Academic influence aware and multidimensional network analysis for research collaboration navigation based on scholarly big data. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. (2018). Early access. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2018.2860051Google Scholar
Index Terms
Venue Topic Model–enhanced Joint Graph Modelling for Citation Recommendation in Scholarly Big Data
Recommendations
Graph Neural Collaborative Topic Model for Citation Recommendation
Due to the overload of published scientific articles, citation recommendation has long been a critical research problem for automatically recommending the most relevant citations of given articles. Relational topic models (RTMs) have shown promise on ...
Attributed Collaboration Network Embedding for Academic Relationship Mining
Finding both efficient and effective quantitative representations for scholars in scientific digital libraries has been a focal point of research. The unprecedented amounts of scholarly datasets, combined with contemporary machine learning and big data ...
Scholar2vec: Vector Representation of Scholars for Lifetime Collaborator Prediction
While scientific collaboration is critical for a scholar, some collaborators can be more significant than others, e.g., lifetime collaborators. It has been shown that lifetime collaborators are more influential on a scholar’s academic performance. However,...






Comments