10.1145/3411763.3450363acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Catch Me If You Can: Designing a Disobedient Object to Protest Against GSM Surveillance

Online:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this article, I discuss the process of designing an object to protest against a specific surveillance device: the IMSI catcher, a controversial object used to monitor GSM networks. Being widely used in protests, I develop a tactical approach based on obfuscation to be adopted collectively to counteract IMSI catchers. In this case study, (1) I present how can remaking an IMSI catcher allow to re-appropriate the technology and create a basis for designing a disobedient object; (2) I introduce some examples of tactics to defeat surveillance based on obfuscation and the potential of inflatables; (3) I conceptualize a possible design of an object to defeat IMSI catchers and show the types of interactions it might generate in protests.

References

  1. James Auger. 2013. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. In Digital Creativity, Volume 24, 2013 - Issue 1. 11-35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. @MashaBorak. 2019. Tweet. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://twitter.com/MashaBorak/status/1138781859939176448.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Leah Binkovitz. 2013. When an Army of Artists Fooled Hitler. Smithsonian Magazine, May 20, 2013. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/when-an-army-of-artists-fooled-hitler-71563360/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Finn Brunton, Helen Nissenbaum. 2015. Obfuscation: A User's Guide for Privacy and Protest. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marc Dessauce. 1999. The Inflatable Moment: Pneumatics and Protest in 68. Princeton Architectural Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Steffi Duarte. 2014. Inflatables for protest: An interview with Artúr van Balen/ Tools for Action. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://www.vam.ac.uk/blog/disobedient-objects/tools-for-action-interview-with-artur-van-balen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Catherine Flood, Gavin Grindon. 2014. Disobedient Objects. V&A Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Félicien Goguey. 2015. Masquerade. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://felicien.io/masq/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Félicien Goguey. 2019. Remaking an IMSI Catcher. In Continent, Issue 8.1-2 / 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Oksana Grytsenko, Shaun Walker. 2014. Text messages warn Ukraine protesters they are 'participants in mass riot’. The Guardian, Tue 21 Jan 2014. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/21/ukraine-unrest-text-messages-protesters-mass-riot.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Garnet Hertz. 2016. Disobedient Electronics: Protest. The Studio for Critical Making.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mike Krauser. 2014. Activists Say Chicago Police Used ‘Stingray’ Eavesdropping Technology During Protests. CBS Chicago, Dec. 6, 2014. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/12/06/activists-say-chicago-police-used-stingray-eavesdropping-technology-during-protests/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Shibani Mahtani. 2019. Masks, cash and apps: How Hong Kong's protesters find ways to outwit the surveillance state, Washington Post, June 15, 2019. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/masks-cash-and-apps-how-hong-kongs-protesters-find-ways-to-outwit-the-surveillance-state/2019/06/15/8229169c-8ea0-11e9-b6f4-033356502dce_story.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gary T. Marx. 2003. A Tack in the Shoe: Neutralizing and Resisting the New Surveillance. In Journal of Social Issues, May 2003, vol. 59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lisa Parks. 2016. Rise of the IMSI Catcher. In Media Fields Journal n°11, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. @jcalpickard. 2020. Tweet. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://twitter.com/jcalpickard/status/1329142075288379393Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jentery Sayers. 2014. The relevance of remaking. Maker Lab in the Humanities. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Konstanze Scheidt. 2018. Inflatables and Activism: Affective Politics and the Political Potential of Inflatables. In APRJA Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018. 128-138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Artur Van Balen. Tactics: Inflatables. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://beautifultrouble.org/tactic/inflatables/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Artur Van Balen. 2018. Interview with Lapo Binazzi. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://floatingutopias.org/stories/lapo-binazzi-artur-van-balen/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. VICE News. 2016. Phone Hackers: Britain's Secret Surveillance. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzBWoVh4qhk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)164
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)74

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!