skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Life Review Using a Life Metaphoric Game to Promote Intergenerational Communication

Published:15 October 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This study explores whether a life metaphoric game can effectively facilitate communication between senior participants and young adult partners during a life review activity. Life review provides older adults with opportunities to organize their past experiences, rediscover the meaning of life, and prepare for their future life and eventual death. We held workshops in which 33 senior participants (ages 51-85) co-played a commercial game, titled "Long Journey of Life," paired with young adult partners (ages 19-23). The young partners asked senior participants about their associated memories during the life review activity. Through inductive thematic analysis, we found seven communication themes during the life review activity: reminiscence, future and death preparation, life advice, appreciation and evaluation, small talks involving self-disclosure, interpretation of metaphors, and explanation of game control methods. We investigated the relationships between communication themes and game design elements that promote conversation. In addition, we identified how participants' responses to the game differ depending on the player's characteristics and generation. Game design suggestions for an effective intergenerational life review using digital games were offered.

References

  1. [n.d.]. Anecdote. Retrieved June 1, 2020 from https://www.cdsboutique.com/en/anecdote-the-reminiscing-game-forseniors.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vero Vanden Abeele and Bob De Schutter. 2010. Designing intergenerational play via enactive interaction, competition and acceleration. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 5 (2010), 425--433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0262--3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jason C Allaire, Anne Collins McLaughlin, Amanda Trujillo, Laura A Whitlock, Landon LaPorte, and Maribeth Gandy. 2013. Successful aging through digital games: Socioemotional differences between older adult gamers and non-gamers. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 4 (2013), 1302--1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Steven Baker, Jenny Waycott, Romina Carrasco, Thuong Hoang, and Frank Vetere. 2019. Exploring the Design of Social VR Experiences with Older Adults. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, NY, USA, 303--315. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Samuel Benveniste, Pierre Jouvelot, Benoît Pin, and Renaud Péquignot. 2012. The MINWii project: renarcissization of patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease through video game-based music therapy. Entertainment Computing 3, 4 (2012), 111--120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2011.12.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Robin N Brewer and Jasmine Jones. 2015. Pinteresce: exploring reminiscence as an incentive to digital reciprocity for older adults. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference companion on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, NY, USA, 243--246. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2699017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Robert N Butler. 1963. The life review: An interpretation of reminiscence in the aged. Psychiatry 26, 1 (1963), 65--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Robert N Butler. 1974. Successful aging and the role of the life review. Journal of the American geriatrics Society 22, 12 (1974), 529--535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532--5415.1974.tb04823.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Alessia Cadamuro and Valentijn Visch. 2013. 'What Remains'?: A Persuasive Story Telling Game. In Games for Health. Springer, Wiesbaden, GER, 153--160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--658-02897--8_11Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Niamh Caprani, Nuala Dwyer, Kim Harrison, and Karen O'Brien. 2005. Remember when: development of an interactive reminiscence device. In CHI'05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, USA, 2070--2073. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057101Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaige Chang, Ning An, Jian Qi, Rongean Li, Sue Levkoff, Hongtu Chen, and Peng Li. 2013. Food stamps: a reminiscence therapy tablet game for Chinese seniors. In 2013 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering. IEEE, 556--561. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCME.2013.6548312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ya-Fang Cheng, Szu-Yang Cho, and Hsien-Hui Tang. 2017. Memoir Monopoly: Improving Rehabilitation Activities for Elderly People with Dementia. User Experience Magazine 17, 1 (2017). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from http: //uxpamagazine.org/memoir-monopoly/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kai-Jo Chiang, Hsin Chu, Hsiu-Ju Chang, Min-Huey Chung, Chung-Hua Chen, Hung-Yi Chiou, and Kuei-Ru Chou. 2010. The effects of reminiscence therapy on psychological well-being, depression, and loneliness among the institutionalized aged. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: A journal of the psychiatry of late life and allied sciences 25, 4 (2010), 380--388. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2350Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tracy Chippendale and Marie Boltz. 2015. Living Legends: students? responses to an intergenerational life review writing program. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 63, 4 (2015), 782--788. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13236Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Puay-Hoe Chua, Younbo Jung, May O Lwin, and Yin-Leng Theng. 2013. Let's play together: Effects of video-game play on intergenerational perceptions among youth and elderly participants. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 6 (2013), 2303--2311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Thecla Damianakis, Masashi Crete-Nishihata, Karen L Smith, Ronald M Baecker, and Elsa Marziali. 2009. The psychosocial impacts of multimedia biographies on persons with cognitive impairments. The Gerontologist 50, 1 (2009), 23--35. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Teresa De la Hera, Eugène Loos, Monique Simons, and Joleen Blom. 2017. Benefits and factors influencing the design of intergenerational digital games: a systematic literature review. Societies 7, 3 (2017), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ soc7030018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jos De Mul. 2015. The game of life: Narrative and ludic identity formation in computer games. In Representations of Internarrative Identity. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK, 159--187. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137462534_10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Bob De Schutter. 2011. Never too old to play: The appeal of digital games to an older audience. Games and Culture 6, 2 (2011), 155--170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010364978Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Bob De Schutter and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2015. Towards a gerontoludic manifesto. Anthropology & Aging 36, 2 (2015), 112--120. https://doi.org/10.5195/aa.2015.104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Bob De Schutter and Julie A Brown. 2016. Digital games as a source of enjoyment in later life. Games and Culture 11, 1--2 (2016), 28--52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015594273Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Bob De Schutter and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2010. Designing meaningful play within the psycho-social context of older adults. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games. ACM, NY, USA, 84--93. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Erik H Erikson and Joan M Erikson. 1998. The life cycle completed (extended version). WW Norton & Company, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Brian J Gajadhar, Yvonne AW De Kort, and Wijnand A Ijsselsteijn. 2008. Shared fun is doubled fun: player enjoyment as a function of social setting. In International Conference on Fun and Games. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, GER, 106--117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--88322--7_11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Alice Good, Clare Wilson, Claire Ancient, and Arunasalam Sambhanthan. 2013. A proposal to support wellbeing in people with borderline personality disorder: applying reminiscent theory in a mobile app. arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.5200 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Thaddeus Griebel. 2006. Self-portrayal in a simulated life: Projecting personality and values in The Sims 2. Game Studies 6, 1 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Bin Guo, Zhiwen Yu, Xingshe Zhou, and Daqing Zhang. 2013. MemPhone: From personal memory aid to community memory sharing using mobile tagging. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops). IEEE, 332--335. https://doi.org/10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529509Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. David Haber. 2006. Life review: Implementation, theory, research, and therapy. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development 63, 2 (2006), 153--171. https://doi.org/10.2190/DA9G-RHK5-N9JP-T6CCGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Barbara K Haight. 1988. The therapeutic role of a structured life review process in homebound elderly subjects. Journal of gerontology 43, 2 (1988), P40--P44. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/43.2.P40Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Barbara K Haight and Barrett S Haight. 2007. The handbook of structured life review. Health Professions Press, Baltimore, MD, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Amanda K Hall, Enmanuel Chavarria, Vasana Maneeratana, Beth H Chaney, and Jay M Bernhardt. 2012. Health benefits of digital videogames for older adults: a systematic review of the literature. Games for Health: Research, Development, and Clinical Applications 1, 6 (2012), 402--410. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2012.0046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Aimee V Hamel, Tai L Sims, Dan Klassen, Thomas Havey, and Joseph E Gaugler. 2016. Memory matters: A mixedmethods feasibility study of a mobile aid to stimulate reminiscence in individuals with memory loss. Journal of gerontological nursing 42, 7 (2016), 15--24. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134--20160201-04Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Berit Ingersoll-Dayton, Nancy Kropf, Ruth Campbell, and Michael Parker. 2019. A systematic review of dyadic approaches to reminiscence and life review among older adults. Aging & mental health 23, 9 (2019), 1074--1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1555696Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Vaiva Kalnikaite and Steve Whittaker. 2011. A saunter down memory lane: Digital reflection on personal mementos. ' International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69, 5 (2011), 298--310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.12.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Linda K Kaye and Jo Bryce. 2012. Putting the fun factor into gaming: The influence of social contexts on the experiences of playing videogames. International Journal of Internet Science 7, 1 (2012), 24--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Amanda Lazar, Hilaire Thompson, and George Demiris. 2014. A systematic review of the use of technology for reminiscence therapy. Health education & behavior 41, 1_suppl (2014), 51S--61S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198114537067Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Hung-Chi Lee, Ya Fang Cheng, Szu Yang Cho, Hsien-Hui Tang, Jane Hsu, and Chien-Hsiung Chen. 2014. Picgo: designing reminiscence and storytelling for the elderly with photo annotation. In Proceedings of the 2014 companion publication on Designing interactive systems. ACM, NY, USA, 9--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598784.2602769Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Siân E Lindley, Richard Harper, and Abigail Sellen. 2008. Designing for elders: exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. People and Computers XXII Culture, Creativity, Interaction 22 (2008), 77--86. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ HCI2008.8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Naemi Luckner, Fares Kayali, Oliver Hödl, Peter Purgathofer, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Erika Mosor, Daniela SchlagerJaschky, and Tanja Stamm. 2013. From research to design-sketching a game to trigger reminiscence in older adults. In International Conference on Human Factors in Computing and Informatics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, GER, 617--624. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--39062--3_41Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Colleen Macklin and John Sharp. 2016. Games, Design and Play: A detailed approach to iterative game design. AddisonWesley Professional, Boston, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Assunta Matassa and Amon Rapp. 2015. Map: making: designing a mobile application for enhancing memories? retrieval. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. ACM, NY, USA, 994--1001. https://doi.org/10.1145/2786567.2794318Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Sanela Osmanovic and Loretta Pecchioni. 2016. Beyond entertainment: motivations and outcomes of video game playing by older adults and their younger family members. Games and Culture 11, 1--2 (2016), 130--149. https: //doi.org/10.1177/1555412015602819Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanela Osmanovic and Loretta L Pecchioni. 2019. Playing with Words: The Experience of Self-disclosure in Intergenerational Gaming. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Cham, 189--203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--22015-0_15Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Celia Pearce. 2008. The truth about baby boomer gamers: A study of over-forty computer game players. Games and Culture 3, 2 (2008), 142--174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412008314132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Teppo Räisänen, Antonia Ypsilanti, Don Ropes, Ana B Vivas, Matti Viitala, and Tuula Ijäs. 2014. Examining the requirements for an intergenerational learning game. Education and Information Technologies 19, 3 (2014), 531--547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014--9324-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Mark Rice, Yian Ling Cheong, Jamie Ng, Puay Hoe Chua, and Yin-Leng Theng. 2012. Co-creating games through intergenerational design workshops. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. ACM, NY, USA, 368--377. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Donald Ropes. 2013. Intergenerational learning in organizations. European Journal of Training and Development 37, 8 (2013), 713--727. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-11--2012-0081Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Juan Pedro Serrano, Jose Miguel Latorre, Margaret Gatz, and Juan Montanes. 2004. Life review therapy using autobiographical retrieval practice for older adults with depressive symptomatology. Psychology and aging 19, 2 (2004), 272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882--7974.19.2.272Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Sinem Siyahhan and Elisabeth Gee. 2018. Families at Play: Connecting and Learning through Video Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Dustin J Souders, Walter R Boot, Neil Charness, and Jerad H Moxley. 2016. Older adult video game preferences in practice: investigating the effects of competing or cooperating. Games and culture 11, 1--2 (2016), 170--200. https: //doi.org/10.1177/1555412015603538Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. David Unruh. 1989. Toward a social psychology of reminiscence. Current Perspective on Aging and the Life Cycle 3 (1989), 25--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Gerben J Westerhof and Ernst T Bohlmeijer. 2014. Celebrating fifty years of research and applications in reminiscence and life review: State of the art and new directions. Journal of Aging studies 29 (2014), 107--114. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jaging.2014.02.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Bob Woods, Sara Portnoy, Donna Head, and Gemma Jones. 1992. Reminiscence and life review with persons with dementia: which way forward. Care giving in dementia 1 (1992), 137--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Xuexin Xu, Jinhui Li, Tan Phat Pham, Charles T Salmon, and Yin-Leng Theng. 2016. Improving psychosocial well-being of older adults through exergaming: the moderation effects of intergenerational communication and age cohorts. Games for health journal 5, 6 (2016), 389--397. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2016.0060Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Li Yang. 2018. Long Journey of Life. Mobile Game [ios]. Last played August 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Fan Zhang. 2018. Intergenerational play between young people and old family members: patterns, benefits, and challenges. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Springer, Cham, 581--593. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--92034--4_44Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Fan Zhang, Simone Hausknecht, Robyn Schell, and David Kaufman. 2016. Factors Affecting the Gaming Experience of Older Adults in Community and Senior Centres. In International Conference on Computer Supported Education. Springer, Cham, 464--475. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--63184--4_24Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Fan Zhang and David Kaufman. 2016. A review of intergenerational play for facilitating interactions and learning. Gerontechnology 14, 3 (2016), 127--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Fan Zhang, David Kaufman, Robyn Schell, Glaucia Salgado, Erik Tiong Wee Seah, and Julija Jeremic. 2017. Situated learning through intergenerational play between older adults and undergraduates. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14, 1 (2017), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0055-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Renee'A Zucchero. 2010. Share your experience and I'll lend you my ear: older adult outcomes of an intergenerational service-learning experience. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education 31, 4 (2010), 383--402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960. 2010.528275Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Life Review Using a Life Metaphoric Game to Promote Intergenerational Communication

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!