skip to main content
research-article

Wikipedia Edit-a-thons as Sites of Public Pedagogy

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Wikipedia edit-a-thon events provide a targeted approach toward incorporating new knowledge into the online encyclopedia while also offering pathways toward new editor participation. Through the analysis of interviews with 13 edit-a-thon facilitators, however, we find motivations for running edit-a-thons extend far beyond adding content and editors. In this paper, we uncover how a range of personal and institutional values inspire these event facilitators toward fulfilling broader goals including fostering information literacy and establishing community relationships outside of Wikipedia. Along with reporting motivations, values, and goals, we also describe strategies facilitators adopt in their practice. Next, we discuss challenges faced by facilitators as they organize edit-a-thons. We situate our findings within two complementary theoretical lenses-information ecologies and public pedagogy to guide our interpretation. Finally, we suggest new ways in which edit-a-thons, as well as similar peer production events and communities, can be understood, studied, and evaluated.

References

  1. Alexa Internet Inc. 2020. wikipedia.org Competitive Analysis, Marketing Mix and Traffic - Alexa. https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wikipedia.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sanghapali Aruna, Siko Bouterse, Az Causevic, Michael Connolly Miskwish, Persephone Hooper Lewis, Jake Orlowitz, Anasuya Sengupta, Belma Steta, and Maari Zwick-Maitreyi. 2018. Our Stories Our Knowledges: Part III Adding Our Knowledge to Wikipedia. https://whoseknowledge.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/OurstoriesOurknowledges-Part3.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Eli Blevis, Susanne Bødker, John Flach, Jodi Forlizzi, Heekyoung Jung, Victor Kaptelinin, Bonnie Nardi, and Antonio Rizzo. 2015. Ecological Perspectives in HCI: Promise, Problems, and Potential. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2401--2404. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702634Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Geoffrey C. Bowker. 2001. Bonnie Nardi and Vicki O'Day, Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 10, 1 (March 2001), 143--145. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011277819050Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Amy Bruckman, Kurt Luther, and Casey Fiesler. 2015. When Should We Use Real Names in Published Accounts of Internet Research? In Digital research confidential: The secrets of studying behavior online,, Eszter Hargittai and Christian Sandvig (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 243--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sheree Chang. 2016. A better view of Wikipedia content on Google -- Wikimedia Blog. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/08/08/wikipedia-google-search/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory .Sage Publications, London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Anne Corden, Roy Sainsbury, University of York, and Social Policy Research Unit. 2006. Using verbatim quotations in reporting qualitative social research: researchers' views .University of York, York. OCLC: 171543970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dallas Public Library. 2017. Dallas Public Library ArtAndFeminism 2017 Programs & Events Dashboard. https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/Dallas_Public_Library/Dallas_Public_Library_ArtAndFeminism_2017Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin Dittus, Giovanni Quattrone, and Licia Capra. 2016. Social Contribution Settings and Newcomer Retention in Humanitarian Crowd Mapping. In Social Informatics,, Emma Spiro and Yong-Yeol Ahn (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 179--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Samuel Dodson. 2019. Interacting with Heterogeneous Information Ecologies: Challenges and Opportunities for Students in Diverse and Distributed Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 445--448. https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298967Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Samir Elsharbaty. 2015. WikiCamps introduce young Armenians to Wikipedia. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/02/27/wikicamps-young-armenians-wikipedia/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Siân Evans, Jacqueline Mabey, and Michael Mandiberg. 2015. Editing for Equality: The Outcomes of the ArtGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thons. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, Vol. 34, 2 (Sept. 2015), 194--203. https://doi.org/10.1086/683380Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosta Farzan, Saiph Savage, and Claudia Flores Saviaga. 2016. Bring on Board New Enthusiasts! A Case Study of Impact of Wikipedia ArtGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Feminism Edit-A-Thon Events on Newcomers. In Social Informatics,, Emma Spiro and Yong-Yeol Ahn (Eds.). Vol. 10046. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 24--40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--47880--7_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, R. Benjamin Shapiro, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2017. Growing Their Own: Legitimate Peripheral Participation for Computational Learning in an Online Fandom Community. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1375--1386. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998210 event-place: Portland, Oregon, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim Gile and Monika Sengul-Jones. 2018. How to Conduct a Wikipedia Edit-A-Thon. Computers in Libraries, Vol. 38, 9 (Nov. 2018). http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/nov18/Gile-Sengul-Jones--How-to-conduct-a-Wikipedia-Edit-a-Thon.shtml Computers in Libraries Magazine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Henry A. Giroux. 2000. PUBLIC PEDAGOGY AS CULTURAL POLITICS: STUART HALL AND THE CRISIS OF CULTURE. Cultural Studies, Vol. 14, 2 (April 2000), 341--360. https://doi.org/10.1080/095023800334913Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Henry A. Giroux. 2004. Cultural studies, public pedagogy, and the responsibility of intellectuals. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, Vol. 1, 1 (March 2004), 59--79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000180926Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ruediger Glott, Philipp Schmidt, and Rishab Ghosh. 2010. Wikipedia survey--overview of results. United Nations University: Collaborative Creativity Group (March 2010), 1158--1178. https://web.archive.org/web/20131208221410/http://wikipediasurvey.org/docs/Wikipedia_Overview_15March2010-FINAL.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Eduardo Graells-Garrido, Mounia Lalmas, and Filippo Menczer. 2015. First Women, Second Sex: Gender Bias in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media - HT '15. ACM Press, Guzelyurt, Northern Cyprus, 165--174. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700171.2791036Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mark Graham, Bernie Hogan, Ralph K. Straumann, and Ahmed Medhat. 2014. Uneven Geographies of User-Generated Information: Patterns of Increasing Informational Poverty. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 104, 4 (July 2014), 746--764. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.910087Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Aaron Halfaker, R. Stuart Geiger, Jonathan T. Morgan, and John Riedl. 2013. The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Wikipedia?s Reaction to Popularity Is Causing Its Decline. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 57, 5 (May 2013), 664--688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469365Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Benjamin Mako Hill and Aaron Shaw. 2013. The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation. PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, 6 (June 2013), e65782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065782Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Nina Hood and Allison Littlejohn. 2018. Hacking History: Redressing Gender Inequities on Wikipedia Through an Editathon. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol. 19, 5 (Nov. 2018). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3549Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Dorothy Howard and Lilly Irani. 2019. Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300327Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Taylor Hughes, Jeff Smith, and Alex Leavitt. 2018. Helping People Better Assess the Stories They See in News Feed with the Context Button. https://about.fb.com/news/2018/04/news-feed-fyi-more-context/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lorelei Lingard. 2019. Beyond the default colon: Effective use of quotes in qualitative research. Perspectives on Medical Education, Vol. 8, 6 (Dec. 2019), 360--364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00550--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Allison Littlejohn, Nina Hood, Martin Rehm, Lou McGill, Bart Rienties, and Melissa Highton. 2019. Learning to become an online editor: the editathon as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments (July 2019), 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1625557Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Maggie MacAulay and Rebecca Visser. 2016. Editing Diversity In: Reading Diversity Discourses on Wikipedia. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology 9 (May 2016). https://doi.org/10.7264/N36M3541Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Rachel M. Magee, Denise E. Agosto, and Andrea Forte. 2017. Four Factors That Regulate Teen Technology Use in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 511--522. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Katherine Maher. 2018. Wikipedia mirrors the world's gender biases, it doesn't cause them. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-maher-wikipedia-gender-bias-20181018-story.html Archived at https://search.proquest.com/docview/2122754248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jens-Erik Mai. 2016. Wikipedians' Knowledge and Moral Duties. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling, Vol. 5, 1 (March 2016), 15--22. https://tidsskrift.dk/ntik/article/view/25879Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sorin Adam Matei and Caius Dobrescu. 2010. Wikipedia's 'Neutral Point of View': Settling Conflict through Ambiguity. The Information Society, Vol. 27, 1 (Dec. 2010), 40--51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.534368Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Amanda Menking and Ingrid Erickson. 2015. The Heart Work of Wikipedia: Gendered, Emotional Labor in the World's Largest Online Encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 207--210. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702514Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Dawn Nafus. 2012. 'Patches don't have gender': What is not open in open source software. New Media & Society, Vol. 14, 4 (June 2012), 669--683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422887Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Bonnie A Nardi and Vicki O'Day. 1999. Information ecologies: using technology with heart .MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Lisa P. Nathan and Eric M. Meyers. 2016. Enriching Visions of Sustainability through Informal Public Pedagogies. Interactions, Vol. 23, 5 (Aug. 2016), 54--57. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971484Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Oded Nov. 2007. What motivates Wikipedians? Commun. ACM, Vol. 50, 11 (Nov. 2007), 60--64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1297797.1297798Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Chaim Noy. 2008. Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 11, 4 (Oct. 2008), 327--344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Jude Ntabathia. 2019. Categories of Control and Visibility in Mapping Infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 174--183. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314344.3332494 event-place: Accra, Ghana.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Leysia Palen, Robert Soden, T. Jennings Anderson, and Mario Barrenechea. 2015. Success & Scale in a Data-Producing Organization: The Socio-Technical Evolution of OpenStreetMap in Response to Humanitarian Events. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4113--4122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702294 event-place: Seoul, Republic of Korea.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Fran. Peavey. 1994. By life's grace: musings on the essence of social change .New Society Pub., Philadelphia, PA. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/002806954Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Eric Phetteplace. 2015. How Can Libraries Improve Wikipedia? Reference & User Services Quarterly, Vol. 55, 2 (2015), 109--112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/refuseserq.55.2.109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Joseph M. Reagle. 2005. Is the Wikipedia Neutral? Cambridge. https://reagle.org/joseph/2005/06/neutrality.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2010. EParticipation as an Information Ecology: A Micro-Scale Examination of Two Cases in Helsinki. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 384--387. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jennifer A. Sandlin, Michael P. O'Malley, and Jake Burdick. 2011. Mapping the Complexity of Public Pedagogy Scholarship: 1894--2010. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 81, 3 (Sept. 2011), 338--375. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413395Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Jennifer A. Sandlin, Brian D. Schultz, and Jake Burdick (Eds.). 2010. Handbook of public pedagogy: education and learning beyond schooling .Routledge, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Monika Sengul-Jones. 2017. Librarians Who Wikipedia: Tiffany Bailey, Dallas Public Library. https://www.webjunction.org/news/webjunction/librarians-wikipedia-tiffany.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Rose Sliger Krause, James Rosenzweig, and Paul Victor. 2017. Out of the Vault: Developing a Wikipedia Edit-a-thon to Enhance Public Programming for University Archives and Special Collections. Journal of Western Archives, Vol. 8, 1 (Jan. 2017). https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/westernarchives/vol8/iss1/3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Sara Snyder. 2018. Edit-a-Thons and Beyond. In Leveraging Wikipedia: connecting communities of knowledge, Merrilee Proffitt (Ed.). ALA Editions, Chicago, 119--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Dario Taraborelli and Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia. 2010. Beyond Notability. Collective Deliberation on Content Inclusion in Wikipedia. In 2010 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshop. IEEE, Budapest, TBD, Hungary, 122--125. https://doi.org/10.1109/SASOW.2010.26Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Nathan TeBlunthuis, Aaron Shaw, and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2018. Revisiting 'The Rise and Decline' in a Population of Peer Production Projects. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173929 event-place: Montreal QC, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Erik H. Trainer, Chalalai Chaihirunkarn, Arun Kalyanasundaram, and James D. Herbsleb. 2014. Community Code Engagements: Summer of Code & Hackathons for Community Building in Scientific Software. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111--121. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660398.2660420 event-place: Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Päivi Tynjälä. 2008. Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, Vol. 3, 2 (Jan. 2008), 130--154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.12.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Mohsen Jadidi, and Markus Strohmaier. 2015. It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia. North America. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10585Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Claudia Wagner, Eduardo Graells-Garrido, David Garcia, and Filippo Menczer. 2016. Women through the glass ceiling: gender asymmetries in Wikipedia. EPJ Data Science, Vol. 5, 1 (Dec. 2016), 5. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0066--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Wikimedia Foundation and Concept Hatchery. 2019. Wikimedia Movement Organizers: Understanding the People who Power the Movement. Technical Report. Wikimedia Foundation. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/Wikimedia_Movement_Organizers_Study.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 2015. Learning and Evaluation/Evaluation reports/2015/Editathons - Meta. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Learning_and_Evaluation/Evaluation_reports/2015/EditathonsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Wikipedia. 2019 a. Wikipedia:About. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:About&oldid=926297166 Page Version ID: 926297166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Wikipedia. 2019 b. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view&oldid=924980093 Page Version ID: 924980093.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Sarah Wyer. 2017. Folk Networks, Cyberfeminism, and Information Activism in the ArtGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon Series. Master's thesis. University of Oregon, Eugene, OR. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1948789837?accountid=14244Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Wikipedia Edit-a-thons as Sites of Public Pedagogy

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!