skip to main content
research-article

Chatbot-based Emotion Management for Distributed Teams: A Participatory Design Study

Published:15 October 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Fueled by the pervasion of tools like Slack or Microsoft Teams, the usage of text-based communication in distributed teams has grown massively in organizations. This brings distributed teams many advantages, however, a critical shortcoming in these setups is the decreased ability of perceiving, understanding and regulating emotions. This is problematic because better team members? abilities of emotion management positively impact team-level outcomes like team cohesion and team performance, while poor abilities diminish communication flow and well-being. Leveraging chatbot technology in distributed teams has been recognized as a promising approach to reintroduce and improve upon these abilities. In this article we present three chatbot designs for emotion management for distributed teams. In order to develop these designs, we conducted three participatory design workshops which resulted in 153 sketches. Subsequently, we evaluated the designs following an exploratory evaluation with 27 participants. Results show general stimulating effects on emotion awareness and communication efficiency. Further, they report emotion regulation and increased compromise facilitation through social and interactive design features, but also perceived threats like loss of control. With some design features adversely impacting emotion management, we highlight design implications and discuss chatbot design recommendations for enhancing emotion management in teams.

References

  1. Sandeep Avula, Gordon Chadwick, Jaime Arguello, and Robert Capra. 2018. Searchbots: User engagement with chatbots during collaborative search. In CHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, Vol. 2018-March. 52--61. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176380Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Murray R. Barrick and Michael K. Mount. 2009. Select on conscientiousness and emotional stability. In Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior. 19--39. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119206422.ch6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sigal G. Barsade. 2002. The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47, 4 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Pernille Bjørn and Ojelanki Ngwenyama. 2009. Virtual team collaboration: Building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Information Systems Journal, Vol. 19, 3 (2009), 227--253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365--2575.2007.00281.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Marc A. Brackett, Susan E. Rivers, Sara Shiffman, Nicole Lerner, and Peter Salovey. 2006. Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 91, 4 (2006), 780--795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022--3514.91.4.780Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Erik Brynjolfsson, Daniel Rock, John Horton, Adam Ozimek, Garima Sharma, and Hong Yi Tu Ye. 2020. COVID-19 and Remote Work : An Early Look at US Data (No. w27344). National Bureau of Economic Research. (2020), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. Buschek, A. De Luca, and F. Alt. 2015. There is more to typing than speed: Expressive mobile touch keyboards via dynamic font personalisation. In MobileHCI 2015 - Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 125--130. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785844Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniel Buschek, Mariam Hassib, and Florian Alt. 2018. Personal Mobile Messaging in Context: Chat Augmentations for Expressiveness and Awareness. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 25, 4 (2018), 1--33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3201404Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Scott A. Cambo, Daniel Avrahami, and Matthew L. Lee. 2017. BreakSense: Combining physiological and location sensing to promote mobility during work-breaks. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). 3595--3607. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Abraham Carmeli. 2003. The relationship between emotional intelligence and work attitudes, behavior and outcomes: An examination among senior managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 18 (2003), 788--813. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940310511881Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Nicholas Clarke. 2010. Emotional intelligence abilities and their relationships with team processes. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, Vol. 16 (2010), 6--32. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591011028906Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Amy Collins, Sandra A. Lawrence, Ashlea C. Troth, and Peter J. Jordan. 2013. Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 34 (2013), 43--62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Edward Cutrell, Mary Czerwinski, and Eric Horvitz. 2001. Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. Interact 1999 (2001), 263--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mary Czerwinski, Edward Cutrell, and Eric Horvitz. 2000. Instant messaging: Effects of Relevance and Timing. People and computers XIV: Proceedings of HCI. Vol. 2. British Computer Society, 2000 (2000), 71--76. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/marycz/hci2000.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mary Czerwinski, Edward Cutrell, and Eric Horvitz. 2002. Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance. Computer Fraud and Security, Vol. 2002, 11 (2002), 19--20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361--3723(02)01112-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Leslie A. DeChurch and Jessica Mesmer-Magnus. 2010. The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a continuation. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 22, 5 (2010), 507--519. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08--2017-0140Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Daantje Derks, Agneta H. Fischer, and Arjan E.R. Bos. 2008. The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24, 3 (2008), 766--785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Designorate.com. 2019. Walt-Disney Ideation Method. https://www.designorate.com/disneys-creative-strategy/ Retrieved 2020-08-07 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jasper Feine, Ulrich Gnewuch, Stefan Morana, and Alexander Maedche. 2019. A Taxonomy of Social Cues for Conversational Agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 132, July (2019), 138--161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gamestorming.com. 2019. 6--8--5 Ideation Method. https://gamestorming.com/6--8--5s/ Retrieved 2020-08-07 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Susanne Geister and Guido Hertel. 2015. Effects of Process Feedback on Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance in Virtual Teams. Small Group Research, Vol. 37, 5 (2015), 459--489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tony Gillie and Donald Broadbent. 1989. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research, Vol. 50, 4 (1989), 243--250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309260Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lucy L. Gilson, M. Travis Maynard, Nicole C. Jones Young, Matti Vartiainen, and Marko Hakonen. 2015. Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities. Journal of Management, Vol. 41, 5 (2015), 1313--1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. James J. Gross. 1998. The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, Vol. 2, 3 (1998), 271--299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jay Hall and W.H. Watson. 1970. The effects of a normative intervention on group decision-making performance. Human Relations, Vol. 23, 4 (1970), 299--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mariam Hassib, Daniel Buschek, Pawel W. Wozniak, and Florian Alt. 2017. HeartChat: Heart Rate Augmented Mobile Messaging to Support Empathy and Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. 2239--2251. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025758Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jess Hohenstein and Malte Jung. 2018. AI-supported messaging: An investigation of human-human text conversation with AI support. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 2018-April. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sungsoo Hong, Minhyang Suh, Nathalie Henry Riche, Jooyoung Lee, Juho Kim, and Mark Zachry. 2018. Collaborative dynamic queries: Supporting distributed small group decision-making. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 2018-April (2018), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Capgemini Research Institute. 2018. Emotional intelligence -- the essential skillset for the age of AI. https://www.capgemini.com/research/emotional-intelligence/ Retrieved 2020-08-07 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Dana L. Joseph and Daniel A. Newman. 2010. Emotional Intelligence: An Integrative Meta-Analysis and Cascading Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 95, 1 (2010), 54--78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017286Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Harmanpreet Kaur, Alex C Williams, Daniel Mcduff, Mary Czerwinski, Jaime Teevan, and Shamsi T Iqbal. 2020. Optimizing for Happiness and Productivity: Modeling Opportune Moments for Transitions and Breaks at Work. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Finn Kensing and Jeanette Blomberg. 1998. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 6, 1--2 (1998), 167--185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Finn Kensing and Andreas Munk-Madsen. 1993. PD: Structure In The Toolbox. Communication of the ACM, Vol. 36, 4 (1993).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Young Ji Kim, David Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Jeffrey Yu Ting Lin, Naomi McArthur, and Thomas W. Malone. 2017. What makes a strong team? Using collective intelligence to predict team performance in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2316--2329. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998185Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Everlyne Kimani, Kael Rowan, Daniel McDuff, Mary Czerwinski, and Gloria Mark. 2019. A Conversational Agent in Support of Productivity and Wellbeing at Work. 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII 2019 (2019), 332--338. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2019.8925488Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Lorenz Cuno Klopfenstein, Saverio Delpriori, Silvia Malatini, and Alessandro Bogliolo. 2017. The rise of bots: A survey of conversational interfaces, patterns, and paradigms. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 555--565. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064672 arxiv: 1407.5225Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Steve W. J. Kozlowski and Daniel R. Ilgen. 2006. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological Science In The Public Interest, Vol. 105, 1 (2006), 39--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Ravi Kuber and Franklin P. Wright. 2013. Augmenting the Instant Messaging Experience Through the Use of Brain-Computer Interface and Gestural Technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 29, 3 (2013), 178--191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.702635Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jennifer Lerner. 2013. Emotions and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 53, 9 (2013), 1689--1699. arxiv: arXiv:1011.1669v3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Dahui Li, Patrick Chau, and Craig Van Slyke. 2010. A Comparative Study of Individual Acceptance of Instant Messaging in the US and China : A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 26, 1 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Bin Lin, Alexey Zagalsky, Margaret Anne Storey, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2016. Why developers are slacking off: Understanding how software teams use slack. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion, Vol. 26-Februar. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 333--336. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2869117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Miki Liu, Austin Wong, Ruhi Pudipeddi, Betty Hou, David Wang, and Gary Hsieh. 2018. ReactionBot: Exploring the effects of expression-triggered emoji in text messages. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, CSCW, Vol. 2. 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274379Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. 'Like Having a Really Bad PA': The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 5286--5297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Michelle A Marks, John E. Mathieu, and Stephen Zaccaro. 2001. A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, 3 (2001), 356--376. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Gerald Matthews, Amanda K. Emo, Gregory Funke, Moshe Zeidner, Richard D. Roberts, Paul T. Costa, and Ralf Schulze. 2006. Emotional intelligence, personality, and task-induced stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 12, 2 (2006), 96--107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076--898X.12.2.96Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. John D. Mayer, Richard D. Roberts, and Sigal G. Barsade. 2008. Human Abilities: Emotional Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 59, 1 (2008), 507--536. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Philipp Mayring. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479--3709(07)11003--7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Joseph E. McGrath. 1984. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Vol. 29. 469 pages. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393041Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Joseph E. McGrath. 1991. Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups. Small Group Research, Vol. 22, 2 (1991), 147--174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Microsoft. 2020 a. How remote work impacts collaboration: findings from our team. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2020/04/22/how-remote-work-impacts-collaboration-findings-team/ Retrieved 2020-08-07 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Microsoft. 2020 b. Remote work trend report: meetings. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2020/04/09/remote-work-trend-report-meetings/ Retrieved 2020-08-07 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Moï ra Mikolajczak, Sophie Brasseur, and Carole Fantini-Hauwel. 2014. Measuring intrapersonal and interpersonal EQ: The Short Profile of Emotional Competence (S-PEC). Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 65 (2014), 42--46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Matthew K. Miller, John C. Tang, Gina Venolia, Gerard Wilkinson, and Kori Inkpen. 2017. Conversational chat circles: Being all here without having to hear it all. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 2017-May. 2394--2404. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025621Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 56, 1 (2000), 81--103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022--4537.00153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Zhenhui Peng, Taewook Kim, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2019. GremoBot: Exploring emotion regulation in group chat. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 335--340. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. S. Perez-Soler, E. Guerra, and J. de Lara. 2018. Collaborative Modelling and Group Decision-Making using Chatbots within Social Networks. IEEE Software (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.290101511Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Virginia E Pitts, Natalie A Wright, and Lindsey C Harkabus. 2012. Communication in Virtual Teams : The Role of Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Organizational Psychology, Vol. 28, 1 (2012), 2046--2054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin Podlubny, John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, and Matthew Chalmers. 2017. Synchronous text messaging: A field trial of Curtains Messenger. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1. 1--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134721Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Soujanya Poria, Navonil Majumder, Rada Mihalcea, and Eduard Hovy. 2019. Emotion Recognition in Conversation: Research Challenges, Datasets, and Recent Advances. IEEE Access, Vol. 7 (2019), 100943--100953. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2929050Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Anne Powell, Gabriele Piccoli, and Blake Ives. 2004. Virtual teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 35, 1 (2004), 6--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/968464.968467Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Michael Pratt. 2009. From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 52, 5 (2009), 856--862. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.44632557Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Samiha Samrose, Ru Zhao, Jeffery White, Vivian Li, Luis Nova, Yichen Lu, Mohammad Rafayet Ali, and Mohammed Ehsan Hoque. 2018. CoCo: Collaboration Coach for Understanding Team Dynamics during Video Conferencing. In Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 1. 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161186Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. J. Alfredo Sá nchez, Norma P. Herná ndez, Julio C. Penagos, and Yulia Ostró vskaya. 2006. Conveying mood and emotion in instant messaging by using a two-dimensional model for affective states. In Proceedings of VII Brazilian symposium on Human factors in computing systems - IHC '06. 66. https://doi.org/10.1145/1298023.1298033Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, Vol. 4, 1 (2008), 5--18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Joseph Seering, Michal Luria, Geoff Kaufman, and Jessica Hammer. 2019. Beyond dyadic interactions: Considering chatbots as community members. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300680Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. A. Tat and M. S.T. Carpendale. 2002. Visualising human dialog. In Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation. IEEE, 16--21. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2002.1028751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. David R. Thomas. 2006. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 27, 2 (2006), 237--246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Carlos Toxtli, André s Monroy-Herná ndez, and Justin Cranshaw. 2018. Understanding chatbot-mediated task management. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 2018-April. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173632Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Ashlea C. Troth, Peter J. Jordan, Sandra A. Lawrence, and Herman H. M. Tse. 2012. A multilevel model of emotional skills, communication performance, and task performance in teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 33, 5 (2012), 700--722. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Ralf A.L.F. van Griethuijsen, Michiel W. van Eijck, Helen Haste, Perry J. den Brok, Nigel C. Skinner, Nasser Mansour, Ayse Savran Gencer, and Saouma BouJaoude. 2015. Global patterns in students' views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, Vol. 45, 4 (2015), 581--603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014--9438--6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Joseph Weizenbaum. 1966. ELIZA--a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun. ACM, Vol. 9, 1 (1966), 36--45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Alex C. Williams, Harmanpreet Kaur, Gloria Mark, Anne Loomis Thompson, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Jaime Teevan. 2018. Supporting workplace detachment and reattachment with conversational intelligence. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 2018-April (2018), 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. J Wilson and C Herná ndez-Hall. 2014. Physics laboratory experiments. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 18. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011--1066Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Ziang Xiao, Michelle X. Zhou, Q. Vera Liao, Gloria Mark, Changyan Chi, Wenxi Chen, and Huahai Yang. 2019. Tell Me About Yourself: Using an AI-Powered Chatbot to Conduct Conversational Surveys. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interaction, Vol. 1, 1 (2019). arxiv: 1905.10700 http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10700Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Svetlana Yarosh, Panos Markopoulos, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2014. Towards a questionnaire for measuring affective benefits and costs of communication technologies. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 84--96. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531634Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Ilze Zigurs and Kenneth A. Kozar. 2006. An Exploratory Study of Roles in Computer-Supported Groups. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, 3 (2006), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/249619Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Chatbot-based Emotion Management for Distributed Teams: A Participatory Design Study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!