Abstract
Modeling politeness across cultures helps to improve intercultural communication by uncovering what is considered appropriate and polite. We study the linguistic features associated with politeness across American English and Mandarin Chinese. First, we annotate 5,300 Twitter posts from the United States (US) and 5,300 Sina Weibo posts from China for politeness scores. Next, we develop an English and Chinese politeness feature set, 'PoliteLex'. Combining it with validated psycholinguistic dictionaries, we study the correlations between linguistic features and perceived politeness across cultures. We find that on Mandarin Weibo, future-focusing conversations, identifying with a group affiliation, and gratitude are considered more polite compared to English Twitter. Death-related taboo topics, use of pronouns (with the exception of honorifics), and informal language are associated with higher impoliteness on Mandarin Weibo than on English Twitter. Finally, we build language-based machine learning models to predict politeness with an F1 score of 0.886 on Mandarin Weibo and 0.774 on English Twitter.
- Hutheifa Y. Al-Duleimi, Sabariah Md Rashid, and Ain Nadzimah Abdullah. 2016. A Critical Review of Prominent Theories of Politeness. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, Vol. 7, 6 (Dec. 2016), 262--270. http://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/alls/article/view/2942Google Scholar
- Sara B Algoe, Jonathan Haidt, and Shelly L Gable. 2008. Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, Vol. 8, 3 (2008), 425.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- F. Bargiela-Chiappini and D. Kádár. 2010. Politeness Across Cultures. Springer. Google-Books-ID: XV11yK9XurkC.Google Scholar
- Christos Baziotis, Nikos Pelekis, and Christos Doulkeridis. 2017. DataStories at SemEval-2017 Task 4: Deep LS™ with Attention for Message-level and Topic-based Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017). Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, 747--754.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jonathan P Chang, Caleb Chiam, Liye Fu, Andrew Z Wang, Justine Zhang, and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil. 2020. ConvoKit: A Toolkit for the Analysis of Conversations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.04246 (2020).Google Scholar
- Rong Chen. 1993. Responding to compliments A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of pragmatics, Vol. 20, 1 (1993), 49--75.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Yi Chen et almbox. 2014. Am I Being Polite?--An Investigation of Chinese students? pragmatic competence in the realization of politeness strategies in English requests. Master's thesis.Google Scholar
- Ta-Chung Chi, Ching-Yen Shih, and Yun-Nung Chen. 2018. BCWS: Bilingual Contextual Word Similarity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.08951 (2018).Google Scholar
- Alexis Conneau, Ruty Rinott, Guillaume Lample, Adina Williams, Samuel R. Bowman, Holger Schwenk, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2018. XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Brussels, Belgium). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jonathan Culpeper. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 25, 3 (1996), 349--367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378--2166(95)00014--3Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Moritz Sudhof, Dan Jurafsky, Jure Leskovec, and Christopher Potts. 2013. A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factors. arXiv:1306.6078 [physics] (June 2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6078 arXiv: 1306.6078.Google Scholar
- Hillary Anger Elfenbein and Nalini Ambady. 2003. Universals and cultural differences in recognizing emotions. Current directions in psychological science, Vol. 12, 5 (2003), 159--164.Google Scholar
- Mary S. Erbaugh. 2008. China Expands Its Courtesy: Saying textquotedblleftHellotextquotedblright to Strangers. The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 67, 2 (May 2008), 621--652. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911808000715Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Joshua A Fishman. 1980. Bilingualism and biculturism as individual and as societal phenomena. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, Vol. 1, 1 (1980), 3--15.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Simeon Floyd, Giovanni Rossi, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Mark Dingemanse, Kobin H Kendrick, Jörg Zinken, and NJ Enfield. 2018. Universals and cultural diversity in the expression of gratitude. Royal Society open science, Vol. 5, 5 (2018), 180391.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Michele J. Gelfand, Jana L. Raver, Lisa Nishii, Lisa M. Leslie, Janetta Lun, Beng Chong Lim, Lili Duan, Assaf Almaliach, Soon Ang, Jakobina Arnadottir, Zeynep Aycan, Klaus Boehnke, Pawel Boski, Rosa Cabecinhas, Darius Chan, Jagdeep Chhokar, Alessia D'Amato, Montse Ferrer, Iris C. Fischlmayr, Ronald Fischer, Marta Fülöp, James Georgas, Emiko S. Kashima, Yoshishima Kashima, Kibum Kim, Alain Lempereur, Patricia Marquez, Rozhan Othman, Bert Overlaet, Penny Panagiotopoulou, Karl Peltzer, Lorena R. Perez-Florizno, Larisa Ponomarenko, Anu Realo, Vidar Schei, Manfred Schmitt, Peter B. Smith, Nazar Soomro, Erna Szabo, Nalinee Taveesin, Midori Toyama, Evert Van de Vliert, Naharika Vohra, Colleen Ward, and Susumu Yamaguchi. 2011. Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study. Science (New York, N.Y.), Vol. 332, 6033 (May 2011), 1100--1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754Google Scholar
- Jeremy Goldkorn, Anthony Tao, Lucas Niewenhuis, Jia Guo, and Jiayun Feng. 2017. Here are all the words Chinese state media has banned. https://supchina.com/2017/08/01/words-chinese-state-media-banned/Google Scholar
- Yueguo Gu. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of pragmatics, Vol. 14, 2 (1990), 237--257.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Xiaowen Guan, Hee Sun Park, and Hye Eun Lee. 2009. Cross-cultural differences in apology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 33, 1 (2009), 32--45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.10.001Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Mingyang Li, Louis Tay, and Lyle H Ungar. 2019. Studying Cultural Differences in Emoji Usage across the East and the West. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 13. 226--235.Google Scholar
- Geert Hofstede. 2009. Geert Hofstede cultural dimensions.Google Scholar
- Thomas Holtgraves and Yang Joong-Nam. 1990. Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 59, 4 (1990), 719.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Beverly Hong. 1985. Politeness in Chinese: Impersonal Pronouns and Personal Greetings. Anthropological Linguistics, Vol. 27, 2 (1985), 204--213. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30028067Google Scholar
- Yaling Hsiao, Yannan Gao, and Maryellen C MacDonald. 2014. Agent-patient similarity affects sentence structure in language production: Evidence from subject omissions in Mandarin. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5 (2014), 1015.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Chiung-Yin Hsu, Margaret O'Connor, and Susan Lee. 2009. Understandings of death and dying for people of Chinese origin. Death Studies, Vol. 33, 2 (2009), 153--174.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Richard W Janney and Horst Arndt. 1993. Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: A historical perspective. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, Vol. 12, 1 (1993), 13--50.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Richard W. Janney and Horst Arndt. 2009. Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: A historical perspective. Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, Vol. 12, 1 (2009), 13--50. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1993.12.1.13Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Li-Jun Ji, Zhiyong Zhang, and Richard E Nisbett. 2004. Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 87, 1 (2004), 57.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Oliver P. John, Alois Angleitner, and Fritz Ostendorf. 1988. The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, Vol. 2, 3 (Sept. 1988), 171--203. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410020302Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Dániel Z. Kádár. 2017. Politeness in Pragmatics. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.218Google Scholar
- Dániel Z Kádár and Sara Mills. 2011. Politeness in East Asia .Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stefan Schneider. 2010. New Approaches to Hedging. BRILL. Google-Books-ID: v5uXCgAAQBAJ.Google Scholar
- Alok Kothari, Walid Magdy, Kareem Darwish, Ahmed Mourad, and Ahmed Taei. 2013. Detecting comments on news articles in microblogs. In Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
- Geoffrey Leech. 2007. Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, Vol. 3, 2 (2007), 167--206. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.009Google Scholar
- Geoffrey N. Leech. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press. Google-Books-ID: cCyTAwAAQBAJ.Google Scholar
- Penelope Levinson, Penelope Brown, Stephen C. Levinson, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press. Google-Books-ID: OG7W8yA2XjcC.Google Scholar
- Haiying Li, Zhiqiang Cai, Arthur Graesser, and Ying Duan. 2012. A Comparative Study on English and Chinese Word Uses with LIWC. (2012). https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS12/paper/view/4402/4800Google Scholar
- Chun Liu. 2014. Chinese, Why Don't You Show Your Anger?--A Comparative Study between Chinese and Americans in Expressing Anger. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 4, 3 (2014), 206.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Marco Lui and Timothy Baldwin. 2012. langid. py: An off-the-shelf language identification tool. In Proceedings of the ACL 2012 system demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics, 25--30.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- David Matsumoto. 1990. Cultural similarities and differences in display rules. Motivation and emotion, Vol. 14, 3 (1990), 195--214.Google Scholar
- Yoshiko Matsumoto. 1989. Politeness and conversational universals--observations from Japanese. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, Vol. 8, 2--3 (1989), 207--222.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Serge Michel, Michel Beuret, Paolo Woods, and Raymond Valley. 2010. China safari: on the trail of Beijing's expansion in africa .Nation Books, New York. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=578985_0 OCLC: 698474212.Google Scholar
- Saif M. Mohammad and Peter D. Turney. 2013. Crowdsourcing a Word-Emotion Association Lexicon., Vol. 29, 3 (2013), 436--465.Google Scholar
- Thomas H Ollendick, Bin Yang, Neville J King, Qi Dong, and Adebowale Akande. 1996. Fears in American, Australian, Chinese, and Nigerian children and adolescents: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 37, 2 (1996), 213--220.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Marion Owen. 1983. Apologies and remedial exchanges. The Hague: Mouton (1983).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- James W Pennebaker, Martha E Francis, and Roger J Booth. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Vol. 71, 2001 (2001), 2001.Google Scholar
- Paul Portner, Miok Pak, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 2019. The speaker-addressee relation at the syntax-semantics interface. Language, Vol. 95, 1 (2019), 1--36.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Sina Samangooei, Trevor Cohn, Nicholas Gibbins, and Mahesan Niranjan. 2012. Trendminer: An architecture for real time analysis of social media text. In Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
- Daniel Preoct iuc-Pietro, H Andrew Schwartz, Gregory Park, Johannes Eichstaedt, Margaret Kern, Lyle Ungar, and Elisabeth Shulman. 2016. Modelling valence and arousal in facebook posts. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis. 9--15.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Anna Schmidt and Michael Wiegand. 2017. A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media. 1--10.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Hansen Andrew Schwartz, Johannes C Eichstaedt, Margaret L Kern, Lukasz Dziurzynski, Richard E Lucas, Megha Agrawal, Gregory J Park, Shrinidhi K Lakshmikanth, Sneha Jha, Martin EP Seligman, et almbox. 2013. Characterizing geographic variation in well-being using tweets. In Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
- Xiumei Shi and Jinying Wang. 2011. Cultural distance between China and US across GLOBE model and Hofstede model. International Business and Management, Vol. 2, 1 (2011), 11--17.Google Scholar
- Chen Song-Cen. 1991. Social distribution and development of greeting expressions in China. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, Vol. 92, 1 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.55Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Ayman Tawalbeh and Emran Al-Oqaily. 2012. In-directness and politeness in American English and Saudi Arabic requests: A cross-cultural comparison. Asian Social Science, Vol. 8, 10 (2012), 85.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Charlotte Taylor. 2015. Beyond sarcasm: The metalanguage and structures of mock politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 87 (2015), 127--141.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jenny Thomas. 1984. Cross-Cultural Discourse as 'Unequal Encounter': Towards a Pragmatic Analysis1. Applied Linguistics, Vol. 5, 3 (1984), 226--235.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jeanne L Tsai, Brian Knutson, and Helene H Fung. 2006. Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 90, 2 (2006), 288.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Joshua A Tucker, Andrew Guess, Pablo Barberá, Cristian Vaccari, Alexandra Siegel, Sergey Sanovich, Denis Stukal, and Brendan Nyhan. 2018. Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature (March 19, 2018) (2018).Google Scholar
- Marco Viviani and Gabriella Pasi. 2017. Credibility in social media: opinions, news, and health information'a survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 7, 5 (2017), e1209.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Carl Vogel. 2014. Denoting Offence. Cognitive Computation, Vol. 6, 4 (01 Dec. 2014), 628--639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014--9289--5Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Dan Wang, Yudan C. Wang, and Jonathan R. H. Tudge. 2015. Expressions of Gratitude in Children and Adolescents: Insights From China and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 46, 8 (Sept. 2015), 1039--1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115594140Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Yu Xu. 2007. Death and dying in the Chinese culture: Implications for health care practice. Home Health Care Management & Practice, Vol. 19, 5 (2007), 412--414.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Kaidi Zhan. 1992. The strategies of politeness in the Chinese language .RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
- Hong-hui Zhou. 2012. A study of situation-bound utterances in Modern Chinese. caslar, Vol. 1, 1 (2012), 55--86. https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2012-0004Google Scholar
Index Terms
Studying Politeness across Cultures using English Twitter and Mandarin Weibo
Recommendations
Topical differences between Chinese language Twitter and Sina Weibo
WWW '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide WebSina Weibo, China's most popular microblogging platform, is considered to be a proxy of Chinese social life. In this study, we contrast the discussions occurring on Sina Weibo and on Chinese language Twitter in order to observe two different strands of ...
Dark retweets: investigating non-conventional retweeting patterns
SocInfo'12: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Social InformaticsRetweets are an important mechanism for recognising propagation of information on the Twitter social media platform. However, many retweets do not use the official retweet mechanism, or even community established conventions, and these "dark retweets" ...
Extracting and Summarizing Situational Information from the Twitter Social Media during Disasters
Microblogging sites like Twitter have become important sources of real-time information during disaster events. A large amount of valuable situational information is posted in these sites during disasters; however, the information is dispersed among ...






Comments